RESUMO
An elderly man presented with fever and evidence of Salmonella infection, and was diagnosed to have coexisting constrictive pericarditis and mycotic aneurysm of the aortic arch. Pericardiectomy was performed under cardiopulmonary bypass with good result. To avoid deep hypothermic circulatory arrest, an aorto-brachiocephalic bypass, instead of total arch replacement, was performed. This was followed by a staged carotid-carotid bypass, thoracic endovascular stent graft placement. He was subsequently treated with prolonged antibiotics, and inflammatory marker normalized afterwards. He was last seen well 2 years after the operation. Follow-up computer tomography (CT) scan at 18 months post-op showed no evidence of endoleak or fistulation. Our case demonstrated that a hybrid treatment of open pericardiectomy and aortic debranching followed by thoracic endovascular stent graft placement is feasible and associated with satisfactory mid-term outcome.
RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The effect of extended prophylactic antibiotic therapy on postoperative infective complications such as wound infection and intra-abdominal abscess for non-perforated appendicitis is poorly defined. METHODS: In a randomized controlled trial of 269 patients aged 15-70 years with non-perforated appendicitis undergoing open appendicectomy; 92 received single dose preoperative (group A), 94 received three-dose (group B) and 83 received 5-day perioperative (group C) regimens of cefuroxime and metronidazole. Postoperative infective complication was the primary endpoint. Secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and complications related to antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: The rate of postoperative infective complication was not significantly different among the groups (6.5% group A, 6.4% group B, 3.6% group C). The duration of antibiotic therapy had no significant effect on the length of hospital stay. Complications related to antibiotic treatment were significantly more common for 5-day perioperative antibiotic group (C) compared with single dose preoperative antibiotic group (A) (P = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Single dose of preoperative antibiotics is adequate for prevention of postoperative infective complications in patients with non-perforated appendicitis undergoing open appendicectomy. Prolonging the use of antibiotics can lead to unnecessary antibiotic related complications.
Assuntos
Antibioticoprofilaxia/métodos , Apendicite/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Anti-Infecciosos/administração & dosagem , Apendicectomia , Cefuroxima/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Metronidazol/administração & dosagem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/prevenção & controle , Pré-Medicação , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do TratamentoAssuntos
Veia Ilíaca/cirurgia , Leiomiossarcoma/cirurgia , Neoplasias Vasculares/cirurgia , Adulto , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Humanos , Veia Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagem , Veia Ilíaca/patologia , Leiomiossarcoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Leiomiossarcoma/patologia , Masculino , Invasividade Neoplásica , Radiografia , Neoplasias Vasculares/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Vasculares/patologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND & AIMS: In patients with stones in their bile ducts and gallbladders, cholecystectomy is generally recommended after endoscopic sphincterotomy and clearance of bile duct stones. However, only approximately 10% of patients with gallbladders left in situ will return with further biliary complications. Expectant management is alternately advocated. In this study, we compared the treatment strategies of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and gallbladders left in situ. METHODS: We randomized patients (>60 years of age) after endoscopic sphincterotomy and clearance of their bile duct stones to receive early laparoscopic cholecystectomy or expectant management. The primary outcome was further biliary complications. Other outcome measures included adverse events after cholecystectomy and late deaths from all causes. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-eight patients entered into the trial (89 in each group); 82 of 89 patients who were randomized to receive laparoscopic cholecystectomy underwent the procedure. Conversion to open surgery was needed in 16 of 82 patients (20%). Postoperative complications occurred in 8 patients (9%). Analysis was by intention to treat. With a median follow-up of approximately 5 years, 6 patients (7%) in the cholecystectomy group returned with further biliary events (cholangitis, n = 5; biliary pain, n = 1). Among those with gallbladders in situ, 21 (24%) returned with further biliary events (cholangitis, n = 13; acute cholecystitis, n = 5; biliary pain, n = 2; and jaundice, n = 1; log rank, P = .001). Late deaths were similar between groups (cholecystectomy, n = 19; gallbladder in situ, n = 11; P = .12). CONCLUSIONS: In the Chinese, cholecystectomy after endoscopic treatment of bile duct stones reduces recurrent biliary events and should be recommended.
Assuntos
Doenças dos Ductos Biliares/cirurgia , Colecistectomia Laparoscópica , Coledocolitíase/cirurgia , Cálculos Biliares/cirurgia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Doenças dos Ductos Biliares/etiologia , China , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica , Coledocolitíase/patologia , Feminino , Cálculos Biliares/patologia , Humanos , Laparotomia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
A coaxial technique was introduced for successful embolization of a large fusiform splenic artery aneurysm in a vessel with a large caliber and a great degree of tortuosity. A standard 5-F angioplasty catheter was placed at the immediate afferent artery for occlusion of arterial inflow into the aneurysm, thereby preventing intraaneurysmal hypertension during embolization of the efferent segment. This was followed by coaxial microcatheterization of the immediate efferent segment for coil embolization, and then embolization of the afferent segment. It is postulated that this approach may improve the safety of embolization of large aneurysms with unfavorable morphology by decreasing the pressure on the aneurysm just after closure of the efferent segment.
Assuntos
Aneurisma/terapia , Cateterismo/instrumentação , Artéria Esplênica/patologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Vasculares/métodos , Idoso , Aneurisma/diagnóstico por imagem , Cateterismo/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Hiperesplenismo/diagnóstico por imagem , Hiperesplenismo/terapia , Cirrose Hepática/diagnóstico por imagem , Cirrose Hepática/terapia , Artéria Esplênica/diagnóstico por imagem , Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios XRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic balloon dilation has been used to treat patients with gastric outlet obstruction caused by peptic stricture. This study assessed the role of endoscopic balloon dilation in patients with gastric outlet obstruction with or without Helicobacter pylori infection. METHODS: Consecutive patients seen between January 1996 and September 2001 with benign gastric outlet obstruction (defined as stenosis preventing the passage of a 9-mm diameter endoscope, vomiting, succussion splash, and recent weight loss) were prospectively studied. Exclusion criteria were the following: refusal to undergo dilation, and gastric outlet obstruction because of malignancy. At endoscopy, antral biopsy specimens were obtained for histopathologic evaluation and for a rapid urease test for Helicobacter pylori infection. Patients then underwent dilation with through-the-scope balloons. After balloon dilation, patients with Helicobacter pylori infection were treated to eradicate the infection. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients (33 men, 18 women; median age 65 years; IQR 44-79 years) were studied; 33 consented to endoscopic balloon dilation. Symptom resolution occurred in 25 patients (14 Helicobacter pylori positive, 11 Helicobacter pylori negative). During a median follow-up of 24 months (IQR 16-40 months), 3 of 14 patients in the Helicobacter pylori positive group and 6 of 11 in the Helicobacter pylori negative group developed further ulcer complications (p=0.039). CONCLUSIONS: After endoscopic dilation for gastric outlet obstruction, eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection is associated with fewer ulcer complications.
Assuntos
Obstrução da Saída Gástrica/etiologia , Obstrução da Saída Gástrica/terapia , Infecções por Helicobacter/complicações , Helicobacter pylori , Úlcera Péptica/complicações , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cateterismo , Feminino , Obstrução da Saída Gástrica/microbiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Úlcera Péptica/microbiologia , Estudos Prospectivos , RecidivaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Endoscopic drainage has replaced emergent surgery for biliary decompression in patients with acute cholangitis. The aim of this study was to prospectively compare the efficacy of the nasobiliary catheter and indwelling stent as temporary measures for biliary decompression in acute suppurative cholangitis caused by bile duct stones. METHODS: Over a 60-month period, 79 patients with acute cholangitis who required emergent endoscopic drainage were recruited. Indications for urgent drainage included any one of the following: temperature greater than 39 degrees C, septic shock with systolic blood pressure less than 90 mm Hg, increasing abdominal pain, and impaired level of consciousness. Patients who had previously undergone sphincterotomy or had coexisting intrahepatic duct stones were excluded. After successful bile duct cannulation, patients were randomized to receive either a nasobiliary catheter or indwelling stent without sphincterotomy for biliary decompression. Outcome measures included procedure time, complications, clinical response, and patient discomfort (scored with a 10-cm, unscaled visual analog score). RESULTS: Of the 79 patients, 5 were excluded because of previous sphincterotomy and intrahepatic duct stones, 40 were randomized to receive a nasobiliary catheter (NBC group), and 34 to receive indwelling stent (stent group). Demographic data were similar between the groups. All procedures were successful in the NBC group; there was one failure in the stent group. The mean (SD) procedure time was similar (NBC group 14.0 [9.3] minutes vs. stent group 11.4 [7.2] min). There were 2 ERCP-related complications in the NBC group. Four patients pulled out the nasobiliary catheter and one catheter became kinked. One stent occluded. There was a significantly lower mean (SD) patient discomfort score on day 1 after the procedure in the stent group (stent group 1.8 [2.6] vs. NBC group 3.9 [2.7]; p = 0.02 t test). The overall mortality rate was 6.8% (2.5% NBC group vs. 12% stent group). CONCLUSION: Endoscopic biliary decompression by nasobiliary catheter or indwelling stent was equally effective for patients with acute suppurative cholangitis caused by bile duct stones. The indwelling stent was associated with less postprocedure discomfort and avoided the potential problem of inadvertent removal of the nasobiliary catheter.