Long-term Results of Partial Release Versus Nonrelease of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament at Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: Minimum 15-Year Follow-up.

The goal of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic results of posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) partial release and PCL nonrelease in performing cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA) for a long-term follow-up period of greater than 15 years. A total of 224 patients underwent CR-TKA in our hospital from June 1996 to April 2002 with greater than 15 years of follow-up. We divided the subjects into 2 groups based on release of the PCL. Group 1 was the PCL partial release group (88 cases), and group 2 was the PCL nonrelease group (136 cases). The mean follow-up period was 16.8 years (range, 15.5-19.5 years). We compared the clinical results by measuring the Knee Society Score (KSS), Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis (WOMAC) score preoperatively and at the last follow-up. For radiologic results, the Knee Society Total Knee Arthroplasty Roentgenographic Evaluation and Scoring System was used and stress radiographs were obtained at the last follow-up to evaluate PCL function. There was no statistically meaningful difference in radiologic and clinical results between the 2 groups. Radiolucent lines were found for 13 patients radiologically (6 in group 1 and 7 in group 2). No instability as a result of PCL insufficiency required revision surgery on stress radiography at the last follow-up. If an appropriate procedure is performed according to PCL function intraoperatively, CR-TKA can produce a satisfactory result on long-term follow-up. [Orthopedics. 2022;45(4):233-238.].

Outcomes of Wedge Wing in the Lag Screw for Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures in Elderly Patients.

PURPOSE: To evaluate clinical-functional and radiologic outcomes of elderly patients with an unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture treated with a wedge wing in the lag screw. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-eight patients treated with the Dyna Locking Trochanteric nail (DLT nail) to resolve an unstable intertrochanteric femur fracture were reviewed retrospectively. Based on AO/OTA classification, Fracture 31-A2 (34 cases) and 31-A3 (14 cases) were included in the analysis. We measured the femoral neck-shaft angle, tip-apex distance (TAD), Cleveland index, sliding distance of the lag screw, and time to the fracture union. The Harris Hip Score and Paker and Palmer's mobility score for clinical evaluation were used. RESULTS: The mean follow-up period was 21.4 months (range, 12-34 months). The postoperative state of reduction was good in 28 cases and acceptable in 20 cases. The mean TAD was 20.5 mm. The position of the lag screw was center-center in 30 cases and center-inferior in 18 cases. The mean sliding distance of the lag screw was 3.4 mm at the last follow-up. The mean union time was 4.5 months. Two cases had complications which included a cut-out (1 case) and non-union (1 case). The mean Harris Hip Score was 86.5±8.3 (range, 76-90). Walking ability in 34 of the cases (70.8%) at last follow-up was similar to that prior to fracture. CONCLUSION: Functional and radiological outcomes are satisfactory using the DLT nail in the treatment of elderly patients with unstable intertrochanteric fractures; however, wedge wing in the lag screw does not prevent implant-related complications.

Results of Decompression Alone in Patients with Lumbar Spinal Stenosis and Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: A Minimum 5-Year Follow-up.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment consisting of decompression and fusion is generally known to produce good clinical results for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis. However, the clinical outcome of decompression alone, without fusion, remains unclear, and long-term follow-up results are scarce. This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the 5-year clinical results of decompression only in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis. METHODS: Among the patients diagnosed as having lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis, 36 patients who underwent decompression without fusion and were followed up for minimum 5 years were included in this study. The average follow-up period was 7.2 years, and the mean age of patients was 63.2 years. Visual analog scale (VAS) score and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were investigated pre- and postoperatively, and also radiologic displacement and instability were measured. In addition, patients who needed fusion or redecompression at the decompression site postoperatively were also investigated. RESULTS: VAS score and ODI improved from an average of 7.8 points and 57 points preoperatively, respectively, to 1.4 points and 19 points at 5 years postoperatively, respectively. The degree of radiologic displacement increased from an average of 5.1 mm preoperatively to 6.4 mm at the final follow-up. Radiological instability was detected in five patients. Two patients (9.5%) required fusion. CONCLUSIONS: The long-term follow-up results revealed that satisfactory clinical outcomes were obtained with decompression alone, without fusion, for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.