The relationship of TP53 R72P polymorphism to disease outcome and TP53 mutation in myelodysplastic syndromes.

Nonsynonymous TP53 exon 4 single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), R72P, is linked to cancer and mutagen susceptibility. R72P associations with specific cancer risk, particularly hematological malignancies, have been conflicting. Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with chromosome 5q deletion is characterized by erythroid hypoplasia arising from lineage-specific p53 accumulation resulting from ribosomal insufficiency. We hypothesized that apoptotically diminished R72P C-allele may influence predisposition to del(5q) MDS. Bone marrow and blood DNA was sequenced from 705 MDS cases (333 del(5q), 372 non-del(5q)) and 157 controls. Genotype distribution did not significantly differ between del(5q) cases (12.6% CC, 38.1% CG, 49.2% GG), non-del(5q) cases (9.7% CC, 44.6% CG, 45.7% GG) and controls (7.6% CC, 37.6% CG, 54.8% GG) (P=0.13). Allele frequency did not differ between non-del(5q) and del(5q) cases (P=0.91) but trended towards increased C-allele frequency comparing non-del(5q) (P=0.08) and del(5q) (P=0.10) cases with controls. Median lenalidomide response duration increased proportionate to C-allele dosage in del(5q) patients (2.2 (CC), 1.3 (CG) and 0.89 years (GG)). Furthermore, C-allele homozygosity in del(5q) was associated with prolonged overall and progression-free survival and non-terminal interstitial deletions that excluded 5q34, whereas G-allele homozygozity was associated with inferior outcome and terminal deletions involving 5q34 (P=0.05). These findings comprise the largest MDS R72P SNP analysis.

Clinical tools for success in managing care.

Managing care effectively requires a coalition of services that are sensitive to individual needs, promote effective resource use, support physician practice, and ensure coordination of services across the continuum. Several clinical tools exist to establish structures, systems, and processes that integrate management of expected and unexpected patient and family needs across the life span and throughout the health care continuum. System evaluation; unrelenting communication; continuous improvement; case management; empowerment; standards-based clinical practice; and satisfaction of the patient, family, and care provider are some of the tools available to develop systems that effectively manage health and illness. This article provides some examples of several of these "tools," the process of development and implementation, and evaluation strategies.