[Argyrophilic grain disease: synergistic component of dementia?]. / Maladie des grains argyrophiles: composante synergique de la démence ?

INTRODUCTION: Argyrophilic grain disease (AGD) is one cause of neurodegenerative dementia with a variable clinical spectrum. A neuropathology study is required for diagnosis. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a 68-year-old patient presenting with cognitive decline associating with frontal dysfunction and parkinsonism. Death occurred two years after onset. The neuropathology study revealed a status criblosus in the basal ganglia, neurofibrillary tangles and AGD. DISCUSSION: We suggest that AGD could explain the atypical course of this dementia considering the fast cognitive decline, the clinical expression and the topography of the lesions. CONCLUSION: This case illustrates the possible synergistic deleterious effect of this pathology on other causes of dementia.

Indirect evidence for Delta-dependent intracellular processing of notch in Drosophila embryos.

Cell-cell signaling mediated by the receptor Notch regulates the differentiation of a wide variety of cell types in invertebrate and vertebrate species, but the mechanism of signal transduction following receptor activation is unknown. A recent model proposes that ligand binding induces intracellular processing of Notch; the processed intracellular form of Notch then translocates to the nucleus and interacts with DNA-bound Suppressor of Hairless (Su(H)), a transcription factor required for target gene expression. As intracellular processing of endogenous Notch has so far escaped immunodetection, we devised a sensitive nuclear-activity assay to monitor indirectly the processing of an engineered Notch in vivo. First, we show that the intracellular domain of Notch, fused to the DNA-binding domain of Gal4, regulated transcription, in a delta-independent manner. Second, we show that full-length Notch, containing the Gal4 DNA-binding domain inserted 27 amino acids carboxy-terminal to the transmembrane domain, activated transcription in a delta-dependent manner. These results provide indirect evidence for a ligand-dependent intracellular processing event in vivo, supporting the view that Su(H)-dependent Notch signaling involves intracellular cleavage, and transcriptional regulation by processed Notch.

Transcriptional repression by suppressor of hairless involves the binding of a hairless-dCtBP complex in Drosophila.

Notch is the receptor for a conserved signaling pathway that regulates numerous cell fate decisions during development [1]. Signal transduction involves the presenilin-dependent intracellular processing of Notch and the nuclear translocation of the intracellular domain of Notch, NICD [2-6]. NICD associates with Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)], a DNA binding protein, and Mastermind (Mam), a transcriptional coactivator [7-9]. In the absence of Notch signaling, Su(H) acts as a transcriptional repressor [10, 11]. Repression by Su(H) is relieved by the activation of Notch [12-16]. In the Drosophila embryo, this transcriptional switch from repression to activation is important for patterning the expression of the single-minded (sim) gene along the dorsoventral axis [12]. Here, we investigate the mechanisms by which Su(H) inhibits the expression of Notch target genes in Drosophila. We show that Hairless, an antagonist of Notch signaling [17-19], is required to repress the transcription of the sim gene. Hairless forms a DNA-bound complex with Su(H). Furthermore, it directly binds the Drosophila C-terminal Binding Protein (dCtBP), which acts as a transcriptional corepressor. The dCtBP binding motif of Hairless is essential for the function of Hairless in vivo. We propose that Hairless mediates transcriptional repression by Su(H) via the recruitment of dCtBP.

The neurogenic suppressor of hairless DNA-binding protein mediates the transcriptional activation of the enhancer of split complex genes triggered by Notch signaling.

The Notch protein (N) acts as a transmembrane receptor for intercellular signals controlling cell fate choices in vertebrates and invertebrates. The signal of N activation may be transduced directly from the cell surface into the nucleus by an evolutionarily conserved transcription factor, Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)], by its regulated nuclear import. Su(H) is shown here to play a direct role in the immediate response of the genome to N signaling in Drosophila. First, Su(H) mutant embryos derived from mutant germ-line clones exhibited a "neurogenic" phenotype of neural hypertrophy similar to the N phenotype. Second, the lack of N lateral signaling in these Su(H) mutant embryos was associated with a failure to express the m5 and m8 genes from the Enhancer of split Complex [E(spl)-C]. Finally, the Su(H) protein bound to the regulatory sequences of the E(spl)-C m5 and m8 genes, and these binding sites were required for the activation of the m5 and m8 promoters in the ventral neuroectoderm. The expression of the E(spl)-C m8 gene was found to be similarly regulated by Su(H) during wing imaginal disc development. Thus, the transcriptional activation of these E(spl)-C genes by Su(H) appears to be a direct and relatively general response to the activation of N. However, we also present evidence indicating that N signals in an Su(H)-independent manner during mesectoderm formation.

Role of suppressor of hairless in the delta-activated Notch signaling pathway.

The Notch protein (N) acts as a transmembrane receptor for intercellular signals controlling cell fate choices in vertebrates and invertebrates. Genetical and molecular evidence indicates that, during Drosophila neurogenesis, an evolutionarily conserved transcription factor, Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)], transduces the signal of N activation by its ligand Delta (D1). Su(H) plays a direct role in the immediate response of the genome to N signaling by up-regulating the transcription of the Enhancer of split Complex [E(spl)-C] genes. These findings suggest that the N transduction pathway can be described as a simple, linear cascade of molecular activation. At the molecular level, the mechanism of Su(H) "activation" is yet unknown. Two non-exclusive models have been proposed. In the first one, Su(H) binds to inactive N at the membrane. The binding of D1 to N in the extracellular space somehow interferes with the N-mediated cytoplasmic retention of Su(H), resulting in the nuclear translocation and "activation" of Su(H). In the second model, DNA-bound Su(H) is proposed to be "activated" in the nucleus by the direct binding of a processed form of N, acting as a transcriptional coactivator. This nuclear N protein would be generated by the ligand-induced proteolytic cleavage of the N transmembrane receptor.

The activity of Drosophila Hairless is required in pupae but not in embryos to inhibit Notch signal transduction.

Drosophila Hairless (H) encodes a negative regulator of Notch signalling. H activity antagonizes Notch (N) signalling during bristle development at the pupal stage. We show here by clonal analysis that H acts by inhibiting signal transduction rather than by promoting signal production, during both selection of microchaete precursors in the notum and vein cell differentiation in the wing. Allele-specific interactions further suggest that H inhibits Notch signal transduction by interacting directly with Suppressor of Hairless. Unexpectedly, this regulatory function of H appears to be essential only during imaginal development. Using a null allele of H that corresponds to a deletion of the H coding sequence, we show that embryos devoid of both maternal and zygotic gene products develop similarly to wild-type embryos. Thus, H activity is not strictly required to regulate N-mediated cell fate choices in the embryo.

Wingless and Hedgehog pattern Drosophila denticle belts by regulating the production of short-range signals.

The secreted proteins Wingless and Hedgehog are essential to the elaboration of the denticle pattern in the epidermis of Drosophila embryos. We show that signaling by Wingless and Hedgehog regulates the expression of veinlet (rhomboid) and Serrate, two genes expressed in prospective denticle belts. Thus, Serrate and veinlet (rhom) partake in the last layer of the segmentation cascade. Ultimately, Wingless, Hedgehog, Veinlet (an indirect activator of the Egfr) and Serrate (an activator of Notch) are expressed in non-overlapping narrow stripes. The interface between any two stripes allows a reliable prediction of individual denticle types and polarity suggesting that contact-dependent signaling modulates individual cell fates. Attributes of a morphogen can be ascribed to Hedgehog in this system. However, no single morphogen organises the whole denticle pattern.

Control of cell fate choices by lateral signaling in the adult peripheral nervous system of Drosophila melanogaster.

The thoracic integument of the adult fruit fly is a relatively simple but highly patterned structure. It is composed of sensory organ cells distributed within a monolayer of epidermal cells. Both cell types are easily detected at the cuticular surface, as each external sense organ forms a sensory bristle and each epidermal cell secretes a small nonsensory hair. Inhibitory cell-cell interactions play a key role in regulating the distribution as well as the formation of the sense organs. This review focuses on the role of these cell-cell interactions in the adoption of alternative cell fates. We also show that Notch, Hairless, and Suppressor of Hairless, three components of this intercellular signaling pathway, exhibit dose-dependent genetic interactions. Finally we address how this intercellular signaling mechanism may be modulated to result in highly reproducible outcomes.

Wingless capture by Frizzled and Frizzled2 in Drosophila embryos.

A variety of factors could influence how far developmental signals spread. For example, the Patched receptor limits the range of its ligand Hedgehog. Somehow, the Frizzled2 receptor has the opposite effect on its ligand. Increasing the level of Frizzled2 stabilizes Wingless and thus extends the Wingless gradient in Drosophila wing imaginal disks. Here we ask whether Frizzled or Frizzled2 affects the spread of Wingless in Drosophila embryos. We show that in the embryonic epidermis, the combined expression of both receptors is lowest in the engrailed domain. This is because expression of Frizzled is repressed by the Engrailed transcription factor, whereas that of Frizzled2 is repressed by Wingless signaling. Receptor downregulation correlates with an early asymmetry in Wingless distribution, characterized by the loss of Wingless staining in the engrailed domain. Raising the expression of either Frizzled or Frizzled2 in this domain prevents the early disappearance of Wingless-containing vesicles. Apparently, Wingless is captured, stabilized, and quickly internalized by either receptor. As far as we can tell, captured Wingless is not passed on to further cells and does not contribute to the spread of Wingless. Receptor downregulation in the posterior compartment may contribute to dampening the signal at the time when cuticular fates are specified.

[Signalling by Notch family receptors]. / Signalisation par les récepteurs de la famille Notch.

From nematode to man, the transmembrane receptors of the Notch family act throughout embryonic and post-embryonic development to regulate the acquisition and/or maintenance of specific differentiative states. We will review here our current state of knowledge on Notch receptors structure and signalling activity.

Subcellular localization of Suppressor of Hairless in Drosophila sense organ cells during Notch signalling.

During imaginal development of Drosophila, Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)], an evolutionarily conserved transcription factor that mediates intracellular signalling by the Notch (N) receptor, controls successive alternative cell fate decisions leading to the differentiation of multicellular sensory organs. We describe here the distribution of the Su(H) protein in the wing disc epithelium throughout development of adult sense organs. Su(H) was found to be evenly distributed in the nuclei of all imaginal disc cells during sensory organ precursor cells selection. Thus differential expression and/or subcellular localization of Su(H) is not essential for its function. Soon after division of the pIIa secondary precursor cell, Su(H) specifically accumulates in the nucleus of the future socket cell. At the onset of differentiation of the socket cell, Su(H) is also detected in the cytoplasm. In this differentiating cell, N and deltex participate in the cytoplasmic retention of Su(H). Still, Su(H) does not colocalize with N at the apical-lateral membranes. These observations suggest that N regulates in an indirect manner the cytoplasmic localization of Su(H) in the socket cell. Finally, the pIIb, shaft and socket cells are found to adopt invariant positions along the anteroposterior axis of the notum. This raises the possibility that tissue-polarity biases these N-mediated cell fate choices.

Regulated endocytic routing modulates wingless signaling in Drosophila embryos.

Embryos have evolved various strategies to confine the action of secreted signals. Using an HRP-Wingless fusion protein to track the fate of endocytosed Wingless, we show that degradation by targeting to lysosomes is one such strategy. Wingless protein is specifically degraded at the posterior of each stripe of wingless transcription, even under conditions of overexpression. If lysosomal degradation is compromised genetically or chemically, excess Wingless accumulates and ectopic signaling ensues. In the wild-type, Wingless degradation is slower at the anterior than at the posterior. This follows in part from the segmental activation of signaling by the epidermal growth factor receptor, which accelerates Wingless degradation at the posterior, thus leading to asymmetrical Wingless signaling along the anterior-posterior axis.

Inhibition of the DNA-binding activity of Drosophila suppressor of hairless and of its human homolog, KBF2/RBP-J kappa, by direct protein-protein interaction with Drosophila hairless.

We have purified the sequence-specific DNA-binding protein KBF2 and cloned the corresponding cDNA, which is derived from the previously described RBP-J kappa gene, the human homolog of the Drosophila Suppressor of Hairless [Su(H)] gene. Deletion studies of the RBP-J kappa and Su(H) proteins allowed us to define a DNA-binding domain conserved during evolution. Because Su(H) mutant alleles exhibit dose-sensitive interactions with Hairless (H) loss-of-function mutations, we have investigated whether the RBP-J kappa or Su(H) proteins directly interact with the H protein in vitro. We show here that H can inhibit the DNA binding of both Su(H) and RBP-J kappa through direct protein-protein interactions. Consistent with this in vitro inhibitory effect, transcriptional activation driven by Su(H) in transfected Drosophila S2 cells is inhibited by H. These results support a model in which H acts, at least in part, as a negative regulator of Su(H) activity. This model offers a molecular view to the antagonistic activities encoded by the H and Su(H) genes for the control of sensory organ cell fates in Drosophila. We further propose that a similar mechanism might occur in mammals.

Molecular characterization of human stathmin expressed in Escherichia coli: site-directed mutagenesis of two phosphorylatable serines (Ser-25 and Ser-63).

Stathmin, a probable relay protein possibly integrating multiple intracellular regulatory signals [reviewed in Sobel (1991) Trends Biochem. Sci. 16, 301-305], was expressed in Escherichia coli at levels as high as 20% of total bacterial protein. Characterization of the purified recombinant protein revealed that it had biochemical properties very similar to those of the native protein. It is a good substrate for both cyclic AMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA) and p34cdc2, on the same four sites as the native eukaryotic protein. As shown by m.s., the difference in isoelectric points from the native protein is probably due to the absence of acetylation of the protein produced in bacteria. C.d. studies indicate that stathmin probably contains about 45% of its sequence in an alpha-helical conformation, as also predicted for the sequence between residues 47 and 124 by computer analysis. Replacement of Ser-63 by alanine by in vitro mutagenesis resulted in a ten times less efficient phosphorylation of stathmin by PKA which occurred solely on Ser-16, confirming that Ser-63 is the major target of this kinase. Replacement of Ser-25, the major site phosphorylated by mitogen-activated protein kinase in vitro and in vivo, by the charged amino acid glutamic acid reproduced, in conjunction with the phosphorylation of Ser-16 by PKA, the mobility shift on SDS/polyacrylamide gels induced by the phosphorylation of Ser-25. This result strongly suggests that glutamic acid in position 25 is able to mimic the putative interactions of phosphoserine-25 with phosphoserine-16, as well as the resulting conformational changes that are probably also related to the functional regulation of stathmin.