The natural history of untreated ocular hypertension and glaucoma.

Glaucoma is a chronic, progressive disease leading to irreversible blindness if left untreated; however, since reducing intraocular pressure has proven to be successful in slowing disease progression, little is known about the natural history of untreated glaucoma. This knowledge can be valuable in guiding management decisions in the era of personalized medicine. A systematic search was performed in Medline (PubMed), Embase, and Web of Science in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRIMSA) guidelines. The rate of structural and/or functional progression and conversion to glaucoma or to a more advanced stage of glaucoma are discussed for ocular hypertension and different types of open-angle glaucoma. Forty-three studies were included. Different rates of progression were found both among and within the different diagnostic groups that belong to the open-angle glaucoma spectrum. The highest rate was found in pseudoexfoliation glaucoma, followed by high tension glaucoma, normal tension glaucoma, and ocular hypertension, in decreasing order. The lowest rate was observed in glaucoma suspects. The known rates of progression provide valuable prognostic information for ophthalmologists and patients. Nonetheless, due to high variability among patients, individual progression cannot be accurately predicted and repeated follow-up examinations are required to estimate individual progression.

Is there an optimal dose of cardiac rehabilitation in coronary artery disease patients?

BACKGROUND: Many studies have shown that participation in cardiac rehabilitation reduces long-term morbidity and mortality after myocardial infarction. Therefore, both American and European evidence-based guidelines recommend cardiac rehabilitation. However, it is still unclear what the optimal dose of cardiac rehabilitation is. METHODOLOGY: The study is a monocenter, retrospective cohort study. We identified patients with stable ischemic heart disease, who participated in at least one phase II center-based cardiac rehabilitation session between 2010 and 2015. A total of 609 patients were included in this study. RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 609 patients. Statistically significant baseline differences between the four groups were observed for index coronary artery revascularization technique, age, dual antiplatelet therapy and smoking status. A total of number of 84 patients (13.8%) had a MACE in the four-year follow-up period. After adjustment for all significant predictors in the univariate analysis, patients who attended 36 or more sessions had a 47% lower risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.54; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.31 to 0.92), patients who attended 24 to 35 sessions had a 68% lower risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.32; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.15 to 0.67), patients who attended 12 to 23 sessions had a 56% lower risk of MACE (hazard ratio [HR], 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.21 to 0.92) than those who attended 1 to 11 sessions. CONCLUSION: There is a clear clinical benefit from participating in more than 11 CR sessions. The best outcomes are achieved in patient who participated between 24 and 35 CR sessions. These results underline again the importance of improving participation and adherence to CR programmes in Europe.