Using a Narrative Practice Approach to Understand In-Depth Experiences of Individuals Coping with Chronic Pain.

OBJECTIVE: Current psychological interventions to enhance management of chronic pain report small to moderate effects. There is a need to explore the experiences and coping of individuals with chronic pain in depth and expand beyond current knowledge paradigms to enhance psychological interventions. The current literature recommends narrative practice as a qualitative approach in a group to facilitate sharing of knowledge on coping with chronic pain. Therefore, we conducted group sessions incorporating narrative practice to explore the experiences of individuals coping with chronic pain. DESIGN: We explored the experiences of 11 individuals coping with chronic pain from two group sessions that incorporated narrative practice. Themes emerging from participants' sharing were triangulated from interview transcripts, field notes, and participants' response worksheets. Data analysis adopted thematic analysis and narrative practice approaches. RESULTS: Themes on coping found include "refocusing," "distraction," "inspiration and perspective taking," and "acknowledgement of skills, knowledge, and attitude." "Distraction" and "refocusing" complimented one another. This provided a new perspective, in contrast to current research that views both as mutually exclusive. Social environmental factors were found to help participants share existing coping methods of "connection," "deepen perspective," "inspiration and perspective taking," and "acknowledgement of skill, knowledge and attitude." The possible relationships between the themes also provided support to the theoretical foundations of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy. Results suggest that adopting a narrative practice sequence helped individuals to acknowledge chronic pain experiences and facilitated their identification of ways to cope. CONCLUSIONS: Narrative practice identified themes of coping that can inform clinical practice. Narrative practice is indicated as a feasible and acceptable research and clinical approach for individuals with chronic pain.

A Theory-Based, Multidisciplinary Approach to Cocreate a Patient-Centric Digital Solution to Enhance Perioperative Health Outcomes Among Colorectal Cancer Patients and Their Family Caregivers: Development and Evaluation Study.

BACKGROUND: Elective colorectal cancer (CRC) surgeries offer enhanced surgical outcomes but demand high self-efficacy in prehabilitation and competency in self-care and disease management postsurgery. Conventional strategies to meet perioperative needs have not been pragmatic, and there remains a pressing need for novel technologies that could improve health outcomes. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this paper was to describe the development of a smartphone-based interactive CRC self-management enhancement psychosocial program (iCanManage) in order to improve health outcomes among patients who undergo elective CRC surgeries and their family caregivers. METHODS: A multidisciplinary international team comprising physicians, specialist nurses, a psychologist, software engineers, academic researchers, cancer survivors, patient ambassadors, and ostomy care medical equipment suppliers was formed to facilitate the development of this patient-centric digital solution. The process occurred in several stages: (1) review of current practice through clinic visits and on-site observations; (2) review of literature and findings from preliminary studies; (3) content development grounded in an underpinning theory; (4) integration of support services; and (5) optimizing user experience through improving interface aesthetics and customization. In our study, 5 participants with CRC performed preliminary assessments on the quality of the developed solution using the 20-item user version of the Mobile App Rating Scale (uMARS), which had good psychometric properties. RESULTS: Based on the collected uMARS data, the smartphone app was rated highly for functionality, aesthetics, information quality, and perceived impact, and moderately for engagement and subjective quality. Several limiting factors such as poor agility in the adoption of digital technology and low eHealth literacy were identified despite efforts to promote engagement and ensure ease of use of the mobile app. To overcome such barriers, additional app-training sessions, an instruction manual, and regular telephone calls will be incorporated into the iCanManage program during the trial period. CONCLUSIONS: This form of multidisciplinary collaboration is advantageous as it can potentially streamline existing care paths and allow the delivery of more holistic care to the CRC population during the perioperative period. Should the program be found to be effective and sustainable, hospitals adopting this digital solution may achieve better resource allocation and reduce overall health care costs in the long run. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04159363; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04159363.