Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 6 de 6
Filtrar
1.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 29(2): 200-205, 2017 Apr 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28453819

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine whether pharmacist-provided home-based medication review (HBMR) can reduce readmissions in the elderly. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Patient's home. PARTICIPANTS: Records of patients referred to a care transition program from March 2011 through March 2015 were reviewed. Patients aged 60 years and older taking more than 5 medications and had at least 2 unplanned admissions within 3 months preceding the first home visit were included. INTERVENTION: Pharmacist-provided HBMR. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome was readmission rate over 6 months after the first home visit. Secondary outcomes included emergency department (ED) visits, outpatient visits and mortality. Drug-related problems (DRPs) were reported for the HBMR group. Multivariate incidence rate ratios (IRR) and hazard ratio (HR) were calculated with adjustments for covariates. RESULTS: The study included 499 patients (97 HBMR, 402 no HBMR). Pharmacist-provided HBMR reduced readmissions by 26% (IRR = 0.74, 95% CI: 0.59-0.92, P = 0.007), reduced ED visits by 20% (IRR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.66-0.98, P = 0.030) and increased outpatient visits by 16% (IRR = 1.16, 95% CI: 0.95-1.41, P = 0.150). There were 8 and 44 deaths in the HBMR and no HBMR groups respectively (HR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.29-1.81, P = 0.492). Pharmacists identified 464 DRPs, with 169 (36.4%) resolved within 1 month after the home visit. CONCLUSIONS: The study suggests that pharmacist-provided HBMR is effective in reducing readmissions and ED visits in the elderly. More studies in the Asian population are needed to determine its long term benefits and patient's acceptability.


Assuntos
Reconciliação de Medicamentos/métodos , Alta do Paciente , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Farmacêuticos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Estudos de Coortes , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/prevenção & controle , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade , Serviço de Farmácia Hospitalar/métodos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Singapura
2.
Pharmacy (Basel) ; 12(1)2024 Feb 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38392938

RESUMO

Background: A collaborative prescribing (CP) practice model, established by the endocrinologists, pharmacists, and advanced practice nurses, aims to provide for the postoperative monitoring and medical and nutritional management of stable patients after bariatric surgery. Method: Under the CP agreement, endocrinologists refer patients who have undergone bariatric surgery with stable medical conditions to CP practitioners, comprising senior pharmacists and advanced practice nurses. CP practitioners review the patient's weight loss progress, blood test results and vitals, the sufficiency of micronutrient repletion, adherence to supplements and medications, and chronic disease control. CP practitioners can prescribe and adjust the medications and supplements, in accordance with a clinical evaluation and standard guidance. Patients who require immediate attention due to complications or red flags are referred to the primary endocrinologist for further management. Results: From 5 May 2020 to 30 September 2023, CP practitioners provided 672 consultations. At least 68% and 80% of patients achieved appropriate weight loss post-surgery during the acute and maintenance phases, respectively. Less than 10% of the patients presented with anaemia and iron deficiency, and vitamin B12, folate and vitamin D deficiency. More than 80% of patients achieved a HbA1c of less than 7%. Conclusions: The CP practice framework provides a sustainable and viable model to facilitate optimal outcomes after bariatric surgery.

3.
Diabetes ; 72(7): 932-946, 2023 07 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36445944

RESUMO

Diabetic corneal neuropathy (DCN) is a common complication of diabetes. However, there are very limited therapeutic options. We investigated the effects of a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPAR-α) agonist, fenofibrate, on 30 patients (60 eyes) with type 2 diabetes. On in vivo confocal microscopy evaluation, there was significant stimulation of corneal nerve regeneration and a reduction in nerve edema after 30 days of oral fenofibrate treatment, as evidenced by significant improvement in corneal nerve fiber density (CNFD) and corneal nerve fiber width, respectively. Corneal epithelial cell morphology also significantly improved in cell circularity. Upon clinical examination, fenofibrate significantly improved patients' neuropathic ocular surface status by increasing tear breakup time along with a reduction of corneal and conjunctival punctate keratopathy. Tear substance P (SP) concentrations significantly increased after treatment, suggesting an amelioration of ocular surface neuroinflammation. The changes in tear SP concentrations was also significantly associated with improvement in CNFD. Quantitative proteomic analysis demonstrated that fenofibrate significantly upregulated and modulated the neurotrophin signaling pathway and linolenic acid, cholesterol, and fat metabolism. Complement cascades, neutrophil reactions, and platelet activation were also significantly suppressed. Our results showed that fenofibrate could potentially be a novel treatment for patients with DCN.


Assuntos
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2 , Neuropatias Diabéticas , Fenofibrato , Humanos , PPAR alfa/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Fenofibrato/farmacologia , Fenofibrato/uso terapêutico , Proteômica , Córnea/inervação , Hipoglicemiantes , Neuropatias Diabéticas/tratamento farmacológico , Neuropatias Diabéticas/diagnóstico , Microscopia Confocal/métodos
4.
J Diabetes ; 11(7): 573-581, 2019 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30556375

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Use of glucose-lowering agents is a cornerstone in combating type 2 diabetes (T2DM). Treatment guidelines have changed significantly over the past decade. We report temporal trends in medication utilization, glycemic control and rate of severe hypoglycemia in T2DM patients at a tertiary referral center in Singapore. METHODS: We analyzed data of 36 924 T2DM patients seen at Singapore General Hospital from 2007 to 2017. Annual age-, sex- and racially-standardized proportions of patients (a) prescribed with each class of glucose-lowering agent, (b) on various glucose-lowering regimens, and (c) had an HbA1c of less than 6%, 6% to less than 7%, 7% to less than 8%, 8% to less than 9%, or 9% or more were estimated using logistic regression. Poisson regression was used to estimate standardized rate of severe hypoglycemia. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2017, use of metformin (45.9% to 59.6%) and insulin (24.4% to 57.9%) increased, while utilization of sulfonylureas (52.0% to 44.9%) decreased (all P < 0.001). Utilization of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors (1.2% to 31.2%) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (0.5% to 7.4%) increased from 2008 to 2017 and 2012 to 2017, respectively (all P < 0.001). More patients were prescribed a combination of insulin and oral agents (17.3% to 46.0%, P < 0.001). The proportion of patients with HbA1c of 8% or more increased (33.7% to 36.0%, P < 0.001). Rates of severe hypoglycemia (5.0 to 8.4 per 100 patient-years, P < 0.001) also rose. CONCLUSION: Medication utilization patterns have changed significantly over the past 11 years with a shift towards newer agents. Glycemic control has remained stable, and rate of severe hypoglycemia increased. Further analysis is required before causal relationships can be inferred.


Assuntos
Biomarcadores/análise , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamento farmacológico , Uso de Medicamentos/tendências , Hiperglicemia/prevenção & controle , Hipoglicemia/prevenção & controle , Hipoglicemiantes/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Glicemia/análise , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicações , Inibidores da Dipeptidil Peptidase IV/administração & dosagem , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemoglobinas Glicadas/análise , Humanos , Hiperglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Hiperglicemia/epidemiologia , Hipoglicemia/induzido quimicamente , Hipoglicemia/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Prognóstico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Singapura/epidemiologia , Inibidores do Transportador 2 de Sódio-Glicose/administração & dosagem , Compostos de Sulfonilureia/administração & dosagem , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Fatores de Tempo , Adulto Jovem
5.
Geriatr Gerontol Int ; 17(2): 302-307, 2017 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26790376

RESUMO

AIM: The study aimed to: (i) evaluate the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary home-based medication review (HBMR) program in reducing hospital admissions and emergency department (ED) visits, cost of hospital admissions and length of stay (LOS); and (ii) determine the prevalence of drug-related problems (DRP) in elderly Singaporeans. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was carried out at an academic medical center in Singapore. Patients referred between 1 March 2011 and 31 December 2012 were included. Frequency of hospital admissions and ED visits, cost of hospital admissions, and LOS 6 months before and after HBMR, number of DRP, their categories, and their outcomes (i.e. resolved/ unresolved) were recorded. RESULTS: The analysis included 107 patients with a mean (SD) age of 75.6 years (7.6 years). HBMR resulted in a 41% reduction in risk for hospital admissions (Incidence rate ratio 0.59, 95% CI 0.47-0.73, P < 0.001). The same magnitude of reduction was observed for ED visits. The mean (SD) cost of hospital admissions reduced from $16 957.77 ($16 118.35) before HBMR to $7488.76 ($12 773.40) after (P < 0.001). Among 62 patients with hospital admissions before and after HBMR, the mean (SD) LOS decreased from 26.5 days (22.4 days) to 17.6 days (17.8 days; P = 0.010). The team identified 525 DRP from 1353 medications reviewed. Of these, 34 (6.7%) and 174 (34.1%) were resolved with and without physician involvement, respectively. The most common DRP identified were failure to receive drug (n = 163, 31.0%) and untreated indication (n = 140, 26.7%). CONCLUSIONS: The multidisciplinary HBMR program was associated with reduced ED visits, hospital admissions, LOS and costs in older adult Singaporeans with multiple DRP. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2017; 17: 302-307.


Assuntos
Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar/organização & administração , Reconciliação de Medicamentos/organização & administração , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Idoso , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Hospitalização , Humanos , Masculino , Avaliação de Programas e Projetos de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Singapura
6.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 39(5): 1031-1038, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28828593

RESUMO

Background Patients receiving hemodialysis are predisposed to drug related problems (DRPs). While collaborative care (CC) models with pharmacist involvement can reduce DRP occurrence, few have examined its impact on clinical and economic outcomes. Objective To determine whether a CC model with pharmacist-provided medication review can reduce unplanned admissions and healthcare utilization in patients receiving hemodialysis, compared to usual care (UC). Setting Outpatient nephrology clinic of a tertiary hospital in Singapore. Method In this retrospective observational study, patients who were taking more than 10 medications or had prior unplanned admissions were included. Patients were identified as being managed under CC (n = 134) if they received comprehensive pharmacist-provided review, or under the UC (n = 190) if they did not. Those perceived to be at greater risk were given priority for receiving CC. All outcomes analyses were adjusted for covariates. Main outcome measure The primary outcome was incidence of unplanned admissions within 6 months post index visit. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS), mortality and healthcare utilization cost. Results CC reduced unplanned admissions by 27% (IRR 0.73, 95% CI 0.54-0.99, p = 0.047) and shortened mean LOS by 1.3 days [6.7 (2.6) vs. 8.0 (3.2), p < 0.001] compared to UC. There were no significant differences in mortality (p = 0.189) or mean healthcare utilization cost (p = 0.165) between groups. Pharmacists identified 515 DRPs with 429 (83.3%) resolved after review. Conclusion The CC model with pharmacist-provided medication review reduced unplanned admissions and LOS in patients receiving hemodialysis. Further studies are warranted to confirm reductions in mortality and healthcare utilization.


Assuntos
Colaboração Intersetorial , Reconciliação de Medicamentos/métodos , Assistência ao Paciente/métodos , Farmacêuticos , Papel Profissional , Diálise Renal , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Reconciliação de Medicamentos/tendências , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Aceitação pelo Paciente de Cuidados de Saúde , Assistência ao Paciente/tendências , Farmacêuticos/tendências , Diálise Renal/tendências , Estudos Retrospectivos , Singapura/epidemiologia , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA