Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
J Periodontol ; 2024 Jun 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38865252

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This study compared the progression of experimental peri-implantitis between alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) and spontaneous healing (SH) sites in infected (IT) and noninfected tooth (NIT). METHODS: Bilateral mandibular third or fourth premolars of six beagle dogs were randomly assigned to IT and NIT groups. Before extraction, chronic dehiscence defects were created at the mesial root of mid-buccal area in IT group. Four weeks later, the mesial roots of the third and fourth premolars were extracted in all groups.ARP procedure was randomly conducted on one side of the extraction sockets using collagenated bovine bone substitutes and resorbable collagen membrane, and contralateral side was allowded spontaneous healing. After 12 weeks of healing, bone-level implants (ϕ 3.6 × 8.0 mm) were placed at the extraction sockets. Three months of ligature induced peri-implantitis and three months of spontaneous progression were allowed, with radiographs taken at each phase. Biopsies were retrieved at the implant site for histomorphometric, immunohistochemical, and polarized light-microscopic analyses. RESULTS: Radiography demonstrated that the changes in the marginal bone level during the spontaneous progression period showed no significant differences between ARP and SH sites. Only small and/or nonsignificant differences in the progression of peri-implantitis were observed between ARP and SH sites in histomorphometric, immunohistochemical, and polarized light microscopic analyses. Additionally, the IT and NIT groups exhibited similar outcomes for most parameters. CONCLUSION: ARP with xenogenic bone substitutes might provide similarly robust results as SH sites regarding the progression of experimental peri-implantitis, irrespective of the infected or noninfected nature of the site before tooth extraction.

2.
BMB Rep ; 57(7): 342, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39079709

RESUMO

[Erratum to: BMB Reports 2024; 57(3): 149-154, PMID: 37817436, PMCID: PMC10979347] The BMB Reports would like to correct in BMB Rep. 57(3):149-154, titled "Stomach clusterin as a gut-derived feeding regulator". This research was supported by the Creative-Pioneering Researchers Program through Seoul National University. Since grant name and number are incorrect, this information has now been corrected as follows: This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Korean government (2020R1A2C3004843, 2022M3E5E8017213 to M-S.K., 2020R1C1C10 08033 to O.K.) and by Creative-Pioneering Researchers Program through Seoul National University (to O.K.). The authors apologize for any inconvenience or confusion that may be caused by this error. The ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS of Original PDF version have been corrected.

SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA