Experiences and management of physician psychological symptoms during infectious disease outbreaks: a rapid review.

BACKGROUND: Prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, physicians experienced unprecedented levels of burnout. The uncertainty of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic along with increased workload and difficult medical triage decisions may lead to a further decline in physician psychological health. METHODS: We searched Medline, EMBASE, and PsycINFO for primary research from database inception (Medline [1946], EMBASE [1974], PsycINFO [1806]) to November 17, 2020. Titles and abstracts were screened by one of three reviewers and full-text article screening and data abstraction were conducted independently, and in duplicate, by three reviewers. RESULTS: From 6223 unique citations, 480 articles were reviewed in full-text, with 193 studies (of 90,499 physicians) included in the final review. Studies reported on physician psychological symptoms and management during seven infectious disease outbreaks (severe acute respiratory syndrome [SARS], three strains of Influenza A virus [H1N1, H5N1, H7N9], Ebola, Middle East respiratory syndrome [MERS], and COVID-19) in 57 countries. Psychological symptoms of anxiety (14.3-92.3%), stress (11.9-93.7%), depression (17-80.5%), post-traumatic stress disorder (13.2-75.2%) and burnout (14.7-76%) were commonly reported among physicians, regardless of infectious disease outbreak or country. Younger, female (vs. male), single (vs. married), early career physicians, and those providing direct care to infected patients were associated with worse psychological symptoms. INTERPRETATION: Physicians should be aware that psychological symptoms of anxiety, depression, fear and distress are common, manifest differently and self-management strategies to improve psychological well-being exist. Health systems should implement short and long-term psychological supports for physicians caring for patients with COVID-19.

A qualitative study of physician perceptions and experiences of caring for critically ill patients in the context of resource strain during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has led to global shortages in the resources required to care for critically ill patients and to protect frontline healthcare providers. This study investigated physicians' perceptions and experiences of caring for critically ill patients in the context of actual or anticipated resource strain during the COVID-19 pandemic, and explored implications for the healthcare workforce and the delivery of patient care. METHODS: We recruited a diverse sample of critical care physicians from 13 Canadian Universities with adult critical care training programs. We conducted semi-structured telephone interviews between March 25-June 25, 2020 and used qualitative thematic analysis to derive primary themes and subthemes. RESULTS: Fifteen participants (eight female, seven male; median age = 40) from 14 different intensive care units described three overarching themes related to physicians' perceptions and experiences of caring for critically ill patients during the pandemic: 1) Conditions contributing to resource strain (e.g., continuously evolving pandemic conditions); 2) Implications of resource strain on critical care physicians personally (e.g., safety concerns) and professionally (e.g. practice change); and 3) Enablers of resource sufficiency (e.g., adequate human resources). CONCLUSIONS: The COVID-19 pandemic has required health systems and healthcare providers to continuously adapt to rapidly evolving circumstances. Participants' uncertainty about whether their unit's planning and resources would be sufficient to ensure the delivery of high quality patient care throughout the pandemic, coupled with fear and anxiety over personal and familial transmission, indicate the need for a unified systemic pandemic response plan for future infectious disease outbreaks.

Allocation of intensive care resources during an infectious disease outbreak: a rapid review to inform practice.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has placed sustained demand on health systems globally, and the capacity to provide critical care has been overwhelmed in some jurisdictions. It is unknown which triage criteria for allocation of resources perform best to inform health system decision-making. We sought to summarize and describe existing triage tools and ethical frameworks to aid healthcare decision-making during infectious disease outbreaks. METHODS: We conducted a rapid review of triage criteria and ethical frameworks for the allocation of critical care resources during epidemics and pandemics. We searched Medline, EMBASE, and SCOPUS from inception to November 3, 2020. Full-text screening and data abstraction were conducted independently and in duplicate by three reviewers. Articles were included if they were primary research, an adult critical care setting, and the framework described was related to an infectious disease outbreak. We summarized each triage tool and ethical guidelines or framework including their elements and operating characteristics using descriptive statistics. We assessed the quality of each article with applicable checklists tailored to each study design. RESULTS: From 11,539 unique citations, 697 full-text articles were reviewed and 83 articles were included. Fifty-nine described critical care triage protocols and 25 described ethical frameworks. Of these, four articles described both a protocol and ethical framework. Sixty articles described 52 unique triage criteria (29 algorithm-based, 23 point-based). Few algorithmic- or point-based triage protocols were good predictors of mortality with AUCs ranging from 0.51 (PMEWS) to 0.85 (admitting SOFA > 11). Most published triage protocols included the substantive values of duty to provide care, equity, stewardship and trust, and the procedural value of reason. CONCLUSIONS: This review summarizes available triage protocols and ethical guidelines to provide decision-makers with data to help select and tailor triage tools. Given the uncertainty about how the COVID-19 pandemic will progress and any future pandemics, jurisdictions should prepare by selecting and adapting a triage tool that works best for their circumstances.

Translation and Validation of the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale for French Paediatric Populations.

Purpose: Physical activity level is a prognostic variable for patients with injuries. Self-report questionnaires exist to obtain these measures; however, they are not accessible to all populations because of language barriers. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to translate and validate the Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS) for francophones. Method: We translated the HSS Pedi-FABS using the forward-reverse translation approach and validated it among bilingual adults and an expert panel before administering it to a paediatric population. A repeated-measures crossover design was used: forty-three middle school students, aged 13.1 (SD 0.75) years, were randomly administered either the English or the French questionnaire. Two days later, all participants completed the other version. The translated questionnaire was assessed for its convergent validity (Spearman's r correlation coefficients [rs ]), internal consistency (Cronbach's α), and reliability (standard error of measurement [SEM]). Results: All assessments had a significance level of p < 0.001 with an excellent Spearman's r correlation coefficient between the participants' total scores on the translated questionnaires (rs  = 0.911). The overall scores for the questionnaire and the individual items of the questionnaire revealed excellent internal consistency (α = 0.868) and reliability (SEM = 0.334). Conclusions: The validated and reliable translated questionnaire can be used by researchers and clinicians to assess physical activity levels in French paediatric populations.

Objectif : le niveau d'activité physique est un pronostic variable pour les patients qui présentent des blessures. Il existe des questionnaires d'autoévaluation pour obtenir ces mesures, mais ils ne sont pas accessibles à toutes les populations à cause de la barrière de la langue. La présente étude visait à traduire et à valider le Hospital for Special Surgery Pediatric Functional Activity Brief Scale (HSS Pedi-FABS) pour les francophones. Méthodologie : les chercheurs ont traduit le HSS Pedi-FABS au moyen du processus de rétrotraduction et l'ont validé auprès d'adultes bilingues et d'un groupe d'experts avant de l'utiliser auprès d'une population pédiatrique. Ils ont utilisé une méthodologie transversale par mesures répétées : 43 élèves du début du secondaire de 13,1 ans (ÉT 0,75) ont répondu au hasard au questionnaire anglais ou français. Deux jours plus tard, tous les participants ont rempli l'autre version. Les questionnaires traduits ont été évalués pour leur validité convergente (coefficients de corrélation Rho de Spearman [rs ]), leur cohérence interne (coefficient alpha [α] de Cronbach) et leur fiabilité (erreur type de mesure). Résultats : toutes les évaluations présentaient un seuil de signification de p < 0,001 et un excellent coefficient de corrélation Rho de Spearman entre les scores totaux des participants dans les questionnaires traduits (rs  = 0,911). Les scores totaux du questionnaire et de chacun de ses éléments ont révélé une excellente cohérence interne (α = 0,868) et une excellente fiabilité (erreur type de mesure = 0,334). Conclusion : le questionnaire validé et traduit avec fiabilité peut être utilisé par les chercheurs et les cliniciens pour évaluer les niveaux d'activité physique de populations pédiatriques francophones.