Coccidioides species antifungal susceptibility testing: Experience from a large healthcare system in the endemic region.

The clinical utility of Coccidioides species antifungal susceptibility testing (AST) remains unclear. This study describes the clinical course of eight patients with severe or chronic coccidioidomycosis and subsequent Coccidioides AST. We present the clinical manifestations, antifungal treatment regimens, and clinical outcomes for these patients.

The role of antifungal susceptibility in the management of coccidioidomycosis remains unknown. This report presents cases of complex coccidioidomycosis where clinicians elected to conduct antifungal susceptibility testing as part of the treatment approach.

Evolution of Cefiderocol Non-Susceptibility in Pseudomonas aeruginosa in a Patient Without Previous Exposure to the Antibiotic.

We report the emergence of non-susceptibility to cefiderocol from a subpopulation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa recovered from a patient without history of cefiderocol exposure. Whole genome sequencing identified mutations in major iron transport pathways previously associated with cefiderocol uptake. Susceptibility testing should be performed before therapy with siderophore cephalosporins.

Comparison of a Novel Rapid Lateral Flow Assay to Enzyme Immunoassay Results for Early Diagnosis of Coccidioidomycosis.

BACKGROUND: Coccidioidomycosis (CM) is a common cause of community-acquired pneumonia where CM is endemic. Manifestations include self-limited pulmonary infection, chronic fibrocavitary pulmonary disease, and disseminated coccidioidomycosis. Most infections are identified by serological assays including enzyme-linked immunoassay (EIA), complement fixation, and immunodiffusion. These are time-consuming and take days to result, impeding early diagnosis. A new lateral flow assay (LFA; Sona; IMMY, Norman, OK) improves time-to-result to 1 hour. METHODS: We prospectively enrolled 392 patients with suspected CM, compared the LFA with standard EIA and included procalcitonin evaluation. RESULTS: Compared with standard EIA, LFA demonstrates 31% sensitivity (95% confidence interval [CI], 20-44%) and 92% specificity (95% CI, 88-95%). Acute pulmonary disease (74%) was the most common clinical syndrome. Hospitalized patients constituted 75% of subjects, and compared with outpatients, they more frequently had ≥3 previous healthcare facility visits (P = .05), received antibacterials (P < .01), and had >3 antibacterial courses (P < .01). Procalcitonin (PCT) was <0.25 ng/mL in 52 (83%) EIA-positive patients, suggesting infection was not bacterial. CONCLUSIONS: When CM is a possible diagnosis, LFA identified nearly one-third of EIA-positive infections. Combined with PCT <0.25 ng/mL, LFA could reduce unnecessary antibacterial use by 77%.

Risk for primary cephalosporin resistance in Gram-negative bacteremia.

Objective: This study aimed to examine the clinical risk factors for cephalosporin resistance in patients with Gram-negative bacteremia caused by Escherichia coli (EC), Klebsiella pneumoniae (KP), Enterobacter cloacae (ENC), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PS). Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 400 adults with Gram-negative bacteremia. The goal was to review 100 cases involving each species and approximately half resistant and half susceptible to first-line cephalosporins, ceftriaxone (EC or KP), or cefepime (ENC or PS). Logistic regression was used to identify factors predictive of resistance. Results: A total of 378 cases of Gram-negative bacteremia were included in the analysis. Multivariate analysis identified significant risk factors for resistance, including admission from a chronic care hospital, skilled nursing facility, or having a history of infection within the prior 6 months (OR 3.00, P < .0001), requirement for mechanical ventilation (OR 3.76, P < .0001), presence of hemiplegia (OR 3.54, P = .0304), and presence of a connective tissue disease (OR 3.77, P = .0291). Conclusions: Patients without the identified risk factors should be strongly considered for receiving ceftriaxone or cefepime rather than carbapenems and newer broad-spectrum agents.

Heterogeneity in stone culture protocols and endourologist practice patterns: a multi-institutional survey.

Kidney stone cultures can be beneficial in identifying bacteria not detected in urine, yet how stone cultures are performed among endourologists, under what conditions, and by what laboratory methods remain largely unknown. Stone cultures are not addressed by current clinical guidelines. A comprehensive REDCap electronic survey sought responses from directed (n = 20) and listserv elicited (n = 108) endourologists specializing in kidney stone disease. Questions included which clinical scenarios prompt a stone culture order, how results influence post-operative antibiotics, and what microbiology lab protocols exist at each institution with respect to processing and resulting stone cultures. Logistic regression statistical analysis determined what factors were associated with performing stone cultures. Of 128 unique responses, 11% identified as female and the mean years of practicing was 16 (range 1-46). A specific 'stone culture' order was available to only 50% (64/128) of those surveyed, while 32% (41/128) reported culturing stone by placing a urine culture order. The duration of antibiotics given for a positive stone culture varied, with 4-7 days (46%) and 8-14 days (21%) the most reported. More years in practice was associated with fewer stone cultures ordered, while higher annual volume of percutaneous nephrolithotomy was associated with ordering more stone cultures (p < 0.01). Endourologists have differing practice patterns with respect to ordering stone cultures and utilizing the results to guide post-operative antibiotics. With inconsistent microbiology lab stone culture protocols across multiple institutions, more uniform processing is needed for future studies to assess the clinical benefit of stone cultures and direct future guidelines.