Drugs in blood and urine samples from victims of suspected exposure to drink spiking: A prospective observational study from Oslo, Norway.

OBJECTIVE: People regularly contact emergency medicine services concerned that they have been exposed to drink spiking, i.e., exposure to drugs without their knowledge or permission. We identified drugs in blood and urine samples from patients suspecting exposure to drink spiking, with special consideration for drugs not reported taken by the patient (unreported drugs). METHODS: From September 2018 to May 2019, we collected blood and urine samples from patients 16 years or older presenting at an emergency clinic in Oslo, Norway, within 48 hours of suspected exposure to drink spiking. We also collected information on ethanol ingestion and drugs taken. Blood samples were analyzed for 20 classical recreational drugs using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS) and an automated enzymatic method for ethanol. Urine samples were analyzed using immunoassay methods and a specific gas chromatography mass spectrometry (GCMS) method for gammahydroxybutyrate (GHB). RESULTS: From 100 included patients (median age 24 years, 62 females), we collected 100 blood samples and 72 urine samples. Median time since exposure was 5 hours. Unreported drugs were found in 15 patients. Unreported drugs in the blood samples were clonazepam in 3, methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA) in 3, amphetamine in 2, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) in 2, tramadol in 1, cocaine in 1, and methamphetamine in 1. Unreported drugs in the urine samples were cocaine in 5, amphetamine in 4, ecstasy in 3, and cannabis in 2. Ethanol was found in 69 patients, all reporting ethanol ingestion. Median blood ethanol concentration was higher in patients with no unreported drugs detected, 1.00‰ (interquartile range (IQR) 0-1.52) vs. 0‰ (IQR 0-0.46) (p<0.001). GHB was not detected. CONCLUSION: Unreported drugs, possibly used for drink spiking, were found in 15% of patients. Blood ethanol concentration was higher when no unreported drugs were found. GHB was not detected in any patient.

Determination of Acetaminophen, Dexchlorpheniramine, Caffeine, Cotinine and Salicylic acid in 100 µL of Whole Blood by UHPLC-MS/MS.

A sensitive and robust ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method has been developed and validated for the quantification of acetaminophen, dexchlorpheniramine, caffeine, cotinine and salicylic acid in postmortem blood samples from children younger than 4 years. The sample was prepared by a protein precipitation with ice-cold methanol/acetonitrile mixture (85:15, v/v). The organic phase was evaporated to dryness and the residue was dissolved in the mobile phase. Separation, with gradient elution and an acidic mobile phase, was achieved on an Acquity UPLC® HSS T3 column. The compounds were quantified using a multiple reaction-monitoring mode. Two transitions were monitored for each compound and one for the deuterated internal standards. The mass spectrometric detection in the positive ion mode was performed for all the compounds except salicylic acid which was detected in the negative ionization mode. The limits of quantification were as follows: acetaminophen 0.30 mg/L, dexchlorpheniramine 0.0050 mg/L, caffeine 0.099 mg/L, cotinine 0.00035 mg/L and salicylic acid 1.3 mg/L. Between-assay and within-assay precisions were ≤15% (biases: -10% to 26%) and ≤10%, respectively. Extraction recoveries varied from 93% to 137%. The matrix effects in blood, corrected with deuterated internal standards, were 100% ± 10% for all compounds except dexchlorpheniramine (111%) and caffeine (138%).

A fatal blood concentration of 5-APB.

For the new psychoactive drug 5-(2-aminopropyl) benzofuran (5-APB), very limited knowledge is available regarding lethal concentrations. We present a case and report the post mortem blood concentration of a fatal outcome for a 25 year old man related to the consumption of 5-APB. After intake, he became unconscious and stopped breathing. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was started without success. After 30min he was declared dead at the scene. During autopsy, whole blood from the femoral vein was collected and screened for a wide range of medicinal drugs and drugs of abuse. 5-APB was initially identified by ultra high performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry (UHPLC-QTOF-MS) and subsequently confirmed by using ultra high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UHPLC-MS/MS). The only toxicological findings were ethanol 0.6g/L, tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) 0.0024mg/L and 5-APB 0.86mg/L. The cause of death was attributed to intake of 5-APB. Only one previous report of a fatal 5-APB concentration as the main toxicological agent exist in the literature, and the present concentration indicated that 5-APB could be lethal in lower concentrations than previously reported.

Fatal Adverse Event with Dabigatran in Elderly Patient with Reduced Kidney Function.

An elderly man with decreased kidney function was admitted to hospital with gastrointestinal bleeding. After remaining stable for 2 days in hospital, he became haemodynamically unstable and an adverse effect of dabigatran was suspected, but efforts to treat the patient failed and the following morning he passed away. In conjunction with the autopsy, blood samples from his hospital stay were analysed for dabigatran, revealing the highest concentration (6400 ng/mL) apparently reported to date. Supra-therapeutic dosing was, however, never suspected. Dabigatran is largely excreted through the kidneys. A possible cause of the high dabigatran concentrations could be a rapid decrease in kidney function that seemingly occurred over a period of 2 months, sometime between his initiation of treatment (eGFR 51-55 mL/min/1.73 m2 ) and subsequent hospital admission (eGFR 31 mL/min/1.73 m2 ). The increasing dabigatran concentrations in the patient was, however, not apparent to the prescribing doctor, as therapeutic drug monitoring of dabigatran is not recommended in current guidelines and no such analyses were performed. There may be a need to evaluate blood concentrations of dabigatran, in the light of the reported differences in interindividual concentrations, along with the increased risks of thromboembolic events with lower concentrations and major bleeding events with higher concentrations. Functional assays to assess concentrations of dabigatran in blood have been developed and are available in some hospitals to be used in suspected overdoses or before emergency surgeries. Methods to determine concentrations of dabigatran specifically have also been developed and can additionally be used for therapeutic drug monitoring in an outpatient setting, especially in high-risk individuals.