A shallow morphology of the intertubercular groove is associated with medial and bilateral but not lateral pulley lesions.

PURPOSE: To investigate the influence of intertubercular groove (IG) morphology on the development of different types of biceps reflection pulley (BRP) injuries. METHODS: A consecutive cohort of 221 patients with ventral shoulder pain and a preoperative diagnosis suspecting BRP injury, who underwent arthroscopy, was retrospectively reviewed. The presence or absence as well as type of pulley injury (medial, lateral or bilateral) was confirmed arthroscopically. The intertubercular groove was evaluated on MRIs after triplanar reconstruction of the axial plane. IG depth, width, medial wall angle (MWA), lateral wall angle (LWA) and total opening angle (TOA) were measured. IG depth and width were expressed in relation to the humeral head diameter. Measurements were performed by two clinicians independently and averaged. RESULTS: Of 166 included patients 43 had bilateral, 65 medial and 38 lateral BRP lesions. 20 patients had intact BRPs and represented the control group. The intra-class correlation coefficient of measurements was 0.843-0.955. Patients with a medial or bilateral BRP injury had a flatter MWA (38.8° or 40.0° vs. 47.9°, p < 0.001), wider TOA (96.1° or 96.6° vs. 82.6°, p < 0.001), greater width (12.5 or 12.3 vs. 10.8 mm, p = 0.013) and shallower depth (5.5 or 5.4 vs. 6.2 mm, p < 0.001) than the control group. Conversely, the IG morphology of those with lateral BRP injuries did not differ significantly from the control group. The odds ratio for a medial or bilateral BRP injury when the TOA exceeded 95° was 6.8 (95% confidence interval 3.04-15.2). CONCLUSION: A dysplastic type of IG morphology with a wide TOA, flat MWA, decreased depth and increased width is associated with the presence of medial and bilateral BRP injuries. A TOA of > 95° increases the likelihood of a medial or bilateral BRP injury 6.8-fold. Lateral BRP injuries are not associated with dysplastic IG morphology. Concomitant LHBT surgery may, therefore, not always be necessary during isolated supraspinatus tendon repair. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Pectoralis major and pectoralis minor transfer for irreparable subscapularis tendon tears.

OBJECTIVE: Irreparable rotator cuff injuries in young patients with moderate to high levels of physical activity remain a challenging pathology for shoulder surgeons. Irreparable anterior rotator cuff injuries require treatment that seeks to restore the dynamic anterior forces of the glenohumeral joint. Among surgical treatment options, transfer of the pectoralis major and minor muscle, have shown good functional outcomes. This technique attempts to reproduce the vector of the subscapular muscle in cases with irreparable tear. Restoration of the dynamic external and internal couple forces to maintain the humeral head in the center of rotation. INDICATIONS: Pectoralis major transfer (PMa): Irreparable subscapularis tendon (SSC) tear in active patients without osteoarthritis. Pectoralis minor transfer (PMi): Irreparable superior SSC tear with concomitant irreparable supraspinatus tendon (SSP) tear in active patients with no osteoarthritis. CONTRAINDICATIONS: Primary osteoarthritis Samilson grade C, cuff tear arthropathy Hamada III-V, infection, axillary nerve palsy, older patients with low physical demand, combination with irreparable SSP/infraspinatus tendon (ISP) tear for PMa or combination with irreparable ISP tear for PMi. SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: General anesthesia and beach-chair position with the arm freely mobile in an arm holder. Deltopectoral approach. Exposure of the humeral head and confirmation of the irreparability of the subscapularis tendon. PMa: Detachment of the tendon to be transferred from the humeral insertion, blunt anatomic dissection medially. Exposure of the conjoined tendon and coracoid process. PMi: Detachment of the tendon with an osteotomy at the coracoid process. Passing the PMa or PMi tendon under the conjoined tendon. The PMa tendon is fixed in a 2-row configuration, the PMi in a single row with suture anchors to the lesser tuberosity. POSTOPERATIVE MANAGEMENT: Shoulder abduction sling (30°) for 6 weeks. Assisted range-of-motion (ROM) exercises with abduction/adduction 60-0-0°, internal/external rotation free-0-0° for 6 weeks. Free active ROM exercises after 6 weeks, muscle strengthening after 12 weeks. RESULTS: The pectoralis major and minor transfer shows an improvement in strength and range of motion in young active patients and an improved Constant score (CS) in long-term follow-up examinations.