Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pharmacotherapy ; 25(12): 1773-88, 2005 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16305297

RESUMO

Clinical pharmacists rarely are involved in the selection and dosing of anesthetic agents. However, when practicing evidence-based medicine in a cost-conscious health care system, optimizing drug therapy is imperative in all areas. Thus, we provide general information on anesthesiology, including the different types of breathing systems and the components of anesthesia machines. Modern inhalation anesthetics that are predominantly used in clinical practice include one gas--nitrous oxide--and new volatile liquid agents--isoflurane, desflurane, and sevoflurane. Desflurane and sevoflurane are the low-soluble inhalation anesthetics, and they offer some clinical advantages over isoflurane, such as fast induction and faster recovery with long procedures. However, efficient use of isoflurane can match the speed of induction and recovery of the other agents in certain cases. In addition, the patient characteristics, duration and type of procedure, type of breathing system, and efficiency in monitoring must be considered when selecting the most optimal therapy for each patient. Maximizing the clinical advantages of these agents while minimizing the waste of an institution's operating room and pharmacy budget requires an understanding of the characteristics, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of these anesthetic agents and the collaborated effort from both the anesthesia and pharmacy departments. An anesthetic agent algorithm is provided as a sample decision-process tree for selecting among isoflurane, desflurane, and sevoflurane.


Assuntos
Anestesia por Inalação/métodos , Anestésicos Inalatórios , Isoflurano/análogos & derivados , Éteres Metílicos , Anestesia por Inalação/efeitos adversos , Anestesia por Inalação/economia , Anestésicos Inalatórios/efeitos adversos , Anestésicos Inalatórios/economia , Anestésicos Inalatórios/farmacocinética , Desflurano , Humanos , Isoflurano/efeitos adversos , Isoflurano/economia , Isoflurano/farmacocinética , Éteres Metílicos/efeitos adversos , Éteres Metílicos/economia , Éteres Metílicos/farmacocinética , Sevoflurano
3.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 66(23): 2126-31, 2009 Dec 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19923314

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The implementation of a comprehensive medication reconciliation program to reduce errors in admission and discharge medication orders at an academic medical center is described. SUMMARY: A multidisciplinary team was formed to assess the current process of obtaining medication histories and to develop a new workflow for the pharmacist to obtain and reconcile medication histories. Pharmacists received intensive training on the new workflow, policies, and procedures. Hospitalwide multidisciplinary education was provided, and the new process was introduced in November 2005. Every inpatient admitted to the hospital has a complete and comprehensive home medication history interview conducted by a pharmacist or designee (pharmacy student or intern with subsequent verification by a pharmacist) within 24 hours of arrival. All components of the medication history are documented utilizing an integrated electronic medical record (EMR) medication documentation tool. Development of the discharge medication reconciliation program began in fall 2006. A discharge medication reconciliation report form was created through the EMR to improve the accuracy of the discharge medication orders. The form provides physicians with complete, accurate medication information and decreases the risk for transcription errors. Finally, a discharge medication report was developed for patients to take home. Analysis of the discharge reconciliation process revealed that medication errors were reduced from 90% to 47% on the surgical unit (95% confidence interval [CI], 42-53%; p = 0.000) and from 57% to 33% on the medicine unit (95% CI, 28-38%; p = 0.000). CONCLUSION: A pharmacy-driven multidisciplinary admission history and medication reconciliation process has reduced medication errors in an academic medical center.


Assuntos
Anamnese/métodos , Erros de Medicação/prevenção & controle , Farmacêuticos/organização & administração , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/organização & administração , Continuidade da Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Humanos , Admissão do Paciente , Equipe de Assistência ao Paciente/organização & administração , Alta do Paciente , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/organização & administração , Papel Profissional , Fluxo de Trabalho
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA