Glycemic Control and the Risk of Tuberculosis: A Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes is a well-known risk factor for tuberculosis (TB) and is increasingly prevalent in low- and middle-income countries, where the burden of TB is high. Glycemic control has the potential to modify the risk of TB. However, there are few studies on the association between glycemic control and TB risk, and the results are inconsistent. METHODS AND FINDINGS: We assembled a cohort using 123,546 individuals who participated in a community-based health screening service in northern Taiwan from 5 March 2005 to 27 July 2008. Glycemic control was measured using fasting plasma glucose (FPG) at the time of screening. The cohort was followed up to 31 December 2012 for the occurrence of TB by cross-matching the screening database to the national health insurance database. Multiple imputation was used to handle missing information. During a median follow-up of 4.6 y, 327 cases of TB occurred. In the multivariable Cox regression model, diabetic patients with poor glycemic control (FPG > 130 mg/dl) had a significantly higher hazard of TB (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 2.21, 95% CI 1.63-2.99, p < 0.001) compared to those without diabetes. The hazard of TB in diabetic patients with good glycemic control (FPG ≤ 130 mg/dl) did not differ significantly from that in nondiabetic individuals (aHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.35-1.36, p = 0.281). In the linear dose-response analysis, the hazard of TB increased with FPG (aHR 1.06 per 10-mg/dl increase in FPG, 95% CI 1.03-1.08, p < 0.001). Assuming the observed association between glycemic control and TB was causal, an estimated 7.5% (95% CI 4.1%-11.5%) of incident TB in the study population could be attributed to poor glycemic control. Limitations of the study include one-time measurement of fasting glucose at baseline and voluntary participation in the health screening service. CONCLUSIONS: Good glycemic control could potentially modify the risk of TB among diabetic patients and may contribute to the control of TB in settings where diabetes and TB are prevalent.

Ambient air pollution and risk of tuberculosis: a cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: Several respirable hazards, including smoking and indoor air pollution from biomass, were suggested to increase the risk of tuberculosis. Few studies have been conducted on ambient air pollution and tuberculosis. We investigated the association between exposure to ambient air pollution and incidence of active tuberculosis. METHODS: We conducted a cohort study using 106,678 participants of a community-based screening service in Taiwan, 2005-2012. We estimated individual exposure to air pollution using data from the nearest air quality monitoring station and the road intensity within a 500 m buffer zone. The incidence of tuberculosis was ascertained from the national tuberculosis registry. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 6.7 years, 418 cases of tuberculosis occurred. Exposure to fine particulate matter (PM2.5) was associated with increased risk of active tuberculosis (adjusted HR: 1.39/10 µg/m3 (95% CI 0.95 to 2.03)). In addition, traffic-related air pollution including nitrogen dioxide (adjusted HR: 1.33/10 ppb; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.70), nitrogen oxides (adjusted HR: 1.21/10 ppb; 95% CI 1.04 to 1.41) and carbon monoxide (adjusted HR: 1.89/ppm; 95% CI 0.78 to 4.58) was associated with tuberculosis risk. There was a non-significant trend between the length of major roads in the neighbourhood and culture-confirmed tuberculosis (adjusted HR: 1.04/km; 95% CI 0.995 to 1.09). CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed a possible link between ambient air pollution and risk of active tuberculosis. Since people from developing countries continue to be exposed to high levels of ambient air pollution and to experience high rates of tuberculosis, the impact of worsening air pollution on global tuberculosis control warrants further investigation.

Beneficial effect of continuous positive airway pressure on lipid profiles in obstructive sleep apnea: a meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Dyslipidemia is considered as one mechanism causing cardiovascular sequelae in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) can reduce cardiovascular morbidities but its effect on lipid profiles is inconclusive. This study aimed to investigate the effects of CPAP on lipid profiles by a meta-analysis of the existing randomized controlled trials. METHODS: Studies were retrieved from MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, commercial websites, and article references up to August 2013 following the protocols (PROSPERO CRD42012002636). Randomized controlled trials investigating the CPAP effects on changes in lipid profiles in adult patients with OSA were included. Two independent researchers extracted relevant data in duplicate. The pooled effect was analyzed by fixed-effect generic inverse variance, and the heterogeneity was assessed using the I (2) statistic. RESULTS: Six trials with 348 patients and 351 controls were included. CPAP significantly lowered total cholesterol (mean, -6.23 mg/dl; 95% CI, -8.73 to -3.73; I (2), 0%; p < 0.001), triglyceride (mean, -12.60 mg/dl; 95% CI, -18.80 to -6.41; I (2), 25%; p < 0.001), and high-density lipoprotein (mean, -1.05 mg/dl; 95% CI, -1.69 to -0.40; I (2), 0%; p = 0.001), but not low-density lipoprotein (mean, -1.01 mg/dl; 95% CI, -5.04 to 3.02; I (2), 0%; p = 0.62). The lipid-lowering effects were homogeneous across the studies. By subgroup analysis, the reductions of lipid profiles were associated with the cross-over design, subtherapeutic CPAP as placebo, enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe OSA or daytime sleepiness, and CPAP treatment with short-term duration or good compliance. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis validates the observation that CPAP can reduce lipid profiles in patients with OSA.