Long-term survival in triple-vessel disease: Hybrid coronary revascularization compared to contemporary revascularization methods.

BACKGROUND: Hybrid coronary revascularization (HCR) constitutes a left internal mammary artery graft to the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery, coupled with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for non-LAD lesions. This management strategy is not commonly offered to patients with complex multivessel disease. Our objective was to evaluate 8-year survival in patients with triple-vessel disease (TVD) treated by HCR, compared with that of concurrent matched patients managed by traditional coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or multivessel PCI. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of 4805 patients with TVD who presented between January 2009 and December 2016. A cohort of 100 patients who underwent HCR were propensity-matched with patients treated by CABG or multivessel PCI. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality at 8 years. RESULTS: Patients with TVD who underwent HCR had similar 8-year mortality (5.0%) as did those with CABG (4.0%) or multivessel PCI (9.0%). A composite endpoint of death, repeat revascularization, and new myocardial infarction, was not significantly different between patient groups (HCR 21.0% vs CABG 15.0%, P = .36; HCR 21.0% vs PCI 25.0%, P = .60). Despite a higher baseline synergy between percutaneous coronary intervention with taxus and cardiac surgery(SYNTAX) score, HCR was able to achieve a lower residual SYNTAX score than multivessel PCI (P = .001). CONCLUSIONS: In select patients with TVD, long-term survival and FREEDOM from major adverse cardiovascular events after HCR are similar to that seen after traditional CABG or multivessel PCI. HCR should be considered for patients with multivessel disease, presuming a low residual SYNTAX score can be achieved.

Timing of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Therapeutic Hypothermia in Patients With ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest.

The American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines include a Class 1 recommendation to initiate therapeutic hypothermia (TH) in comatose patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) with an initial shockable rhythm who have achieved return of spontaneous circulation. There is also a Class 1 recommendation for immediate angiography in these patients whose initial electrocardiography shows ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, due to a lack of clinical trials evaluating these patients who have received both percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and TH, controversy remains regarding whether the two can be safely combined. Furthermore, in patients who receive TH and PCI, another question to address is which therapy to initiate first. This article focuses on how best to manage comatose OHCA survivors who have an initial shockable rhythm and STEMI.

Failed repeated thrombolysis requiring left ventricular assist device pump exchange.

A 51-year-old male with untreated hepatitis C infection, cirrhosis, and dilated cardiomyopathy with a HeartMate II LVAD presented with right heart failure and cardiogenic shock, INR of 7, hemolysis, and renal failure. Acute LVAD thrombosis was suspected. Alteplase was injected into the inflow cannula of the LVAD with little effect. Intravenous alteplase was given but failed to restore an adequate pump output, resulting in the need for emergency pump exchange. The patient had an uncomplicated postoperative recovery and was discharged uneventfully. Inspection of the pump identified a thrombus wedged between the spines of the impeller. Our case highlights the challenges in managing pump thrombosis which is often resistant to thrombolysis and may instead rely upon prompt surgical intervention to be resolved.

Comparison of six risk scores in patients with triple vessel coronary artery disease undergoing PCI: competing factors influence mortality, myocardial infarction, and target lesion revascularization.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the discriminatory value of differing risk scores for predicting clinical outcomes following PCI in routine practice. BACKGROUND: Various risk scores predict outcomes after PCI. However, these scores consider markedly different factors, from purely anatomical (SYNTAX risk score [SRS]) to purely clinical (ACEF, modified ACEF [ACEFmod], NCDR), while other scores combine both elements (Clinical SYNTAX score [CSS], NY State Risk Score [NYSRS]). METHODS: Patients with triple vessel and/or LM disease with 12 month follow-up were studied from a single center PCI registry. Exclusion criteria included STEMI presentation, prior revascularization and shock. Clinical events at 12 months were compared to baseline risk scores, according to score tertiles and area under receiver-operating-characteristic curves (AUC). RESULTS: We identified 584 eligible patients (69.8±12.3yrs, 405 males). All scores were predictive of mortality, with the SRS being least predictive (AUC=0.66). The most accurate scores for mortality were the CSS and ACEF (AUC=0.76 for both: P = 0.019 and 0.08 vs. SRS, respectively). For TLR, while the SRS trended toward being positively predictive (P = 0.075), several scores trended towards a negative association, which reached significance for the NCDR (P = 0.045). The SRS and CSS were the only scores predictive of MI (both P < 0.05). No score was particularly accurate for predicting MACE (death+MI+TLR), with AUCs ranging from 0.53 (NCDR) to 0.63 (SRS). CONCLUSIONS: Competing factors influence mortality, MI and TLR after PCI. An increasing burden of comorbidities is associated with mortality, whereas anatomical complexity predicts MI. By combining these outcomes to predict MACE, all scores show reduced utility.

Female gender and mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a large registry.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate if previously reported gender-based outcome disparities following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are applicable in a large and racially-diverse cohort in the drug eluting stent (DES) era. BACKGROUND: It is generally believed that women suffer inferior outcomes compared to men after PCI. However, various strategies have evolved that may have mitigated this imbalance, including improved medical therapy, attention to risk-factors, and procedural advances of PCI including DES. METHODS: We identified 13,752 patients (4,761 female, 34.6%) with complete follow-up data who underwent de novo lesion PCI from 04/2003 to 04/2009. Relevant data were extracted from an IRB-approved registry. RESULTS: Compared to males, females were significantly older (69.0 vs. 64.8 years) and more frequently from a minority or non-Caucasian background. Females smoked less, but more were hypertensive and/or diabetic. Women had higher HDL, but also higher LDL cholesterol levels. More women presented with an unstable coronary syndrome and required left anterior descending artery PCI. While unadjusted post-PCI mortality rates were higher in females versus males (30 days, 1.3 vs. 0.8%, P = 0.009; 1 year, 6.1 vs. 4.8%, P = 0.001; 3 year, 10.4 vs. 8.4%, P < 0.0001), multivariable regression analyses failed to identify female gender as an independent predictor of mortality. Propensity-adjusted modeling confirmed that females were not at intrinsically higher risk for mortality after PCI. CONCLUSIONS: Females undergoing PCI exhibit more comorbidities and adverse prognostic factors than males. However, risk-adjusted analyses identified that gender is not an independent predictor of mortality after PCI in the DES era.

Minimally invasive coronary bypass versus percutaneous coronary intervention for isolated complex stenosis of the left anterior descending coronary artery.

OBJECTIVE: Debate continues as to the optimal minimally invasive treatment modality for complex disease of the left anterior descending coronary artery, with advocates for both robotic-assisted minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass and percutaneous coronary intervention with a drug-eluting stent. We analyzed the midterm outcomes of patients with isolated left anterior descending disease, revascularized by minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass or drug-eluting stent percutaneous coronary intervention, focusing on those with complex lesion anatomy. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of all patients who underwent coronary revascularization between January 2008 and December 2016. From this population, 158 propensity-matched pairs of patients were generated from 158 individuals who underwent minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass for isolated complex left anterior descending disease and from 373 patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention using a second-generation drug-eluting stent. Midterm survival and incidence of repeat left anterior descending intervention were analyzed for both patient groups. RESULTS: Overall 9-year survival was not significantly different between patient groups both before and after propensity matching. Midterm mortality in the matched minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass group was low, irrespective of patient risk profile. By contrast, advanced age (hazard ratio, 1.10; P = .012) and obesity (hazard ratio, 1.09; P = .044) predicted increased late death after drug-eluting stent percutaneous coronary intervention among matched patients. Patients who underwent minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass were significantly less likely to require repeat left anterior descending revascularization than those who had percutaneous coronary intervention, both before and after propensity matching. Smaller stent diameter in drug-eluting stent percutaneous coronary intervention was associated with increased left anterior descending reintervention (hazard ratio, 3.53; P = .005). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with complex disease of the left anterior descending artery, both minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass and percutaneous coronary intervention are associated with similar excellent intermediate-term survival, although reintervention requirements are lower after surgery.

Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass: An Evolving Paradigm Over the Past 25 Years.

OBJECTIVE: We have routinely utilized minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass (MIDCAB) for revascularization of the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery. We examined how this procedure has evolved. METHODS: A retrospective review was undertaken of 2,283 consecutive patients who underwent MIDCAB between 1997 and 2021. Patients were divided into 3 groups: group A from 1997 to 2002 (n = 751, 32.9%), group B from 2003 to 2009 (n = 452, 19.8%), and group C from 2009 to 2021 (n = 1,080, 47.3%). Risk profiles and short-term outcomes were analyzed for the entire cohort and for 293 propensity-matched patients drawn from each group. RESULTS: The left internal mammary artery was harvested open in group A but with robotic assistance in group C. Thirty-day mortality was higher in group A versus group C (12 deaths, 1.6% vs 5 deaths, 0.5%, P = 0.044); this difference was negated after propensity matching. Group A had more comorbidities than group C, including peripheral vascular disease (17.7% vs 10.0%, P < 0.001), congestive heart failure (39.6% vs 18.0%, P < 0.001), and a history of stroke (17.9% vs 10.0%, P < 0.001), although diabetes mellitus was more common in group C (51.4% vs 31.0%, P < 0.001). Stroke was greater in group A (1.2% vs 0.0% vs 0.2%, respectively, P = 0.004), as was the need for prolonged ventilation (3.6% vs 0.2% vs 0.9%, respectively, P < 0.001), before and after propensity matching. CONCLUSIONS: MIDCAB patients had less comorbidities than in the past. Robot-assisted MIDCAB was associated with lower stroke risk.

Recognition and Management of Acute Purpura Fulminans: A Case Report of a Complication of Neisseria meningitidis Bacteremia.

Purpura fulminans (PF) is a rare, potentially fatal complication of disseminated intravascular coagulation that is commonly associated with severe bacterial infections such as those caused by the bacterium Neisseria meningitidis. With the advent of vaccination, meningococcal disease has become infrequent, with a reported incidence of 1 case per 100,000 people per year. PF is an even rarer phenomenon that is only found in approximately 10 to 20% of patients with meningococcal septicemia. PF can cause irreversible tissue necrosis within 48 hours and, in severe cases, death. Early recognition is crucial as PF has a mortality rate as high as 60% in patients with meningococcal disease. Prompt recognition, treatment of the underlying cause, vigorous skin care, and multispecialty collaboration are required for optimal management of PF, though morbidity and mortality remain high as there is no cure for adult PF. We present a case of acute PF in a patient who presented with septic shock secondary to Neisseria bacteremia.

Nivolumab-Induced Toxic Epidermal Necrolysis: Rare but Fatal Complication of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy.

Toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) is a rare, but potentially fatal dermatological emergency most commonly caused by medication exposure. It is characterized by skin desquamation affecting over 30% of the body, and it remains a fatal condition with a high mortality rate. Nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor used in the treatment of various types of malignancies, has been linked to TEN. Nivolumab-induced TEN is a rare phenomenon with a low incidence rate in patients treated with a single-agent immune checkpoint inhibitor, but it has a high mortality rate that exceeds non-nivolumab-induced TEN. Nivolumab-induced TEN can present with many potential complications such as hemodynamic instability from excessive fluid loss, sepsis from bacterial superinfection, and disseminated intravascular coagulation. Due to its high mortality rate, prompt recognition of the condition, immediate withdrawal of the offending drug(s), vigorous skin care, multispecialty collaboration, and close monitoring of complications is needed. We present a case of nivolumab-induced TEN in an elderly male with a history of hepatocellular carcinoma who presented with acute-onset skin desquamation after nivolumab initiation.

Serum creatinine ratio: a novel predictor of mortality after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with normal and abnormal renal function.

UNLABELLED: The occurrence of contrast induced nephropathy (CIN) is associated with increased mortality after percutaneous revascularization procedures. However, the exact correlation between various levels of creatinine elevation relative to the baseline and subsequent mortality in patients with chronic renal insufficiency (CRI) is not well established. In addition, the relationship between elevated postprocedural creatinine and ensuing mortality in patients with normal baseline renal function needs to be investigated. METHODS: All percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) patients (n = 12,997) were analyzed for any rise in serum creatinine (SCr): CRI group (BSC > or = 1.5 mg/dl) (n = 1,853) and normal baseline renal function (NBR BSC < 1.5 mg/dl) group (n = 11,144). Patients in each group were analyzed for any elevation in SCr postprocedure and subdivided based on the SCr ratio [peak SCr/Baseline creatinine (BSC)] of <1.25, 1.25-1.5, and >1.5. The overall incidence of CIN (defined as an increment of 25% over baseline creatinine) was 5.9%: 11.3% in the CRI group versus 5.1% in normal BSC group (P < 0.01). Recursive partitioning and Cox hazard modeling were used to assess significant variables associated with mortality within 1 year. Only serum creatinine ratio (SCrR) > 1.5 correlated with increased mortality in both CRI group as well as normal BSC group. CONCLUSIONS: SCrR > 1.5 predicts mortality at 1 year after PCI. The association between SCrR > 1.5 and increased mortality at follow-up is observed in patients with CRI as well as normal baseline renal function. SCrR may thus serve as a useful clinical tool for risk stratification and prognostication of patients after PCI.

Changing outcomes and treatment strategies for wire induced coronary perforations in the era of bivalirudin use.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study is to analyze the clinical outcomes and treatment strategies of coronary wire perforations (WPs) in the era of heparin use compared to the era of bivalirudin use. BACKGROUND: Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) advances have led to progressive decrease in complications. Therefore, complex coronary lesions such as chronic total occlusions and calcified lesions are being attempted with stiff/hydrophilic wires with resultant higher incidence of coronary WP. METHODS: A single-center retrospective data analysis of coronary perforation (CP) for the last 4 years with review of coronary angiograms was done and WPs were identified. A simple classification scheme based on angiographic appearance of CP was made: Type I ("myocardial stain," with no frank dye extravasation) and type II ("myocardial fan," with dye extravasation to pericardial cavity or cardiac chambers). RESULTS: Overall incidence of CP was 0.49% (82/16,859). Of these 50 (61%) were caused by WP; 30 occurred with heparin use (Group A) and 20 with bivalirudin use (Group B). WPs always occurred in type B2/C lesions (100%) and commonly with use of hydrophilic guidewires (70%). Major adverse cardiac events and cardiac tamponade were frequent in group A (50%) and none in group B (0%); P < 0.01. All WP in group B responded to stopping anticoagulation and prolonged balloon inflation, while group A type II perforations frequently required additional interventions (pericardiocentesis, coil embolization). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac tamponade and major adverse cardiac events from WPs were less frequent with bivalirudin use compared to heparin use. This beneficial effect of bivalirudin may be explained on the basis of its short half-life and reversible thrombin inhibition property. Therefore, bivalirudin may offer a safer alternative for anticoagulation in complex PCI.

Diminished benefits of drug-eluting stents versus bare metal stents in patients with severe renal insufficiency.

BACKGROUND: Since their introduction, the use of drug-eluting stents (DES) has increasingly become standard practice due to their decreased rates of in-stent restenosis and target lesion revascularization (TLR) rates in comparison to bare metal stents (BMS). However, these benefits have not been reproduced in patients with severe renal disease (SRD). This study compared TLR rates in patients with severe renal insufficiency treated with DES vs. BMS. METHODS: Between 2003 and 2006, we collected data on 6,220 consecutive patients receiving either DES or BMS. Both groups were similar in angiographic and clinical variables. TLR rates at 270 days and 1 year were then compared between patients receiving DES or BMS with varying creatinine clearance (CrCl). RESULTS: At 1 year after PCI, TLR rates were significantly lower for DES in patients with CrCl >60 (5 vs. 9.3%; p < 0.0001). However, in patients with CrCl <40 ml/min or on dialysis there was no significant difference in TLR rates for DES vs. BMS. CONCLUSION: While DES showed improved clinical outcomes in patients with normal and mildly impaired renal function, they showed no benefit over BMS in patients with moderate to severe renal insufficiency. Coupled with the possibly increased risk of late stent thrombosis with DES, BMS may be a more appropriate and safer stent in this population.

Bolus-only versus bolus + infusion of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: The present study was done to analyze if glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) bolus-only will reduce vascular/bleeding complications and cost with similar major adverse cardiac events (MACE) when compared with GPI bolus + infusion. Evidence-based therapy of GPI inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) incorporates intravenous bolus followed by 12 to 18 hours of infusion. However, GPI bolus + infusion may increase vascular/bleeding complications and may not reduce MACE when compared with GPI bolus-only. METHODS: From January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2004, 2,629 consecutive patients received GPI during PCI at a single center. Of these, 1,064 patients received GPI bolus + infusion in 2003 and were compared with 1,565 patients that received GPI bolus-only in 2004. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. RESULTS: Patients receiving GPI bolus-only had reduced vascular/bleeding complications when compared with bolus + infusion (4.9% vs 7%, P < .05, odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.89). Furthermore, ischemic complications were similar in both groups, including periprocedural creatine kinase-MB enzyme release (12.8% vs 15.3%, P = NS), MACE at 30 days (3.2% vs 3%, P = NS), and death and myocardial infarction at 1 year (7.1% vs 7.8%, P = NS). In addition, GPI bolus-only reduced cost in US dollars ($323 vs $706, P < .001) and increased ambulatory PCI (13.1% vs 3.2%, P < .01), with reduced length of stay (1.1 vs 1.6 days, P < .01), when compared with GPI bolus + infusion. CONCLUSIONS: Glycoprotein inhibitor bolus-only reduces vascular/bleeding complications with similar MACE and reduced cost when compared with GPI bolus + infusion. In addition, GPI bolus-only improved ambulatory PCI and reduced length of stay. These results are consistent with a safer and cost-effective strategy for bolus-only when GPI therapy is considered during PCI.

Comparison of coronary flow reserve and fractional flow reserve in patients with versus without diabetes mellitus and having elective percutaneous coronary intervention and abciximab therapy (from the PREDICT Trial).

Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) have poor long-term outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) partly because of microvascular disease and distal embolization. Microvascular obstruction can be assessed by measuring coronary flow reserve (CFR). The Prediction of CK-MB RElease During Successful Stenting Correlating with Indicators of Microvascular ObstruCTion (PREDICT) trial compared the CFR in patients with versus without DM during PCI. Patients undergoing elective PCI were prospectively enrolled according to diabetic (n = 36) and nondiabetic (n = 36) status. All patients received drug-eluting stent with abciximab and were followed for 30-day major adverse cardiac events. CFR and FFR (fractional flow reserve) before and after stenting were measured before and after intracoronary adenosine bolus. Procedural success, MB enzyme of creatine-kinase (CK-MB), troponin I, and high-sensitive C-reactive protein elevation, vascular complications, and major adverse cardiac events were not different. FFR before stenting was 0.77 +/- 0.03 in patients with DM versus 0.76 +/- 0.02 in patients without DM (p = 0.69). FFR after stenting was 0.97 +/- 0.03 and 0.99 +/- 0.01 (p = 0.26), respectively. CFR before stenting was 1.36 +/- 0.31 in patients with DM versus 1.49 +/- 0.25 in patients without DM (p = 0.064). However, CFR after stenting was significantly lower in patients with versus without DM (1.89 +/- 0.30 versus 2.44 +/- 0.67, p <0.001, respectively). CFR after stenting only moderately correlated with CK-MB and high-sensitive C-reactive protein after PCI but did not correlate with 30-day major adverse cardiac events. In conclusion, patients with DM have significantly lower CFR after stenting despite equivalent FFR and myonecrosis compared with patients without DM, indicating greater microvascular obstruction after PCI despite abciximab.

Outcome of intracoronary stenting after failed maximal medical therapy in patients with symptomatic myocardial bridge.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of the present study was to study the outcome of coronary stenting in patients with symptomatic myocardial bridging refractory to standard medical therapy. BACKGROUND: Medical therapy constitutes the first line treatment for patients with symptomatic myocardial bridge, surgical correction may be offered to select patients with refractory symptoms. Limited data exists on the outcome of coronary stenting in this patient cohort. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients with symptoms of angina, documented myocardial ischemia and angiographically documented myocardial bridge of the left anterior descending artery (defined as [mt]50% systolic compression) were identified retrospectively. Seventeen (59%) patients responded to maximized medical therapy (mean age 51 +/- 16 years, range 29-80, 7 female) and 12 (41%) patients received coronary stents following a failed attempt of minimum 3 months of maximal medical therapy (mean age 49 +/- 15 years, range 32-76 years, 5 females). Medical therapy responders were compared with intracoronary stent group for recurrent severe angina, target vessel revascularization (TVR), myocardial infarction (MI), and death at follow-up. RESULTS: Intracoronary stents were placed in all patients successfully. The incidence of recurrent severe angina and TVR were significantly greater in the stent group (P = 0.04) while MI and death in two groups were similar at mean follow-up of 15 +/- 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary stent placement for medically refractory symptomatic myocardial bridge failed to relieve severe angina and is associated with high clinical restenosis and hence should be avoided.

Short- and intermediate-term outcomes of hybrid coronary revascularization for double-vessel disease.

OBJECTIVE: We sought to evaluate midterm survival data and resource use for patients who received hybrid coronary revascularization for 2-vessel coronary disease (robotic-assisted left internal thoracic artery graft to left anterior descending coronary artery (minimally invasive direct coronary artery bypass), coupled with a stent to the circumflex or right coronary artery), compared with a concurrent cohort who had traditional coronary artery bypass grafting. METHODS: A comprehensive retrospective review was undertaken of our prospectively collected database from January 2009 to December 2016. We propensity matched 207 patients who underwent hybrid coronary revascularization for double-vessel disease with patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting. Eight-year survival data were obtained from the National Death Index. RESULTS: Thirty-day mortality was 1 patient (0.5%) in each of the hybrid coronary revascularization and coronary artery bypass grafting groups. Eight-year survival for the hybrid coronary revascularization group was 187 of 207 patients (90.3%) compared with 182 of 207 patients (87.9%) for the coronary artery bypass grafting cohort. End-stage renal disease independently predicted late mortality in all patients (overall hazard ratio, 5.60, P < .001; hybrid coronary revascularization hazard ratio, 5.58, P = .002; coronary artery bypass grafting hazard ratio, 4.59, P = .006). Female patients who underwent hybrid coronary revascularization had a higher incidence of late death (hazard ratio, 2.47, P = .05). Length of stay and perioperative transfusion requirements were lower in the hybrid coronary revascularization group (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Hybrid coronary revascularization for double-vessel coronary disease is associated with similar short-term outcomes and intermediate-term survival as traditional coronary artery bypass grafting. Hybrid coronary revascularization is associated with lower transfusion requirements and a shorter length of stay than coronary artery bypass grafting.

Comparison of platelet function and morphology in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention receiving bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin versus clopidogrel pretreatment and bivalirudin.

We hypothesized that direct thrombin inhibition could attenuate platelet activation and release of soluble CD40 ligand (sCD40L), a marker of inflammation, during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). To assess platelet function under flow conditions with bivalirudin versus unfractionated heparin (UFH), we employed the cone and plate(let) analyzer (CPA) assay in drug-spiked blood samples from volunteers (n = 3) in vitro, and then in PCI patients who received bivalirudin alone (n = 20), UFH alone (n = 15), and clopidogrel pretreatment plus bivalirudin (n = 15). Scanning electron microscopy was employed to image bivalirudin or UFH-treated platelets to determine whether platelet function observations had a morphologic explanation. Enzyme immunoassay was used to measure sCD40L levels in PCI patients. In vitro, bivalirudin decreased platelet surface coverage; UFH increased platelet surface coverage. In PCI patients, bivalirudin alone decreased platelet surface coverage, UFH alone increased platelet surface coverage, and clopidogrel pretreatment plus bivalirudin additively reduced platelet surface coverage. Unlike UFH, bivalirudin did not activate platelets in SEM studies. Bivalirudin alone or coupled with clopidogrel significantly reduced plasma sCD40L in PCI patients. In conclusion, our findings suggest that under flow conditions, bivalirudin alone or coupled with clopidogrel may have an antiplatelet effect versus UFH alone during PCI. These data suggest that bivalirudin and UFH may confer an anti-inflammatory effect by reducing sCD40L during PCI.

Therapy insight: how changes in renal function with increasing age affect cardiovascular drug prescribing.

Age is well recognized as a powerful prognostic factor in the setting of cardiovascular disease. With the aging of the US population, it is projected that more than 50 million people will be aged over 65 years by the year 2020. This growing elderly population has increased rates of morbidity and mortality owing to cardiovascular disease; however, proven therapies for prevention and treatment are often underused in older patients, largely because physicians perceive them as being frail and have limited understanding of age-related unique adverse and therapeutic effects. Advancing age is associated with a number of physiologic and pathophysiologic changes that impact the toxic effects, efficacy and dosing of many medications. Decreases in lean muscle mass affect the volume of distribution, and reductions in hepatic function affect the metabolism of many medications. Age-related reductions in renal function might have the most profound impact on the safety profile and dosing of medications in elderly patients. The strong association between renal and cardiovascular disease makes recognition of renal dysfunction and appropriate dose adjustment particularly important in elderly patients with cardiovascular disease. This article reviews current approaches to the estimation of renal function, and unique considerations related to prescribing medication for elderly patients with concomitant renal and cardiovascular disease.

Vascular closure devices.

This article summarizes the vascular closure device technologies that are available to physicians who perform percutaneous catheter-based procedures.

Refractory angina pectoris: mechanism and therapeutic options.

As the survival of patients with primary coronary events continues to increase, the number of patients presenting with coronary artery disease unsuitable to further revascularization techniques and symptoms refractory to medical therapy also continues to rise. The aims of this review were to define the population of patients with refractory angina pectoris and to present the therapeutic options currently available for this condition. Refractory angina pectoris is defined, and traditional medical therapies are discussed. Then, current therapeutic options for patients with refractory angina are extensively reviewed. A multitude of therapeutic options exist for patients with refractory angina pectoris. Small, uncontrolled studies have shown a potential benefit for additional antiplatelet and antithrombotic therapy. In randomized trials, neurostimulation has been shown to be effective in reducing angina symptoms. Enhanced external counterpulsation is a viable treatment option for select patients with refractory angina. In many randomized trials, laser revascularization has been shown to diminish angina symptoms, although no placebo-controlled studies exist to date. Gene therapy is a promising area of research in this field. Percutaneous in situ coronary venous arterialization is in its infancy, but may be able to treat many patients if proved successful. No data support the role of chelation therapy in this population. Heart transplantation remains a final option for these patients. Further research of the techniques mentioned in this review is warranted. The importance of randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials cannot be overemphasized, as the placebo effect of these therapies is probably marked.