Secondary Prevention in Younger vs. Older Coronary Heart Disease Patients-Insights from the German Subset of the EUROASPIRE IV Survey.

PURPOSE: Evidence is limited on implementation of secondary prevention guidelines for coronary heart disease (CHD) in clinical practice and variations between younger and elder patients. We investigated the control of cardiovascular risk factors in German patients with CHD enrolled in the European-wide EUROASPIRE IV survey, stratified by younger (18-69 years) and older (70-79 years) age groups. METHOD: Eligible subjects were identified via the hospitals' patient information system and invited to attend a study visit 6 months to 3 years after hospitalization for CHD (myocardial infarction, ischemia, angioplasty/stent, coronary bypass grafting). Information on lifestyle and medication was collected by interview. RESULTS: Five hundred thirty-six patients were recruited in 2012-2013 (median age 69 years [IQR 62-74 years], 18% female, 44% ≥ 70 years of age, median time between index hospitalization and study visit 1.8 [1.1-2.5] years). Proportion of CHD patients receiving recommended drug therapy was 89% for platelet inhibitors (younger vs. older patients 93 vs. 84%, p < 0.01), 83% for statins (83 vs. 85%, p = 0.9), and 83% for beta-blockers (87 vs. 79%, p = 0.02). Uncontrolled blood pressure was observed in 45% (40 vs. 50%, p = 0.02), LDL cholesterol levels > 2.5 mmol/l in 53% (56 vs. 49%, p = 0.1), and HbA1c levels > 7% in diabetic patients in 39% (45 vs. 32%, p = 0.1). Eighty-five percent were overweight (86 vs. 85%, p = 0.8), 37% were obese (41 vs. 31%, p = 0.01), and 10% reported currently smoking (17 vs. 3%, p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Although most CHD patients received the drug classes recommended by guidelines, treatment goals were frequently not achieved. Elderly subjects had a less favorable pattern, which may reflect multi-morbidity and weaker identification with treatment targets. National CHD prevention strategies should focus not only on enhancing lifestyle modifications and reaching treatment targets, but also on highlighting the different needs in older individuals.

Control of main risk factors after ischaemic stroke across Europe: data from the stroke-specific module of the EUROASPIRE III survey.

BACKGROUND: Previous cross-sectional surveys in different European countries within the EUROASPIRE programme demonstrated a high prevalence of modifiable risk factors, unhealthy lifestyles and inadequate drug treatment in coronary heart disease patients. Comparable data for ischaemic stroke patients is lacking. METHODS: A stroke-specific study module was added to the EUROASPIRE III core survey. This cross-sectional multicentre survey included consecutive patients with first-ever ischaemic stroke from four European countries. Data were obtained from medical records, patient interviews and patient examinations within 6-36 months after the stroke event. Control of modifiable risk factors after stroke was evaluated against contemporary European guidelines. RESULTS: A total of 881 patients was recruited. Median age was 66 years, 37.5% were female; average time from the stroke event to interview was 550 days. At the time of the interview, 17.6% of stroke patients smoked cigarettes, 35.5% had a body mass index ≥30 kg/m(2), 62.4% showed elevated blood pressure and 75.7% exhibited elevated LDL cholesterol levels. Antiplatelet drugs or oral anticoagulants were used by 87.2%, antihypertensive medication by 84.4% and statins by 56.8% of stroke patients. Among patients using antihypertensive drugs and lipid-lowering medication at the time of the interview, 34.3% and 34.4%, respectively, achieved target blood pressure and total cholesterol values according to current European guidelines. CONCLUSION: The EUROASPIRE III stroke-specific module shows that secondary prevention and risk factor control in patients after ischaemic stroke need to be improved in four European centres at the time of the study since about half of patients are not achieving risk factor targets defined in European guidelines.