To what extent is the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) associated with quality of life as measured using the EORTC C30 and CR38 quality of life questionnaires?

PURPOSE: Treatment of rectal cancer often results in disturbed anorectal function, which can be quantified by the Low Anterior Resection Syndrome (LARS) score. This study investigates the association of impaired anorectal function as measured with the LARS score with quality of life (QoL) as measured with the EORTC-QLQ-C30 and CR38 questionnaires. METHODS: All stoma-free patients who had undergone sphincter-preserving surgery for rectal cancer from 2000 to 2014 in our institution were retrieved from a prospective database. They were contacted by mail and asked to return the questionnaires. QoL was evaluated in relation to LARS and further patient- and treatment factors using univariate and multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of the eligible patients (n = 331), 261 (78.8%) responded with a complete LARS score. Mean score for global QoL according to the EORTC-QLQ-C30 questionnaire was 63 ± 21 for all patients. If major LARS was present, mean score decreased to 56 ± 19 in contrast to 67 ± 20 in patients with no/minor LARS (p < 0.001). In regression analysis, major LARS was furthermore associated with reduced physical, role, emotional, cognitive and social functioning as well as impaired body image, more micturition problems and poorer future perspective. It was not related to sexual function. The variance explained by major LARS in the differences of QoL was approximately 10%. CONCLUSION: The presence of major LARS after rectal resection for cancer is negatively associated with global health as well as many other aspects of QoL. Preserving anorectal function and treatment of LARS are potential measures to improve QoL in this patient group.

Outcome of bowel function following anterior resection for rectal cancer-an analysis using the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score.

PURPOSE: Severity of anorectal dysfunction after low anterior resection is associated with various patient- and treatment-related factors. We aimed to quantify anorectal dysfunction after treatment for rectal cancer using the low anterior resection syndrome (LARS) score. METHODS: We retrieved from a prospective database 331 eligible patients on whom anterior resection for rectal cancer had been performed from 2000 to 2014. All patients were sent a LARS score accompanied by a supplementary questionnaire. Response rate was 78.8% (261 patients). The main outcome measure was the relation of the LARS score to potentially associated patient and treatment factors. Secondary endpoints were further measures that reflect anorectal dysfunction, e.g., Vaizey score. RESULTS: Overall, 144 (55.2%) patients exhibited scores > 20 reflecting minor (n = 51 (19.5%)) or major (n = 93 (35.6%)) LARS. A significant difference for scores > 20 was found for intersphincteric resection (IR, 73.2% affected patients) compared to total mesorectal excision (TME, 58.4%) and partial mesorectal excision (PME, 38.0%, p = 0.001). Radio(chemo)therapy resulted in LARS scores > 20 in 64.6% of patients compared to 43.1% in patients without irradiation (p = 0.001). Type of procedure (TME and IR as compared to PME), radio(chemo)therapy, and younger age were independently associated with LARS in logistic regression analysis. However, younger age remained the only independent factor for higher scores after exclusion of PME. CONCLUSIONS: The LARS score identified a substantial proportion of patients after surgery for rectal cancer with anorectal dysfunction. The extent of surgical procedure is independently associated with the severity of symptoms whereas the role of radiotherapy needs further assessment.

[Low anterior resection syndrome-Causes and treatment approaches]. / "Low anterior resection syndrome" ­ Ursachen und therapeutische Ansätze.

BACKGROUND: With improvement of the oncological prognosis and more sphincter-preserving procedures for rectal cancer of the lower third, the functional sequelae of anterior rectal resection become more and more predominant and are summarized under the term low anterior resection syndrome (LARS). MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this narrative review the causes, associated factors, prevalence, diagnostics and treatment strategies are presented based on an evaluation of the international literature. RESULTS: The central role of the rectum in the physiology of defecation and continence explains the frequency of symptoms following anterior rectal resection. In an unselected patient population a major LARS is to be expected in approximately 40% and a minor LARS in approximately 20%. The most important factor is the length of the remaining rectal stump. The diagnosis of LARS is made clinically and can be quantified by scores, especially by the LARS score. Treatment options range from patient counselling to stoma construction and a symptom-related, stepwise approach is generally accepted. CONCLUSION: While the evidence for the causes, the quantification and determination of associated factors of LARS is good, the treatment options are based either on experience or on only few studies.

Cultivation of EPC and co-cultivation with MSC on ß-TCP granules in vitro is feasible without fibronectin coating but influenced by scaffolds' design.

INTRODUCTION: Meanwhile, the osteoconductive properties of frequently used synthetic bone grafts can be improved by the use of osteoinductive cells and growth factors. Nevertheless, the cultivation of endothelial progenitor cells (EPC) seems to be difficult and requires a pre-conditioning of the scaffolds with fibronectin. Additionally, the influence of the scaffolds' design on cell cultivation is not fully elucidated. METHODS: As scaffold, a commercially available ß-tricalcium phosphate was used. 5 × 105 EPC, or 5 × 105 MSC or a combination of each 2.5 × 105 cells was seeded onto the granules. We investigated seeding efficiency, cell morphology, cell metabolism, adherence, apoptosis and gene expression of EPC and MSC in this in vitro study on days 2, 6 and 10. RESULTS: Total number of adherent cells was higher on the ß-TCP without fibronectin coating. The number of cells in all approaches significantly declined when a solid ß-TCP was used. Metabolic activity of MSC was comparable throughout the scaffolds and increased until day 10. Additionally, the amount of supernatants VEGF was higher for MSC than for EPC. DISCUSSION: Our results demonstrate that a coating of the scaffold for successful cultivation of EPC in vitro is not necessary. Furthermore, our study showed that structural differences of the scaffolds significantly influenced cell adherence and metabolic activity. Thereby, the influence on EPC seems to be higher than on MSC.