Understanding social risk factors in patients presenting to the emergency Department for Acute Heart Failure: A pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The standard of care for congestive heart failure (CHF) aims to slow disease progression and maximize patient function, however there is an increase in emergency department (ED) revisits and readmissions. Social risk factors play a role in the disease management and prognosis of CHF. There is a gap in the identification of low-risk CHF patient who would be safely discharged using an initial social risk factor stratification. OBJECTIVES: To generate a social risk profile for patients presenting to the ED with acute CHF exacerbation and identify variables that may increase the risk of 7-day and overall mortality, 30-day ED revisit, and readmission. METHODS: We conducted a pilot prospective survey-based study among adult patients presenting to the ED with acute CHF exacerbation. The combination of a self-report questionnaire and retrospective chart review was used to generate a CHF risk profile. RESULTS: A total of 62 patients were recruited in the pilot study with a mean age of 69.5 years. The preliminary data indicated that prior to this ED visit, 21% of patients were not aware of a previous CHF diagnosis; 64.5% of patients rated their sleep quality as poor or very poor; 72.6% reported orthopnea; and 43.5% reported recent weight gain. 37.1% of patients did not adhere to dietary recommendations and some patients did not adhere to their medication regime 100%. CONCLUSION: This study suggests establishing a social risk profile for patients presenting to the ED with CHF can help formulate a CHF-specific care plan and optimize multidisciplinary management to reduce ED revisits and readmissions.

Concept of virtual research scribes in clinical research in emergency medicine.

BACKGROUND: Due to the unique nature of working in the field of emergency medicine (EM), physicians often find it difficult to engage in research and scholarly activity while also working clinical shifts. Barriers to engaging in both academic and clinical work include lack of time, resources, and incentives. EM physicians are familiar with the concept of scribes working alongside them in the emergency department, and there are multiple papers published that examine and advocate for their benefits. OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to introduce the concept of virtual research scribes in clinical research in EM to offer physicians an opportunity to alleviate the burdens of balancing clinical work and academia simultaneously. METHODS: A research scribe is a student who is interested in healthcare and research and aids the PI in literature reviews and manuscript writing and editing, completely remotely. Six research scribes were hired in a pilot program to test their efficacy in a clinical research setting. The scribes were assigned tasks including manuscript writing and editing, performing literature reviews, and writing newsletters. RESULTS: The six research scribes in the pilot program proved to be beneficial for time management, collaboration, and editing in the research and scholarly process. The remote nature of the program allowed for flexibility in scheduling on both the PI and scribe's behalf. CONCLUSION: By utilizing a research scribe in their academic career, EM physicians can increase efficiency and productivity in scholarly work.

Acuity patterns of heart failure among emergency departments in a large health system.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic importance of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade (EHMRG) score in assessing short term mortality in Congestive Heart Failure (CHF) patients has been validated in the past, however, few studies have examined acuity patterns in the CHF population across healthcare settings. We aim to understand acuity patterns of CHF patients across a large health system for better resource utilization. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of adult patients with acute CHF in a large Metropolitan health system was performed in 3 community and 3 academic hospitals between January 2014 and January 2016. We collected demographic data, setting type, and calculated EHMRG score. Descriptive analysis of each hospital and mixed-effects negative binomial models were created to see patterns of acuity versus hospital volume. RESULTS: A total of 3312 Emergency Department (ED) visits among 2490 unique patients were included. Academic and community hospitals had 2168 patients and 1144 patients, respectively. Hospitals with higher volume treated a large amount of lower acuity patients. Academic hospitals had 30% of CHF ED visits in the lowest EHMRG quantile versus 20% at community hospital (p < 0.0001). Compared to EHMRG quantile 5b, hospital volume was 17%, 8% and 5% higher in quantile 1, 2, and 3 with a p-value less than 0.05 (IRR = 1.17; 1.08;1.05), respectively, but were not significant compared to quantile 4 and 5a. Revisit rates were lower in academic hospitals; admission rates were lower in community hospitals. CONCLUSION: Academic hospitals had a higher number of Acute Heart Failure (AHF) patients, larger number of low acuity patients, higher admission rates, but less revisit rates to the ED as compared to community hospitals. We suggest acuity specific interventions will help decrease admission and revisit rates.

Performance of Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade in the Emergency Department.

INTRODUCTION: The purpose of this study was to validate and assess the performance of the Emergency Heart Failure Mortality Risk Grade (EHMRG) to predict seven-day mortality in US patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with acute congestive heart failure (CHF) exacerbation. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review on patients presenting to the ED with acute CHF exacerbation between January 2014-January 2016 across eight EDs in New York. We identified patients using codes from the International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10 Revisions, or who were diagnosed with CHF in the ED. Inclusion criteria were patients ≥ 18 years of age who presented to the ED for acute CHF. Exclusion criteria included the following: end-stage renal disease related heart failure; < 18 years of age; pregnancy; palliative care; renal failure; and "do not resuscitate" directive. The primary outcome was seven-day mortality. We used mixed-effects logistic regression models to estimate C-statistics and continuous net reclassification index for events and nonevents. RESULTS: We identified 3,320 ED visits associated with suspected CHF among 2,495 unique patients. Of the 3,320 ED visits, 94.7% patients were admitted to the hospital and 3.4% were discharged. The median age was 78.6 (interquartile range 68.01 - 86.76). There was an overall seven-day mortality of 2%, an inpatient mortality rate of 2.4%, and no mortality among the discharge group. Adding EHMRG to the risk prediction model improved the C-statistic (from 0.748 to 0.772) and led to a higher degree of reclassification for both events and nonevents. CONCLUSION: The EHMRG can be used as a valuable and effective screening tool in the US while considering disposition decision for patients with acute CHF exacerbation. Emergency medical services transport and metolazone use is much higher in the US population as compared to the Canadian population. We observed minimal to no short-term mortality among discharged CHF patients from the ED.