RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: To provide further validation of the treadmill test by assessing its "test-retest" reproducibility. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this prospective study, 28 patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis underwent exercise treadmill testing, first at a walking speed of 1.2 mph and then at the patient's preferred walking speed. All patients had a second treadmill examination or "retest." No treatment intervention was performed between the initial test and the retest. Time to first symptoms (TFS) and total ambulation time (TAT) were measured. Differences between the baseline examination and the retest examination were assessed by using the concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) as well as graphically. RESULTS: There was good reproducibility between baseline test and retest results for all 4 end points: 1.2 mph, TFS (CCC = 0.90); 1.2 mph, TAT (CCC = 0.89); preferred walking speed, TFS (CCC = 0.98); and preferred walking speed, TAT (CCC = 0.96). The median difference between trials was not significantly different from zero for any of the 4 outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise treadmill testing has good test-retest reproducibility. There was no learning phenomenon associated with the test procedure. The study further validates the clinical utility of exercise treadmill testing in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis and neurogenic claudication.
Assuntos
Teste de Esforço , Vértebras Lombares/fisiopatologia , Estenose Espinal/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Teste de Esforço/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Laminectomia , Aprendizagem , Perna (Membro)/inervação , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor/etiologia , Parestesia/etiologia , Doenças do Sistema Nervoso Periférico/complicações , Estudos Prospectivos , Estenose Espinal/cirurgia , Estatísticas não Paramétricas , Fatores de Tempo , Caminhada/fisiologiaRESUMO
OBJECT: The authors report a retrospective analysis of 194 patients surgically treated at their institutions for symptomatic lumbar synovial cysts from January 1974 to January 1996. METHODS: Patient characteristics including age, sex, symptoms, signs, and preoperative neuroimaging studies were reviewed. Surgical procedures, complications, results, and pathological findings were correlated with preoperative assessment. One hundred ninety-four patients were surgically treated for symptomatic lumbar synovial cysts. Eighty percent were diagnosed and treated between 1987 and 1996. There were 100 men and 94 women with an average age of 66 years (range 28-94 years). The most common symptoms were painful radiculopathy (85%) and neurogenic single or multiroot claudication (44%). However, sensory loss (43%) and motor weakness (27%) were also presenting symptoms. Eleven percent of patients had undergone previous lumbar surgery prior to being referred to the Mayo Clinic. Preoperative neurological examination demonstrated motor weakness (40%), sensory loss (45%), reflex changes (57%), and variants of cauda equina syndrome (13%). In 19% of patients, normal neurological status was demonstrated. There was equal left/right-sided laterality, and eight patients presented with bilateral synovial cysts. The most commonly affected level was L4-5 (64%). All patients underwent laminectomy and resection of the cyst. Concomitant fusion was performed in 18 patients in whom clinical evidence of instability had been observed. However, subsequent fusion was required in only four patients who developed symptomatic spondylolisthesis. Surgery-related complications included cerebrospinal fluid leak (three patients), discitis (one patient), epidural hematoma (one patient), seroma (one patient), and deep vein thrombosis (one patient). One patient died 3 days after surgery of cardiac dysrhythmia. Follow-up data obtained for at least 6 months postoperatively were available in 147 patients. Of these, 134 (91%) reported good relief of their pain and 82% experienced improvement in their motor deficits. CONCLUSIONS: Lumbar synovial cysts are a more common cause of lumbar radicular pain than previously thought. Surgical removal of the cyst is a safe and effective treatment for symptomatic relief in patients with lumbar synovial cysts. A concomitant fusion procedure may be performed in select cases. In this study, only a few patients developed symptomatic spinal instability requiring a second operation.
Assuntos
Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/cirurgia , Cisto Sinovial/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Líquido Cefalorraquidiano , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Instabilidade Articular/cirurgia , Laminectomia/efeitos adversos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Debilidade Muscular/etiologia , Síndromes de Compressão Nervosa/etiologia , Polirradiculopatia/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Radiculopatia/etiologia , Reflexo Anormal/fisiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transtornos de Sensação/etiologia , Doenças da Coluna Vertebral/complicações , Fusão Vertebral , Raízes Nervosas Espinhais/patologia , Espondilolistese/etiologia , Espondilolistese/cirurgia , Taxa de Sobrevida , Cisto Sinovial/complicações , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
A prospective study of patients with neurogenic claudication and lumbar spinal stenosis was undertaken to determine whether measurement of exercise tolerance on the treadmill would be useful in defining baseline functional status and response to surgical treatment. Twenty patients with an average age of 73 years, all of whom had intractable neurogenic claudication and radiographically confirmed severe lumbar spinal stenosis, were studied. Lumbar decompressive laminectomy was performed in all patients. Preoperatively and 2 months postoperatively, quantitative assessment of ambulation was conducted on a treadmill at 0 degree ramp incline at two different speeds: 1.2 mph and the patient's preferred walking speed. The following information was recorded: time to first symptoms, time to severe symptoms, and nature of symptoms (leg pain, back pain, or generalized fatigue). The examination was stopped after 15 minutes or at the onset of severe symptoms. In the preoperative 1.2-mph trial, the mean time to first symptoms was 2.68 minutes (median 1.31) and the mean time to severe symptoms was 5.47 minutes (median 3.42). In the postoperative trial at the same speed, 13 patients (65%) were able to walk symptom free for 15 minutes. The mean time to first symptoms was 11.12 minutes (median 15) and the mean time to severe symptoms was 11.81 minutes (median 15). Similar findings were recorded in the preferred walking-speed trials. There were no complications from the treadmill testing procedure. These findings indicate that exercise stress testing on a treadmill is a safe, easily administered, and quantifiable means of assessing baseline functional status and outcome following laminectomy in patients with symptomatic lumbar spinal stenosis.
Assuntos
Tolerância ao Exercício/fisiologia , Laminectomia/reabilitação , Estenose Espinal/fisiopatologia , Estenose Espinal/cirurgia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Teste de Esforço , Feminino , Humanos , Vértebras Lombares/diagnóstico por imagem , Vértebras Lombares/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Pós-Operatório , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos , Radiografia , Estenose Espinal/reabilitação , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
STUDY DESIGN: A prospective study of exercise tolerance on the treadmill before and after decompressive laminectomy in patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether treadmill testing provides useful information about baseline functional status and surgical outcome. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Historically, criteria for selecting patients for surgery and assessing postoperative outcome have been variable. Functional testing has not been used in a systematic fashion. METHODS: Fifty patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis underwent decompressive laminectomy. Preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively, functional capacity was assessed on an exercise treadmill. Time to first symptoms and total ambulation time were recorded. The examination was stopped at the onset of severe symptoms or after 15 minutes. RESULTS: In the preoperative trial, mean time to first symptoms (+/- standard deviation) was 1.82 minutes (median, 0.58), and mean total ambulation time was 6.91 minutes (median, 5.22). In the postoperative trial, mean time to first symptoms increased to 11.93 minutes (median, 15) and mean total ambulation time increased to 13.26 minutes (median, 15). There was significant improvement after surgery in both time to first symptoms (P < 0.001) and total ambulation time (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Exercise stress testing on a treadmill is a safe, easily administered, and quantifiable means of assessing baseline functional status and surgical outcome in patients with neurogenic claudication due to lumbar spinal stenosis. Treadmill testing provides objective evidence that surgery is beneficial in most cases and is helpful in guiding subsequent management of patients with residual symptoms.