[Clozapine rechallenge in resistant schizophrenia disorder affecting "super sensitive" patients, after neutropenia under clozapine: a case report]. / Réintroduction de la clozapine chez les patients souffrant de schizophrénie résistante "super répondeurs", après neutropénie sous clozapine: à propos d'un cas.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: The frequency of agranulocytosis induced by psychoactive drugs is estimated the first year of around 0.8% under clozapine, against 0.13% under chlorpromazine (King and Wager, 1998 [3]). It is associated with a mortality rate of 5 to 10%, and requires heavy treatment, usually in an intensive care unit. The objective of this paper is to present a practical therapeutic answer (clozapine rechallenge with filgrastim) through a case report following a neutropenia episode preventing clozapine use. CASE AND METHODS: B.N. aged 35, native of Martinique, shows a resistant schizophrenia disorder "ultra sensitive" to clozapine. Without any treatment, after 4 years in stable clinical state under clozapine, B.N. suffered three neutropenia episodes when absorbing clozapine (2008, 2010 and 2011). First, a literature survey was conducted along with a consultation of the head of pharmacovigilance regional center and the hematology referee. Then, a 4th clozapine treatment was decided under cover of filgrastim (G-CSF), the role of which is to limit the risk of a new neutropenia. After stopping all psychoactive drugs, except morphine, the subject benefited from a first 0.3mg filgrastim injection, the day before re-introducing 25mg clozapine. Before treatment: Leucocytes=4.8 G/L while absolute neutrophils count=2.4 G/L. Filgrastim injections were carried out at a rate of two 0.3mg injections per week. Clozapine was increased to reach 25mg every 3 days and electroconvulsivotherapy continued fortnightly while supervision was double: on the first hand, daily and clinical search for an increase in body temperature and signs of treatment intolerance, and on the other hand biological surveillance with NFS three times a week besides weekly clozapinemia. The well-informed consent of the patient was obtained. RESULTS: Signs of improvement were noticed as early as the 8th day and after 8 weeks of treatment and 31 sessions of ECT, the patient was stabilized under clozapine at 300 mg per day. The evolution is clearly favorable, as PANNS evolved from 158 to 90. Neutropenia episodes were not observed with a lowest measured rate of 1.9 G/L neutrophils. The filgrastim dosage was then reduced to 0.3mg per week from the 7th week onwards, along with the pursuit of a weekly NFS supervision throughout the treatment. Tolerance is satisfying, with an improvement in lipid check, glycaemia, blood pressure and QT intervals during ECG. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The B.N. case isn't an isolated one as several articles refer to filgrastim use, combined with clozapine. This confirms the role of hematopoietic cytokines (mainly G-CSF) in neutropenia episodes induced by clozapine. Filgrastim dosage appears to be an important point with regards to the risk of a new neutropenia episode. Let's mention also that it is not a harmless treatment, it could hide the occurrence of neutropenia, besides it's expensive and invasive. Clinical and biological supervision is essential as the probability of an enhanced malignant hemopathy is low but nonetheless present. We also noticed a "biased notoriety of the clozapine", with the association with other hematotoxic molecules, the existence of a circadian rhythm of neutrophils or G-CSF, along with transitional or ethnical neutropenia. These points should be discussed thoroughly before exclusively accusing clozapine; this in turn would have consequences regarding the possibility of treatment resumption. Finally, association with lithium is also an option; several cases have already been reported.

Anaphylactic reaction after methylene blue-treated plasma transfusion.

Methylene blue-treated fresh-frozen plasma (MB-FFP) is mainly used in Europe. The advantage of the methylene blue system is that units can be treated individually. The combined action of methylene blue and illumination is a photodynamic process preventing viral RNA and DNA replication. We report the first immediate allergic hypersensitivity reaction to methylene blue-treated plasma transfusion. The clinical course and subsequent assessment of the allergic reaction, including skin tests and basophil activation test, confirmed methylene blue-induced IgE-mediated anaphylaxis. All immediate reactions after MB-FFP transfusion should be investigated to document the underlying mechanism.

Toxic optic neuropathy due to voriconazole: possible potentiation by reduction of CYP2C19 activity.

OBJECTIVE: Voriconazole is an antifungal treatment with central neurotoxicity. Modifications of the electroretinogram can explain some of its visual complications: visual hallucination, blurred vision, altered visual perception or photophobia. However, reports from the literature or the French pharmacovigilance centers evoked toxic optic neuropathy due to voriconazole. The aim of this report is to analyze the role of voriconazole in the occurrence of toxic optic neuropathy or the role of the combination of voriconazole with other neurotoxic drugs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We report the case of a 15-year-old young boy treated with voriconazole and ethambutol for a severe lung infection due to aspergillosis and mycobacterium tuberculosis in the mucoviscidosis and pulmonary transplantation who developed a toxic optic neuropathy. A review of the literature on the role of ethambutol on the activity of CYP2C19 and its relationship with the serum concentration of voriconazole was conducted. RESULTS: In our patients, visual acuity recovered after discontinuation of voriconazole. Other cases of toxic optic neuropathy due to voriconazole were reported in pharmaco-vigilance databases, often in association with ethambutol. CONCLUSIONS: Ethambutol can reduce the activity of CYP2C19 leading to an increase of voriconazole concentration. Thus, it potentiates its risk of adverse event. Such mechanism leading to this neuro ophthalmological adverse effect would have an important clinical involvement. It would require a stricter monitoring and screening of patients treated by combination of neurotoxic molecules and VRZ to detect an adverse event.

Safety of Inulin and Sinistrin: Combining Several Sources for Pharmacovigilance Purposes.

Introduction: Inulin and its analog sinistrin are fructose polymers used in the food and pharmaceutical industries. In 2018, The French National Agency for the Safety of Medicines and Health Products (ANSM) decided to withdraw products containing sinistrin and inulin due to several reports of serious hypersensitivity reactions, including a fatal outcome. Objective: To assess the safety of inulin and sinistrin use in France. Methods: We searched multiple sources to identify adverse reactions (ARs) to inulin or sinistrin: first, classical pharmacovigilance databases including the French Pharmacovigilance (FPVD) and the WHO Database (VigiBase); second, data from a clinical trial, MultiGFR; third, data regarding current use in an hospital. All potential ARs to inulin or sinistrin were analyzed with a focus on hypersensitivity reactions and relationships to batches of sinistrin. Results: From 1991 to 2018, 134 ARs to inulin or sinistrin were registered in the FPVD or VigiBase. Sixty-three cases (47%) were classified as serious, and 129 cases (96%) were hypersensitivity reactions. We found an association between a batch of sinistrin and the occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions. During the MultiGFR clinical trial, 7 patients (7/163 participants) had an Adverse reaction; of these, 4 were hypersensitivity reactions including one case of grade 4 anaphylactic shock. In the hospital, no ARs were observed. In the literature, ARs to inulin and sinistrin are very rarely reported and mostly benign. Conclusion: Most ARs to inulin and sinistrin are hypersensitivity reactions that appear to be associated with sinistrin batches.

Valganciclovir prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus infection in thoracic transplant patients: retrospective study of efficacy, safety, and drug exposure.

Oral ganciclovir (GCV) was replaced by prodrug valganciclovir (vGCV) for cytomegalovirus (CMV) prophylaxis. We assessed retrospectively (2005-2007) vGCV effectiveness and safety during prophylaxis and 4 months after, in heart (HTx) and lung transplantation (LTx), including lung transplant for cystic fibrosis (CFTx). Patients with stable renal function received vGCV 900 mg daily during 3-6 and 8-12 months in HTx and LTx. Effectiveness was assessed by antigenemia (pp65Ag) and a GCV therapeutic drug monitoring to document exposure. A total of 32 patients (11 HTx, 7 LTx, and 14 CFTx) received vGCV for 106+/-67 days in HTx versus 270+/-85 days in LTx and CFTx. Doses were 700+/-225, 915+/-60, and 820+/-150 mg/24 h in HTx, LTx, and CFTx showing acceptable mean trough GCV 0.75+/-0.5 mg/L. Two of 9 cases of neutropenia were attributable to vGCV. Three CMV donor-positive/recipient-negative CFTx patients presented positive pp65Ag; 2 developed CMV disease (6%). We found that vGCV 900 mg, adapted to renal function, was effective and safe for long CMV prophylaxis together with efficient exposure in thoracic transplantation.

Voriconazole pharmacokinetic variability in cystic fibrosis lung transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Aspergillosis is a high-risk complication in cystic fibrosis (CF) lung transplant patients. Azole antifungal drugs inhibit CYP3A4, resulting in significant metabolic drug-drug interactions. Voriconazole (VRZ) was marketed without therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) recommendations, consistent with favorable pharmacokinetics, but regular determinations of plasma VRZ concentration were introduced in our center to manage interactions with calcineurin inhibitors and to document the achievement of therapeutic levels. METHODS: VRZ TDM data analysis for trough concentration (C0) and peak concentration (C2) was carried out, using validated liquid chromatography assay with ultraviolet detection, for 35 CF lung transplant patients (mean age 25 years, mean weight 47 kg, balanced sex ratio) since 2003. Therapeutic range (C0: 1.5 +/- 0.5 - C2 : 4.0 +/- 1.0 mg/L) was expressed relative to pivotal pharmacokinetic trial data. RESULTS: The duration of VRZ treatment ranged from 9 days to 22 months. The recommended standard dose of VRZ (200 mg twice a day, following the loading dose) resulted in significant plasma concentrations (>0.5 mg/L) in 20% of CF lung transplant patients. Therapeutic concentrations were obtained using higher doses (average 570 +/- 160 mg/day, +43%, P<0.01). Despite adaptation, C0 remained <0.5 mg/L (11%), even when the drug was administered intravenously, highlighting the variability of VRZ pharmacokinetics, possibly enhanced by CYP2C19 polymorphism. The risk of inefficacy during periods of underdosage was overcome by treatment with antifungal drug combinations (caspofungin, n=10). The therapeutic index was limited by neurologic effects (14%) and hepatic abnormalities (30%). VRZ concentrations correlated significantly (P<0.01) with aspartate aminotransferase levels but not with bilirubin levels. VRZ acted as a metabolic inhibitor of tacrolimus (C0 to dose ratio 5.8 +/- 2.6, n=31/VRZ versus 1.7 +/- 0.9 alone, P<0.001). Large changes in azole concentration affected the magnitude of the drug-drug interactions and adjustment requirements. CONCLUSIONS: TDM is required because VRZ levels are often undetectable in treated CF lung transplant patients, supporting the use of antifungal drug combinations until achievement of VRZ C0 at a steady state between 1 and 2 mg/L. Plasma VRZ concentrations should be determined for the quantitative, individualized management of drug-drug interactions in lung transplant patients, in particular immunosuppressant such as tacrolimus, considering VRZ to be both a target and an inhibitor of CYP3A4.

Diagnostic score for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia after cardiopulmonary bypass.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) occurs in nearly 3% of patients treated with heparin after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). HIT carries a risk of severe thrombotic complications, and must be diagnosed rapidly. To identify simple criteria for estimating the probability of HIT after CPB, we retrospectively analyzed the files of 84 patients with suspected HIT after CPB and we analyzed the usefulness of several variables collected at the time of HIT suspicion to estimate HIT probability. HIT was confirmed in 35 cases and ruled out in 49 cases, on the basis of a platelet increment after heparin withdrawal, detection of heparin-dependent antibodies, and absence of other clear cause of thrombocytopenia. A biphasic platelet count from CPB to the first day of suspected HIT, an interval of >/= 5 days from CPB to the first day of suspected HIT, and a CPB duration of

[Treatments with immunoglobulin and thrombotic adverse events]. / Traitements par immunoglobulines et complications thrombotiques.

Treatments with intravenous or subcutaneous immunoglobulin (Ig) are used in a broad variety of disorders. Tolerance of Ig is usually good but adverse events, including some serious ones, have been reported and may differ among different Ig preparations. Thrombotic complications occur in 0.6 to 13% of cases and can involve arterial or venous circulation, rarely both. Deep venous thrombosis with or without pulmonary embolism, stroke or myocardial infarction remained the most frequent thrombotic complications. Some risk factors have been identified, mainly old age, multiple cardiovascular risk factors, and past history of thrombo-embolic manifestations. Several mechanisms are suggested to explain this increased risk of thrombotic complications. Indeed, Ig treatments increase the plasma viscosity, increase and activate platelets, can trigger the coagulation cascade through the presence of activated factor XI in some Ig preparations, and release vasoactive molecules responsible for vasospasm. Patients have to be carefully monitored and risk factors to be identified as soon as possible. The role of antiplatelets or anticoagulation is not well determined but should probably be proposed to patients with high risk.

[Drug-induced fever: a diagnosis to remember]. / Fièvre médicamenteuse: un diagnostic à ne pas oublier.

Drug fever (DF) is a febrile reaction induced by a drug without additional clinical features like skin eruption. This adverse drug reaction is probably common but under diagnosed. While its outcome is generally favourable, DF generates unnecessary diagnostic procedures as well as hospitalisations or hospitalisation prolongations. Clinical presentation and biological findings are not specific. Fever is generally well tolerated but may be accompanied by general symptoms mimicking sepsis. Moderate biological disorders could be expected, including elevation or decrease in white blood cell count, eosinophilia, liver cytolysis, and increased C-reactive protein. An infection should be systematically ruled out. Clinical or biological signs of severity should question DF diagnosis. When DF is suspected, the involved drug(s) should be stopped after a reliable assessment of imputability. Antibiotics represent the most often implicated drugs. Fever disappearance after discontinuing the suspected drug is the cornerstone of DF diagnosis. Before stopping the administration of the suspected drug(s), a risk/benefit ratio assessment is necessary. Consistently, it may be complicated to stop an antimicrobial drug when treating an infection or an immunosuppressive drug if required.

[Hemorrhagic accidents of the new oral anticoagulants and coagulation assays]. / Accidents hémorragiques des nouveaux anticoagulants oraux et examens de la coagulation.

New oral anticoagulants which specifically inhibit factor Xa (FXa) or thrombin (FIIa) do not require routine laboratory monitoring. However, they induce a state of hypocoagulation and increase the risk of bleeding. In some clinical situations, such as emergency surgery, hemorrhagic episodes, or recurrent stroke, coagulation monitoring may be useful. A significant number of publications have reported uncontrollable hemorrhagic complications and deaths in patients treated with these new anticoagulants. The selection of the most appropriate clotting assay is based on the drug used and the availability of the test. The new anticoagulants influence all global clot-based tests. Prothrombin time and partial thromboplastin time measured before and after treatment are considered as qualitative tests since they are not specific. Specific anti-Xa and anti-IIa assays are available and results can be expressed in nanogram per milliliter of plasma using calibrated plasmas containing well-established amounts of drug. The fact that there is no specific antidote to reverse the anticoagulant action of the new anticoagulants can impair management of hemorrhagic complications; clinical experience is still limited. Pro-hemostatic treatment with non-activated or activated prothrombin complexes (FEIBA(®)), or as a last recourse with FVIIa concentrates (NovoSeven(®)), has been used with variable results. Some suggestions for the management of patients with bleeding have been published but there is still little clinical evidence for these interventions.

Neuromuscular painful disorders: a rare side effect of voriconazole in lung transplant patients under tacrolimus.

Voriconazole is an anti-fungal agent active against Aspergillus infection that is used for prophylaxis and curative treatment in lung transplant patients. We present nine cases of painful neuromuscular disorders, an unusual and rare side effect of high-dose voriconazole in association with tacrolimus.