Size-mismatched transplantation from large donors to small recipients is associated with pancreas graft thrombosis: A retrospective national observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Donor-recipient (D/R) size mismatch has been evaluated for a number of organs but not for pancreas transplantation. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 438 patients who had undergone pancreas transplantation. The D/R body surface area (BSA) ratio was calculated, and the relationship between the ratio and graft prognosis was evaluated. We divided the patients into two groups and evaluated graft survival. The incidence of pancreas graft thrombosis resulting in graft failure within 14 days and 1-year graft survival were compared using Kaplan-Meier curves, and the prognostic factors associated with graft thrombosis were identified by univariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The mean/median donor and recipient BSAs were 1.63 m2 /1.65 m2 , and 1.57 m2 /1.55 m2 , respectively; the mean and median D/R BSAs were both 1.05. The receiver operating characteristic curve cutoff for the D/R BSA ratio was 1.09, and significant differences were identified between patients with ratios of ≥1.09 (high group) versus <1.09 (low group). The incidence of graft thrombosis resulting in pancreas graft failure within 14 days was significantly higher in the high group than in the low group (p < .01). One-year overall and death-censored pancreas graft survival were significantly higher in the low group than in the high group (p < .01). Multivariate analysis identified recipient height, donor BSA, and donor hemoglobin A1c as significant independent factors for graft thrombosis. Cubic spline curve analysis indicated an increased risk of graft thrombosis with increasing D/R BSA ratio. CONCLUSION: D/R size mismatch is associated with graft thrombosis after pancreas transplantation.

Utilization of the Pancreas From Donors With an Extremely High Pancreas Donor Risk Index: Report of the National Registry of Pancreas Transplantation.

Pancreas transplants from expanded criteria donors are performed widely in Japan because there is a shortage of brain-dead donors. However, the effectiveness of this strategy is unknown. We retrospectively studied 371 pancreas transplants to evaluate the possibility of pancreas transplantation from expanded criteria donors by the Pancreas Donor Risk Index (PDRI). Patients were divided into five groups according to quintiles of PDRI values (Q1-Q5). The 1-year pancreas graft survival rates were 94.5% for Q1, 91.9% for Q2, 90.5% for Q3, 89.3% for Q4, and 79.6% for Q5, and were significantly lower with a lower PDRI (p = 0.04). A multivariate analysis showed that the PDRI, donor hemoglobin A1c values, and pancreas transplantation alone significantly predicted 1-year pancreas graft survival (all p < 0.05). Spline curve analysis showed that the PDRI was incrementally associated with an increased risk of 1-year graft failure. In the group with a PDRI ≥ 2.87, 8/56 patients had graft failures within 1 month, and all were due to graft thrombosis. The PDRI is a prognostic factor related to the 1-year graft survival rate. However, pancreas transplantation from high-PDRI donors shows acceptable results and could be an alternative when the donor pool is insufficient.

Impact of COVID-19 on living donor liver and kidney transplantation programs in Japan in 2020.

BACKGROUND: Although many transplant programs have been forced to suspend living donor transplants due to the emergence of coronavirus disease (COVID-19), there are relatively few real-time databases to assess center-level transplant activities. We aimed to delineate the actual impact of COVID-19 on living donor transplant programs and the resumption process in Japan. METHODS: In a nationwide survey, questionnaires were sent to 32 liver transplant programs that had performed at least more than one case of living donor liver transplantation in 2019 and 132 kidney transplant programs that had performed more than one living donor kidney transplantation in 2018. RESULTS: Thirty-one (96.9%) and 125 (94.7%) liver and kidney transplant programs responded, respectively. In the early pandemic period, 67.7% (21/31) of liver programs and 29.8% (37/125) of kidney programs were able to maintain transplant activities similar to those during the pre-pandemic period. After temporal suspension, 58.1% of kidney programs resumed their transplant activity after the number of local COVID-19 cases peaked. Establishing institutional COVID-19 screening, triage, and therapeutic management protocols was mandatory to resume transplant activity for 64.5% and 67.7% of liver and kidney programs, respectively. In the future wave of COVID-19, 67.7% of liver programs would be affected by institutional COVID-19 intensive care unit-bound patient numbers, and 55.7% of kidney programs would stop if hospital-acquired severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection spreads. CONCLUSIONS: THIS NATIONWIDE SURVEY REVEALED FOR THE FIRST TIME HOW LIVING DONOR LIVER AND KIDNEY: transplant programs changed in response to the COVID-19 pandemic in a country where living donor transplantations are predominant.

Analysis of risk factors for donation after circulatory death kidney transplantation in Japan.

BACKGROUND: In Japan, donations after circulatory death kidney transplantation are widely performed due to legislation delays. The number of donations after brain death kidney transplantations is increasing, but the target remains unmet. We reviewed the outcomes of donation after circulatory death in Japan. METHODS: We analyzed 2923 deceased kidney transplantations (2239: donation after circulatory death (DCD), 684: donation after brain death (DBD)) performed in Japan from 2000 to 2019. The outcomes of the DCD and DBD groups were compared. We examined the risk factors for graft loss in the DCD group. RESULTS: The 5-year patient survival and death-censored graft survival rates of the DCD group, obtained by propensity score matching, were 93.6% and 95.2%, respectively, which were equivalent to 94.2% and 93.8%, respectively, obtained in the DBD group. Older donors (≥ 50 years) and prolonged cold ischemia time (≥ 12 h) were risk factors for graft loss; in the presence of these, graft survival was lower in the DCD group. CONCLUSIONS: Older donors and prolonged cold ischemia time reduced graft survival in the DCD group. Proper evaluation of donors and careful preparation for transplant surgery are, therefore, essential to ensure good transplant outcomes.

National survey on deceased donor organ transplantation during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.

PURPOSE: We investigated the status of deceased organ donation and transplantation through a questionnaire distributed to transplant centers in Japan during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The questionnaire was distributed electronically to 206 transplant centers for heart (n = 11), lung (n = 10), liver (n = 25), kidney (n = 130), pancreas (n = 18), and small intestine (n = 12) transplantation. Organ donations and organ transplantation data were extracted from the Japan Organ Transplant Network website. RESULTS: We received questionnaire responses from 177 centers (response rate, 86%). In 2020, the number of brain-dead donors (BDDs) decreased to 68 (69% of the year-on-year average) and the number of donors after cardiac death (DCDs) decreased to 9 (32% of the year-on-year average). Eighty-five (48%) transplant centers (heart, n = 0; lung, n = 0; liver, n = 4; kidney, n = 78; pancreas, n = 22; and small intestine, n = 0) suspended transplant surgeries in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Consequently, the number of organ transplantations from deceased donors was significantly lower in 2020 than in 2019. CONCLUSION: Although the COVID-19 pandemic has had less impact in Japan than in other countries, it has affected transplantation activity significantly, suspending transplantation surgeries in 48% of the transplantation centers, including 78% of the kidney transplantation centers, and reducing the number of organ donations to 61% of the year-on-year average.

First World Consensus Conference on pancreas transplantation: Part II - recommendations.

The First World Consensus Conference on Pancreas Transplantation provided 49 jury deliberations regarding the impact of pancreas transplantation on the treatment of diabetic patients, and 110 experts' recommendations for the practice of pancreas transplantation. The main message from this consensus conference is that both simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) and pancreas transplantation alone can improve long-term patient survival, and all types of pancreas transplantation dramatically improve the quality of life of recipients. Pancreas transplantation may also improve the course of chronic complications of diabetes, depending on their severity. Therefore, the advantages of pancreas transplantation appear to clearly surpass potential disadvantages. Pancreas after kidney transplantation increases the risk of mortality only in the early period after transplantation, but is associated with improved life expectancy thereafter. Additionally, preemptive SPK, when compared to SPK performed in patients undergoing dialysis, appears to be associated with improved outcomes. Time on dialysis has negative prognostic implications in SPK recipients. Increased long-term survival, improvement in the course of diabetic complications, and amelioration of quality of life justify preferential allocation of kidney grafts to SPK recipients. Audience discussions and live voting are available online at the following URL address: http://mediaeventi.unipi.it/category/1st-world-consensus-conference-of-pancreas-transplantation/246.

Clinical impact of pancreas donor age on outcomes following pancreas transplantation: Analysis of a nationwide registry in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical impact of pancreas donor age on pancreas transplantation (PTx) outcome has not been well investigated. Here we analyzed the nationwide PTx registry in Japan to assess posttransplant outcomes in donor age-stratified groups. METHODS: This study included 410 cases of PTx performed in Japan between 2000 and 2019. Analyses were performed using clinical data from the Japan Pancreas Transplant Registry of Japan Society for Pancreas and Islet Transplantation. RESULTS: The 410 PTx cases were classified based on donor age: <10 years (n = 10, 2.4%), 10-19 years (n = 30, 7.3%), 20-29 years (n = 64, 15.6%), 30-39 years (n = 75, 18.3%), 40-49 years (n = 114, 27.8%), 50-59 years (n = 90, 22.0%), and ≥60 years (n = 27, 6.6%). The incidence of early pancreas graft loss (8.9%, 36/410 cases) did not exhibit a significant linear correlation with donor age. Posttransplant pancreas graft survival (1-/3-/5-/10-year rates of 85.9%/80.6%/76.2%/67.4% among all cases) was also not significantly associated with donor age. CONCLUSION: Pancreas donor age was not significantly associated with posttransplant outcome. This finding supports the use of expanded criteria donors, with regards to pancreas donor age, for PTx in cases of type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Everolimus-facilitated calcineurin inhibitor reduction in Asian de novo kidney transplant recipients: 2-year results from the subgroup analysis of the TRANSFORM study.

OBJECTIVE: We analyzed the efficacy and safety of an everolimus with reduced-exposure calcineurin inhibitor (EVR+rCNI) versus mycophenolic acid with standard-exposure CNI (MPA+sCNI) regimen in Asian patients from the TRANSFORM study. METHODS: In this 24-month, open-label study, de novo kidney transplant recipients (KTxRs) were randomized (1:1) to receive EVR+rCNI or MPA+sCNI, along with induction therapy and corticosteroids. RESULTS: Of the 2037 patients randomized in the TRANSFORM study, 293 were Asian (EVR+rCNI, N = 136; MPA+sCNI, N = 157). At month 24, EVR+rCNI was noninferior to MPA+sCNI for the binary endpoint of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 50 ml/min/1.73 m2 or treated biopsy-proven acute rejection (27.0% vs. 29.2%, P = .011 for a noninferiority margin of 10%). Graft loss and death were reported for one patient each in both arms. Mean eGFR was higher in EVR+rCNI versus MPA+sCNI (72.2 vs. 66.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 , P = .0414) even after adjusting for donor type and donor age (64.3 vs. 59.3 ml/min/1.73 m2 , P = .0582). Overall incidence of adverse events was comparable. BK virus (4.4% vs. 12.1%) and cytomegalovirus (4.4% vs. 13.4%) infections were significantly lower in the EVR+rCNI arm. CONCLUSION: This subgroup analysis in Asian de novo KTxRs demonstrated that the EVR+rCNI versus MPA+sCNI regimen provides comparable antirejection efficacy, better renal function, and reduced viral infections (NCT01950819).

Outcomes of pancreas transplantation in older versus younger recipients: a comparative analysis.

PURPOSE: The feasibility of pancreas transplantation (PT) in older recipients remains a matter of debate. We examined the influence of recipient age on PT outcomes and identified the prognostic factors for older recipients. METHODS: We compared the outcomes of PT in recipients aged < 50 years (younger group; n = 285) with those in recipients aged ≥ 50 years (older group; n = 94). Prognostic factors in the older group were analyzed by a logistic regression model and the influence of recipient age on survival outcomes were analyzed using propensity score matching. RESULTS: The patient survival rate was significantly worse in the older group (P < 0.001). Patient death from infection or/and multiple organ failure or cardiac/cerebrovascular events was also more frequent in the older group than in the younger group (P = 0.012 and P = 0.045, respectively). A longer duration of diabetes was an independent risk factor of 1-year mortality in the older group. In a propensity score-matched comparison, the older recipients (n = 77) had significantly poorer survival than the younger recipients (n = 77) (P = 0.026). CONCLUSIONS: PT should be considered with appropriate caution, especially for older recipients with a long duration of diabetes.

Are the outcomes of Japanese pancreas transplantation utilizing extended-criteria donors acceptable? A propensity score matching analysis for donors <50 or ≥50 years old.

In Japan, about 30% of pancreatic transplant donors are ≥50 years old, making them "extended-criteria donors (ECDs)." We analyzed 361 cases of transplantation involving donors from the Japanese pancreas transplantation registry to evaluate the acceptability of ECDs. The patient survival rates at 1, 5, and 10 years after transplantation were 96.6%, 94.9%, and 88.3%, respectively. The survival rates of pancreas and kidney grafts at 1, 5, and 10 years were 85.3%, 74.8%, and 70.6%, and 94.2%, 90.9%, and 80.9%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that no particular donor factors significantly influenced the pancreatic graft survival. Patients were divided into 2 groups: donors ≥50 years old (older group) and those <50 years old (younger group). After propensity score matching, the overall pancreatic graft survival at 1, 5, and 10 years after transplantation in the older group was 82.8%, 71.8%, and 69.5%, respectively, which was almost the same as in the younger group (84.9%, 70.2%, and 67.4%, respectively). No donor factors markedly influenced the pancreatic graft survival, and the outcomes of pancreas transplantation from ECDs ≥50 years old were comparable to those from younger donors.

Warm ischemic time as a critical risk factor of graft failure from donors after cardiac death: A single-center experience over three decades in the Kidney Donor Profile Index/Kidney Donor Risk Index era in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the prognostic value of the warm ischemic time and the validity of the Kidney Donor Profile Index/Kidney Donor Risk Index for predicting the survival of donors after cardiac death grafts. METHODS: We retrospectively assessed 315 kidneys retrieved from donors after cardiac death at Fujita Health University Hospital, Toyoake, Aichi, Japan. The Kidney Donor Profile Index/Kidney Donor Risk Index was calculated and the grafts were enrolled. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 11.9 years. The Kidney Donor Profile Index had a markedly asymmetric distribution (median 94%), and the Kidney Donor Risk Index had high index rates (0.79-2.94, median 1.70). The overall 5-, 10- and 15-year graft survival rates were 67.5%, 52.1% and 38.9%, respectively. The Kidney Donor Profile Index correlated with graft survival. The 5-, 10- and 15-year graft survival rates for the Kidney Donor Profile Index <1.2 were 87.7%, 73.5% and 59.2%; those for the Kidney Donor Risk Index >2.0 were 55.0%, 34.7% and 22.1%, respectively. A Cox multivariate analysis identified the Kidney Donor Risk Index (hazard ratio 2.06, 95% confidence interval 1.48-2.86, P < 0.0001) and warm ischemic time (hazard ratio 1.21, 95% confidence interval 1.09-1.34, P = 0.0010) as independent risk factors for graft loss. The addition of warm ischemic time >30 min had a significant effect, as measured by the C-index (0.708-0.731, P = 0.032), improving the net reclassification improvement score (0.256, P = 0.0039) and integrated discrimination improvement score (0.042, P = 0.0022). CONCLUSIONS: The Kidney Donor Profile Index/Kidney Donor Risk Index is a good prognostic tool for determining the outcomes of donors after cardiac death grafts. However, the warm ischemic time should also be included in the allocation system for donors after cardiac death grafts.

Combined predictive value of the expanded donor criteria for long-term graft survival of kidneys from donors after cardiac death: A single-center experience over three decades.

OBJECTIVES: Kidneys procured from the deceased hold great potential for expanding the donor pool. The aims of the present study were to investigate the post-transplant outcomes of renal allografts recovered from donors after cardiac death, to identify risk factors affecting the renal prognosis and to compare the long-term survival from donors after cardiac death according to the number of risk factors shown by expanded criteria donors. METHODS: A total of 443 grafts recovered using an in situ regional cooling technique from 1983 to 2011 were assessed. To assess the combined predictive value of the significant expanded criteria donor risk criteria, the patients were divided into three groups: those with no expanded criteria donor risk factors (no risk), one expanded criteria donor risk factor (single-risk) and two or more expanded criteria donor risk factors (multiple-risk). RESULTS: Among the donor factors, age ≥50 years, hypertension, maximum serum creatinine level ≥1.5 mg/dL and a warm ischemia time ≥30 min were identified as independent predictors of long-term graft failure on multivariate analysis. Regarding the expanded criteria donors criteria for marginal donors, cerebrovascular disease, hypertension and maximum serum creatinine level ≥1.5 mg/dL were identified as significant predictors on univariate analysis. The single- and multiple-risk groups showed 2.01- and 2.40-fold higher risks of graft loss, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Renal grafts recovered from donors after cardiac death donors have a good renal function with an excellent long-term graft survival. However, an increased number of expanded criteria donors risk factors increase the risk of graft loss.

Age and Pre-operative HbA1c levels affect renal function compensation in living kidney donors.

OBJECTIVES: About 90% of Japanese kidney transplantations are conducted from living donors, and their safety and the maintenance of their renal function are critical. This study aims to identify factors that affect the compensation of renal function in living kidney donors after donor nephrectomy. METHOD: In a retrospective cohort study, we reviewed data from 120 patients who underwent nephrectomy as living kidney transplant donors in our department from 2012 to 2021. Univariable and multivariable linear regression analyses were performed for donor factors affecting renal function after donor nephrectomy. RESULT: The multivariable linear regression model revealed that the donor's age (p = 0.025), preoperative estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) (p < 0.001), and hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) (p = 0.043) were independent risk factors for eGFR at six months after nephrectomy. The eGFR deterioration was more strongly associated with age in females than in males, whereas higher HbA1c values were more strongly associated with eGFR deterioration in males. Higher donor age and higher HbA1c each enhance the deterioration of eGFR six months after living donor nephrectomy. The data suggest that old age in especially female donors and preoperative higher HbA1c in male donors have a harmful impact on their renal function compensation.

An Examination of Packing Methods for Grafts to Prevent Freezing Injury during Transportation for Liver Transplantation.

BACKGROUND: University of Wisconsin solution (UW) may freeze at temperatures below -0.7 °C, damaging the graft. The present study assessed the effectiveness of the liver graft package protocol, which recommends filling a package with sufficient liquid to prevent grafts from sustaining freezing injury. METHODS: We filled ice cubes at two temperatures (-80 and -20 °C) around packages and performed a comparative study with four groups based on the temperature and filling of the second layer with lactated Ringer's solution (LR) (A: -80 °C, LR-; B: -80 °C, LR+; C: -20 °C, LR-; D: -20 °C, LR+). The bovine liver was used as a graft and preserved for 6 h in the first isolation bag filled with UW. RESULTS: While temperatures dropped below -0.7 °C at some points for 6 h in groups A, B, C, they never dropped to -0.7 °C in group D. The macroscopic findings in groups A, B, C showed freezing of the UW and grafts, but no such results in group D. A pathological study including electron microscopy showed freezing injury in groups A, B, and C but no significant changes in group D. CONCLUSIONS: The graft package protocol prevents freezing of the UW and liver grafts.

Total Cell-Free DNA as a Noninvasive Biomarker of a Delayed Graft Function After Kidney Transplantation From Donors After Cardiac Death.

BACKGROUND: Because of the organ shortage, donation after cardiac death (DCD) kidney transplantation (KTx) is an alternative way of achieving KTx using brain-dead donors (BDs). Although the prognosis of DCD-KTx is improving, the graft suffers from delayed graft function (DGF), the management of which is essential. With progress in understanding the characteristics of cell-free DNA (CF-DNA), we consider plasma total CF-DNA (tCF-DNA) to be a useful biomarker for predicting DGF in DCD-KTx. STUDY DESIGN AND METHOD: Consecutive patients from living donors (LDs; n = 9), BDs (n = 8), or DCD donors (n = 13) were enrolled. Plasma samples were collected after KTx and on postoperative days 3 and 5. CF-DNA was isolated, and tCF-DNA was quantified using the TapeStation 2200 software program. RESULTS: The tCF-DNA levels after BD-KTx and DCD-KTx were higher than those after LD-KTx (LD, 78 ± 27 (ng/mL); BD, 99 ± 20; DCD, 150 ± 23); the difference between DCD-KTx and LD-KTx was statistically significant (P < .05). The tCF-DNA levels declined at postoperative day 5 (LD, 45 ± 10; BD, 51 ± 11; DCD, 66 ± 13). tCF-DNA levels were significantly increased in patients with DGF after KTx (DGF, 139 ± 22; immediate function, 91 ± 18; P < .05). The tCF-DNA level was correlated with the duration of DGF (r = 0.5825, P < .05). CONCLUSION: Although the mechanism underlying DNA release from transplanted grafts into the recipient circulation remains unclear, cell death by apoptosis or necrosis and the active secretion of the immune system may play important roles in DGF. These data suggest that monitoring tCF-DNA may help predict graft recovery after DCD-KTx.

Impact of B Cell Depletion on COVID-19 in Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Kidney transplant recipients are patients at high risk for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to being on immunosuppressive therapy. B cell depletion therapy, including rituximab, is an important strategy for ABO-incompatible transplants. However, knowledge about the effect of B cell depletion therapy on COVID-19 is lacking. Thirty kidney transplant recipients who developed COVID-19 were included in this study. To examine the impact of B cell depletion therapy, we retrospectively investigated the relationship between the background of the patients and the clinical outcome. Of the 30 patients, 13 received B cell depletion therapy. The median time between transplant and onset of COVID-19 was 6.1 years after transplantation; however, nine cases remained markedly depleted of CD19(+) cells (<4.0%). The patients were assigned to the normal (n = 21) and depletion groups (n = 9). Progression rates in the depletion and normal groups were 55.6% and 9.5%, respectively (p = 0.014). Furthermore, the survival rate was significantly lower in the depletion group (100% in the normal group vs. 66.7% in the depletion group; p = 0.021). B cell depletion therapy may have long-term effects and increase the risk of COVID-19 in kidney transplant recipients.

Outcomes of Pancreas Transplantation for Lower-Ranked Candidates.

BACKGROUND: To perform more pancreas transplantation (PTx), our center sometimes performs pancreas transplantation for candidates ranked sixth place or lower. In this study, we analyzed the outcomes of PTx performed in our center to compare the outcomes of higher- and lower-ranked candidates. METHODS: Seventy-two cases in which PTx was performed at our center were divided into 2 groups according to the candidate's rank. Cases in which PTx was performed for candidates up to fifth place were classified into the higher rank candidate group (HRC group; n = 48), whereas PTx for candidates who were ranked sixth place or lower were classified into the lower rank candidate group (LRC group; n = 24). The outcomes of PTx were retrospectively compared. RESULTS: Although the LRC group included a greater number of older donors (age ≥60 years), a greater number of donors with deteriorated renal function, and a greater number of HLA mismatches, the 1- and 5-year patient survival rates in the HRC group were 91.6% and 91.6%, respectively, compared with 95.8% and 87.0%, respectively, in the LRC group (P = .755). In terms of both pancreas and kidney graft survival, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups. Additionally, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups regarding the glucagon stimulation test and 75 g OGTT results, insulin independence rate, HbA1c, or serum creatinine level after transplantation. CONCLUSIONS: In Japan, where there is a severe donor shortage, the performance of transplantation for lower-ranked candidates would increase the number of opportunities for patients to receive PTx.

Pancreas transplantation improves the quality of life of Japanese type 1 diabetes patients with diabetic kidney disease.

Objectives: Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) patients with diabetic kidney disease-induced kidney failure have a significantly impaired quality of life (QOL), resulting in a high level of physical, mental, and social anxiety. In this study, we evaluated the QOL of T1DM patients on the list for pancreas transplantation (PTx) at their registration, and determined whether PTx improved their QOL. Methods: There were 58 patients (men/women, 22/36; mean age, 42.8±8.0 years) with T1DM and who were registered on the waiting list for PTx. Quantitative QOL assessment was performed using the Medical Health Survey Short Form (SF-36) version 2. Changes in the QOL before and after PTx were also examined in 24 of these patients. Results: The mean value of each endpoint and the summary score of the SF-36 physical (PCS), mental (MCS), and role (RCS) components were all below the national normal level at PTx registration. No significant difference in QOL scores was observed in the intergroup comparison of 35 patients on dialysis, 13 patients without dialysis, and ten patients after kidney transplantation. The 24 patients who underwent PTx showed improvement in PCS, MCS, and most SF-36 scores. Conclusion: T1DM patients waiting for PTx had a decreased QOL, regardless of dialysis, and PTx improved their QOL.

Adherence to recommended vaccination policies for pre- and post-solid organ transplantation patients: A national questionnaire survey in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Pre-transplant vaccination is recommended for patients undergoing solid organ transplantation (SOT). While appropriate vaccination protocols are implemented at some facilities, transplantation is sometimes performed with inadequate preoperative vaccine management. Vaccination rates vary across facilities, but those of SOT centers in Japan have never been investigated. This study aimed to conduct a nationwide questionnaire survey to assess pre- and post-transplant vaccination policies among SOT facilities in Japan. METHODS: The survey was conducted from September to November 2022. All registered (n = 221) solid organ (namely, the lungs, liver, kidneys, pancreas, heart, and small intestine) transplant facilities were asked to complete a web-based survey. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 70.2 %. Live and inactivated vaccines were recommended at 64.9 % and 68.9 % of the responding facilities, respectively. The following vaccines were incorporated into the vaccination protocols of facilities: pneumococcal vaccine, 31.7 % (13-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine) and 65.4 % (23-valent pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine); hepatitis B virus vaccine, 67.3 %; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccine, 73.1 %; influenza vaccine, 73.1 %; and zoster vaccines, 23.1 %. The reasons for unresponsiveness to vaccinations included inadequate time before transplantation (60.3 %), cost burden (41.1 %), high number of vaccinations (21.9 %), no recognition of the need for vaccination (17.9 %), and the requirement to explain the need for vaccination (15.2 %). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed gaps in vaccination practices across nationwide facilities in Japan. The findings indicate the importance of promoting scheduled efficiency and encouraging the national health system to reduce vaccine costs with the support of public subsidies.