Engineering functional skin constructs: A quantitative comparison of three-dimensional bioprinting with traditional methods.

Tissue engineering has been successful in reproducing human skin equivalents while incorporating new approaches such as three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting. The latter method offers a plethora of advantages including increased production scale, ability to incorporate multiple cell types and printing on demand. However, the quality of printed skin equivalents compared to those developed manually has never been assessed. To leverage the benefits of this method, it is imperative that 3D-printed skin should be structurally and functionally similar to real human skin. Here, we developed four bilayered human skin epidermal-dermal equivalents: non-printed dermis and epidermis (NN), printed dermis and epidermis (PP), printed epidermis and non-printed dermis (PN), and non-printed epidermis and printed dermis (NP). The effects of printing induced shear stress [0.025 kPa (epidermis); 0.049 kPa (dermis)] were characterized both at the cellular and at the tissue level. At cellular level, no statistically significant differences in keratinocyte colony-forming efficiency (CFE) (p = 0.1641) were observed. In the case of fibroblasts, no significant differences in the cell alignment index (p < 0.1717) and their ability to contract collagen gel (p = 0.851) were detected. At the tissue levels, all the four skin equivalents were characterized using histological and immunohistochemical analysis with no significant differences found in either epidermal basal cell count, thickness of viable epidermis, and relative intensity of filaggrin and claudin-1. Our results demonstrated that 3D printing can achieve the same high-quality skin constructs as have been developed traditionally, thus opening new avenues for numerous high-throughput industrial and clinical applications.

Reconstructive Trends After Tissue-Expander Loss in Breast Reconstruction.

PURPOSE: Tissue-expander breast reconstruction (TEBR) is a common method of reconstruction after mastectomy but may result in complications that may necessitate removal. Although complications in TEBR have been well studied, there is a paucity of data regarding outcomes after tissue-expander loss. In this study, we examine the eventual reconstructive pathways and associated factors of patients who required tissue-expander removal after infection. METHODS: This retrospective study examines patients undergoing breast reconstruction at a single institution. Patients included underwent mastectomy, immediate TEBR, and subsequent tissue-expander loss. Patients who underwent autologous reconstruction after mastectomy or had successful TEBR were excluded. Patients were followed for an average of 7 years, with a minimum of 2 years and a maximum of 13 years. RESULTS: A total of 674 TEBR patients were initially screened, of which 60 patients (8.9%) required tissue-expander removal because of infection or skin necrosis. Thirty-one of these patients (group 1) did not complete reconstruction after initial tissue-expander loss, whereas the remaining 29 patients (group 2) underwent either TEBR or autologous reconstruction after tissue-expander loss. Group 1 had a significantly higher mean body mass index than group 2 (32.61 ± 8.88 vs 28.69 ± 5.84; P = 0.049) and also lived further away from our institution than group 2 (P = 0.052), which trended toward significance. There were otherwise no significant differences in demographics between the 2 groups.Among the 29 patients in group 2, 18 patients underwent a second TEBR (group 2a), and 11 patients underwent autologous reconstruction (group 2b). Patients in group 2b had a significantly greater mean number of complication related admissions (1.11 ± 0.323 vs 1.55 ± 0.688; P = 0.029) and also had higher occurrence of postmastectomy radiation therapy (16.7% vs 45.5%; P = 0.092), although this was not significant. There were otherwise no differences between the 2 groups. CONCLUSION: Our data demonstrate the trends in breast reconstruction decision making after initial tissue-expander loss. This study elucidates the factors associated with patients who undergo different reconstructive options. Further work is needed to delineate the specific reasons between the decision to pursue different reconstructive pathways among a larger cohort of patients.

Listeria monocytogenes triggers noncanonical autophagy upon phagocytosis, but avoids subsequent growth-restricting xenophagy.

Xenophagy is a selective macroautophagic process that protects the host cytosol by entrapping and delivering microbes to a degradative compartment. Both noncanonical autophagic pathways and xenophagy are activated by microbes during infection, but the relative importance and function of these distinct processes are not clear. In this study, we used bacterial and host mutants to dissect the contribution of autophagic processes responsible for bacterial growth restriction of Listeria monocytogenesL. monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular pathogen that escapes from phagosomes, grows in the host cytosol, and avoids autophagy by expressing three determinants of pathogenesis: two secreted phospholipases C (PLCs; PlcA and PlcB) and a surface protein (ActA). We found that shortly after phagocytosis, wild-type (WT) L. monocytogenes escaped from a noncanonical autophagic process that targets damaged vacuoles. During this process, the autophagy marker LC3 localized to single-membrane phagosomes independently of the ULK complex, which is required for initiation of macroautophagy. However, growth restriction of bacteria lacking PlcA, PlcB, and ActA required FIP200 and TBK1, both involved in the engulfment of microbes by xenophagy. Time-lapse video microscopy revealed that deposition of LC3 on L. monocytogenes-containing vacuoles via noncanonical autophagy had no apparent role in restricting bacterial growth and that, upon access to the host cytosol, WT L. monocytogenes utilized PLCs and ActA to avoid subsequent xenophagy. In conclusion, although noncanonical autophagy targets phagosomes, xenophagy was required to restrict the growth of L. monocytogenes, an intracellular pathogen that damages the entry vacuole.

Avoidance of autophagy mediated by PlcA or ActA is required for Listeria monocytogenes growth in macrophages.

Listeria monocytogenes is a facultative intracellular pathogen that escapes from phagosomes and grows in the cytosol of infected host cells. Most of the determinants that govern its intracellular life cycle are controlled by the transcription factor PrfA, including the pore-forming cytolysin listeriolysin O (LLO), two phospholipases C (PlcA and PlcB), and ActA. We constructed a strain that lacked PrfA but expressed LLO from a PrfA-independent promoter, thereby allowing the bacteria to gain access to the host cytosol. This strain did not grow efficiently in wild-type macrophages but grew normally in macrophages that lacked ATG5, a component of the autophagy LC3 conjugation system. This strain colocalized more with the autophagy marker LC3 (42% ± 7%) at 2 h postinfection, which constituted a 5-fold increase over the colocalization exhibited by the wild-type strain (8% ± 6%). While mutants lacking the PrfA-dependent virulence factor PlcA, PlcB, or ActA grew normally, a double mutant lacking both PlcA and ActA failed to grow in wild-type macrophages and colocalized more with LC3 (38% ± 5%). Coexpression of LLO and PlcA in a PrfA-negative strain was sufficient to restore intracellular growth and decrease the colocalization of the bacteria with LC3. In a cell-free assay, purified PlcA protein blocked LC3 lipidation, a key step in early autophagosome biogenesis, presumably by preventing the formation of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate (PI3P). The results of this study showed that avoidance of autophagy by L. monocytogenes primarily involves PlcA and ActA and that either one of these factors must be present for L. monocytogenes growth in macrophages.

The Molecular Evolution of Melanoma Distant Metastases.

The evolution of primary melanoma to lymph node and distant metastasis is incompletely understood. We examined the genomic diversity in melanoma progression in matched primary melanomas and lymph node and distant metastases from 17 patients. FISH analysis revealed cancer cell fractions with monotonic copy number alterations, including PHIP gain and PTEN loss, in the metastatic cascade. By contrast, the cancer cell fraction with copy number alterations for BPTF and MITF was reduced in lymph node metastases but increased in distant metastases. Separately, the cancer cell fraction with NCOA3 copy number alteration was comparable between primary tumors and lymph node metastases yet increased in distant metastases. These results suggest enrichment of the phosphoinositide 3-kinase and MITF pathways in the transition through the metastatic cascade. By contrast, next-generation sequencing analysis did not identify a consistent pattern of changes in variant allele frequency while revealing several intriguing findings, including decreased variant allele frequency in distant metastases and distinct drivers in lymph node versus distant metastases. These results provide evidence that distant melanoma metastasis does not always emanate from lymph node metastasis. These results enhance our understanding of clonal patterns of melanoma metastasis, with possible implications for targeted therapy and metastasis competency.

Perioperative Management of a Patient with Hemophilia C and Allergy to Fresh Frozen Plasma.

Hemophilia C is a rare bleeding disorder characterized by a deficiency in clotting factor XI (fXI) and has no standard of care for preoperative optimization before cardiac surgery. Normalization of fXI levels in patients with hemophilia C can be achieved with fresh frozen plasma (FFP), which sometimes results in allergic reactions. We present a case of a patient with hemophilia C requiring coronary artery bypass grafting surgery who developed an allergic reaction to FFP. Our report underscores the balance between thrombosis and bleeding risks when devising a perioperative plan for patients with hemophilia C.

Autologous Skin Grafts, versus Tissue-engineered Skin Constructs: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

For over 100 years, autologous skin grafts have remained the gold standard for the reconstruction of wounds but are limited in availability. Acellular tissue-engineered skin constructs (acellular TCs) and cellular tissue-engineered skin constructs (cellular TCs) may address these limitations. This systematic review and meta-analysis compare outcomes between them. Methods: A systematic review was conducted using PRISMA guidelines, querying MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane to assess graft incorporation, failure, and wound healing. Case reports/series, reviews, in vitro/in vivo work, non-English articles or articles without full text were excluded. Results: Sixty-six articles encompassing 4076 patients were included. No significant differences were found between graft failure rates (P = 0.07) and mean difference of percent reepithelialization (p = 0.92) when split-thickness skin grafts were applied alone versus co-grafted with acellular TCs. Similar mean Vancouver Scar Scale was found for these two groups (p = 0.09). Twenty-one studies used at least one cellular TC. Weighted averages from pooled results did not reveal statistically significant differences in mean reepithelialization or failure rates for epidermal cellular TCs compared with split-thickness skin grafts (p = 0.55). Conclusions: This systematic review is the first to illustrate comparable functional and wound healing outcomes between split-thickness skin grafts alone and those co-grafted with acellular TCs. The use of cellular TCs seems promising from preliminary findings. However, these results are limited in clinical applicability due to the heterogeneity of study data, and further level 1 evidence is required to determine the safety and efficacy of these constructs.

Alternative uses of ustekinumab for non-indicated dermatological conditions: a systematic review.

Ustekinumab is approved for the treatment of psoriasis and Crohn's disease. Because many dermatological conditions are due to immune-mediated development, ustekinumab may be effective in other conditions. A systematic review of the off-label uses of ustekinumab, as well as on-label adverse effect, was performed, reporting on clinical improvement. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched for studies regarding ustekinumab treatment of rativa (HS), lichen planus (LP), pyoderma gangrenosum (PG), pityriasis rubra pilaris (PRP), cutalopecia areata (AA), atopic dermatitis (AD), Bechet's disease, bullous pemphigoid (BP), hidradenitis suppuaneous sarcoidosis, cutaneous systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and vitiligo. Descriptive statistics were performed. 74 articles of 4596 screened were included, and reported on 212 patients receiving ustekinumab treatment. Across all studies, ustekinumab showed promise in treating patients: AA (10/12 patients; 83.3% improvement), AD (28/74 patients; 37.8% improvement), HS (42/52 patients; 80.8% improvement), and PRP (25/27 patients; 92.6% improvement), among others. Adverse events were noted with the use of ustekinumab, including development of AA (four patients), AD (three patients), and BP (four patients), among others. Ustekinumab can be a promising option for patients with dermatological conditions refractory to traditional therapies. Adverse events must be monitored in certain patients.

Smartwatch inertial sensors continuously monitor real-world motor fluctuations in Parkinson's disease.

Longitudinal, remote monitoring of motor symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) could enable more precise treatment decisions. We developed the Motor fluctuations Monitor for Parkinson's Disease (MM4PD), an ambulatory monitoring system that used smartwatch inertial sensors to continuously track fluctuations in resting tremor and dyskinesia. We designed and validated MM4PD in 343 participants with PD, including a longitudinal study of up to 6 months in a 225-subject cohort. MM4PD measurements correlated to clinical evaluations of tremor severity (ρ = 0.80) and mapped to expert ratings of dyskinesia presence (P < 0.001) during in-clinic tasks. MM4PD captured symptom changes in response to treatment that matched the clinician's expectations in 94% of evaluated subjects. In the remaining 6% of cases, symptom data from MM4PD identified opportunities to make improvements in pharmacologic strategy. These results demonstrate the promise of MM4PD as a tool to support patient-clinician communication, medication titration, and clinical trial design.