Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Base de dados
País/Região como assunto
Ano de publicação
Tipo de documento
Assunto da revista
País de afiliação
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Microsurgery ; 33(1): 3-8, 2013 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22821641

RESUMO

The free jejunum has become an important method for reconstructing extensive oncologic defects of the upper esophagus and pharynx. The advantages of a single-staged reconstruction with a low incidence of morbidity have generally outweighed criticisms such as the requirement for a laparotomy and poor voice quality. The aim of the study was to present the technique and outcomes of free jejunal reconstruction of the upper esophagus in 31 consecutive cases. We reviewed our experience of free jejunal flaps undertaken over a 6-year period. Our surgical approach, complications, and results of swallow and speech restoration are described. A functional swallow was achieved by 27/31 patients. However, satisfactory voice restoration was seen in only a small proportion of patients. Complications at the donor site occurred in just one patient. The current review confirms the jejunal flap as a reliable reconstructive option with minimal donor site morbidity.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Esofagoplastia/métodos , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico/transplante , Jejuno/transplante , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Esofagectomia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs ; 37(6): 615-8, 2010.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21052028

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The surgical management of pressure ulcers traditionally involved staged procedures, with initial debridement of necrotic or infected material followed by reconstruction at a later date when the wound was deemed viable and free of gross infection. However, over the past decade, it has been suggested that a single-stage procedure, combining initial debridement and definitive reconstruction, may provide advantages over staged surgery. We present our experience with the staged approach and review the current evidence for both methods. SUBJECTS AND SETTINGS: : We reviewed medical records of all patients referred to our service for pressure ulcer management between October 2001 and October 2007. The National Rehabilitation Hospital is the national center in Ireland for primary rehabilitation of adults and children suffering from spinal and brain injury, serving patients locally and from around the country. METHODS: All subjects who were managed surgically underwent a 2-stage procedure, with initial debridement and subsequent reconstruction. The main outcome measures were length of hospital stay, postoperative morbidity and mortality, and time to complete ulcer healing. RESULTS: Forty-one of 108 patients with 58 pressure ulcers were managed surgically. All patients underwent initial surgical debridement and 20 patients underwent subsequent pressure ulcer reconstruction. Postreconstructive complications occurred in 5 patients (20%). The mean time to complete ulcer healing was 17.4 weeks. Partial flap necrosis occurred in 3 patients, but there were no episodes of flap failure. CONCLUSIONS: We achieved favorable results with a 2-stage reconstruction technique and suggest that the paucity of evidence related to single-stage procedures does not support a change in surgical management.


Assuntos
Procedimentos de Cirurgia Plástica/métodos , Úlcera por Pressão/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Desbridamento , Feminino , Humanos , Irlanda/epidemiologia , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Necrose , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Úlcera por Pressão/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Retalhos Cirúrgicos , Resultado do Tratamento , Cicatrização
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA