Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 7(11): e2444495, 2024 Nov 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39495518

RESUMO

Importance: Traditional approaches to practice guidelines frequently result in dissociation between strength of recommendation and quality of evidence. Objective: To create a clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of urinary tract infections that addresses the gap between the evidence and recommendation strength. Evidence Review: This consensus statement and systematic review applied an approach previously established by the WikiGuidelines Group to construct collaborative clinical guidelines. In May 2023, new and existing members were solicited for questions on urinary tract infection prevention, diagnosis, and management. For each topic, literature searches were conducted up until early 2024 in any language. Evidence was reported according to the WikiGuidelines charter: clear recommendations were established only when reproducible, prospective, controlled studies provided hypothesis-confirming evidence. In the absence of such data, clinical reviews were developed discussing the available literature and associated risks and benefits of various approaches. Findings: A total of 54 members representing 12 countries reviewed 914 articles and submitted information relevant to 5 sections: prophylaxis and prevention (7 questions), diagnosis and diagnostic stewardship (7 questions), empirical treatment (3 questions), definitive treatment and antimicrobial stewardship (10 questions), and special populations and genitourinary syndromes (10 questions). Of 37 unique questions, a clear recommendation could be provided for 6 questions. In 3 of the remaining questions, a clear recommendation could only be provided for certain aspects of the question. Clinical reviews were generated for the remaining questions and aspects of questions not meeting criteria for a clear recommendation. Conclusions and Relevance: In this consensus statement that applied the WikiGuidelines method for clinical guideline development, the majority of topics relating to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of urinary tract infections lack high-quality prospective data and clear recommendations could not be made. Randomized clinical trials are underway to address some of these gaps; however further research is of utmost importance to inform true evidence-based, rather than eminence-based practice.


Assuntos
Consenso , Infecções Urinárias , Infecções Urinárias/diagnóstico , Infecções Urinárias/prevenção & controle , Infecções Urinárias/terapia , Humanos , Adulto , Criança , Feminino , Masculino , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Pediatria/normas , Pediatria/métodos
3.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37502250

RESUMO

Antibiotic prescribing errors at hospital discharge are common. We designed a pharmacist-driven antimicrobial stewardship program to evaluate prescriptions prior to being transmitted to community pharmacies. Drug-related problems were identified in prescriptions for 48 of 149 patients, resulting in 55 interventions. Review at discharge improves outpatient prescribing of antimicrobials.

4.
JAMA Netw Open ; 6(7): e2326366, 2023 07 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37523190

RESUMO

Importance: Practice guidelines often provide recommendations in which the strength of the recommendation is dissociated from the quality of the evidence. Objective: To create a clinical guideline for the diagnosis and management of adult bacterial infective endocarditis (IE) that addresses the gap between the evidence and recommendation strength. Evidence Review: This consensus statement and systematic review applied an approach previously established by the WikiGuidelines Group to construct collaborative clinical guidelines. In April 2022 a call to new and existing members was released electronically (social media and email) for the next WikiGuidelines topic, and subsequently, topics and questions related to the diagnosis and management of adult bacterial IE were crowdsourced and prioritized by vote. For each topic, PubMed literature searches were conducted including all years and languages. Evidence was reported according to the WikiGuidelines charter: clear recommendations were established only when reproducible, prospective, controlled studies provided hypothesis-confirming evidence. In the absence of such data, clinical reviews were crafted discussing the risks and benefits of different approaches. Findings: A total of 51 members from 10 countries reviewed 587 articles and submitted information relevant to 4 sections: establishing the diagnosis of IE (9 questions); multidisciplinary IE teams (1 question); prophylaxis (2 questions); and treatment (5 questions). Of 17 unique questions, a clear recommendation could only be provided for 1 question: 3 randomized clinical trials have established that oral transitional therapy is at least as effective as intravenous (IV)-only therapy for the treatment of IE. Clinical reviews were generated for the remaining questions. Conclusions and Relevance: In this consensus statement that applied the WikiGuideline method for clinical guideline development, oral transitional therapy was at least as effective as IV-only therapy for the treatment of IE. Several randomized clinical trials are underway to inform other areas of practice, and further research is needed.


Assuntos
Endocardite Bacteriana , Endocardite , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Adulto , Humanos , Consenso , Endocardite/diagnóstico , Endocardite/terapia , Endocardite Bacteriana/prevenção & controle , Estudos Prospectivos
5.
Am J Health Syst Pharm ; 79(15): 1245-1249, 2022 07 22.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35377411

RESUMO

PURPOSE: We present the case of a 56-year-old man with stage IV sarcoidosis on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) support for the management of respiratory failure receiving treatment with isavuconazole for invasive aspergillosis. SUMMARY: VV-ECMO is an increasingly utilized life support therapy for patients with cardiac and/or respiratory failure, but its impact on medication dosing is poorly understood. In our patient with invasive Aspergillus infection receiving VV-ECMO, because of difficulty achieving therapeutic serum concentrations of voriconazole, we administered isavuconazole 372 mg intravenously (IV) every 8 hours for 6 doses followed by 372 mg IV once daily. Isavuconazole has a favorable pharmacokinetic and safety profile compared to other azole antifungal agents, but its high protein binding and lipophilicity raise concerns about drug sequestration in the VV-ECMO circuit. To optimize the efficacy and safety of this treatment, the isavuconazole trough concentration was measured at days 5 and 17, at which time it was 1.7 and 0.7 µg/mL, respectively. The dose was subsequently increased to 744 mg IV once daily, and serum trough concentrations were measured 5 and 8 days after dose adjustment, corresponding to 3.7 and 2.9 µg/mL, respectively. To our knowledge, this is the third report to describe inadequate isavuconazole trough concentrations during VV-ECMO support when utilizing standard doses. CONCLUSION: In the case described here, standard-dose isavuconazole (372 mg every 8 hours for 6 doses followed by 372 mg daily) did not achieve target trough concentrations in a patient receiving concomitant ECMO support.


Assuntos
Aspergilose , Oxigenação por Membrana Extracorpórea , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas , Insuficiência Respiratória , Adulto , Aspergilose/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Infecções Fúngicas Invasivas/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Nitrilas , Piridinas , Insuficiência Respiratória/etiologia , Triazóis/farmacocinética , Triazóis/uso terapêutico
6.
J Int Assoc Provid AIDS Care ; 19: 2325958220981265, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33327851

RESUMO

Patient acceptance of long-acting injectable antiretroviral (LAI-ARV) HIV-1 regimens will determine uptake. Although previous literature reports high satisfaction, these data stem from clinical trials subject to selection bias. This cross-sectional survey from the HIV practices of an urban academic medical center assessed perceptions and preferences using Likert scales toward overall acceptability, proposed frequencies, injection-site reaction durations, and distribution venue. 59% of surveys were completed resulting 202 respondents. 60% were male, 72% black, and the median age was 49 (IQR 36-58). 93% reported a once daily tablet frequency, 69% reported single tablet regimens, and 59% reported missing zero doses in the prior 30 days. Patients self-categorized as likely (57%) or unlikely (43%) to accept LAI-ARV. Both decreasing frequencies between injections and durations of injection-site reactions resulted higher acceptability scores. 57% of respondents preferred receiving an injectable from their clinician's office over other potential options. These data demonstrate positive LAI-ARV acceptance potential.


Assuntos
Antirretrovirais/administração & dosagem , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Adulto , Antirretrovirais/uso terapêutico , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Preferência do Paciente , Percepção , Estados Unidos
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA