Managing hospitalized patients with bacterial infections: the price-to-pay upon site of infection.

INTRODUCTION: Infections impose a significant burden on healthcare costs worldwide. We aimed to explore antibiotic- and hospital-related costs of infections needing admission in a tertiary university hospital in Greece. METHODS: We performed a prospective cohort study in the medical care unit of a tertiary university hospital in Greece, for the period May 2016 to May 2018. Patients admitted with respiratory, urinary, gastrointestinal tract, skin, soft tissue and bone infections or primary bacteremia were included in this study. Costs of hospitalization and unit cost of antibiotic regimen were retrieved from a database for Greek hospitals containing data for each International Classification of Diseases (ICD-10) code and the national formulary respectively, and manually calculated for each patient. RESULTS: Antibiotic costs represent approximately 14-40% of total hospital-related costs depending on infection studied. Skin, soft tissue and bone infections and primary bacteremia led hospital- and antibiotic-related costs, with median costs of €6370 (interquartile range (IQR) 3330.90-11 503.90), €2519.90 (IQR 431.50-8371.10), €4418.10 (IQR 2335-8281.90) and €1394.30 (IQR 519.12-6459.90), respectively. Antibiotic- and hospital-related costs significantly differs with site of infection (p<0.0001). Length of stay is strongly correlated with antibiotic- and hospital-related costs, while site of infection is moderately related to antibiotic cost (eta value 0.445), and hospital-related cost (eta value 0.387). CONCLUSION: Healthcare-related costs vary substantially depending on site of infection. Information about real-life costs can drive best decisions and help to reduce healthcare expenditures.

Patterns, price and predictors of successful empiric antibiotic therapy in a real-world setting.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Prompt and appropriate empiric antibiotic therapy (EAT) remains the cornerstone of successful outcomes, while the majority of blood cultures do not identify pathogen. We aimed to report patterns of EAT and its impact on outcomes and associated medical costs, while exploring predictors of its success in a real-world setting. METHODS: We retrospectively utilized the prospective registry of the medical unit of a tertiary university hospital, including patients admitted with diagnosis of infection between 1st May 2016 and 1st May 2018. Costs of hospitalization and unit of antibiotic regimen were retrieved from a database regarding Greek hospitals containing hospitalization-cost data for each ICD-10 code and the national formulary, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 489 patients were included in this study. Mean age was 61.3 years, 53% were males, while intra-abdominal infections predominated (55%). The most commonly administered EAT included quinolones (48%), followed by piperacillin/tazobactam (18%), or other regimens alone or in combination. EAT was successful in 67% and failed in 33% of cases. Fourteen patients died of the infection before EAT was switched, while among 55 patients that EAT had to be modified, mortality was 22%. Presence of urinary tract infection and use of quinolones, least predicted for failure of EAT [OR:0.15 (0.07-0.35), p < 0.0001, OR:0.53 (0.32-0.90), p = 0.019, respectively], in contrast to presence of sepsis [OR:3.11 (1.79-5.40), p < 0.0001]. Patients with failure had longer length of stay [7(5-11) versus 4 (3-6) days], higher antibiotic [201.9 (97.8-471.8) vs 104.6 (60.2-187.7) euros] and hospitalization costs [1409.3 (945.4-2311.6) vs 759.4 (516.5-1036.5) euros] (p < 0.0001). DISCUSSION: We observed significantly increased antibiotic-related, healthcare-related costs and length of stay in patients with failure of EAT. Moreover, in our cohort, absence of sepsis, presence of urinary tract infection and use of quinolones better predicted for success of EAT. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS: Appropriate selection of EAT is crucial to ensure better outcomes and minimize costs.

Acute mental stress has a prolonged unfavorable effect on arterial stiffness and wave reflections.

OBJECTIVE: Large-artery stiffness and arterial wave reflections have been identified as independent markers and prognosticators of cardiovascular risk. Mental stress is a novel risk factor for coronary artery disease and has been associated with left ventricular dysfunction, myocardial ischemia and infarction, and sudden cardiac death. The purpose of this study was to assess the effect of acute mental stress on aortic stiffness and wave reflections. METHODS: The effect of a mental arithmetic test was assessed in 19 healthy individuals using a randomized, sham-procedure-controlled, crossover design. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity and augmentation index were measured as indices of aortic stiffness and wave reflections, respectively. RESULTS: Mental stress induced a sustained increase in central systolic and pulse pressure throughout the whole study (systolic: by 7.5 mm Hg, p < .05; pulse: by 5.7 mm Hg, p < .01). The increase in peripheral systolic and pulse pressure was not significant throughout the study, but only when their peak values were compared with baseline (systolic: by 6.2 mm Hg, peak at 0 minutes; pulse: by 6.6 mm Hg, peak at 5 minutes, p < .05 for both). There was a sustained increase in pulse wave velocity (by 0.57 m/s, p < .005) throughout the study denoting a sustained increase in aortic stiffness. Similarly, augmentation index showed a sustained increase with mental stress (by 6.16%, p < .05) denoting increased wave reflections from the periphery. CONCLUSION: Acute mental stress results in a prolonged increase in aortic stiffness and wave reflections. Given the important pathophysiologic and prognostic role of these parameters, our results provide important mechanistic links between acute mental stress and increased cardiovascular risk.

Smoking and caffeine have a synergistic detrimental effect on aortic stiffness and wave reflections.

OBJECTIVES: We investigated the acute and chronic combined effect of cigarette smoking and caffeine intake on aortic stiffness and wave reflections. BACKGROUND: We have shown that smoking and caffeine separately increase arterial stiffness. Aortic stiffness and wave reflections are important determinants of the efficient performance of the cardiovascular system and prognosticators of cardiovascular risk. METHODS: The acute effects of smoking (one cigarette), caffeine (200 mg, equivalent to 2 cups of coffee), and smoking plus caffeine were studied in 24 healthy subjects according to a randomized, placebo- and sham procedure-controlled crossover design. The chronic effect of smoking and caffeine was studied in a population study that enrolled 160 healthy subjects. RESULTS: Acute study: there was a significant interaction between caffeine and smoking with regard to pulse-wave velocity (p < 0.01) and augmentation index (p < 0.05). When smoking followed caffeine intake, pulse-wave velocity and augmentation index increased further by 0.52 m/s and 13.4%, respectively, reaching a total of 0.85 m/s and 17.4%, 0.17 m/s and 9.2% in excess of the mere sum of caffeine effect (0.33 m/s and 4%) alone and smoking effect alone (0.35 m/s and 4.2%). Population study: there was a significant interaction of chronic coffee consumption and smoking regarding pulse-wave velocity (p < 0.05) and augmentation index (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows, for the first time, that when smoking and caffeine intake are combined, they interact and exert a synergistic, unfavorable effect on aortic stiffness and wave reflections on both an acute and chronic basis.