Clinic reported facilitators and barriers to pediatric cancer survivor care delivery among survivorship clinics: A fishbone analysis.

BACKGROUND: Childhood cancer survivors need regular, long-term survivor care. The Children's Oncology Group (COG) recommends that pediatric patients receive ongoing, evidence-based surveillance for late effects, beginning 2 years after the completion of cancer therapy. However, at least a third of survivors are not engaging in long-term survivorship care. This study assessed facilitators and barriers to follow-up survivorship care through the perspectives of pediatric cancer survivor clinic representatives. METHODS: As part of a hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial, a representative from 12 participating pediatric cancer survivor clinics completed a survey about site characteristics and a semi-structured interview on facilitators and barriers to survivor care delivery at their institution. Interviews were grounded in the socio-ecological model (SEM) framework and utilized a fishbone diagram to understand what facilitates and impedes survivor care. We ran descriptive statistics and conducted thematic analyses of the interview transcripts to create two meta-fishbone diagrams. RESULTS: All participating clinics (N = 12) have existed for at least 5 years (mean = 15, median = 13, range = 3-31), and half (n = 6, 50%) reported seeing more than 300 survivors annually. In the fishbone diagram, the top facilitators were in the SEM domain of organization, specifically with familiar staff (n = 12, 100%), resource utilization (n = 11, 92%), dedicated survivorship staff (n = 10, 83%), and clinic processes (n = 10, 83%). Common barriers were across the domains of organization, community, and policy, which included distance/transportation to the clinic (n = 12, 100%), technology limits (n = 11, 92%), scheduling issues (n = 11, 92%), and insufficient funding/insurance (n = 11, 92%). CONCLUSION: Clinic staff and provider perceptions are instrumental in understanding multilevel contextual issues related to survivor care delivery for pediatric cancer survivor clinics. Future research can aid in developing education, processes, and services to promote cancer survivor follow-up care.

Fertility-related worry among emerging adult cancer survivors.

PURPOSE: Cancer survivors with a history of gonadotoxic treatment are at risk for future infertility and reproductive concerns, including worry about infertility. The purpose of this study was to describe factors associated with fertility-related worry among emerging adult survivors of childhood cancer. METHODS: This chart review included patients aged 18.00-25.99 years and > 1 year from cancer treatment completion with a history of gonadotoxic treatment. Survivors were offered structured fertility-focused discussions at age ≥ 18 years, which assessed worry about future infertility. Data from this discussion (i.e., reported fertility-related worry (yes/no), sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics were abstracted from the medical record. Multivariable logistic regression with backwards elimination was used to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for factors associated with fertility-related worry. RESULTS: Survivors (N = 249) were a mean age of 19.1 ± 1.2 years at initial fertility discussion; 55.8% were male, 58.2% non-Hispanic White, and 27.3% were at high risk for future treatment-related infertility. Fertility-related worry was reported by 66.3% of survivors. Factors related to worry on multivariable analysis included female sex (OR: 2.64, 95%CI: 1.44-4.96, p = .002), solid tumor diagnosis (OR: 2.31, 95%CI: 1.15-4.71, p = .019), moderate and high risk of infertility (OR: 2.94, 95%CI: 1.23-7.64, p = .02; OR: 3.25, 95%CI: 1.55-7.17, p = .002), and ≥ 2 fertility discussions during survivorship care OR: 2.71, 95%CI: 1.46-5.20, p = .002). CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of emerging adult cancer survivors expressed worry about future infertility, which has been linked to a variety of adverse quality of life outcomes. Survivors who are worried about infertility may benefit from psychological interventions.

Patterns of surveillance for late effects of BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors in survivors of pediatric Philadelphia chromosome positive leukemias.

BACKGROUND: Targeted anticancer therapies such as BCR-ABL tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved outcomes for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) and Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (Ph + ALL). However, little is known about long-term risks of TKIs in children. Exposure-based survivorship guidelines do not include TKIs, thus surveillance practices may be variable. METHODS: We retrospectively examined surveillance for cardiac and endocrine late effects in children receiving TKIs for Ph + leukemias, diagnosed at < 21 years between 2000 and 2018. Frequency of echocardiogram (ECHO), electrocardiogram (EKG), thyroid stimulating hormone (TSH), dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), and bone age testing were abstracted. Descriptive statistics were stratified by leukemia type. RESULTS: 66 patients (CML n = 44; Ph + ALL n = 22) met inclusion criteria. Among patients with CML, ≥1 evaluation was done: ECHO (50.0%), EKG (48.8%), TSH (43.9%), DXA (2.6%), bone age (7.4%). Among patients with Ph + ALL, ≥1 evaluation was done: ECHO (86.4%), EKG (68.2%), TSH (59.1%), DXA (63.6%), bone age (44.4%). Over a median 6.3 and 5.7 years of observation, respectively, 2% of patients with CML and 57% with Ph + ALL attended a survivorship clinic. CONCLUSIONS: Despite common exposure to TKIs in survivors of Ph + leukemias, patterns of surveillance for late effects differed in CML and Ph + ALL, with the latter receiving more surveillance likely due to concomitant chemotherapy exposures. Targeted therapies such as TKIs are revolutionizing cancer treatment, but surveillance for late effects and referral to survivorship clinics are variable despite the chronicity of exposure. Evidence based guidelines and longer follow-up are needed.

Interest in fertility status assessment among young adult survivors of childhood cancer.

BACKGROUND: Cancer survivors who received gonadotoxic treatment are at-risk for future infertility and may desire a fertility status assessment (FSA), defined as semen analysis for males and consultation with a reproductive specialist for females. The purpose of this study was to describe the proportion of, and factors associated with, interest in FSA among young adult survivors of childhood cancer. METHODS: This retrospective single-institution review included patients with prior gonadotoxic treatment, aged 18-25 years and >1 year from cancer treatment completion, who received a fertility-focused discussion during survivorship. Documentation of interest in and completion of FSA, worry about infertility, sociodemographic, and clinical characteristics were abstracted from medical records. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to calculate odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) for factors associated with interest in FSA. RESULTS: Survivors (N = 259) were on average 19.2 ± 1.2 years at their fertility discussion; 55.6% were male and 57.9% non-Hispanic white. Interest in FSA was reported by 50.7% of males and 46.1% of females. Factors related to interest in FSA for males and females respectively, included worry about infertility (OR 2.40, 95%CI 1.11-5.27, p = 0.026 and OR 4.37, 95%CI 1.71-12.43, p = 0.003) and ≥2 fertility discussions (OR 3.78, 95%CI 1.70-8.75, p = 0.001 and 2.45, 95%CI 1.08-5.67, p = 0.033). Among males, fertility preservation consult/procedure at diagnosis (OR 3.02, 95%CI 1.09-9.04, p = 0.039) and high-risk for infertility (OR 2.47, 95%CI 1.07-5.87, p = 0.036) were also associated with interest in FSA. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer survivors are interested in FSA, particularly those who have had repeated fertility-focused discussions during survivorship care and who report worry about infertility.

Comparison of Anti-Mullerian Hormone Levels Pre- and Post-Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation in Pediatric and Adolescent Females with Sickle Cell Disease.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell therapy (HCT) is an established cure for sickle cell disease (SCD); however, HCT conditioning regimens are known to be gonadotoxic. Anti-mullerian hormone (AMH) measures ovarian reserve, and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) defines premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) at values >40 mIU/mL in pubertal females. The present study was conducted to assess ovarian reserve and function before and after transplantation in pediatric and adolescent females with SCD treated with allogeneic HCT between January 2015 and June 2020 at Children's Healthcare of Atlanta. In this retrospective review of 17 females age <21 years with SCD who had AMH levels measured at baseline and at 2 years post-HCT, AMH levels were categorized as normal, low, or undetectable, and FSH levels were measured and used to identify pubertal females who had developed POI. Demographic and treatment data were abstracted from the institutional database and medical records, and a descriptive statistical analysis was conducted. Of the 17 patients in the study cohort, 14 had been treated with hydroxyurea and 3 had chronic transfusions but with no significant iron overload. AMH levels were normal in 15 patients (88%) and low in 2 patients (12%) at baseline. The median age at HCT was 7.5 years (range, 3.7 to 20.3 years), and 14 patients (82%) underwent matched related donor HCT. After HCT, 15 patients (88%) had undetectable AMH and 2 (12%) had low AMH, with no apparent differences by HCT conditioning regimen. No pubertal patients had POI at baseline, whereas 55% of pubertal patients had progressed to POI by 2 years post-HCT. In this cohort, the majority of females had normal AMH levels at baseline but undetectable levels after HCT. Females with SCD considering HCT should be counseled about the treatment-related risk of gonadal dysfunction. © 2022 American Society for Transplantation and Cellular Therapy. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Survivor clinic attendance among pediatric- and adolescent-aged survivors of childhood cancer.

PURPOSE: Childhood cancer survivors need regular, risk-adapted, long-term survivor care. This retrospective study describes the proportion of survivors seen for an initial survivor clinic visit within a large pediatric oncology program. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with non-central nervous system childhood malignancies from 2007 to 2012 were followed from the time of survivor clinic eligibility (2 years following completion of therapy) through their initial survivor clinic visit or end of study. Demographic, cancer-related, and logistical factors related to clinic attendance were examined using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional regressions. RESULTS: Eligible survivors were 53.0% male, 51.5% non-Hispanic white, and 30.9% survivors of leukemia. Among the 866 eligible survivors for this study, 610 (70.4%) completed their initial visit. After controlling for sex and time eligible, survivors who received surgery only (aHR 0.04 (0.02, 0.08)) or radiation only (0.24 (0.15, 0.39)) and who had Medicaid (0.77 (0.64, 0.92)) were significantly less likely to have an initial visit as were those of black or other/mixed race and those who lived > 25 mi from the clinic (p < 0.01). Survivors aged 6-11 years or 12-17 years at eligibility were significantly more likely to complete an initial visit as compared to those aged 2-5 years (1.55 (1.24, 1.93) and 1.44 (1.14, 1.83), respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Nearly a third of survivors were not seen in a pediatric survivor clinic despite the importance of survivor care. These results identify populations at risk for not pursuing long-term survivorship care. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Failure to transition to pediatric survivor care may lead to lifelong non-engagement and incorrect perceptions about future health.