Histopathologic evaluation of gastric intestinal metaplasia in non-neoplastic biopsy specimens: Accuracy and interobserver reliability among general pathologists and pathology residents.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and interobserver reliability of diagnosing and subtyping gastric intestinal metaplasia (IM) among general pathologists and pathology residents at a university hospital in Thailand, focusing on the challenges in the histopathologic evaluation of gastric IM for less experienced practitioners. METHODS: The study analyzed 44 non-neoplastic gastric biopsies, using a consensus diagnosis of gastrointestinal pathologists as the reference standard. Participants included 6 general pathologists and 9 pathology residents who assessed gastric IM and categorized its subtype (complete, incomplete, or mixed) on digital slides. After initial evaluations and receiving feedback, participants reviewed specific images of gastric IM, as agreed by experts. Following a one-month washout period, a reevaluation of the slides was conducted. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy, interobserver reliability, and time taken for diagnosis improved following training, with general pathologists showing higher accuracies than residents (median accuracy of gastric IM detection: 100 % vs. 97.7 %). Increased years of experience were associated with more IM detection accuracy (p-value<0.05). However, the overall median accuracy for diagnosing incomplete IM remained lower than for complete IM (86.4 % vs. 97.7 %). After training, diagnostic errors occurred in 6 out of 44 specimens (13.6 %), reported by over 40 % of participants. Errors involved omitting 5 slides with incomplete IM and 1 with complete IM, all showing a subtle presence of IM. CONCLUSIONS: The study highlights the diagnostic challenges in identifying incomplete gastric IM, showing notable discrepancies in accuracy and interobserver agreement. It underscores the need for better diagnostic protocols and training to enhance detection and management outcomes.

Diagnostic validity and learning curve of non-NBI expert endoscopists in gastric intestinal metaplasia diagnosis.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopists' experience influences narrow-band imaging (NBI)-guided gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) diagnostic performance. We aimed to evaluate the general gastroenterologists (GE) performance in NBI-guided GIM diagnosis compared to NBI experts (XP) and assess GEs' learning curve. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted between 10/2019 and 2/2022. Histology-proven GIM who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) were randomly assessed by 2XPs or 3GEs. Endoscopists' performance on NBI-guided diagnoses were compared to the pathological diagnosis (gold standard) in five areas of the stomach according to the Sydney protocol. The primary outcome were GIM diagnosis validity scores of GEs compared to XPs. The secondary outcome was the minimum number of lesions required for GEs to achieve an accuracy of GIM diagnosis ≥ 80%. RESULTS: One thousand one hundred and fifty-five lesions from 189 patients (51.3% male, mean age 66 ± 10 years) were examined. GEs performed EGD in 128 patients with 690 lesions. the GIM diagnosis sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of GEs compared to the XPs, were 91% vs.93%, 73% vs.83%, 79% vs.83%, 89% vs.93%, and 83% vs.88%, respectively. GEs demonstrated lower specificity (mean difference - 9.4%; 95%CI - 16.3, 1.4; p = 0.008) and accuracy (mean difference - 5.1%; 95%CI - 3.3, 6.3; p = 0.006) compared to XPs. After 100 lesions (50% GIM), GEs achieved an accuracy of ≥ 80% and all diagnostic validity scores were comparable to the XPs (p < 0.05 all). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to XPs, GEs had lower specificity and accuracy for GIM diagnosis. The learning curve for a GE to achieve comparable performance to XPs would necessitate at least 50 GIM lesions. Created with BioRender.com.

Useful histopathologic features for diagnosing focal liver lesions with spindle cell morphology: A clinicopathologic study.

BACKGROUND: Focal liver lesions with spindle cell morphology are rare in the daily practice of pathology. The differential diagnosis is broad, including both tumors and tumor-like lesions. Initial radiologic assessment is sometimes inaccurate. Histopathology is needed to arrive at the correct diagnosis. This study analyzed discrepancies between histopathology and radiologic findings of focal liver lesions with spindle cell morphology. METHODS: A six-year retrospective analysis was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Thailand. All focal liver lesions with spindle cell morphology were retrieved. Clinicopathologic features of these cases were analyzed. The pathological diagnosis was rendered primarily based on routine histopathology, using other ancillary studies as an adjunct. RESULTS: 287 biopsies and 151 resection specimens with focal liver lesions were identified. In 12 (2.7%) cases, tumors or tumor-like lesions with spindle cell morphology were retrieved. A total of five cases had discrepancies between histopathology and radiologic findings. These lesions encompassed primary liver tumors (EBV-associated smooth muscle tumor and leiomyosarcoma); metastatic tumors (gastrointestinal stromal tumor, small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma); and a tumor-like lesion (endometriosis). Several morphologic findings (i.e., cytologic grades, dense and loose areas, intratumoral lymphocytes, distinct perinuclear vacuoles, and hemosiderin) are important clues to diagnose these spindle cell lesions. CONCLUSIONS: Pathologists play a critical role in diagnosing focal liver lesions with spindle cell morphology, particularly those with limited clinical data at the initial presentation. A thorough evaluation of histomorphology on routine hematoxylin and eosin-stained slides is essential for correct diagnosis.

Combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma and its mimickers: Diagnostic pitfalls in surgical pathology.

BACKGROUND: The diagnosis of combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA) requires histomorphological detection of both hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA). However, these primary liver cancers (PLCs) have a wide variety of microscopic appearances resulting in difficulties and uncertainties in cHCC-CCA's diagnosis. This study aims to perform a clinicopathologic analysis on the diagnosis of PLCs at a tertiary referral hospital in Thailand using traditional morphologic studies. METHODS: A 5-year retrospective analysis of pathologically diagnosed PLCs was conducted. Pathological features and clinical characteristics of cHCC-CCA and other PLCs with the histopathologic resemblance to cHCC-CCA were studied. The pathological diagnosis was rendered based on histomorphological context rather than immunoreactivity. A literature review containing diagnostic pitfalls of cHCC-CCA was carried out. RESULTS: PLCs from a total of 295 patients were retrieved, and cHCC-CCA accounted for 1.4% (n = 4) of the malignancies. Histomorphological evaluation is the most reliable diagnostic modality for cHCC-CCA. Extremely uncommon variants of iCCA (i.e., mucinous iCCA and adenosquamous iCCA) and iCCA arising with hepatocellular nodular lesions (i.e., iCCA with nodular regenerative hyperplasia (NRH), and iCCA in cirrhosis) could have a histomorphologic resemblance to that of cHCC-CCA. CONCLUSIONS: Although there has been an exceedingly high incidence of iCCA in Thailand, such a commonness is not valid for cHCC-CCA in our series. Rare forms of iCCA could have a morphologic resemblance to that of cHCC-CCA. Regardless of the differentiation and immunophenotype, iCCA without a distinct HCC component should never be diagnosed as cHCC-CCA.

Performance status of targeted biopsy alone versus Sydney protocol by non-NBI expert gastroenterologist in gastric intestinal metaplasia diagnosis.

Background and study aims According to a recent guideline, patients with gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM) should have at least five biopsies performed under the Sydney protocol to evaluate for risk of extensive GIM. However, only narrow-band imaging (NBI)-targeted biopsy may be adequate to diagnose extensive GIM. Patients and methods A cross-sectional study was conducted between November 2019 and October 2020. Patients with histology-proven GIM were enrolled. All patients underwent standard esophagogastroduodenoscopy performed by a gastroenterology trainee. The performing endoscopists took biopsies from either a suspected GIM area (NBI-targeted biopsy) or randomly (if negative for GIM read by NBI) to complete five areas of the stomach as per the Sydney protocol. The gold standard for GIM diagnosis was pathology read by two gastrointestinal pathologists with unanimous agreement. Results A total of 95 patients with GIM were enrolled and 50 (52.6%) were men with a mean age of 64 years. Extensive GIM was diagnosed in 43 patients (45.3%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of NBI-targeted biopsy vs. the Sydney protocol were 88.4% vs.100 %, 90.3% vs. 90.3%, 88.4% vs. 89.6%, 90.3% vs. 100%, and 89.5% vs. 94.7%, respectively. The number of specimens from NBI-targeted biopsy was significantly lower than that from Sydney protocol (311vs.475, P  < 0.001). Conclusions Both NBI-targeted biopsy and Sydney protocol by a gastroenterologist who was not an expert in NBI and who has experience with diagnosis of at least 60 cases of GIM provided an NPV higher than 90%. Thus, targeted biopsy alone with NBI, which requires fewer specimens, is an alternative option for extensive GIM diagnosis.

Comparison of tumor regression grading system in locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma after preoperative radio-chemotherapy to determine the most accurate system predicting prognosis.

BACKGROUND: Nowadays, preoperative radio-chemotherapy is a standard treatment for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Tumor regression grade (TRG), referring to a classification of cancer response to preoperative treatment, can predict a prognosis of survival. Many TRG systems are proposed for use in esophageal cancer, but none of them has become standard grading system. This research compared five TRG systems, including Mandard system, Chirieac system, Schneider system, Hermann system, and Japan Esophageal Society (JES) system, to find the most accurately predictive system. METHODS: We recruited 37 participants with locally advanced ESCC from 2006 to 2014. All of them were treated with radio-chemotherapy followed by esophagectomy. The resection specimens were evaluated microscopically for percentage of viable residual tumor comparing with tumor bed, number of positive lymph nodes and, consequently, assigned TRG grade according to each TRG system. Kaplan-Meier (KM) graphs were used to describe the median survival time. Log-rank tests and cox proportional hazard regression models were used in assessing associations between TRG systems and survival. Proportional hazard assumptions were evaluated on the basis of Schoenfeld and log-log plot. Akaike information criterion (AIC) values and pseudo R-squared values assessed model fit. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: The KM graphs displayed overlapped curves in all TRG systems. The log-rank tests revealed that Schneider, JES and Mandard systems were statistically associated with overall-survival (P<0.05). Only the multivariate cox regression analysis of Schneider system showed the statistically significant hazard ratio (P=0.037). Schneider system also had the best AIC and pseudo R-squared values. CONCLUSIONS: Schneider system might be the best predictive system. However, the overlapped KM curve opposed. This study had limitation due to small number of participants. More participants were needed to confirm our findings.