The Anesthesia Perioperative "Call for Help"-Experience at a Quaternary Pediatric Medical Center: Analysis of 67,564 Anesthesia Encounters.

BACKGROUND: During the past several decades, anesthesia has become increasingly safe. Truly major adverse events are rare, and anesthesia quality researchers have instituted programs to evaluate "near miss" or less critical adverse events to evaluate the safety of anesthesia delivery. In this study, we aimed to evaluate calls for emergency help in our institution as a surrogate for pending critical events. We hypothesized that calls would be more common in patients with high American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status, history of prematurity, and children with recent respiratory illness compared to those without these characteristics. METHODS: We analyzed emergent calls for help initiated by perioperative personnel ("STAT" calls) between August 2011 and September 2015 at Boston Children's Hospital. Our analysis had 2 phases: (1) All 193 STAT calls that occurred during this time period were analyzed for demographic variables (age, ASA physical status, gender) and specific features of the STAT calls (provider who initiated the call, anesthetic phase, presence of recent respiratory illness, location). We further categorized the STAT calls as "complicated" or "uncomplicated" based on an unexpected change in patient disposition, and analyzed how demographic factors and specific features related to the likelihood of a STAT call being complicated. (2) A subset of the total calls (108), captured after introduction of electronic intraoperative medical record in July 2012, were analyzed for the incidence of STAT calls by comparing the number and nature of the STAT calls to the number of surgical/diagnostic procedures performed. RESULTS: Univariable and multivariable analysis of the entire cohort of STAT calls (193 cases) identified several characteristics that were more likely to be associated with a complicated STAT call: higher ASA physical status; history of respiratory illness; cardiac inciting event; occurrence during induction phase of general anesthesia; postanesthesia care unit location; and calls initiated by an attending physician or a pediatric anesthesia fellow. Multivariable analysis of the subset of 108 indicated that age <1 year and a history of prematurity were independent predictors of a higher incidence of STAT calls. Offsite anesthesia services were associated with a lower frequency of STAT calls independent of the other variables. CONCLUSIONS: Our study offers the most comprehensive analysis of emergent perioperative calls for help in pediatric anesthesia to date. We identified several characteristics, independently associated with more complicated and frequent perioperative STAT calls. Further research is required to evaluate the utility of this information in preventing and treating adverse events in children undergoing surgery and anesthesia.

A Shared Opportunity for Improving Electronic Medical Record Data.

With the recent rapid adoption of electronic medical records (EMRs), studies reporting results based on EMR data have become increasingly common. While analyzing data extracted from our EMR for a retrospective study, we identified various types of erroneous data entries. This report investigates the root causes of the incompleteness, inconsistency, and inaccuracy of the medical records analyzed in our study. While experienced health information management professionals are well aware of the many shortcomings with EMR data, the aims of this case study are to highlight the significance of the negative impact of erroneous EMR data, to provide fundamental principles for managing EMRs, and to provide recommendations to help facilitate the successful use of electronic health data, whether to inform clinical decisions or for clinical research.

Making the pediatric perioperative surgical home come to life by leveraging existing health information technology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To design a patient data dashboard for the Department of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine at Boston Children's Hospital that supports care integration across the healthcare system as described by the pediatric perioperative surgical home (PPSH) initiative. RECENT FINDINGS: By using 360 Technology, patient data was automatically pulled from all available Electronic Health Record sources from 2005 to the present. The PPSH dashboard described in this report provides a guide for implementation of PPSH Clinical Care Pathways. The dashboard integrates several databases to allow for visual longitudinal tracking of patient care, outcomes, and cost. The integration of electronic information provided the ability to display, compare, and analyze selected PPSH metrics in real time. By utilizing the PPSH dashboard format the use of an automated, integrated clinical, and financial health data profile for a specific patient population may improve clinicians' ability to have a comprehensive assessment of all care elements. This more global clinical thinking has the potential to produce bottom-up, evidence-based healthcare reform. SUMMARY: The experience with the PPSH dashboard provides solid evidence for the use of integrated Electronic Health Record to improve patient outcomes and decrease cost.

Medication errors in a pediatric anesthesia setting: Incidence, etiologies, and error reduction strategies.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to: a) characterize the frequency, type, and outcome of anesthetic medication errors spanning an 8.5-year period, b) describe the targeted error reduction strategies and c) measure the effects, if any, of a focused, continuous, multifaceted Medication Safety Program. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. SETTING: All anesthetizing locations (57). PATIENTS: All anesthesia patients at all Boston Children's Hospital anesthetizing locations from January 2008 to June 2016 were included. INTERVENTIONS: Medication libraries, zero-tolerance philosophy, independent verification, trainee education, standardized dosing; retrospective study. MEASUREMENTS: Number and type of medication errors. MAIN RESULTS: 105 medication errors were identified among the 287,908 cases evaluated during the study period. Incorrect dose (55%) and incorrect medication (28%) were the most frequently observed errors. Beginning within 3 years of the implementation of the 2009 Medication Safety Program, the incidence declined to an average of 3.0 per 10,000 cases in the years from 2010 to 2016 (57% reduction) and declined to an average of only 2.2 per 10,000 cases since 2012 (69% reduction). Logistic regression indicated a 13% reduction per year in the odds of a medication error over the time period (odds ratio = 0.87, 95% CI: 0.79-0.95, P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS: Although medication errors persisted, there was a statistically significant reduction in errors during the study period. Formalized Medication Safety Programs should be adopted by other departments and institutions; these Programs could help prevent medication errors and decrease their overall incidence.

Safety and cost-effectiveness of port removal outside of the operating room among pediatric patients.

PURPOSE: The current emphasis on fiscally responsible health spending in the era of the Affordable Care Act and other health care reform necessitates cost-conscious delivery of care. "Value" in health care is defined as the quality of care divided by the cost. As such, health systems optimize value by providing the most cost-effective care possible without sacrificing safety or outcomes. Elective, minimal risk surgical procedures in children may be value-enhanced by moving from an operating room (OR) to a more cost-efficient setting. The purpose of this study was to assess the safety and cost of performing the removal of implantable central venous access devices ("ports") in locations other than the main OR. METHODS: We compared port removal at three sites: 1. Main OR, 2. Satellite OR, and 3. Clinic Procedure Room. This was a mixed-methods study including a retrospective review of medical records and prospective observation/interviewing. To calculate cost without the inherent biases of hospital charges, costs, and payments, we utilized the methodology of time-driven activity based costing. Specifically, we recorded time spent by the patient in hospital facilities and with health care personnel. This duration was then weighted with the hourly cost of each health care professional and hospital space. The Mann-Whitney U test compared time and cost across the three sites. Overall cost at each site was divided by overall cost at the referent site (Main OR) to obtain a ratio of cost savings. RESULTS: A total of 120 patients (40 per site) were included in the analysis. Demographic and clinical factors were not significantly different between sites. No complication occurred with port removal at any site. Time of the entire care episode was significantly decreased in the Clinic (median 161min, 95% confidence interval [CI] 134-188min), compared to the Main OR (median 235min, 95% confidence interval [CI] 209-251min) or Satellite OR (median 228min, 95% confidence interval [CI] 211-245min). Overall cost was decreased by 25% (95% CI: 13-34%) at the Clinic and by 6% (95% CI: -2-11%) at the Satellite OR, compared to the Main OR (referent, P<0.01). CONCLUSION: In our study, port removal in the Clinic Procedure Room was not associated with increased risk of negative outcomes. Shifting port removal from the Main OR to the Clinic may result in substantial cost savings.