Evaluation of Rehabilitation Techniques for Traumatic Ulnar Nerve Injuries After Surgical Repair: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Traumatic ulnar nerve injuries often result in significant loss of motor and sensory function, negatively impacting patients' quality of life. Physical rehabilitation is crucial for recovery, but standardized treatment protocols are lacking. This study aims to systematically review rehabilitation techniques to identify future research direction and improve existing protocols for ulnar nerve injury patients. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane CENTRAL, Web of Science, and Scopus were queried from inception until July 31, 2023. Articles containing axonotmesis or neurotmesis injuries of the ulnar nerve were included. Reviews, opinions, editorials, technical reports without clinical outcomes, conference abstracts, non-English text, nonhuman studies, and studies without adult patients were excluded. Three independent reviewers performed screening and data extraction using Covidence, and risk of bias assessments utilizing Cochrane and JBI tools. Because of article heterogeneity, a narrative review was conducted. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) database, registration number CRD42023442016. RESULTS: This systematic review included one randomized controlled trial and four observational studies (103 patients), which exhibited differences in study quality. Overall, motor and sensory outcomes improved after rehabilitation. Rehabilitation techniques varied widely, and early sensory reeducation appeared to improve sensory function. Only two studies included patient-reported outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Diverse rehabilitation techniques are used to address ulnar nerve injuries. The low number of included studies, differences in study quality, and small sample size underscore the need for larger and more inclusive studies to improve functional recovery after ulnar nerve injuries. Future research should consider the impact of patient and injury characteristics to develop comprehensive treatment guidelines for these patients.

Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of chronic knee joint pain: a real-world cohort study with evaluation of prognostic factors.

BACKGROUND: Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (GNRFA) is an effective treatment for chronic knee pain. However, there has been minimal investigation of real-world, long-term outcomes and factors that predict treatment success after GNRFA. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effectiveness of GNRFA for chronic knee pain in a real-world population and identify predictive factors. METHODS: Consecutive patients who underwent GNRFA at a tertiary academic center were identified. Demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics were collected from the medical record. Outcome data were numeric rating scale (NRS) pain reduction and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC). Data were collected by standardized telephone survey. Predictors of success were evaluated with logistic and Poisson regression analyses. RESULTS: Of the 226 total patients identified, 134 (65.6 ± 12.7; 59.7% female) were successfully contacted and analyzed, with a mean follow-up time of 23.3 ± 11.0 months. Of those, 47.8% (n = 64; 95% CI: 39.5%-56.2%) and 61.2% (n = 82; 95% CI: 52.7%-69.0%) reported ≥50% NRS score reduction and ≥2-point NRS score reduction, respectively, and 59.0% (n = 79; 95% CI: 50.5%-66.9%) reported "much improved" on the PGIC questionnaire. Factors associated with a greater likelihood of treatment success (P < .05) were higher Kellgren-Lawrence osteoarthritis grade (2-4 vs 0-1); no baseline opioid, antidepressant, or anxiolytic medication use; and >3 nerves targeted. CONCLUSION: In this real-world cohort, approximately half of the participants experienced clinically meaningful improvements in knee pain after GNRFA at an average follow-up time of nearly 2 years. Factors associated with higher likelihood of treatment success were more advanced osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence Grade 2-4); no opioid, antidepressant, or anxiolytic medication use; and >3 nerves targeted.

A Comparison of Postoperative Outcomes Between Immediate, Delayed Immediate, and Delayed Autologous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction: Analysis of 2010-2020 NSQIP Data.

BACKGROUND: While many factors influence decisions related to the timing between mastectomy and flap-based breast reconstruction, there is limited literature comparing postoperative complications between immediate (IBR), delayed immediate (DIBR), and delayed (DBR) reconstruction modalities. Using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP), we sought to compare postoperative complication rates of each timing modality. METHODS: The NSQIP 2010-2020 database was queried for patients who underwent free flap breast reconstruction. Cases were categorized to include mastectomy performed concurrently with a free flap reconstruction, removal of a tissue expander with free flap reconstruction, and free flap reconstruction alone which are defined as IBR, DIBR, and DBR, respectively. The frequency of postoperative outcomes including surgical site infection (SSI), wound dehiscence, intraoperative transfusion, deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and return to operating room (OR) was assessed. Overall complication rates, hospital length of stay (LOS), and operative time were analyzed. Multivariable regression analysis controlling for age, race, BMI, diabetes, hypertension, ASA class, and laterality was performed. RESULTS: A total of 7,907 cases that underwent IBR, DIBR (n = 976), and DBR reconstruction (n = 6,713) were identified. No statistical difference in occurrence of SSIs, wound dehiscence, or DVT was identified. DIBR (9%) and DBR (11.9%) were associated with less occurrences of reoperation than IBR (13.2%, p < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate regression analysis demonstrated that DIBR and DBR were associated with a lower odds of complications and shorter operation time versus IBR. No statistically significant differences between DIBR and DBR in surgical complications, LOS, and operative time were identified. CONCLUSION: Awareness of overall complication rates associated with each reconstructive timing modality can be used to help guide physicians when discussing reconstructive options. Our data suggests that DIBR and DBR are associated with less overall complications than IBR. Physicians should continue to consider patients' unique circumstances when deciding upon which timing modality is appropriate.

Does the Contrast Dispersion Pattern During Fluoroscopically Guided Cervical Transforaminal Epidural Steroid Injection Predict Short-Term Pain and Functional Outcomes? An Exploratory Analysis of Prospective Cohort Data.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: No study has evaluated the relationship between contrast dispersion patterns and outcomes after fluoroscopically guided cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection (CTFESI). OBJECTIVES: Determine whether contrast dispersion patterns predict pain and functional outcomes after CTFESI. METHODS: Secondary analysis of data collected during two prospective studies of CTFESI for the treatment of refractory radicular pain. Contrast dispersion patterns visualized by true anteroposterior (AP) projections during CTFESIs were categorized by flow: 1) completely external to the lateral border of the neuroforamen (zone 1); 2) within the neuroforamen but without entry into the lateral epidural space (zone 2); and 3) with extension into the lateral epidural space (zone 3). At baseline and at 1 month post-CTFESI, neck pain, arm pain, and "dominant index pain" (the greater of arm or neck pain) were evaluated using a numeric rating scale (NRS); physical function was assessed using the Five-Item Version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-5). RESULTS: One-month post-CTFESI, neck pain, arm pain, and "dominant index pain" reductions of ≥50% were observed in 39.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 28.2-51.8), 55.6% (95% CI, 43.0-67.5), and 44.1% (95% CI, 32.7-56.2) of participants, respectively. Regarding "dominant index pain," 72.7% (95% CI, 40.8-91.2), 39.4% (95% CI, 24.2-57.0), and 37.5% (95% CI, 20.5-58.2) of participants reported ≥50% pain reduction when zone 1, zone 2, and zone 3 contrast flow patterns were observed. Contrast dispersion zone was not significantly associated with subgroup differences in neck pain, arm pain, or NDI-5 scores (P>0.05). CONCLUSION: Improvements in pain and function 1 month after treatment with CTFESI did not differ significantly based on the contrast dispersion pattern. Future study is needed to confirm or refute these findings in other procedural settings, in broader patient populations, and with longer-term outcome assessment.

Early Results on the Efficacy of Demineralized Bone Matrix, Bone Morphogenic Protein, and Freeze-dried Bone Chips in Alveolar Cleft Repair.

Background: Conventional treatment for alveolar cleft repair is done using autologous iliac crest alveolar bone graft (ABG). However, this method may not be ideal in all patients. Analysis of the efficacy of a mixture of demineralized bone matrix (DBX), bone morphogenic protein (rhBMP-2), and freeze-dried bone chips (FDBC) as an alternative for alveolar cleft repair was performed. Methods: Consecutive patients from August 2019 to June 2022 undergoing early alveolar cleft repair, concomitant hard palate and alveolar cleft repair, secondary alveolar cleft repair, and regrafting from a previously failed ABG were analyzed. Computed tomography scans were performed to evaluate graft take at least 6 months postoperatively. Images were reviewed and scored. Alveolar graft height and graft thickness were recorded. A standardized scoring system was developed, with a score of 0 representing no graft take and 3 representing best possible graft take. Results: Fifty-five consecutive alveolar clefts (43 patients) were identified as having undergone ABG and satisfied all the other inclusion criteria. Of these, 29 underwent first time ABG and 26 underwent redo ABG. The mean graft height and graft thickness recorded for all clefts was 2.2 and 2.0, respectively. Conclusions: Early results evaluating the efficacy of ABG using DBX, rhBMP-2, and FDBC show feasibility in regard to both graft height and thickness when using a maxillary computed tomography scan to measure the bone graft take. These results suggest that DBX, rhBMP-2, and FDBC may act as a versatile bone graft material in cleft care, although further studies are needed to determine long-term outcomes.

The effectiveness of cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections for the treatment of cervical radicular pain: A prospective cohort study reporting 12-month outcomes.

Objectives: To evaluate the effectiveness of cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injection (CTFESI) for the treatment of unilateral cervical radicular pain. Design: Single-group prospective cohort study. Methods: Outcomes included ≥50% reductions in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for arm pain, ≥30% Neck Disability Index (NDI-5) improvement, health-related quality of life (EQ-5D), global improvement (PGIC), personal goal achievement (COMBI), Chronic Pain Sleep Index (CPSI), and healthcare utilization at one, three, six, and 12 months. Data analysis included descriptive statistics with the calculations of 95% confidence intervals (CIs), contingency table analysis, and multilevel logistic regression (LR) analysis, including a worst-case (WC) sensitivity analysis in which missing data were treated as treatment failure. Participants who were treated surgically were considered failures in the categorical analyses. Results: 33 consecutively enrolled participants (63.6% females, 51.2 ± 12.2 years of age, BMI 28.3 ± 4.5 kg/m2) were analyzed. Success rates for ≥50% reduction in NRS for arm pain at one, three, six and 12 months were 57.6% (95% CI 40.8-72.8%), 71.9% (95% CI 54.6-84.4%), 64.5% (95% CI 46.9-78.9%), and 64.5% (95% CI 46.9-78.9%). Success rates for ≥30% improvement in NDI-5 were 60.6% (95% CI 43.7-75.3%), 68.8% (95% CI 51.4-82.0%), 61.3% (95% CI 43.8-76.3%), and 71.0% (95% CI 53.4-83.9%). In WC analysis, success rates for ≥50% arm NRS and NDI-5 were 0-4.3% lower between 1 and 12 months. PGIC scores were at least "much improved" or "very much improved," in 48.4-65.6% of participants between 1 and 12 months. 6.1%, 6.1%, and 3.0% had one, two, or three repeat injections, respectively. 18.2% of participants underwent surgery by 12 months. Participants showed significant improvements in arm NRS and NDI-5 after treatment (p < 0.05), multilevel logistic regression models showed no significant decline in improvements across the follow-up time points (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements in pain and disability were observed after CTFESI for up to 12 months in individuals with unilateral cervical radicular pain.

The association of payer type on genicular radiofrequency neurotomy treatment outcomes: Results of a cross-sectional study.

Background: Genicular radiofrequency neurotomy (GRFN) is an effective treatment for a subset of individuals with chronic knee pain. Previous studies demonstrate that Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries report worse outcomes following various interventional procedures compared with commercially insured patients. Objective: Evaluate the association of payer type on GRFN treatment outcomes. Methods: Consecutive patients who underwent GRFN at a tertiary academic center were contacted for participation. Demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics were collected from electronic medical records. Outcome data were collected by standardized telephone survey at 6-12 months, 12-24 months and ≥24 months. Treatment success was defined as ≥50% numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) score reduction from baseline. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics for demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics. Logistic and Poisson regression analyses were performed to examine the association of variables of interest and pain reduction. Results: One hundred thirty-four patients treated with GRFN (mean 65.6 ± 12.7 years of age, 59.7% female) with a mean follow-up time of 23.3 ± 11.3 months were included. Payer type composition was 48.5% commercial (n = 65), 45.5% Medicare (n = 61), 3.7% Medicaid (n = 5), 1.5% government (n = 2), and 0.8% self-pay (n = 1). Overall, 47.8% of patients (n = 64) reported ≥50% NPRS score reduction after GRFN. After adjusting for age, follow-up duration, Kellgren-Lawrence osteoarthritis grade, baseline opioid use, antidepressant/antianxiety medication use, history of knee replacement, and number of RFN lesions placed, the logistic regression model showed no statically significant association between payer type and treatment outcome (OR = 2.11; 95% CI = 0.87, 5.11; p = 0.098). Discussion/conclusion: In this study, after adjusting for demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics, we found no association between payer type and treatment success following GRFN. This observation contrasts findings from other interventional studies reporting an association between payer category and treatment success.

Percutaneous treatments for residual and/or phantom limb pain in adults with lower-extremity amputations: A narrative review.

Residual limb pain (RLP) and phantom limb pain (PLP) profoundly affect the lives of many individuals who have undergone lower- or upper-extremity amputation. Despite the considerable impact of RLP/PLP on quality of life in persons with amputation, there have been few attempts to evaluate the efficacy of percutaneous interventions in the treatment of RLP and/or PLP. This narrative review evaluates the effectiveness of percutaneous treatments for RLP and/or PLP in patients after lower-extremity amputation. Peripheral nerve stimulation, alcohol neurolysis, conventional thermal radiofrequency ablation, perineural corticosteroid injection, botulinum toxin injection, and etanercept injection were associated with varying success rates. Wide confidence intervals and small treatment cohorts impede assessments of overall success. High-quality studies of nonsurgical, percutaneous treatments for RLP and/or PLP are lacking. Well-designed randomized controlled trials and large cohort studies with comparison groups using validated outcomes are needed to determine the effectiveness of nonsurgical interventions for the treatment of RLP and PLP.

The Effectiveness of Fluoroscopically Guided Genicular Nerve Radiofrequency Ablation for the Treatment of Chronic Knee Pain Due to Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review.

ABSTRACT: The objective was to determine the effectiveness of fluoroscopically guided genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for painful knee osteoarthritis. Primary outcome measure was improvement in pain after 6 mos. Secondary outcomes included the Oxford Knee Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index. Two reviewers independently assessed publications before October 10, 2020. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool and Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system were used. One hundred ninety-nine publications were screened, and nine were included. Six-month success rates for 50% or greater pain relief after radiofrequency ablation ranged from 49% to 74%. When compared with intra-articular steroid injection, the probability of success was 4.5 times higher for radiofrequency ablation (relative risk = 4.58 [95% confidence interval = 2.61-8.04]). When radiofrequency ablation was compared with hyaluronic acid injection, the probability of treatment success was 1.8 times higher (relative risk = 1.88, 95% confidence interval = 1.38-2.57). The group mean Oxford Knee Score and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index scores improved in participants receiving genicular radiofrequency ablation compared with intra-articular steroid injection and hyaluronic acid injection. According to Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation, there is moderate-quality evidence that fluoroscopically guided genicular radiofrequency ablation is effective for reducing pain associated with knee osteoarthritis at minimum of 6 mos. Further research is likely to have an important impact on the current understanding of the long-term effectiveness of this treatment.

Thoracic transforaminal epidural steroid injection for management of thoracic spine pain: A multicenter cross-sectional study of short-term outcomes.

Background: Thoracic transforaminal epidural steroid injections (TFESIs) are procedures performed for the treatment of thoracic spine pain (TSP). The literature on these interventions is sparse. Purpose: To report outcomes of thoracic TFESIs for TSP indications. Study design: Multicenter, retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study. Patient sample: Consecutive patients receiving thoracic TFESIs at three academic spine centers. Outcome measures: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients reporting at least 50% improvement in NRS pain score at short-term follow-up (>1 week, <3 months post-injection). Methods: A chart review was performed of consecutive patients who underwent a thoracic TFESI over a 4- to 10-year time period at three academic spine centers and had reported an NRS pain score at short-term follow-up. Results: Overall, 19/64 patients (30% [95% CI 20-42%]) experienced ≥50% relief following the injection at a median 22 days follow-up. 42% [95% CI 31-54%] experienced at least a 2-point improvement in NRS score. There was a slight improvement in median NRS scores from pre-to post-procedure of -1 (IQR -3, 0), from 6/10 to 5/10 (p â€‹< â€‹0.001). The success rate (≥50% pain relief) was 36% [95%CI 22-52%] in those with a disc herniation as compared to 21% [95%CI 10-40%]) in those with degenerative stenosis; however, the difference did not reach statistical significance. There was a trend towards a greater success rate in those who were employed vs. unemployed (43% [95% CI 27-61%] vs. 19% [95% CI 9-36%]). Conclusions: This is the largest series reporting outcomes from thoracic TFESI to date. Overall, the observed success rate was low compared to known success rates associated with TFESI for the treatment of pain at cervical and lumbar spinal regions.

A comparison of the effectiveness of cervical medial branch radiofrequency ablation for chronic facet joint syndrome in patients selected by two common medial branch block paradigms.

Background: Cervical medial branch radiofrequency ablation (CMBRFA) is effective when patients are selected by dual medial branch blocks (MBBs). SIS guidelines recommend 100% pain improvement after dual comparative MBBs before CMBRFA; however, our prior investigation showed similar outcomes in those selected by a lesser strict paradigm. Objective: Compare pain and patient impression of improvement after CMBRFA in individuals stratified by a less stringent (80-99%) dual MBB response than those selected by the 100% criteria. Design: Cross-sectional study. Methods: Follow-up was conducted via standardized telephone survey at ≥6 months post-CMBRFA to obtain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) pain and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) scores. Primary and secondary outcomes were within-group and between-group differences in the proportions of patients reporting ≥50% NRS score reduction and PGIC scores. Results: Medical records of 195 consecutive patients were reviewed; 100 individuals were analyzed. 48% (95% CI 35-61%) and 52% (95% CI 37-67%) of the 80-99% and 100% MBB groups, reported ≥50% pain reduction at ≥6 months post-CMBRFA. 74% (95% CI 63-85%) and 67% (95% CI 52-81%) of the 80-99% and 100% MBB groups reported a PGIC score consistent with "improved" or "very much improved." There were no significant between-group differences in any outcome at any time point. Conclusions: We observed similar rates of pain relief and global improvement after CMBRFA in patients selected by dual MBBs with ≥80% symptom relief versus 100% relief. This provides evidence that a more practical criteria, compared to a more strict selection paradigm, may result in similar clinical outcomes.

Image Guided Bone Marrow Biopsy.

Bone marrow biopsy and aspiration are common diagnostic procedures used for the diagnosis and monitoring of multiple conditions including hematologic malignancies, non-hematologic malignancies, infection, and metabolic processes. While these procedures can be done on the inpatient floor or in clinic, imaging guidance has been utilized to improve patient safety. This article will review the patient work-up and considerations, as well as technique for performing both computed tomography and fluoroscopic guided bone marrow biopsies.

Novice vs expert inter-rater reliability of the balance error scoring system in children between the ages of 5 and 14.

BACKGROUND: The Balance Error Scoring System (BESS) is a tool to measure balance, however, no studies have shown its reliability between novice and expert raters. RESEARCH QUESTION: What is the inter-rater reliability of BESS measurements when performed by novice raters compared to experts, and does completion of a focused, online training module increase the inter-rater reliability among novice raters? METHODS: In this reliability study, 5 novice volunteers were asked to independently rate BESS tests from 50 random prerecorded BESS videos of normal healthy subjects aged 5-14. Novice raters regraded the same 50 videos after receiving a formal training. The novices' scores before and after the formal training were compared to one another and then the scores were compared to 4 expert scores. Intraclass correlation (ICC) with 95 % confidence intervals or percent agreements were calculated and compared across groups. RESULTS: For the total BESS score, novice raters showed good reliability (ICC 0.845) which did not change with a formal training (ICC 0.846). Expert raters showed excellent reliability (ICC 0.929). Poor to moderate reliability was noted in the foam stance-single leg in the untrained novice and trained novice group (ICCs 0.452 and 0.64 L respectively). SIGNIFICANCE: BESS testing by novice raters with only written instruction and no formal training yields good inter-rater reliability. In contrast, BESS testing by expert raters yields excellent reliability. A focused training for novice raters conferred a small improvement in the reliability of the scoring of the single leg stance on foam condition but not a significant difference to the overall BESS score. While novices demonstrated promising reliability for overall BESS scores, optimizing clinical research using the BESS with expert raters show the highest reliability.