Association between exposure to topical tacrolimus or pimecrolimus and cancers.

BACKGROUND: The Food and Drug Administration has issued a public health advisory regarding cancer risk from topical calcineurin inhibitors. OBJECTIVE: To compare the rates of cancer among patients with common dermatologic conditions who were exposed or not exposed to topical calcineurin inhibitors. METHODS: A retrospective cohort observational study used data from an integrated healthcare delivery system on 953,064 subjects with diagnoses of atopic dermatitis or eczema between 2001 and December 2004. The main endpoint was initial cancer diagnosis. Chart review was performed to confirm cancer diagnosis in the subjects exposed to topical calcineurin inhibitors when any particular cancer rate was at least 3 times higher than that in unexposed subjects. Data were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Age- and sex-adjusted hazard ratios for all cancers were 0.93 (95% CI 0.81 to 1.07; p = 0.306) for tacrolimus-exposed versus -unexposed subjects and 1.15 (95% CI 0.99 to 1.31; p = 0.054) for pimecrolimus-exposed versus -unexposed subjects. T-cell lymphoma was the only cancer associated with a significantly increased risk among subjects exposed to tacrolimus (HR = 5.04, 95% CI 2.39 to 10.63; p < 0.001) or pimecrolimus (HR = 3.76, 95% CI 1.71 to 8.28; p = 0.010). Subsequent chart review of subjects in the exposed group with T-cell lymphoma found that 4 of 16 had skin lesions that were suspected to be the early lesions of T-cell lymphoma prior to exposure to tacrolimus or pimecrolimus. After these 4 cases were excluded, the age and sex hazard ratio for T-cell lymphoma was 5.44 (95% CI 2.51 to 11.79; p < 0.001) for tacrolimus and 2.32 (95% CI 0.89 to 6.07; p = 0.086) for pimecrolimus. There was no statistically significantly increased risk for other subgroups of cancer, including melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: Exposure to topical tacrolimus or pimecrolimus was not associated with an increase in the overall cancer rate. Use of topical tacrolimus may be associated with an increased risk of T-cell lymphoma.

Would elimination of copayments for phototherapy decrease the cost of treating psoriasis with systemic biologics? A cost analysis.

Phototherapy is a proven treatment method for the treatment of psoriasis, yet is typically underutilized because of the frequency of physician visits and copayments required for each session (typically 2-5 treatments/wk). Injectable biologic therapies are effective but costly. The objective of this study was to explore how changes in copayment strategies for phototherapy may affect biologic usage. Published estimates of the cost of phototherapy and biologic treatment were used to determine the costs of these treatments to patients and insurers. With an estimated patient copayment of $30 per office visit and a pharmacy copayment of $50 per month, the $1,800 annual patient expense for phototherapy far exceeds the estimated out-of-pocket expenses for etanercept, alefacept, and efalizumab ($840, $405, and $780, respectively). The estimated annual costs to MCOs ranged from $3,008 for phototherapy, to $20,300 for etanercept. Copayments for phototherapy may be shifting patients toward biologic treatment, which is more convenient but more costly to managed care plans.