Common driver mutations and programmed death-ligand 1 expression in advanced non-small cell lung cancer in smokers and never smokers.

BACKGROUND: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there may be a relationship between programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression, driver mutations and cigarette smoking. METHODS: In this single-center retrospective study, the relationship between common driver mutations (EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement) and PD-L1 expression in advanced NSCLC according to the patients' smoking history was examined. Light, moderate and heavy smokers had smoked < 20, 20-39, and ≥ 40 pack-years, respectively. The level of PD-L1 expression, assessed using Ventana SP263 monoclonal antibody assay, was defined by the tumor proportion score (TPS) as high expression (TPS ≥ 50%), low expression (TPS 1%-49%) and no expression (TPS < 1%). RESULTS: 101 (52.9%) of 191 advanced NSCLC patients were never smokers. EGFR mutations were more common in never smokers (64.4%) than in smokers (17.8%) with advanced NSCLC (P < 0.0001). A higher proportion of smokers (26.7%) had high PD-L1 expression compared to never smokers (13.9%) (P = 0.042). There was a trend for a higher proportion of male NSCLC patients [28 of 115 (24.3%)] than female patients [10 of 76 (13.2%)] to have high PD-L1 expression (P = 0.087]. High PD-L1 expression was seen in 32 of 110 (29.1%) patients with EGFR wild-type NSCLC but only in 6 of 81 (7.4%) patients with EGFR-mutant tumors (P < 0.0001). Among the 90 smokers with NSCLC, a higher proportion of heavy smokers (35.8%) than non-heavy smokers (13.5%) had high PD-L1 expression (P = 0.034). In patients with adenocarcinoma, high PD-L1 expression was seen in 25 of 77 (32.5%) patients with EGFR wild-type tumors but only in 4 of 70 (5.7%) patients with EGFR-mutant tumors (P < 0.0001). Among patients with adenocarcinoma, a significantly higher proportion of ever smokers (29.3%) than never smokers (13.5%) had high PD-L1 expression (P = 0.032). Among smokers with adenocarcinoma, a significantly higher proportion of heavy smokers (44.1%) than non-heavy smokers (8.3%) had high PD-L1 expression (P = 0.004). On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for gender and smoking status, heavy smoking and EGFR wild-type tumors remained significantly associated with high PD-L1 expression in NSCLCs and also in adenocarcinoma. CONCLUSIONS: Heavy smoking and EGFR wild-type tumors were significantly associated with high PD-L1 expression in NSCLCs and also in adenocarcinoma.

Accuracy of lung cancer staging in the multidisciplinary team setting.

Accurate staging of lung cancer is of utmost importance in determining the stage-appropriate treatment and prognosis. Imaging tests which include contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) examination of the chest to include the liver and adrenal glands and 18-fluoro-2 deoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET)/CT scan facilitate the initial tumor node metastasis (TNM) staging of the disease and provide guidance on the optimal biopsy site and biopsy method. The diagnostic and staging approach should be tailored to the individual patient according to risk, benefit, patient preferences, and available expertise. Diagnosis and staging should preferably be accomplished with a single procedure or the least number of invasive procedures if more than one is needed. Ideally, centers managing lung cancer patients should have a multidisciplinary thoracic oncology board prescribing personalized evidence-based management tailored to each individual patient. Multidisciplinary team (MDT) meetings provide a platform for key experts from various disciplines to contribute specific advice on the management of each individual patient. As assessment of mediastinal lymph node involvement is an important component of lung cancer staging, optimal mediastinal staging can be achieved with a variety of techniques that can be discussed and performed by the various specialists in the MDT. Despite a relative paucity of quality evidence that MDT contributes to improvements in lung cancer survival outcomes, this approach has evolved to become the standard of care in many centers around the world. Thoracic MDT has resulted in more focused and timely investigations for histopathologic diagnosis and disease staging which translate into earlier treatment initiation. Moreover, there is increasing evidence that MDT care facilitates and allows access to investigations that lead to improved accuracy of tumor and nodal staging. However, there is still a paucity of evidence on the accuracy of lung cancer staging in the MDT setting.