Predicting State Investment in Medicaid Home- and Community-Based Services, 2000-2011.

Although state use of Medicaid home- and community-based services (HCBS) to provide long-term services and supports to older adults and individuals with physical disabilities continues to increase, progress is uneven across states. We used generalized linear models to examine state factors associated with increased allocation of Medicaid dollars to HCBS for the period 2000 to 2011. We observed enhanced growth in states that began the period with limited investment in HCBS, as reflected in significant year trends among these states. The political environment appeared to be an important influence on states' investment for states with limited initial allocation to HCBS, as was housing affordability, a policy amenable variable. There continues to be wide variation in states' relative investment, calling for additional policy attention and research.

The relation between health insurance and health care disparities among adults with disabilities.

OBJECTIVES: We examined disparities among US adults with disabilities and the degree to which health insurance attenuates disparities by race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES). METHODS: We pooled data from the 2001-2007 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey on individuals with disabilities aged 18 to 64 years. We modeled measures of access and use as functions of predisposing, enabling, need, and contextual factors. We then included health insurance and examined the extent to which it reduced observed differences by race, ethnicity, and SES. RESULTS: We found evidence of disparities in access and use among adults with disabilities. Adjusting for health insurance reduced these disparities most consistently for emergency department use. Uninsured individuals experienced substantially poorer access across most measures, including reporting a usual source of care and experiencing delays in or being unable to obtain care. CONCLUSIONS: Although health insurance is an important enabling resource among adults with disabilities, its effect on reducing differences by race, ethnicity, and SES on health care access and use was limited. Research exploring the effects of factors such as patient-provider interactions is warranted.

Disparities in access to health care among middle-aged and older adults with disabilities.

Disability is increasing among middle-aged adults and, reversing earlier trends, increasing among older adults as well. Disability is experienced disproportionately by Black and lower socioeconomic status (SES) individuals. We used Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data to examine health care disparities in access to health care for middle-aged (31 to 64 years of age) and older (65+ years of age) adults with disabilities by race and ethnicity, education, and income (n=13,174). Using logistic regression, we examined three measures of potential (e.g., usual source of care), and three measures of realized (e.g., counseling related to smoking) access. Middle-aged and older minority individuals with disabilities had lower relative risks of having usual sources of care and higher relative risks of having suboptimal usual sources of care (e.g., a place rather than a person) than White adults with disabilities. There were SES effects observed for middle-aged adults with disabilities across most measures that were, for certain measures, more pronounced than SES effects among older adults with disabilities. These findings are important, since health resources (e.g., a usual source of care) may mediate relations among disability, morbidity, and mortality. Policy actions that may mitigate the disparities we observed include financial incentives to support access to an optimal usual source of care and mechanisms to foster behavioral interventions related to smoking and exercise. Ensuring that these actions address the specific concerns of individuals with disabilities, such as physical accessibility and provider cultural competency, is essential.

The effect of pharmacy benefit design on patient-physician communication about costs.

BACKGROUND: Incentive-based formularies have been widely instituted to control the rising costs of prescription drugs. To work properly, such formularies depend on patients to be aware of financial incentives and communicate their cost preferences with prescribing physicians. The impact of financial incentives on patient awareness of and communication about those costs is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between enrollment in incentive-based pharmacy benefit plans and awareness of out-of-pocket costs and rates of communication about out-of-pocket costs. DESIGN: A matched telephone survey of patients and their primary care physicians. SETTING: Los Angeles County. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand nine hundred and seventeen patients aged 53 to 82 (73% response rate). MEASUREMENTS: Patient-reported pharmacy benefit design, knowledge of out-of-pocket costs, and discussion of out-of-pocket costs with physicians. RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of patients who had prescription drug coverage and were aware of their pharmacy benefit design reported being enrolled in incentive-based plans. The majority of these (54%) were "never" or only "sometimes" aware of their out-of-pocket cost requirements at the time of the physician visit. After controlling for numerous physician and patient level variables, we found that patients enrolled in pharmacy benefit designs requiring no copayments were more likely to report they "never" discuss out-of-pocket costs with physicians compared with patients enrolled in incentive-based pharmacy benefit designs (81% vs 67%, P=.001) and patients with no prescription drug insurance (57%, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: Incentive-based pharmacy benefit plans and lack of insurance are associated with increased rates of discussions about out-of-pocket costs. Nonetheless, most incentive-based enrollees are unaware of out-of-pocket costs when prescriptions are written and never discuss out-of-pocket costs with their physicians, likely mitigating the effectiveness of financial incentives to guide decision making. Considering that out-of-pocket costs are associated with adherence to medical therapy, interventions to improve patient access to out-of-pocket cost information and the frequency of patient-physician discussions about costs are needed.

Intrinsic racial differences in the risk of cesarean delivery are not explained by differences in caregivers or hospital site of delivery.

OBJECTIVE: This study was undertaken to assess whether racial differences in the risk of cesarean delivery result from differing practices of their caregivers or the hospitals at which they deliver. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study was performed using the Perinatal Database of the Memorial Health Care System. Logistic regression was used to estimate the risk of primary cesarean delivery among patients eligible for labor. The contribution of hospital and physician level cluster correlation was evaluated using fixed and random effects regression models. RESULTS: Compared with white patients, black and Hispanic patients were 75% and 22% more likely to undergo primary cesarean delivery. Further adjustment for hospital and physician level cluster correlation resulted in persistently increased risks of primary cesarean delivery in black (54%) and Hispanic patients (12%). CONCLUSION: Hospital site of delivery and individual physician practices do not fully explain racial differences in the risk of primary cesarean delivery.

Risk adjustment for people with chronic conditions in private sector health plans.

BACKGROUND: Although the problem of adverse selection into more generous health insurance plans has been the focus of previous work, risk adjustment systems have only recently begun to be implemented to blunt its effect. OBJECTIVES: This study examines the ability of the leading risk adjustment systems to predict health care expenditures for people with chronic conditions, using claims and enrollment data from 2 large employers. RESEARCH DESIGN: Predictive errors and total financial losses/gains are compared for different risk adjustment approaches (primarily hierarchical condition categories [HCCs] and adjusted clinical groups) for several chronic conditions. RESULTS: One of the best performing risk adjustment systems was a regression-based HCC method, which had an average under-prediction error rate of 9% or 6%, depending on the employer. In comparison, more typical actuarial risk adjustments based on just age, gender, and prevailing area wages lead to a prediction error of at least 50%. We did not find evidence that payments for particular chronic conditions would be consistently and significantly under- or overestimated. CONCLUSION: The leading risk adjustment approaches substantially reduce the incentives for adverse selection but do not eliminate them.

Effects of gender, disability, and age in the receipt of preventive services.

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: We extend research to examine relations between gender, disability, and age in the receipt of preventive services. DESIGN AND METHODS: We pool Medical Expenditure Panel Survey data for years 2001-2007. Using logit models, we examine the relations between gender, disability, and age and the receipt of preventive services. RESULTS: For most services, both women and men with disabilities had higher probabilities of receiving preventive services relative to those without disabilities. There was a pattern of more significant differences for men relative to women. Predicted probabilities for receipt of services were significantly higher among older adults relative to younger adults. A usual source of care was a significant predictor across services. For example, we estimate that adults aged 18-64 with a place as a usual source of care received 59% of recommended services, whereas those with a person as a source of care received 63% of services relative to 47% for those without a usual source of care. Among older adults, the predicted percentage of preventive services received for no usual source of care was 52% and that for a place or a person as a usual source of care were 71% and 76%, respectively. Across gender, disability, and age, receipt of a range of clinical preventive services is suboptimal. IMPLICATIONS: Policy actions that may mitigate the differences we observed include mechanisms to support access to a usual source of care, financial incentives to enhance the receipt of preventive services, and implementation of community-based prevention services with attention to their linkage to clinical care.