RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Diligent fluid management is an instrumental part of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery. However, the effect of a ward regimen to limit intravenous fluid administration on outcome remains unclear. We performed a meta-analysis investigating the effect of a restrictive versus a conventional fluid regimen on complications in patients after non-cardiac surgery in the postoperative period on the clinical ward. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and CINAHL databases, from the start of indexing until June 2022, with constraints for English language and adult human study participants. Data were combined using classic methods of meta-analyses and were expressed as weighted pooled risk ratio (RR) or odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Quality assessment and risk of bias analyses was performed according to PRISMA guidelines. RESULTS: Seven records, three randomized controlled trials, and four non-randomized studies were included with a total of 883 patients. A restrictive fluid regimen was associated with a reduction in overall complication rate in the RCTs (RR 0.46, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.95; P < .03; I2 = 35%). This reduction in overall complication rate was not consistent in the non-randomized studies (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.03; P 0.07; I2 = 45%). No significant association was found for mortality using a restrictive fluid regimen (RCTs OR 0.51, 95% CI 0.05 to 4.90; P = 0.56; I2 = 0%, non-randomized studies OR 0.30, 95% CI 0.06 to 1.46; P = 0.14; I2 = 0%). A restrictive fluid regimen is significantly associated with a reduction in postoperative length of stay in the non-randomized studies (MD - 1.81 days, 95% CI - 3.27 to - 0.35; P = 0.01; I2 = 0%) but not in the RCTs (MD 0.60 days, 95% CI - 0.75 to 1.95; P = 0.38). Risk of bias was moderate to high. Methodological quality was very low to moderate. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis suggests restrictive fluid therapy on the ward may be associated with an effect on postoperative complication rate. However, the quality of evidence was moderate to low, the sample size was small, and the data came from both RCTs and non-randomized studies.
RESUMO
Potentially, mean circulatory filling pressure (Pmcf) could aid hemodynamic management in patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). However, data regarding the normal range for Pmcf do not exist challenging its clinical use. We aimed to define the range for Pmcf for ICU patients and also calculated in what percentage of cases equilibrium between arterial blood pressure (ABP) and central venous pressure (CVP) was reached. In patients in whom no equilibrium was reached, we corrected for arterial-to-venous compliance differences. Finally, we studied the influence of patient characteristics on Pmcf. We hypothesized fluid balance, the use of vasoactive medication, being on mechanical ventilation, and the level of positive end-expiratory pressure would be positively associated with Pmcf. We retrospectively studied a cohort of 311 patients that had cardiac arrest in ICU while having active recording of ABP and CVP 1 min after death. Median Pmcf was 15 mmHg [interquartile range (IQR) 12-18]. ABP and CVP reached an equilibrium state in 52% of the cases. Correction for arterial-to-venous compliances differences resulted in a maximum alteration of 1.3 mmHg in Pmcf. Fluid balance over the last 24 h, the use of vasoactive medication, and being on mechanical ventilation were associated with a higher Pmcf. Median Pmcf was 15 mmHg (IQR 12-18). When ABP remained higher than CVP, correction for arterial-to-venous compliance differences did not result in a clinically relevant alteration of Pmcf. Pmcf was affected by factors known to alter vasomotor tone and effective circulating blood volume.NEW & NOTEWORTHY In a cohort of 311 intensive care unit (ICU) patients, median mean circulatory filling pressure (Pmcf) measured after cardiac arrest was 15 mmHg (interquartile range 12-18). In 48% of cases, arterial blood pressure remained higher than central venous pressure, but correction for arterial-to-venous compliance differences did not result in clinically relevant alterations of Pmcf. Fluid balance, use of vasopressors or inotropes, and being on mechanical ventilation were associated with a higher Pmcf.