Multiorgan involvement and circulating IgG1 predict hypocomplementaemia in IgG4-related disease.

OBJECTIVES: Hypocomplementaemia is common in patients with IgG4-related disease (IgG4-RD). We aimed to determine the IgG4-RD features associated with hypocomplementaemia and investigate mechanisms of complement activation in this disease. METHODS: We performed a single-centre cross-sectional study of 279 patients who fulfilled the IgG4-RD classification criteria, using unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted logistic regression to identify factors associated with hypocomplementaemia. RESULTS: Hypocomplementaemia was observed in 90 (32%) patients. In the unadjusted model, the number of organs involved (OR 1.42, 95% CI 1.23 to 1.63) and involvement of the lymph nodes (OR 3.87, 95% CI 2.19 to 6.86), lungs (OR 3.81, 95% CI 2.10 to 6.89), pancreas (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.001 to 2.76), liver (OR 2.73, 95% CI 1.17 to 6.36) and kidneys (OR 2.48, 95% CI 1.47 to 4.18) were each associated with hypocomplementaemia. After adjusting for age, sex and number of organs involved, only lymph node (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.36 to 4.91) and lung (OR 2.56, 95% CI 1.35 to 4.89) involvement remained associated with hypocomplementaemia while the association with renal involvement was attenuated (OR 1.6, 95% CI 0.92 to 2.98). Fibrotic disease manifestations (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21 to 0.87) and lacrimal gland involvement (OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.999) were inversely associated with hypocomplementaemia in the adjusted analysis. Hypocomplementaemia was associated with higher concentrations of all IgG subclasses and IgE (all p<0.05). After adjusting for serum IgG1 and IgG3, only IgG1 but not IgG4 remained strongly associated with hypocomplementaemia. CONCLUSIONS: Hypocomplementaemia in IgG4-RD is not unique to patients with renal involvement and may reflect the extent of disease. IgG1 independently correlates with hypocomplementaemia in IgG4-RD, but IgG4 does not. Complement activation is likely involved in IgG4-RD pathophysiology.

Early experience of COVID-19 vaccination in adults with systemic rheumatic diseases: results from the COVID-19 Global Rheumatology Alliance Vaccine Survey.

BACKGROUND: We describe the early experiences of adults with systemic rheumatic disease who received the COVID-19 vaccine. METHODS: From 2 April to 30 April 2021, we conducted an online, international survey of adults with systemic rheumatic disease who received COVID-19 vaccination. We collected patient-reported data on clinician communication, beliefs and intent about discontinuing disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) around the time of vaccination, and patient-reported adverse events after vaccination. RESULTS: We analysed 2860 adults with systemic rheumatic diseases who received COVID-19 vaccination (mean age 55.3 years, 86.7% female, 86.3% white). Types of COVID-19 vaccines were Pfizer-BioNTech (53.2%), Oxford/AstraZeneca (22.6%), Moderna (21.3%), Janssen/Johnson & Johnson (1.7%) and others (1.2%). The most common rheumatic disease was rheumatoid arthritis (42.3%), and 81.2% of respondents were on a DMARD. The majority (81.9%) reported communicating with clinicians about vaccination. Most (66.9%) were willing to temporarily discontinue DMARDs to improve vaccine efficacy, although many (44.3%) were concerned about rheumatic disease flares. After vaccination, the most reported patient-reported adverse events were fatigue/somnolence (33.4%), headache (27.7%), muscle/joint pains (22.8%) and fever/chills (19.9%). Rheumatic disease flares that required medication changes occurred in 4.6%. CONCLUSION: Among adults with systemic rheumatic disease who received COVID-19 vaccination, patient-reported adverse events were typical of those reported in the general population. Most patients were willing to temporarily discontinue DMARDs to improve vaccine efficacy. The relatively low frequency of rheumatic disease flare requiring medications was reassuring.