Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
1.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 88(3): 259-72, 2015 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25047981

RESUMO

PURPOSE: Air pollution has been linked to an increased risk of ischemic heart disease (IHD), but less is known about occupational exposure to welding fumes and the risk of IHD. The objective of this paper was to review the epidemiological evidence on causal links between welding fume exposure and risk of IHD and to investigate whether the risk of IHD depends on specific welding characteristics. METHODS: A systematic search in Medline 1979-2013 and EMBASE 1974-2013 identified 18 epidemiological studies with at least one risk estimate of IHD morbidity or mortality among workers exposed to welding fumes. Following an assessment of completeness of reporting, confounding, and bias, each risk estimate was characterized as more or less reliable. Pooled risk estimates were computed across studies by random effect meta-analyses. RESULTS: The weighted relative risk (RR) for IHD following exposure to welding fumes was 1.09 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.00, 1.19]. We calculated a RR of 1.39 (95 % CI 0.96, 2.02) among studies using an internal reference group and 1.08 (95 % CI 0.99, 1.18) for studies using an external reference group. An increased risk was observed for acute myocardial infarction RR = 1.69 (95 % CI 1.18, 2.42) and other IHDs RR = 1.06 (95 % CI 0.98, 1.14). There was too limited evidence to evaluate the risk of IHD related to specific welding characteristics. CONCLUSION: Several studies indicate that welding is associated with a moderately increased risk of IHD; however, bias and confounding cannot be ruled out with reasonable confidence.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/efeitos adversos , Isquemia Miocárdica/epidemiologia , Isquemia Miocárdica/etiologia , Exposição Ocupacional/efeitos adversos , Soldagem , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Exposição por Inalação/efeitos adversos , Fatores de Risco
2.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health ; 88(6): 743-50, 2015 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25408460

RESUMO

PURPOSE: The purpose was to examine bronchial asthma according to cumulative exposure to fume particulates conferred by stainless steel and mild steel welding through a proxy of redeemed prescribed asthma pharmaceuticals. METHODS: A Danish national company-based historical cohort of 5,303 male ever-welders was followed from 1995 to 2011 in the Danish Medicinal Product Registry to identify the first-time redemption of asthma pharmaceuticals including beta-2-adrenoreceptor agonists, adrenergic drugs for obstructive airway diseases and inhalable glucocorticoids. Lifetime exposure to welding fume particulates was estimated by combining questionnaire data on welding work with a welding exposure matrix. The estimated exposure accounted for calendar time, welding intermittence, type of steel, welding methods, local exhaustion and welding in confined spaces. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using a Cox proportional hazards model adjusting for potential confounders and taking modifying effects of smoking into account. RESULTS: The average incidence of redemption of asthma pharmaceuticals in the cohort was 16 per 1,000 person year (95% CI 10-23 per 1,000 person year). A moderate nonsignificant increased rate of redemption of asthma medicine was observed among high-level exposed stainless steel welders in comparison with low-level exposed welders (HR 1.54, 95% CI 0.76-3.13). This risk increase was driven by an increase risk among non-smoking stainless steel welders (HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.06-2.02). Mild steel welding was not associated with increased risk of use asthma pharmaceuticals. CONCLUSION: The present study indicates that long-term exposure to stainless steel welding is related to increased risk of asthma in non-smokers.


Assuntos
Poluentes Ocupacionais do Ar/toxicidade , Antiasmáticos/uso terapêutico , Asma Ocupacional/epidemiologia , Prescrições de Medicamentos/estatística & dados numéricos , Exposição por Inalação/efeitos adversos , Material Particulado/toxicidade , Soldagem , Adulto , Asma Ocupacional/tratamento farmacológico , Asma Ocupacional/etiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Seguimentos , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Modelos de Riscos Proporcionais , Sistema de Registros , Fatores de Risco , Fumar , Aço , Inquéritos e Questionários , Fatores de Tempo
3.
Ugeskr Laeger ; 186(14)2024 Apr 01.
Artigo em Dinamarquês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38606703

RESUMO

Bronchoscopy has a low risk of complications when diagnosing peripheral lung lesions suspected of malignancy, however the procedures do not always determine a diagnosis. Several modalities have been invented to improve the diagnostic yield, including radial endobronchial ultrasound and electromagnetic navigation, which are currently used by several departments in Denmark. Augmented fluoroscopy, CT-guided bronchoscopy and robotic bronchoscopy are not yet available in Denmark, but may improve the diagnostic work-up, as argued in this review.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Pulmonares , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/diagnóstico , Broncoscopia/métodos , Fluoroscopia/métodos , Endossonografia/métodos , Pulmão/patologia
4.
Respir Med ; 198: 106880, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35599064

RESUMO

Inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) has been debated for 20 years. In our systematic literature review and meta-analysis, we addressed the following: Should patients with COPD and a blood eosinophil count (EOS) of, respectively, a) < 150 cells/µl, b) 150-300 cells/µl, and c) > 300 cells/µl continue treatment with ICS? Protocol registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020178110) and funded by the Danish Health Authority. We searched Medline, Embase, CINAHL and Cochrane Central on 22nd July 2020 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) of ICS treatment in patients with COPD (≥40 years, no current asthma), which analyzed outcomes by EOS count and where >50% of patients used ICS prior. We used the GRADE method. Meta-analyzes for the outcomes were divided into EOS subgroups and analyzed for differences. We identified 11 RCTs with a total of 29,654 patients. A significant difference (p < 0.00001) between the three subgroups' reduction of risk of moderate to severe exacerbation was found. Rate ratios for EOS counts: <150 cells/µL was 0.88 (95%CI: 0.83, 0.94); 150-300 cells/µL was 0.80 (95%CI: 0.69, 0.94); >300 cells/µL was 0.57 (95%CI: 0.49, 0.66). Overall, the certainty of the effect estimates was low to very low due to risk of bias, unexplained heterogeneity, few RCTs, and wide confidence intervals. A clear correlation was demonstrated between effect of continued ICS treatment (number of exacerbations, lung function, and quality of life) and increasing EOS count. Our meta-analyses suggested that treatment with ICS seemed beneficial for everyone except patients with EOS count below 150 cells/µl.


Assuntos
Eosinófilos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica , Administração por Inalação , Corticosteroides/uso terapêutico , Progressão da Doença , Humanos , Contagem de Leucócitos , Doença Pulmonar Obstrutiva Crônica/tratamento farmacológico
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA