Predictive Capacity of 3 Comorbidity Indices in Estimating Survival Endpoints in Women With Early-Stage Endometrial Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The negative impact of comorbidity on survival in women with endometrial carcinoma (EC) is well-known. Few validated comorbidity indices are available for clinical use, such as the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), the Age-Adjusted CCI (AACCI), and the Adult Comorbidity Evaluation-27 (ACE-27). The aim of the study is to determine which index best correlates with survival endpoints in women with EC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 1132 women with early-stage EC treated at an academic center. Three scores were calculated for each patient using CCI, AACCI, and ACE-27 at the time of hysterectomy. Univariate and multivariable modeling was used to determine predictors of survival. RESULTS: For each of the studied comorbidity indices, the highest scores were significantly correlated with poorer overall survival. The hazard ratio of death from any cause was 3.92 for AACCI, 2.25 for CCI, and 1.57 for ACE-27. All 3 indices were independent predictors of overall survival with a P value of less than 0.001 on multivariate analysis. In addition, lymphovascular space invasion, lower uterine segment involvement, and tumor grade were predictors of overall survival. Lymphovascular space invasion, grade (P < 0.001), and high AACCI score were the only significant predictors of recurrence-free survival (RFS). Lymphovascular space invasion and tumor grade were the only 2 predictors of disease-specific survival. CONCLUSIONS: Although all 3 studied comorbidity indices were significant predictors of overall survival in women with early-stage EC, AACCI showed a stronger association. It should be considered for evaluating comorbidity in women with early-stage EC.

The impact of lymphadenectomy on survival endpoints in women with early stage uterine endometrioid carcinoma: A matched analysis.

OBJECTIVES: The role of pelvic lymphadenectomy (LA) in women with stage I endometrial carcinoma (EC) is controversial. The objective of this study is to investigate the prognostic impact of LA on survival endpoints in matched cohorts of women with stage I EC solely of endometrioid histology. Survival endpoints included recurrence-free (RFS), disease-specific (DSS) and overall survival (OS). METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with FIGO stage I EC who underwent hysterectomy with LA as part of their surgical staging between 1/1990 and 6/2015 were matched to a similar group that underwent hysterectomy without lymphadenectomy (NLA), based on stage, grade and adjuvant management. Univariate and multivariate modeling with Cox regression analysis was carried out for predictors of survival endpoints. RESULTS: 870 women constituted the study cohort (435 in each group). Median number of dissected lymph node in the LA group was 9 (range, 5-75). There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in regards to 5-year OS (87.2% for LA vs. 91.7% for NLA) (p=0.36), DSS 97.7% vs. 98% (p=0.54) and RFS (93.7% vs. 90% (p=0.08), respectively. Lymphadenectomy was not a predictor of any of the studied survival endpoints. On multivariate analysis for the entire cohort, older age, deep myometrial invasion and higher tumor grade were predictors of worse RFS. For DSS, higher tumor grade, lower uterine segment (LUS) involvement and FIGO stage IB were significant predictors of worse outcome. For OS, older age and LUS involvement were the only two independent predictors for shorter OS. CONCLUSIONS: After matching for FIGO stage, grade and adjuvant management, it appears that lymphadenectomy in women with stage I EC does not impact survival endpoints.