RESUMO
Endometrial carcinoma (EC) can be divided into 4 prognostic molecular subtypes, and no specific molecular profile (NSMP) type is the most commonly occurring type (â¼50%). Although described as having an intermediate to favorable prognosis, this subtype encompasses pathologically and molecularly diverse tumors. We aimed to identify factors associated with outcomes within the NSMP ECs that might be used to stratify prognosis and direct treatment. Clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and genetic features of a large series of NSMP EC were used to identify parameters that could identify the subset associated with a very favorable outcome (disease-specific death rate <5% at 5 years, termed low-risk NSMP). A total of 1110 NSMP ECs were profiled. In a univariate analysis, stage, grade, lymphovascular invasion, estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR) expression, L1CAM overexpression, and mutations in PIK3CA were associated with disease-specific survival. Two critical features, grade and ER expression, identified a low-risk NSMP subset (grade 1-2, ER-positive [>1%], 84% of cases), which showed a 5-year disease-specific death rate of 1.6% across all stages and 1.4% within stage I. The remaining cases (high-risk NSMPs, grade 3, and/or ER-negative status) were responsible for most of the disease-specific deaths (disease-specific death rate at 5 years, 22.9%; hazard ratio compared with that of low-risk NSMPs: 16.3; 95% CI, 8.4-31.7). Within NSMP EC, the low-risk and high-risk categories were of prognostic significance independent of the stage on a multivariate analysis. Low-grade and ER-positive NSMP ECs are a homogeneous low-risk group associated with an exceptionally favorable prognosis in which de-escalation and/or endocrine therapy strategies can be applied. Grade 3 and/or ER-negative status identifies a high-risk NSMP subset, including rare high-grade histotypes (eg, clear cell, dedifferentiated, and mesonephric-like), responsible for most NSMP-related deaths. Subclassification of NSMPs allows for the category of low-risk EC molecular subtypes to be dramatically expanded because it now includes both POLEmut and the much more common low-risk NSMP EC.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Endometrioide , Neoplasias do Endométrio , Feminino , Humanos , Receptores de Estrogênio/metabolismo , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Prognóstico , Fatores de Risco , Biomarcadores Tumorais/genética , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patologiaRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: Recent data support the predictive implications of molecular subtype assignment in endometrial cancer (EC). Our objective was to retrospectively assess clinical outcomes according to adjuvant treatment received within EC molecular subtypes. METHODS: Clinical outcomes (disease-specific and progression-free survival DSS/PFS) of EC patients from a single institution and population-based cohorts that had undergone molecular classification were assessed with respect to adjuvant therapy received and 2016 ESMO risk group. RESULTS: 2472 ECs were assessed; 184 (7.4%) POLEmut, 638 (25.8%) MMRd, 1223 (49.5%) NSMP and 427 (17.3%) p53abn. N = 774 (34.6%) of the cohort were ESMO 2016 high risk and 109 (4.8%) were advanced or metastatic. In patients with MMRd EC, assessed across and within stage, there was no observed benefit in DSS or PFS with the addition of chemotherapy +/- radiation compared to radiation alone in ESMO high risk (p = 0.694) or ESMO high, advanced, metastatic risk groups combined (p = 0.852). In patients with p53abn EC, adjuvant chemotherapy given with radiation was associated with significantly longer DSS compared to radiation alone in ESMO high risk (p = 0.007) and ESMO high, advanced and metastatic risk groups combined (p = 0.015), even when restricted to stage I disease (p < 0.001) and when compared in serous vs. non-serous histotypes (p = 0.009). CONCLUSIONS: Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with more favorable outcomes for patients with p53abn EC, including stage I disease and non-serous histotypes, but does not appear to add benefit within MMRd ECs for any stage of disease, consistent with PORTEC-3 molecular subanalysis. Prospective trials, assessing treatment efficacy within molecular subtype are needed, however these 'real-world' data should be considered when discussing adjuvant treatment with patients.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Estudos Prospectivos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Terapia Combinada , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Radioterapia AdjuvanteRESUMO
Individuals that have gynecologic reproductive organs with pathogenic variants in BRCA1 or BRCA2 ("BRCA-positive") have an increased risk of developing high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). The majority of HGSOC develops in the fallopian tubes and later spreads to the ovaries and peritoneal cavity. Therefore, risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is recommended for those who are BRCA-positive to preventatively remove their ovaries and fallopian tubes. The Hereditary Gynecology Clinic (HGC) is a provincial program in Winnipeg, Canada, that specifically targets care to the unique needs of such individuals through an interdisciplinary team of gynecological oncologists, menopause specialists, and registered nurses. A mixed-methods study design was used to explore the decision-making processes of these BRCA-positive individuals who have been recommended (or who completed) RRSO and experiences with healthcare providers at the HGC influenced this decision. Individuals who are BRCA-positive without a previous diagnosis of HGSOC and who had previously received genetic counselling were recruited from the HGC and the provincial cancer genetics program (Shared Health Program of Genetics & Metabolism). Forty-three people completed a survey and 15 participated in an in-depth interview about their experiences and decisions surrounding RRSO. Surveys were analyzed to compare scores on validated scales related to decision-making and cancer-related worry. Qualitative interviews were transcribed, coded, and analyzed using interpretive description. Participants described the complex decisions faced by those who are BRCA-positive, which are intertwined with life experiences and circumstances including age, marital status, and family disease history. Participants interpreted their HGSOC risk through a personalized "lens" of contextual factors that impacted perceptions about the practical and emotional implications of RRSO and the need for surgery. Mean scores on validated scales evaluating the HGC's impact on decisional outcomes and preparedness for decision-making about RRSO were not significant, indicating that the HGC played a supportive role, rather than helping with decision-making itself. Therefore, we present a novel framework that consolidates the various influences on decision-making and connects them to the psychological and practical implications of RRSO in the context of the HGC. Strategies for improving support, decisional outcomes, and the overall experiences of individuals who are BRCA-positive attending the HGC are also described.
Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Feminino , Humanos , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/genética , Neoplasias dos Genitais Femininos/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Genes BRCA2 , Genes BRCA1 , Mutação , Ovariectomia , Neoplasias da Mama/genéticaRESUMO
We assessed the landscape of diagnostic pathology practice and how molecular classification could potentially impact management of patients with endometrial cancer by collecting patient samples, clinicopathologic data, and patient outcomes from EC patients diagnosed in 2016 at 10 Canadian tertiary cancer centers and 19 community hospitals. ProMisE molecular subtype (POLEmut, MMRd, p53abn, No Specific Molecular Profile (NSMP)) was assigned retrospectively. 1357 patients were fully evaluable including 85 POLEmut (6.3%), 380 MMRd (28.0%), 643 NSMP (47.4%), and 249 p53abn ECs (18.3%). Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for MMR proteins was undertaken at the time of primary diagnosis in 2016 in only 42% of the cohort (570/1357; range 3.5-95.4%/center). p53 IHC had only been performed in 21.1% of the cohort (286/1357; range 10.1-41.9%/center). Thus, based on the retrospective molecular subtype assignment, 54.7% (208/380) of MMRd EC had not been tested with MMR IHC (or MSI) and 48.2% (120/249) of p53abn ECs were not tested with p53 IHC in 2016. Molecular subtype diversity within histotypes was profound; most serous carcinomas were p53abn (91.4%), but only 129/249 (51.8%) p53abn EC were serous. Low-grade (Gr1-2) endometrioid carcinomas were mostly NSMP (589/954, 61.7%) but included all molecular subtypes, including p53abn (19/954, 2.0%). Molecular subtype was significantly associated with clinical outcomes (p < 0.001) even in patients with stage I disease (OS p = 0.006, DSS p < 0.001, PFS p < 0.001). Assessment of national pathologic practice in 2016 shows highly variable use of MMR and p53 IHC and demonstrates significant opportunities to improve and standardize biomarker reporting. Inconsistent, non-reflexive IHC resulted in missed opportunities for Hereditary Cancer Program referral and Lynch Syndrome diagnosis, and missed potential therapeutic implications (e.g., chemotherapy in p53abn EC, immune blockade for MMRd EC). Routine integration of molecular subtyping into practice can improve the consistency of EC pathology assessment and classification.
Assuntos
Carcinoma Endometrioide , Neoplasias do Endométrio , Feminino , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/genética , Proteína Supressora de Tumor p53/metabolismo , Canadá , Neoplasias do Endométrio/patologia , Carcinoma Endometrioide/patologia , Reparo de Erro de Pareamento de DNARESUMO
OBJECTIVES: We measured the variation in practice across all aspects of endometrial cancer (EC) management and assessed the potential impact of implementation of molecular classification. METHODS: Centers from across Canada provided representative tumor samples and clinical data, including preoperative workup, operative management, hereditary cancer program (HCP) referrals, adjuvant therapy, surveillance and outcomes, for all EC patients diagnosed in 2016. Tumors were classified into the four ProMisE molecular subtypes. RESULTS: A total of 1336 fully evaluable EC patients were identified from 10 tertiary cancer centers (TC; n = 1022) and 19 community centers (CC; n = 314). Variation of surgical practice across TCs was profound (14-100%) for lymphadenectomy (LND) (mean 57% Gr1/2, 82% Gr3) and omental sampling (20% Gr1/2, 79% Gr3). Preoperative CT scans were inconsistently obtained (mean 32% Gr1/2, 51% Gr3) and use of adjuvant chemo or chemoRT in high risk EC ranged from 0-55% and 64-100%, respectively. Molecular subtyping was performed retrospectively and identified 6% POLEmut, 28% MMRd, 48% NSMP and 18% p53abn ECs, and was significantly associated with survival. Within patients retrospectively diagnosed with MMRd EC only 22% had been referred to HCP. Of patients with p53abn EC, LND and omental sampling was not performed in 21% and 23% respectively, and 41% received no chemotherapy. Comparison of management in 2016 with current 2020 ESGO/ESTRO/ESP guidelines identified at least 26 and 95 patients that would have been directed to less or more adjuvant therapy, respectively (10% of cohort). CONCLUSION: Molecular classification has the potential to mitigate the profound variation in practice demonstrated in current EC care, enabling reproducible risk assessment, guiding treatment and reducing health care disparities.
Assuntos
Neoplasias do Endométrio , Quimioterapia Adjuvante , Terapia Combinada , Neoplasias do Endométrio/genética , Neoplasias do Endométrio/terapia , Feminino , Humanos , Excisão de Linfonodo , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: To describe the response rate to chemotherapy, rates of recurrence, and overall survival in patients with non-serous epithelial ovarian cancers. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study used the Manitoba Cancer Registry to identify all women with non-serous epithelial ovarian, fallopian, or peritoneal cancer treated between 1995 and 2010. Chart review entailed extracting information regarding therapy and outcomes. All patients with recurrence were identified and response to chemotherapy was assessed. RESULTS: We identified 392 patients with non-serous ovarian cancers, 192 of whom received chemotherapy in the first-line setting. Optimal debulking resulted in improvements in rates of recurrence and overall survival (P < 0.001). Histology did not have an effect on recurrence or overall survival. Forty-eight patients (25%) had a recurrence and received second-line therapy, and 21 (11%) received third-line therapy. Response rates were similar regardless of histology. In the second-line setting, 40.9%-83.3% of patients (other > mucinous > clear cell > endometrioid) and in the third-line setting, 33.3%-75.0% of patients (other > mucinous > clear cell > endometrioid) received >6 lines of chemotherapy. Twenty-three percent of patients experienced a recurrence within 2 years of first-line therapy. Two-year survival was 79.4% after first-line treatment, 27.6% after second-line treatment, and 19.5% after third-line treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients with clear cell ovarian cancer had chemotherapy continuation rates similar to those of previously reported studies. This is one of the first studies reporting response rates for mucinous and endometrioid subtypes. Recurrent disease responds to treatment with second- and third-line therapy, emphasizing the importance of offering patients subsequent lines of chemotherapy for disease management. Further studies are needed to determine the optimal regimen.
Assuntos
Antineoplásicos/uso terapêutico , Carcinoma Epitelial do Ovário/tratamento farmacológico , Neoplasias Ovarianas/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Manitoba/epidemiologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/patologia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Detecção Precoce de Câncer , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Humanos , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Canadá/epidemiologia , Feminino , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Programas de Rastreamento/economia , Papillomavirus HumanoAssuntos
Infecções por Papillomavirus , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero , Humanos , Canadá/epidemiologia , Feminino , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/prevenção & controle , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo do Útero/epidemiologia , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , Infecções por Papillomavirus/prevenção & controle , Manejo de Espécimes/economia , Manejo de Espécimes/métodos , Esfregaço Vaginal/economia , Autocuidado/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/economia , Detecção Precoce de Câncer/métodos , Papillomaviridae/isolamento & purificação , Papillomavirus HumanoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Uterine inversion is most commonly seen in labour and delivery. However, it can be associated with uterine tumours, including gynaecologic malignancy. CASE: In a 66-year-old woman, uterine inversion identified at laparotomy that was found to be associated with uterine carcinosarcoma (malignant mixed mesodermal tumour) represents an unusual presentation. Surgical approach necessitated a vertical hysterotomy to amputate and deliver the uterine tumour. CONCLUSION: Uterine inversion in gynaecologic oncology may be associated with sarcoma or malignant mixed mesodermal tumour. This can represent a diagnostic and surgical challenge and should be considered.
Assuntos
Carcinossarcoma/complicações , Carcinossarcoma/cirurgia , Histerotomia/métodos , Inversão Uterina/etiologia , Inversão Uterina/cirurgia , Neoplasias Uterinas/complicações , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirurgia , Idoso , Carcinossarcoma/patologia , Evolução Fatal , Feminino , Humanos , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia , Carga Tumoral , Inversão Uterina/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Uterinas/patologiaRESUMO
The purpose of this paper is to provide evidence-based guidance on the management of a positive human papilloma virus (HPV) test and to provide guidance around screening and HPV testing for specific patient populations. The guideline was developed by a working group in collaboration with the Gynecologic Oncology Society of Canada (GOC), Society of Colposcopists of Canada (SCC), and the Canadian Partnership Against Cancer. The literature informing these guidelines was obtained through a systematic review of relevant literature by a multi-step search process led by an information specialist. The literature was reviewed up to July 2021 with manual searches of relevant national guidelines and more recent publications. The quality of the evidence and strength of recommendations were developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. The intended users of this guideline include primary care providers, gynecologists, colposcopists, screening programs, and healthcare facilities. The implementation of the recommendations will ensure an optimum implementation of HPV testing with a focus on the management of positive results. Recommendations for appropriate care for underserved and marginalized groups are made.
Assuntos
Papillomavirus Humano , Infecções por Papillomavirus , Humanos , Feminino , Infecções por Papillomavirus/diagnóstico , CanadáRESUMO
(1) Background: The primary objective of this study was to examine the rate of genetic referral, BRCA testing, and BRCA positivity amongst all patients with high-grade serous ovarian cancers (HGSOC) from 2004-2019. The secondary objective was to analyze secondary factors that may affect the rates of referral and testing. (2) Methods: This population-based cohort study included all women diagnosed with HGSOC using the Manitoba Cancer Registry, CervixCheck registry, Medical Claims database at Manitoba Health, the Hospital Discharge abstract, the Population Registry, and Winnipeg Regional Health Authority genetics data. Data were examined for three different time cohorts (2004-2013, 2014-2016; 2017-2019) correlating to practice pattern changes. (3) Results: A total of 944 patients were diagnosed with HGSOC. The rate of genetic referrals changed over the three timeframes (20.0% â 56.7% â 36.6%) and rate of genetic testing increased over the entire timeframe. Factors found to increase rates of referral and testing included age, histology, history of oral contraceptive use, and family history of ovarian cancer. Prior health care utilization indicators did not affect genetic referral or testing. (4) Conclusion: The rate of genetic referral (2004-2016) and BRCA1/2 testing (2004-2019) for patients with a diagnosis of HGSOC increased over time. A minority of patients received a consultation for genetics counselling, and even fewer received testing for a BRCA1/2. Without a genetic result, it is difficult for clinicians to inform treatment decisions. Additional efforts are needed to increase genetics consultation and testing for Manitoban patients with HGSOC. Effects of routine tumour testing on rates of genetic referral will have to be examined in future studies.
Assuntos
Aconselhamento Genético , Neoplasias Ovarianas , Humanos , Feminino , Genes BRCA1 , Estudos de Coortes , Genes BRCA2 , Manitoba/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Ovarianas/genética , Neoplasias Ovarianas/patologia , Encaminhamento e ConsultaRESUMO
â¢Ovarian cancer can present as paraneoplastic myositis.â¢Presented with progressive weakness unresponsive to treatment with glucocorticoidsâ¢Imaging revealed bilateral ovarian masses, myositis resolved after surgery.â¢Ovarian cancer should be included on the differential diagnosis of a patient presenting with myositis.