The Oxford knee score and its subscales do not exhibit a ceiling or a floor effect in knee arthroplasty patients: an analysis of the National Health Service PROMs data set.

PURPOSE: In this study, we examined whether the OKS demonstrated a floor or a ceiling effect when used to measure the outcome of knee replacement surgery in a large national cohort. METHODS: NHS PROMs database, containing pre- to 6 month post-operative OKS on 72,154 patients, mean age 69 (SD 9.4), undergoing knee replacement surgery, was examined to establish the proportion of patients achieving top or bottom OKS values pre- and post-operatively. RESULTS: Pre-operatively, none of patients achieved the maximum/'best' (48) and minimum (0) scores. Post-operatively, no patients (0 %) achieved the minimum/'worst' score, but the percentage achieving the maximum score increased to 2.7 %. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that the highest post-operative overall ceiling percentage was 3 %, in a subgroup of patients between 60 and 79 years of age and 13.7 % in a group of patients who had a pre-operative OKS above 41. Furthermore, 10.8 % of patients achieved the top post-operative OKS-PCS and 4.7 % top post-operative OKS-FCS. CONCLUSION: Based on NHS PROMs data, the OKS does not exhibit a ceiling or floor effect overall, or for both its pain and function subscales, and remains a valid measure of outcomes for patients undergoing TKA. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Large-scale retrospective observations study, Level II.

Hand dominance in traumatic shoulder dislocations.

BACKGROUND: Shoulder dislocations are common injuries among athletes. Patients with instability after their injury often require stabilization procedures for treatment. The primary outcome measure was to see whether there was any correlation between the side of traumatic shoulder dislocation and dominance of hand. Secondary outcomes were to look at subgroups of age and sporting discipline. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study recruited all patients with a frank dislocation that required arthroscopic surgical stabilization who attended the same private orthopedic surgeon. Exclusion criteria included injury without frank dislocation, nonsport-related injuries, and ambidexterity. Data were collected for 325 of 365 patients (89.0% response rate). RESULTS: There were 278 right hand-dominant patients (85.5%), with 136 (48.9%) requiring arthroscopic stabilization of their dominant side for dislocation. Of the remaining 47 left hand-dominant patients, 17 (36.2%) required operations on their dominant arm. In total, 153 patients (47.1%) dislocated their dominant shoulder and 172 (52.9%) dislocated their nondominant shoulder, with an odds ratio of 1.692 (95% confidence interval, 0.893-3.205). CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that there is no statistical significance between the side of shoulder dislocation and hand dominance of patients with shoulder dislocation. Future research could investigate further the causal relationship between hand dominance and mechanisms of injury.

Floor and ceiling effects in the OHS: an analysis of the NHS PROMs data set.

OBJECTIVES: The objective was to examine whether the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) demonstrated a floor or a ceiling effect when used to measure the outcome of hip replacement surgery in a large national cohort. SETTING: Secondary database analysis of a national audit conducted in England and Wales on patient undergoing hip and knee arthroplasty in a secondary care setting. PARTICIPANTS: 93 253 primary arthroplasty patients completed preoperative OHS questionnaires and 69 361 completed 6-month postoperative OHS questionnaires. The population had a mean age of 67.78 (range 14-100, SD 11.3) and 59% were female. PRIMARY SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome measure was the Oxford Hip Score (OHS). Secondary outcome measures were the OHS-FCS and OHS-PCS. Floor and ceiling effects were considered present if >15% of patients achieved the worst score/floor effect (0/48) or best/ceiling effect (48/48) score. RESULTS: Preoperatively, 0% of patients achieved the best score (48) and 0.1% achieved the worst score (0). Postoperatively, 0.1% patients achieved the worst score, but the percentage achieving the best score increased to 11.6%. Subgroup analyses demonstrated that patients between 50 and 59 years of age had the highest postoperative best score, at 15.3%. The highest postoperative OHS worst score percentage was in a group of patients who had a preoperative OHS above 41/48 at 28%. Furthermore, 22.6% of patients achieved the best postoperative OHS-PCS and 19.9% best postoperative OHS-FCS. CONCLUSIONS: Based on NHS PROMS data the overall OHS does not exhibit a ceiling or floor effect and should continue to be used as a valid measure of patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty. However, subscale analysis does indicate some limitations in the OHS-PCS and OHS-FCS. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NDORMS. Introducing standardised and evidence-based thresholds for hip and knee replacement surgery. The Arthroplasty Candidacy Help Engine (ACHE tool). HTA Project 11/63/01.