The impact of preoperative biliary stenting in pancreatic cancer: A case-matched study from the German nationwide pancreatic surgery registry (DGAV StuDoQ|Pancreas).

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE: The impact of preoperative biliary stenting (PBS) before pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is controversial. METHODS: Patients undergoing PD with or without PBS for PDAC were identified from the German DGAV-StuDoQlPancreas registry. The impact of PBS on perioperative complications was analyzed. RESULTS: 1133 patients undergoing PD for PDAC were identified from the registry. After matching, 480 PBS patients vs. 480 patients without PBS were analyzed. Postoperative complications Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC) grade IIIa-IVb were higher in PBS patients (PBS 27% vs. no PBS 22%, p = 0.027). 320 PBS patients (66%) had no history of jaundice. In these patients, PBS was associated with higher morbidity. In contrast, PBS was not associated with higher complication rates in patients with history of jaundice. Serum bilirubin levels of 15 mg/dl and higher lead to more CDC IIIa-IVb (24% vs. 28%, p = 0.053) and higher mortality (3% vs. 7%, p < 0.001). PBS in patients with serum bilirubin levels of >15 mg/dl increased CDC IIa-IVb complications (21% vs. 50%, p = 0.001), mortality was equivalent. CONCLUSION: Most PBS procedures were performed in patients with no history of jaundice and increased morbidity. Serum bilirubin levels >15 mg/dl lead to higher morbidity and mortality. PBS correlated with higher complication rates in these patients.

Risk stratification for postoperative pancreatic fistula using the pancreatic surgery registry StuDoQ|Pancreas of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) is a major factor for morbidity and mortality after pancreatic resection. Risk stratification for POPF is important for adjustment of treatment, selection of target groups in trials and quality assessment in pancreatic surgery. In this study, we built a risk-prediction model for POPF based on a large number of predictor variables from the German pancreatic surgery registry StuDoQ|Pancreas. METHODS: StuDoQ|Pancreas was searched for patients, who underwent pancreatoduodenectomy from 2014 to 2016. A multivariable logistic regression model with elastic net regularization was built including 66 preoperative und intraoperative parameters. Cross-validation was used to select the optimal model. The model was assessed via area under the ROC curve (AUC) and calibration slope and intercept. RESULTS: A total of N = 2488 patients were included. In the optimal model the predictors selected were texture of the pancreatic parenchyma (soft versus hard), body mass index, histological diagnosis pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and operation time. The AUC was 0.70 (95% CI 0.69-0.70), the calibration slope 1.67 and intercept 1.12. In the validation set the AUC was 0.65 (95% CI 0.64-0.66), calibration slope and intercept were 1.22 and 0.42, respectively. CONCLUSION: The model we present is a valid measurement instrument for POPF risk based on four predictor variables. It can be applied in clinical practice as well as for risk-adjustment in research studies and quality assurance in surgery.

Laparoscopic versus open distal pancreatectomy-a propensity score-matched analysis from the German StuDoQ|Pancreas registry.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess intraoperative, postoperative, and oncologic outcome in patients undergoing laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) versus open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) for benign and malignant lesions of the pancreas. METHODS: Data from patients undergoing distal pancreatic resection were extracted from the StuDoQ|Pancreas registry of the German Society for General and Visceral Surgery. After propensity score case matching, groups of LDP and ODP were compared regarding demography, comorbidities, operative details, histopathology, and perioperative outcome. RESULTS: At the time of data extraction, the StuDoQ|Pancreas registry included over 3000 pancreatic resections from over 50 surgical departments in Germany. Data from 353 patients undergoing ODP (n = 254) or LDP (n = 99) from September 2013 to February 2016 at 29 institutions were included in the analysis. Baseline data showed a strong selection bias in LDP patients, which disappeared after 1:1 propensity score matching. A comparison of the matched groups disclosed a significantly longer operation time, higher rate of spleen preservation, more grade A pancreatic fistula, shorter hospital stay, and increased readmissions for LDP. In the small group of patients operated for pancreatic cancer, a lower lymph node yield with a lower lymph node ratio was apparent in LDP. CONCLUSIONS: LDP needed more time but potential advantages include increased spleen preservation and shorter hospital stay, as well as a trend for less transfusion, ventilation, and mortality. LDP for pancreatic cancer was performed rarely and will need critical evaluation in the future. Data from a prospective randomized registry trial is needed to confirm these results.

[Measures for preventing bile duct injuries during difficult cholecystectomies-Bail-out procedures]. / Maßnahmen zur Vermeidung von Gallengangsläsionen bei schwieriger Cholezystektomie ­ Bail-out-Prozeduren.

BACKGROUND: Cholecystectomies can sometimes be very complex operations, which place high demands on the surgeon. OBJECTIVE: Are there preoperative and intraoperative procedures available for reducing the risk of intraoperative bile duct injuries during a complex cholecystectomy? RESULTS: The complexity of the operation should be estimated preoperatively. Extended diagnostic examinations, preoperative biliary stenting and the performance of the operation by an experienced surgeon may help to reduce the operative risk. In high-risk patients, postponing the cholecystectomy may be indicated. The timely intraoperative recognition of the impossibility to perform a regular cholecystectomy is of decisive importance. In this situation, so-called bail-out procedures, such as fundus-down cholecystectomy or subtotal cholecystectomy are warranted. Conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery is not always necessary. CONCLUSION: Bail-out procedures are useful to reduce the risk of bile duct injuries during complex cholecystectomy and can enable a safe completion of the operation.

[Minimum volume requirements-perspective of a tertiary care hospital]. / Mindestmengen aus der Sicht einer Klinik der Schwerpunktversorgung.

BACKGROUND: The increase of minimum volumes for complex esophageal resections decided by the Federal Joint Committee (GBA) in Germany is currently the subject of intensive discussions. OBJECTIVE: To shed light on the effects of minimum volume requirements from the perspective of a tertiary care hospital. RESULTS: Strict adherence to the valid minimum volume requirements for esophageal surgery would significantly reduce the number of hospitals offering these procedures in Germany. The associated loss of revenue should not have any relevant negative economic consequences for most hospitals; however, the loss of complex esophageal surgery may result in a competitive disadvantage for these hospitals in times of shortage of qualified medical personnel. Another point of criticism is the assumption that the treatment quality can be recognized based solely on the numbers of patients. CONCLUSION: Despite the well-known volume-outcome relationship, minimum volume requirements do not define the lower limit of quality of surgical treatment. Therefore, additional evidence of treatment quality, such as structural or process quality as well as outcome parameters should be required, e.g. through certification. An obligatory synchronous certification could contribute to increasing the acceptance of minimum volume requirements in Germany.

Osteoporosis prevalence and fracture characteristics in elderly female patients with fractures.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to characterize the features of fractures that occur in female patients with osteoporosis in the setting of a typical trauma hospital. METHODS: Observational study was conducted on 233 women aged 50 years and above reporting to a trauma center with a fracture. Fracture location, fracture classification and cause of fracture were obtained and compared with bone mineral status assessed by DXA at the spine. RESULTS: Our findings indicate that with increasing patient age, the majority of fractures occur after a minor traumatic event. In more than one-third of all fractures after minor trauma, the patients were diagnosed with osteoporosis. The overall prevalence of osteoporosis in patients older than 50 years with fractures was more than 30% and was increasing with age. Most strikingly, one-third of the patients have had a previous fracture at a location that should have triggered the assessment of bone health status, but only 25% of them had received any form of osteoporosis treatment. CONCLUSION: For patients older than 50 years reporting to a trauma unit with a fracture, osteoporosis has a considerable prevalence. The large number of patients who have had a previous fracture emphasizes the necessity for an effective implementation of treatment algorithms for elderly patients with osteoporosis in the setting of a trauma hospital.