RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To describe clinical, biological, radiological presentation and W4 status in COVID-19 elderly patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients ≥ 70 years with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and hospitalized in the Infectious Diseases department of the Pitié-Salpêtrière hospital, Paris, France, from March 1st to April 15th 2020 were included. The primary outcome was death four weeks after hospital admission. Data on demographics, clinical features, laboratory tests, CT-scan findings, therapeutic management and complications were collected. RESULTS: All in all, 100 patients were analyzed, including 49 patients ≥ 80 years. Seventy percent had ≥2 comorbidities. Respiratory features were often severe as 48% needed oxygen support upon admission. Twenty-eight out of 43 patients (65%) with a CT-scan had mild to severe parenchymal impairment, and 38/43 (88%) had bilateral impairment. Thirty-two patients presented respiratory distress requiring oxygen support ≥ 6 liters/minute. Twenty-four deaths occurred, including 21 during hospitalization in our unit, 2 among the 8 patients transferred to ICU, and one at home after discharge from hospital, leading to a global mortality rate of 24% at W4. Age, acute renal failure and respiratory distress were associated with mortality at W4. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of elderly COVID-19 patients with several comorbidities and severe clinical features survived, a finding that could provide arguments against transferring the most fragile patients to ICU.
Assuntos
COVID-19/diagnóstico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , COVID-19/diagnóstico por imagem , COVID-19/mortalidade , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de TempoRESUMO
The issue of intensive and palliative care in patients with chronic disease frequently arises. This review aims to describe the prognostic factors of chronic respiratory diseases in stable and in acute situations in order to improve the management of these complex situations. The various laws on patients' rights provide a legal framework and define the concept of unreasonable obstinacy. For patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, the most robust decision factors are good knowledge of the respiratory disease, the comorbidities, the history of previous exacerbations and patient preferences. In the case of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, it is necessary to know if there is a prospect of transplantation and to assess the reversibility of the respiratory distress. In the case of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, treatment decisions depend on the presence of advance directives about the use of intubation and tracheostomy. For lung cancer patients, general condition, cancer history and the tumor treatment plan are important factors. A multidisciplinary discussion that takes into account the patient's medical history, wishes and the current state of knowledge permits the taking of a coherent decision.
Assuntos
Cuidados Críticos/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Transtornos Respiratórios/complicações , Transtornos Respiratórios/terapia , Doença Crônica , Tomada de Decisões , Humanos , Conforto do Paciente/métodos , Prognóstico , Transtornos Respiratórios/diagnósticoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: The modified French version of the Appropriateness Evaluation Protocol (AEPf) has been validated. Inappropriate days according to simple medical and technical criteria are identified with this tool. The aim of this study is to highlight the interest of investigating the reasons for inappropriate days and to assess the inter-observers reliability of the questionnaire developed for this purpose. METHODS: This questionnaire collects on one hand the needs of patients - distinguishing health care and accommodation needs - and on the other hand the reasons for inappropriate hospital days. The data were collected from January to September 1998 in nine voluntary medical and surgical departments. For each day of study randomly selected, each inappropriate hospital day according to AEPf has been included. Data were collected by two health professionals (a nurse and a physician), using a concurrent design. RESULTS: The reliability of the over-ride option of the appropriateness assessment of the 345 hospital days was good (overall Kappa coefficient: 0.66; 95% CI: 0.55-0.78). The comparison of the two expert judgments on health care needs fulfilled during the hospital day was acceptable; the Kappa coefficient was 0.62 (95% CI: 0.52-0.72). The reliability of expert assessment on patient accommodation needs (home, housing facilities or hospital) was good (Kappa coefficient: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.60-0.75). When hospital was not the accommodation the most adapted for patient, the reliability of the reasons for inappropriate days was high (Kappa coefficient: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.61-0.80). Kappa coefficients were different between hospitals, indicating a center effect. CONCLUSION: This instrument has been found to be reliable and should be used in complement of the first part of the AEPf which assess the prevalence of inappropriate days. It might help to detect dysfunctions within or outside the hospital and thus be used for evaluation or planning of health care.
Assuntos
Revisão Concomitante/métodos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Inquéritos e Questionários/normas , Tradução , Adulto , Idoso , Revisão Concomitante/normas , Modificador do Efeito Epidemiológico , França , Pesquisa sobre Serviços de Saúde , Habitação , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação das Necessidades , Alta do Paciente , Seleção de Pacientes , Fatores SocioeconômicosRESUMO
Brucellosis, which decreased during the eighties in France, remains a public health problem in many Mediterranean countries. We report the case of a 65-year old patient native of Morocco, of thoracic aorta aneurysm and lumbar spondylodiscitis due to Brucella melitensis, revealed by haemoptysis and lumbar pains, with a favourable outcome after aortic graft resection, spinal plaster immobilization and specific lengthy antibiotic treatment. This case report is characterized by the absence of endocarditis or infectious focus near the aneurysm. Diagnosis of aneurysm and spondilitis due to Brucella melitensis is based on imaging and bacteriological and serological examination. Because of a clinical and biological intolerance for rifampicin and cotrimoxazole, this patient received ofloxacin-doxycyclin-streptomycin. We discuss antibiotic recommendations and stress the interest of the early diagnosis of complicated forms of brucellosis for a better prognosis.
Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/etiologia , Brucella melitensis , Brucelose/complicações , Discite/etiologia , Vértebras Lombares , Idoso , Aneurisma da Aorta Torácica/terapia , Brucelose/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Discite/terapia , Humanos , MasculinoRESUMO
PURPOSE: To assess preferences among individuals aged ≥80 years for a future hypothetical critical illness requiring life-sustaining treatments. METHODS: Observational cohort study of consecutive community-dwelling elderly individuals previously hospitalised in medical or surgical wards and of volunteers residing in nursing homes or assisted-living facilities. The participants were interviewed at their place of residence after viewing films of scenarios involving the use of non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV), invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV), and renal replacement therapy after a period of invasive mechanical ventilation (RRT after IMV). Demographic, clinical, and quality-of-life data were collected. Participants chose among four responses regarding life-sustaining treatments: consent, refusal, no opinion, and letting the physicians decide. RESULTS: The sample size was 115 and the response rate 87 %. Mean participant age was 84.8 ± 3.5 years, 68 % were female, and 81 % and 71 % were independent for instrumental activities and activities of daily living, respectively. Refusal rates among the elderly were 27 % for NIV, 43 % for IMV, and 63 % for RRT (after IMV). Demographic characteristics associated with refusal were married status for NIV [relative risk (RR), 2.9; 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI), 1.5-5.8; p = 0.002] and female gender for IMV (RR, 2.4; 95 %CI, 1.2-4.5; p = 0.01) and RRT (after IMV) (RR, 2.7; 95 %CI, 1.4-5.2; p = 0.004). Quality of life was associated with choices regarding all three life-sustaining treatments. CONCLUSIONS: Independent elderly individuals were rather reluctant to accept life-sustaining treatments, especially IMV and RRT (after IMV). Their quality of life was among the determinants of their choices.