RESUMO
BACKGROUND: In the CHAMPION trial, significant reductions in admissions to hospital for heart failure were seen after 6 months of pulmonary artery pressure guided management compared with usual care. We examine the extended efficacy of this strategy over 18 months of randomised follow-up and the clinical effect of open access to pressure information for an additional 13 months in patients formerly in the control group. METHODS: The CHAMPION trial was a prospective, parallel, single-blinded, multicentre study that enrolled participants with New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class III heart failure symptoms and a previous admission to hospital. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) by centre in block sizes of four by a secure validated computerised randomisation system to either the treatment group, in which daily uploaded pulmonary artery pressures were used to guide medical therapy, or to the control group, in which daily uploaded pressures were not made available to investigators. Patients in the control group received all standard medical, device, and disease management strategies available. Patients then remained masked in their randomised study group until the last patient enrolled completed at least 6 months of study follow-up (randomised access period) for an average of 18 months. During the randomised access period, patients in the treatment group were managed with pulmonary artery pressure and patients in the control group had usual care only. At the conclusion of randomised access, investigators had access to pulmonary artery pressure for all patients (open access period) averaging 13 months of follow-up. The primary outcome was the rate of hospital admissions between the treatment group and control group in both the randomised access and open access periods. Analyses were by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00531661. FINDINGS: Between Sept 6, 2007, and Oct 7, 2009, 550 patients were randomly assigned to either the treatment group (n=270) or to the control group (n=280). 347 patients (177 in the former treatment group and 170 in the former control group) completed the randomised access period in August, 2010, and transitioned to the open access period which ended April 30, 2012. Over the randomised access period, rates of admissions to hospital for heart failure were reduced in the treatment group by 33% (hazard ratio [HR] 0·67 [95% CI 0·55-0·80]; p<0·0001) compared with the control group. After pulmonary artery pressure information became available to guide therapy during open access (mean 13 months), rates of admissions to hospital for heart failure in the former control group were reduced by 48% (HR 0·52 [95% CI 0·40-0·69]; p<0·0001) compared with rates of admissions in the control group during randomised access. Eight (1%) device-related or system related complications and seven (1%) procedure-related adverse events were reported. INTERPRETATION: Management of NYHA Class III heart failure based on home transmission of pulmonary artery pressure with an implanted pressure sensor has significant long-term benefit in lowering hospital admission rates for heart failure. FUNDING: St Jude Medical Inc.
Assuntos
Pressão Arterial , Monitores de Pressão Arterial , Insuficiência Cardíaca/fisiopatologia , Insuficiência Cardíaca/terapia , Artéria Pulmonar/fisiopatologia , Idoso , Doença Crônica , Feminino , Seguimentos , Hemodinâmica , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Monitorização Fisiológica/instrumentação , Monitorização Fisiológica/métodos , Admissão do Paciente , Estudos Prospectivos , Resultado do TratamentoRESUMO
BACKGROUND: End point committees are routinely used to adjudicate efficacy and safety end points in clinical trials. The 2,708-patient ß-Blocker Evaluation of Survival Trial (BEST) originally determined hospitalization type via investigator case report forms (CRFs), which captured whether a hospitalization was due to worsening heart failure (HF). Recently, the BEST End Points Committee (EPC) completed a blinded adjudication of all hospitalizations, allowing a comparison of the CRF method to the EPC method of determining hospitalization type. We sought to compare the investigator-determined mode of hospitalizations with the adjudicated events, to quantify the degree of agreement, and to compare the clinical trial results by method of event classification. METHODS: The BEST EPC reviewed all 5,086 hospitalizations that occurred in BEST. Events were identified using investigator-reported hospitalizations, as well as those documented by FDA Form 3500 (MedWatch) reports. RESULTS: The investigators identified more HF hospitalization events than adjudication (2,466 vs 1,729, P < .0001, paired analysis). Eight hundred thirty-four (34%) HF hospitalizations identified in CRFs were not confirmed by adjudication. Ninety-seven (6%) adjudicated events were not identified by the investigator reported method. One thousand six hundred thirty-two events were similarly identified by both methods. CONCLUSIONS: The EPC adjudication identified fewer HF hospitalizations than did the investigator reported method with no change in the hazard ratio for this end point. Our findings suggest that independent end point committees may improve reliability through reduced variance, thus providing similar outcome results with fewer events and no increase in CIs.
Assuntos
Antagonistas Adrenérgicos beta/uso terapêutico , Comitês de Monitoramento de Dados de Ensaios Clínicos , Insuficiência Cardíaca/tratamento farmacológico , Registros Hospitalares , Hospitalização/estatística & dados numéricos , Pesquisadores , Feminino , Insuficiência Cardíaca/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar/tendências , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Volume overload in heart failure (HF) results from neurohumoral activation causing renal sodium and water retention secondary to arterial underfilling. Volume overload not only causes signs and symptoms of congestion, but can impact myocardial remodeling and HF progression. Thus, treating congestion is a cornerstone of HF management. Loop diuretics are the most commonly used drugs in this setting. However, up to 30% of the patients with decompensated HF present with loop-diuretic resistance. A universally accepted definition of loop diuretic resistance, however, is lacking. Several approaches to treat diuretic-resistant HF are available, including addition of distal acting thiazide diuretics, natriuretic doses of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs), or vasoactive drugs. Slow continuous veno-venous ultrafiltration is another option. Ultrafiltration, if it is started early in the course of HF decompensation, may result in prominent decongestion and a reduction in re-hospitalization. On the other hand, ultrafiltration in HF patients with worsening renal function and volume overload after aggressive treatment with loop diuretics, failed to show benefit compared to a stepwise pharmacological approach, including diuretics and vasoactive drugs. Early detection of congested HF patients for ultrafiltration treatment might improve decongestion and reduce readmission. However, the best patient characteristics and best timing of ultrafiltration requires further evaluation in randomized controlled studies.
RESUMO
While bronchiolitis obliterans organizing pneumonia (BOOP) has been associated with the use of sirolimus (SIR), the incidence in a consecutive group of patients given SIR to replace a calcineurin-inhibitor (CI) is unknown. Twenty-nine consecutive cardiac transplant recipients were switched from a CI to SIR to ameliorate CI-associated nephropathy or coronary graft atherosclerosis. Seven patients (24%) developed BOOP. The clinical characteristics and biopsy results of these patients are presented. The clinical course and response to withdrawal of SIR in all and steroids in four of seven patients suggested the diagnosis of BOOP. Chest X-rays and CT scans showed typical findings of BOOP in all seven patients. Infection was excluded in all patients. Biopsy results were characteristic of BOOP in six of seven patients. Six patients recovered and one died. BOOP is a common and potentially serious adverse event in cardiac transplant patients switched from a CI to SIR, especially when SIR is started late post-transplantation.