RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Recent studies have identified subgroups of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients at increased likelihood for developing primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). Most studies look at predominantly white populations. GOALS: The aim of our study was to determine the characteristics of PSC in a black cohort of patients and its relationship to disease location in IBD. STUDY: A retrospective analysis was performed on IBD patients over the age of 18 years. RESULTS: Of the 209 black patients identified as having IBD, 7 (3.5%) had a concomitant diagnosis of PSC; 5/138 (3.6%) ulcerative colitis (UC) patients, and 2/71 (2.8%) Crohn's disease patients (CD). Numerically, more males developed PSC in both the UC and CD subgroups. Age at diagnosis of IBD tended to be younger among PSC cohorts. All PSC-UC patients had pancolitis (P<0.0001), and all PSC-CD patients had a colonic component to their disease. In the UC cohort, PSC patients were statistically more likely to be on immunosuppressive therapy (P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: With greater research, physicians will better recognize IBD phenotypes at highest risk of PSC and hopefully identify complications of PSC, including cholangiocarcinoma.
Assuntos
Idade de Início , Negro ou Afro-Americano , Colangite Esclerosante/etnologia , Colite Ulcerativa/etnologia , Doença de Crohn/etnologia , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Colangite Esclerosante/diagnóstico , Colite Ulcerativa/tratamento farmacológico , Feminino , Humanos , Fatores Imunológicos/uso terapêutico , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores Sexuais , Adulto JovemRESUMO
OBJECTIVES: The Gastroenterology (GI) Core Curriculum is a culmination of efforts from the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, the American College of Gastroenterology, the American Gastroenterological Association, and the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy to develop a review of knowledge and skills for those training in a gastrointestinal subspecialty. Fellows are expected to conduct scholarly activity, attend seminars, and read textbooks and syllabus materials. While efforts to standardize education across the nation are welcomed, we sought to ascertain the learning preferences of GI fellows and attending physicians. METHODS: A national online survey was e-mailed to directors of US adult GI programs, who were also asked to invite their colleagues and fellows to participate. RESULTS: While majorities of both fellows and attendings affirmed regular attendance at national conferences, more attendings affirmed that their knowledge was improved by their participation. Asked how they acquire knowledge best, 45 fellows and 67 attendings responded; 42% of attendings favored journal articles, and 40% of fellows favored conferences. More attendings than fellows felt that writing a manuscript and belonging to a GI society improved knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: We believe the Gastroenterology Core Curriculum provides trainees with essential tools for becoming an autonomous gastroenterologist who can appreciate various learning modalities.
Assuntos
Comportamento do Consumidor , Educação Médica Continuada/métodos , Gastroenterologia/educação , Aprendizagem , Congressos como Assunto , Bolsas de Estudo , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Publicações Periódicas como Assunto , Sociedades Médicas , Inquéritos e Questionários , Livros de Texto como Assunto , RedaçãoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) has been increasingly prescribed for patients admitted to medical wards. The knowledge, attitudes, and practices of those in the healthcare profession regarding use of SUP in medical wards are understudied. METHODS: A survey consisting of closed-ended questions and multiple-choice queries was handed out during grand rounds. RESULTS: One hundred people (39 attending physicians, 61 residents) completed the survey. More attending physicians (41 vs. 30 %) believed SUP was indicated for patients treated in a non-intensive-care medical ward (P = 0.2357). All residents preferred a proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) for SUP compared with 85 % of attending physicians (P < 0.05). Despite equal agreement that PPIs were not harmless, more attending physicians than residents agreed that using PPIs increased the risk of community-acquired pneumonia (P < 0.05). More residents than attending physicians agreed on the use of SUP for patients suffering from major burns and for those with liver failure. In situations of respiratory distress not requiring intubation and in cases of steroid treatment for a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease flare, more attending physicians than residents felt SUP was required. Approaching a statistically significant difference, more attending physicians than residents felt that being too busy to question SUP indication and the perception of PPIs as harmless affected decision making. CONCLUSION: Despite the publication of guidelines, misuse of gastric acid suppressants continues to occur, even by attending physicians. More complete understanding of the need and occasion for SUP use should result in more cautious use.