Neoadjuvant Modified FOLFOXIRI With Selective Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: Long-term Outcomes of Phase II Study and Propensity-Score-Matched Comparison With Chemoradiotherapy.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant modified FOLFOXIRI (folinic acid, 5-fluorouracil, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan) chemotherapy with selective radiotherapy did not compromise pathologic complete response and tumor downstaging in locally advanced rectal cancer. OBJECTIVE: The study aimed to analyze disease-free survival and local recurrence of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with modified FOLFOXIRI (mFOLFOXIRI). DESIGN: This was a prospective single-arm phase II study. A propensity score-adjusted method was implemented to compare outcomes against historical controls of chemoradiotherapy. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at single institutions. PATIENTS: One hundred 6 patients with stage II and III rectal cancers were included. INTERVENTION: All patients received neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI chemotherapy before total mesorectal excision. Patients with mesorectal fascia-positive or ycT4a/b after reevaluation with MRI received radiation before surgery. Otherwise, immediate total mesorectal excision would be performed. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURES: The primary end point was tumor downstaging (ypStage 0-I) rate, which was reported previously. Disease-free survival and local recurrence rate were the main outcomes for the current study. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 43.3 months, the 2-year disease-free survival rate was 85.6% and the 3-year disease-free survival rate was 78.9%. The local recurrence rate was 7.8% after surgery. After propensity score matching, 73 patients were available for comparison in each group. The pathologic complete response rate was 23.3% and 13.7% ( p = 0.14), the proportion of ypStage 0-I was 45.2% vs 39.7% ( p = 0.5), the 3-year disease-free survival was 87.6% vs 75.8% (HR = 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.95, p = 0.037). The local recurrence rate in the mFOLFOXIRI group was 5.5% and in the chemoradiotherapy group was 4.1% ( p = 0.70). Patients receiving mFOLFOXIRI had a lower incidence of anastomotic fistula compared with the chemoradiotherapy group (5.5% vs 17.8%, p = 0.02). LIMITATIONS: This was a single-arm, nonrandomized phase II study. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI with selective radiotherapy was feasible and safe, and it improved 3-year disease-free survival compared with propensity score-matched historical controls who received chemoradiotherapy. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B989 .Trial registration: NCT02217020. FOLFOXIRI MODIFICADO NEOADYUVANTE CON RADIOTERAPIA SELECTIVA EN CNCER DE RECTO LOCALMENTE AVANZADO RESULTADOS A LARGO PLAZO DEL ESTUDIO DE FASE II Y COMPARACIN EMPAREJADA POR PUNTUACIN DE PROPENSIN CON QUIMIORRADIOTERAPIA: ANTECEDENTES:La quimioterapia neoadyuvante con FOLFOXIRI modificado (ácido folínico, 5-fluoruracilo, oxaliplatino e irinotecan) con radioterapia selectiva no comprometió la respuesta patológica completa ni la reducción del estadio del tumor en el cáncer de recto localmente avanzado.OBJETIVO:El estudio tuvo como objetivo analizar la sobrevida libre de enfermedad y la recurrencia local de la quimioterapia neoadyuvante con FOLFOXIRI modificado (mFOLFOXIRI).DISEÑO:Este fue un estudio prospectivo de fase II de un solo brazo. Se implementó un método ajustado por puntaje de propensión para comparar los resultados con los controles históricos de quimiorradioterapia.ESCENARIO:El estudio se realizó en instituciones individuales.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron 106 pacientes con cáncer de recto en estadio II y III.INTERVENCIÓN:Todos los pacientes recibieron quimioterapia neoadyuvante con mFOLFOXIRI antes de la escisión total del mesorrecto. Los pacientes con fascia mesorrectal positiva o ycT4a/b después de la reevaluación con MRI recibirían radiación antes de la cirugía. En caso contrario, se realizaría una escisión mesorrectal total inmediata.PRINCIPALES RESULTADOS Y MEDIDAS:El criterio principal de valoración fue la tasa de disminución del estadio del tumor (ypEstadio 0-I), que se informó anteriormente. La sobrevida libre de enfermedad y la tasa de recurrencia local son los principales resultados del estudio actual.RESULTADOS:Después de una mediana de seguimiento de 43,3 meses, las tasas de sobrevida libre de enfermedad a 2 y 3 años fueron del 85,6 % y 78,9 %, respectivamente. La tasa de recidiva local fue del 7,8% tras la cirugía. Después del emparejamiento por puntaje de propensión, 73 pacientes estaban disponibles para la comparación en cada grupo. La tasa de respuesta patológica completa fue de 23,3 % y de 13,7 % (p = 0,14), la proporción de ypEstadio 0-I fue del 45,2 % frente al 39,7 % (p = 0,5), la SLE a los 3 años fue del 87,6 % frente al 75,8 % (HR = 0,46, IC del 95 % 0,22-0,95, p = 0,037) y la tasa de recurrencia local fue del 5,5 % y del 4,1 % (p = 0,70) en el grupo de mFOLFOXIRI frente al grupo de quimiorradioterapia, respectivamente. Los pacientes que recibieron mFOLFOXIRI tuvieron una menor incidencia de fístula anastomótica en comparación con el grupo de quimiorradioterapia (5,5 % frente a 17,8 %, p = 0,02).LIMITACIONES:Este fue un estudio de fase II no aleatorizado de un solo brazo.CONCLUSIONES:El mFOLFOXIRI neoadyuvante con radioterapia selectiva fue factible y seguro, y mejoró la SSE a los 3 años en comparación con los controles históricos emparejados por puntaje de propensión que recibieron quimiorradioterapia. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B989 . (Traducción-Dr. Felipe Bellolio ).

Capecitabine maintenance therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer patients with no evidence of disease: CAMCO trial.

Background: In patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) exhibiting no evidence of disease (NED), this study assessed the efficacy and safety of capecitabine maintenance therapy. Methods: The single-arm, phase II CAMCO trial enrolled mCRC-NED patients after first-line treatment, administering oral capecitabine maintenance for 1 year. Results: A total of 93 patients were enrolled. The primary end point, 3-year disease-free survival, yielded a rate of 51.6% (95% CI: 41.3-62.0%). Secondary end points included a 3-year overall survival rate of 83.9% (95% CI: 76.3-91.5%). Grade 3 adverse events (AE) were observed in seven patients (7.5%). Predominantly grade 1 and 2, the most common AE was hand-foot syndrome. Conclusion: In mCRC-NED patients, capecitabine maintenance demonstrated a manageable 3-year disease-free survival rate of 51.6%, accompanied by manageable AEs. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT01880658 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Modified FOLFOXIRI With or Without Cetuximab as Conversion Therapy in Patients with RAS/BRAF Wild-Type Unresectable Liver Metastases Colorectal Cancer: The FOCULM Multicenter Phase II Trial.

PURPOSE: This trial evaluated the addition of cetuximab to a modified FOLFOXIRI (mFOLFOXIRI: 5-fluorouracil/folinic acid, oxaliplatin, irinotecan) as conversion therapy in a two-group, nonrandomized, multicenter, phase II trial in patients with initially technically unresectable colorectal liver-limited metastases (CLM) and BRAF/RAS wild-type. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were enrolled to receive cetuximab (500 mg/m2 ) plus mFOLFOXIRI (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 , irinotecan 165 mg/m2 , folinic acid 400 mg/m2 , 5-fluorouracil 2,800 mg/m2 46-hour infusion, every 2 weeks) (the cetuximab group) or the same regimen of mFOLFOXIRI alone (the control group), in a 2:1 ratio allocation. The primary endpoint was the rate of no evidence of disease (NED) achieved. Secondary endpoints included resection rate, objective response rate (ORR), survival, and safety. RESULTS: Between February 2014 and July 2019, 117 patients were registered for screening at six centers in China, and 101 of these were enrolled (67 cetuximab group, 34 control group). The rate of NED achieved was 70.1% in the cetuximab group and 41.2% in the control group (difference 29.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 9.1%-48.8%; p = .005). Patients in the cetuximab group had improved ORR (95.5% vs. 76.5%; difference 19.1%; 95% CI, 17.4%-36.4%; p = .010) compared with those in control group. Progression-free survival and overall survival showed the trend to favor the cetuximab group. The incidence of grade 3 and 4 adverse events was similar in the two groups. CONCLUSION: Addition of cetuximab to mFOLFOXIRI improved the rate of NED achieved. This combination could be an option of conversion regimen for molecularly selected patients with initially technically unresectable CLM. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: This trial evaluated the addition of cetuximab to a modified FOLFOXIRI as conversion therapy in a phase II trial in patients with initially technically unresectable colorectal liver-limited metastases and BRAF/RAS wild-type. The rate of no evidence of disease achieved was 70.1% in the cetuximab plus modified FOLFOXIRI group and 41.2% in the modified FOLFOXIRI group. Objective response rates, overall survival, and progression-free survival were improved in the cetuximab group when compared with the modified FOLFOXIRI group. Addition of cetuximab to modified FOLFOXIRI increased the rate of no evidence of disease achieved, and this combination could be an option of conversion regimen for molecularly selected patients with initially technically unresectable colorectal liver-limited metastasis.

Comparison of outcomes between neoadjuvant imatinib and upfront surgery in patients with localized rectal GIST: An inverse probability of treatment weighting analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare outcomes between neoadjuvant imatinib and upfront surgery in patients with localized rectal gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) patients. METHODS: Eighty-five patients with localized rectal GIST were divided into two groups: upfront surgery ± adjuvant imatinib (Group A, n = 33) and the neoadjuvant imatinib + surgery + adjuvant imatinib (Group B, n = 52). Baseline characteristics between groups were controlled for with inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) adjusted analysis. RESULTS: The response rate to neoadjuvant imatinib was 65.9%. After the IPTW-adjusted analysis, patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy had better distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) compared with those who underwent upfront surgery (5-year DRFS 97.8 vs. 71.9%, hazard ratio [HR], 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.87; p = 0.03; 5-year DSS 100 vs. 77.1%; HR, 0.11; 95% CI, 0.01-0.92; p = 0.04). While no significant association was found between overall survival (OS) and treatment groups (p = 0.07), 5-year OS was higher for the neoadjuvant group than upfront surgery group (97.8% vs. 71.9%; HR, 0.2; 95% CI, 0.03-1.15). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with localized rectal GIST, neoadjuvant imatinib not only shrunk the tumor size but also decreased the risk of metastasis and tumor-related deaths when compared to upfront surgery and adjuvant imatinib alone.

Application and comparison of different implanted ports in malignant tumor patients.

BACKGROUND: The current study aims to compare the application and convenience of the upper arm port with the other two methods of implanted ports in the jugular vein and the subclavian vein in patients with gastrointestinal cancers. METHODS: Currently, the standard of practice is placement of central venous access via an internal jugular vein approach. Perioperative time, postoperative complications, and postoperative comfort level in patients receiving an implanted venous port in the upper arm were retrospectively compared to those in the jugular vein and the subclavian vein from April 2013 to November 2014. RESULTS: Three hundred thirty-four patients are recruited for this analysis, consisting of 107 in the upper arm vein group, 70 in the jugular vein group, and 167 in the subclavian vein group. The occurrence of catheter misplacement in the upper arm vein is higher than that in the other two groups (13.1 vs. 2.9 vs. 5.4 %, respectively, P = 0.02), while the other complications in the perioperative period were not significantly different. The occurrence of transfusion obstacle of the upper arm vein group is significantly lower than that of the jugular and subclavian groups (0.9 vs. 7.1 vs. 7.2 %, P = 0.01). The occurrence of thrombus is also lower than that of other two groups (0.9 vs. 4.3 vs. 3.6 %, P = 0.03). Regarding the postoperative comfort, the influences of appearance (0 vs. 7.1 vs. 2.9 %, P = 0.006) and sleep (0.9 vs. 4.2 vs. 10.7 %, P = 0.003) are significantly better than those of the jugular and subclavian vein groups. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the jugular and the subclavian vein groups, the implanted venous port in the upper arm vein has fewer complications and more convenience and comfort, and might be a superior novel choice for patients requiring long-term chemotherapy or parenteral nutrition.

PD-1 blockade plus COX inhibitors in dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer: Clinical, genomic, and immunologic analyses from the PCOX trial.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 20% of patients with DNA mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer do not respond to anti-programmed death-1 (PD-1) ligand therapy, and baseline biomarkers of response are lacking. METHODS: We conducted a phase 2 study to evaluate the efficacy of cyclooxygenase (COX) inhibitors in combination with anti-PD-1 therapy in patients with dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. The secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), disease control rate, duration of response, and safety. FINDINGS: A total of 30 patients were enrolled, and the objective response rate was 73.3%, meeting the predefined endpoint of 68%. The median PFS and median OS were not reached at a median follow-up period of 50.8 months. Disease control was achieved in 28 patients (93.3%). The median duration of response was not reached. The combination was well tolerated. Multiomics analysis revealed that the antigen processing and presentation pathway was positively associated with treatment response and PFS. Higher TAPBP expression was predictive of better PFS (log-rank p = 0.003), and this prognostic significance was confirmed in an immunotherapy validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, COX inhibitors combined with PD-1 blockade may be effective and safe treatment options for patients with dMMR metastatic colorectal cancer, and TAPBP may serve as a biomarker for immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy (this study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03638297). FUNDING: Funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81974369) and the program of Guangdong Provincial Clinical Research Center for Digestive Diseases (2020B1111170004).

Efficacy and safety of ripretinib vs. sunitinib in patients with advanced gastrointestinal stromal tumor previously treated with imatinib: A phase 2, multicenter, randomized, open-label study in China.

AIM: A bridging study of INTRIGUE study to assess the efficacy and safety of ripretinib versus sunitinib as second-line treatment in Chinese GIST patients. METHODS: This was a phase 2, multicenter, randomized, open-label study in China. GIST patients previously treated with imatinib were randomized (1:1) to receive ripretinib 150 mg once daily (QD) by continuous dosing in 42-day cycles or sunitinib 50 mg QD in 42-day cycles (four weeks on/two weeks off). Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by independent radiological review (IRR). RESULTS: Between 6 December 2020 and 15 September 2021, 108 patients were randomized to receive ripretinib (n = 54) or sunitinib (n = 54) (all-patient [AP] intention-to-treat [ITT] population). Seventy patients had primary KIT exon 11 mutations (ripretinib, n = 35; sunitinib, n = 35; Ex11 ITT population). By data cut-off (20 July 2022), in AP ITT population, PFS by IRR was comparable between ripretinib and sunitinib arms (HR 0·99, 95 % CI 0·57, 1·69; nominal p = 0·92; median PFS [mPFS] 10·3 vs 8·3 months). In Ex11 ITT population, PFS by IRR was longer for ripretinib than sunitinib (HR 0·46, 95 % CI 0·23, 0·92; nominal p = 0·03; mPFS not reached in ripretinib arm and 4·9 months in sunitinib arm). Fewer patients experienced grade 3/4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events with ripretinib (17%) versus sunitinib (56%). CONCLUSIONS: Ripretinib demonstrated similar efficacy and a favorable safety profile versus sunitinib as second-line treatment in Chinese GIST patients. Furthermore, ripretinib provided greater clinically meaningful benefit versus sunitinib in patients with KIT exon 11 mutation.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy With Oxaliplatin and Fluoropyrimidine Versus Upfront Surgery for Locally Advanced Colon Cancer: The Randomized, Phase III OPTICAL Trial.

PURPOSE: The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in colon cancer remains unclear. This trial investigated whether 3 months of modified infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or capecitabine and oxaliplatin (CAPOX) as NAC could improve outcomes in patients with locally advanced colon cancer versus upfront surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: OPTICAL was a randomized, phase III trial in patients with clinically staged locally advanced colon cancer (T3 with extramural spread into the mesocolic fat ≥5 mm or T4). Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive six preoperative cycles of mFOLFOX6 or four cycles of CAPOX, followed by surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC group), or immediate surgery and the physician's choice of adjuvant chemotherapy (upfront surgery group). The primary end point was 3-year disease-free survival (DFS) assessed in the modified intention-to-treat (mITT) population. RESULTS: Between January 2016 and April 2021, of the 752 patients enrolled, 744 patients were included in the mITT analysis (371 in the NAC group; 373 in the upfront surgery group). At a median follow-up of 48.0 months (IQR, 46.0-50.1), 3-year DFS rates were 82.1% in the NAC group and 77.5% in the upfront surgery group (stratified hazard ratio [HR], 0.74 [95% CI, 0.54 to 1.03]). The R0 resection was achieved in 98% of patients who underwent surgery in both groups. Compared with upfront surgery, NAC resulted in a 7% pathologic complete response rate (pCR), significantly lower rates of advanced tumor staging (pT3-4: 77% v 94%), lymph node metastasis (pN1-2: 31% v 46%), and potentially improved overall survival (stratified HR, 0.44 [95% CI, 0.25 to 0.77]). CONCLUSION: NAC with mFOLFOX6 or CAPOX did not show a significant DFS benefit. However, this neoadjuvant approach was safe, resulted in substantial pathologic downstaging, and appears to be a viable therapeutic option for locally advanced colon cancer.

Effect of Inhibitors on Hydrogen Bond Reduction and Kaolinite Dissolution for Enhanced CO2 Adsorption in Coal.

The application of an inhibitor to the remaining coal in the goaf not only prevents spontaneous combustion of the coal seam in the mining area but also greatly enhances the capacity of coal to adsorb CO2. To investigate the mechanism by which inhibitors improve the CO2 adsorption capacity of the coal seam in the goaf, we conducted swelling experiments, infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, and X-ray diffraction analyses to examine the microstructural changes in the adsorption of CO2 before and after inhibition. The results indicate that after inhibition, the number of hydrogen bonds between coal macromolecules decreased, and the samples exhibited approximately 5% swelling. This swelling of the coal macromolecular structure and the increased distance between coal particles create additional space for CO2 sequestration, which is a critical factor contributing to the enhanced CO2 adsorption capacity of coal. The mineral composition of coal consists of 75.6% kaolinite, and inhibition leads to a reduction in kaolinite content by 0.8-7.9%. After inhibition, the swelling and disintegration of kaolinite cause uneven stress, resulting in changes to the pore structure. Closed pores filled with kaolinite transform into open pores, and the original pores crack, forming new pores and pore channels. The dissolution of kaolinite particles increases the porosity of the coal, further facilitating gas adsorption. Among the three inhibitors tested, the most effective in enhancing CO2 sequestration by bituminous coal in the mining area was the urea solution. This study holds significant importance in improving the CO2 sequestration capacity of residual coal in goaves.

Neoadjuvant versus adjuvant imatinib in primary localized gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

Background: The effect of neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) with imatinib versus upfront resection (UR) followed by adjuvant therapy (AT) with imatinib on the outcomes of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GIST) is unknown. Methods: This is a retrospective study at a high-volume center. All the patients with primary localized GIST were identified in a hospital database from 2007 to 2021. The endpoints included local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), distance recurrence-free survival (DRFS), and overall survival (OS). Cox regression was used to perform multivariate survival analyses. The sensitivity analysis was conducted with the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. Results: A total of 211 patients were included (Group A: UR + AT, n=140; Group B: NAT + resection + AT, n=71). In the entire cohort, 5-year DRFS, LRFS, and OS were 85.6%, 90.7%, and 92.5%, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, better DRFS was linked to NAT, tumor size of 5 cm, and AT. Sixteen patients (11.4%) in Group A and 1 (1.4%) in Group B had distant recurrences after AT discontinuation. The sensitivity analysis by IPTW provided approximately similar results. An interaction effect was observed between NAT and tumor location on DRFS. In non-gastric GISTs, NAT was associated with better DRFS [hazard ratio =0.131, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.017-0.989, P=0.049], which was not the case in gastric GIST (P=0.08). NAT was not independently associated with LRFS or OS. Conclusions: When compared to UR + AT, NAT + resection + AT may reduce the risk of distant recurrence in localized GIST and may be especially beneficial for patients with non-gastric GISTs.

Remodeling of the immune and stromal cell compartment by PD-1 blockade in mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy can induce complete responses in mismatch repair-deficient and microsatellite instability-high (d-MMR/MSI-H) colorectal cancers (CRCs). However, the underlying mechanism for pathological complete response (pCR) to immunotherapy has not been completely understood. We utilize single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) to investigate the dynamics of immune and stromal cells in 19 patients with d-MMR/MSI-H CRC who received neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade. We found that in tumors with pCR, there is a concerted decrease in CD8+ Trm-mitotic, CD4+ Tregs, proinflammatory IL1B+ Mono and CCL2+ Fibroblast following treatment, while the proportions of CD8+ Tem, CD4+ Th, CD20+ B, and HLA-DRA+ Endothelial cells increase. Proinflammatory features in the tumor microenvironment mediate the persistence of residual tumors by modulating CD8+ T cells and other response-associated immune cell populations. Our study provides valuable resources and biological insights into the mechanism of successful ICI therapy and potential targets for improving treatment efficacy.

mFOLFOXIRI versus mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced rectal cancer: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Preoperative chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the standard treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC). However, CRT failed to impact metastatic recurrence and the risk of side effects on bowel and genitourinary remained a concern. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone with mFOLFOX6 or FOLFOXIRI had been investigated in LARC. Here, we tried to compare the efficacy of mFOLFOXIRI with mFOLFOX6 as neoadjuvant chemotherapy in LARC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between January 2014 and December 2019, patients with LARC receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI or mFOLFOX6 were retrospective analyzed, including data from a prospective trial (NCT02217020). All patients underwent total mesorectal excision (TME). The propensity-score matching was preformed to adjust baseline potential confounders and to estimate differences in outcomes between patients receiving mFOLFOXIRI and mFOLFOX6. Survival analysis was done using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional regression analysis. RESULTS: The median follow-up time was 31.1 months. After propensity score matching, 156 patients were available for comparison in each group. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate was 17.9% vs. 5.1% (P< .001), the incidence rate of anastomotic fistula was 3.2% vs. 9% (P = .03), the 3 year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 75% vs. 66.7% (P = .047) and the distant metastasis rate was 16.4% versus 26.6% (P = .013) for mFOLFOXIRI and mFOLFOX6 group, respectively. Patients receiving mFOLFOXIRI had higher incidence of grade III and/or IV nausea and/or vomiting (7.6% vs. 2.5%, P = .04). CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI regimens improved pCR rate and survival outcome, reduced the rate of distant metastasis and anastomotic fistula when comparing with propensity-score matched controls of mFOLFOX6 neoadjuvant chemotherapy. MICROABSTRACT: This trial assessed the short-term and long-term effects of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with mFOLFOXIRI and mFOLFOX6 in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Comparing with propensity-score matched historical control of chemoradiotherapy, neoadjuvant mFOLFOXIRI chemotherapy was well tolerated and led to higher rates of 3 year disease-free survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer.

Aprepitant plus palonosetron versus dexamethasone plus palonosetron in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with moderate-emetogenic chemotherapy: A randomized, open-label, phase 3 trial.

Background: Despite significant progress in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) by using dexamethasone combined with palonosetron for patients who received moderate-emetogenic chemotherapy (MEC), some of these patients still suffer from CINV. We evaluated whether aprepitant combined with palonosetron can improve the efficacy in the prevention of CINV in patients receiving MEC. Methods: This was a single-centre, open-label, phase III, randomized controlled trial, which was done at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University of China. The registered patients planned to receive mFOLFOX6 (oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil) but had not received any chemotherapy previously. The patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the aprepitant group (aprepitant 125 mg orally on day 1, 80 mg on day 2-3) and the dexamethasone group (dexamethasone 10 mg intravenously on day 1, 5 mg on days 2 and 3), both groups with palonosetron 0.25 mg intravenously on day 1. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who achieved a complete response (CR), defined as the absence of vomiting and no use of rescue medications in the overall phase (0-120 h). The primary outcome and safety were assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which excluded all patients who used estazolam within 24 h before registration and those who refused to keep a diary documenting the severity of nausea, frequency of vomiting, and the use of rescue therapy. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02909478. Findings: Between Sep 1, 2017, and Oct 23, 2019, 320 patients were enrolled, and 315 patients were evaluated. The proportion of patients who achieved CR was significantly higher with aprepitant than that noted with dexamethasone in the overall phase (88.8% vs. 74.2%; P = 0.0010; rate difference, RD 15%, 95% CI, 6% to 23%) and in the delayed phase (25-120 h), 90.6% vs. 75.5%, (P < 0.0001; RD 15%, 95%CI, 7% to 23%). No significant difference of CR rate was observed in the acute phase (0-24 h), 93.8% vs. 93.5%, (P = 0.94; RD 0%, 95% CI, -5% to 6%)). In the overall phase, the incidence of insomnia (P < 0.0010), dyspepsia (P = 0.038), and flushing (P = 0.0010) reported by the patients was significantly higher in the dexamethasone group than that in the aprepitant group. Interpretation: Aprepitant combined with palonosetron is superior to dexamethasone combined with palonosetron in patients who received the MEC regimen mFOLFOX6 in terms of preventing CINV. Funding: The National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFC1316000) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81974369).

mFOLFOXIRI with or without bevacizumab for conversion therapy of RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutant unresectable colorectal liver metastases: the FORBES non-randomized phase II trial.

Background: The aim of this non-randomized single-center phase II trial was to prospectively assess the clinical efficacy of triplet chemotherapy with modified 5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin, and irinotecan (mFOLFOXIRI) plus bevacizumab as conversion therapy for initially unresectable rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (RAS)/v-raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B1 (BRAF)/phosphatidylinositol-3 kinase catalytic alpha (PIK3CA) mutant colorectal liver-limited metastases (CRLMs). Methods: Patients with RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutant initially unresectable CRLMs were recruited at a ratio of 2:1 to receive mFOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab (experimental group) or mFOLFOXIRI alone (control group). The rate of patients attaining no evidence of disease (NED) was the primary endpoint. The secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), depth of tumor response (DpR), secondary resection rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: The rate of NED achieved was 40.7% and 30.8%, respectively, in the experimental (n=54) and control groups (n=26); the adjusted odds ratio was 4.519 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.247-16.375, P=0.022]. The ORR was 77.4% in the experimental group and 60.0% in the control group (P=0.112). The median DpR was significantly greater in the experimental group (45.6% vs. 34.9%, P=0.041). The median PFS was 12.6 months in the experimental group and 9.1 months in the control group [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.584, 95% CI: 0.304-1.121, P=0.106]. Median OS was prolonged in the experimental group compared with the control group (42.6 vs. 35.3 months, adjusted HR: 0.443, 95% CI: 0.195-1.006, P=0.052). Thirty patients (55.6%) in the experimental group and 16 (61.5%) in the control group experienced grade 3/4 adverse events. Conclusions: We observed that the combination of mFOLFOXIRI and bevacizumab increased the rate of clinical NED and showed a trend toward improved survival compared with mFOLFOXIRI alone. This could represent a conversion therapy option for fit patients with initially unresectable RAS/BRAF/PIK3CA mutant CRLMs.

Neoadjuvant PD-1 blockade with toripalimab, with or without celecoxib, in mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high, locally advanced, colorectal cancer (PICC): a single-centre, parallel-group, non-comparative, randomised, phase 2 trial.

BACKGROUND: PD-1 blockade is highly effective in patients with mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high metastatic colorectal cancer. The role of single-agent PD-1 blockade in the neoadjuvant setting for resectable mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer remains unclear. We investigated the efficacy and safety of PD-1 blockade with toripalimab, with or without the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib, as neoadjuvant treatment for mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high, locally advanced, colorectal cancers. METHODS: The PD-1 Inhibitor in Microsatellite Instability Colorectal Cancer (PICC) trial was a single-centre, open-label, parallel-group, non-comparative, randomised, phase 2 study undertaken at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China). Eligible patients were aged 18-75 years, had histologically confirmed mismatch repair-deficient or microsatellite instability-high colorectal cancer, had clinical stage T3-T4 or any T with lymph node positivity (N+), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score of 0 or 1, and adequate haematological, hepatic, and renal function. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1), without any stratification or balanced blocking, to receive toripalimab 3 mg/kg intravenously on day 1, with or without celecoxib 200 mg orally twice daily from day 1 to 14 of each 14-day cycle, for six cycles before surgical resection. Adjuvant treatment with toripalimab with or without celecoxib was permitted at the investigators' discretion. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with pathological complete response, defined as tumours without any viable tumour cells in the resected primary tumour sample and all sampled regional lymph nodes. All efficacy and safety analyses were assessed in the modified intention-to-treat population, which included all patients who were randomly assigned to treatment and who received at least one dose of toripalimab. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03926338, and is ongoing. FINDINGS: Between May 1, 2019, and April 1, 2021, 53 patients were screened, of whom 34 were randomly assigned to either the toripalimab plus celecoxib group (n=17) or the toripalimab monotherapy group (n=17). As of data cutoff (Aug 10, 2021), median follow-up was 14·9 months (IQR 8·8-17·0). All patients received study treatment and underwent surgical resection; there were no treatment-related surgical delays. All 34 patients had an R0 resection (>1 mm resection margin). 15 of 17 patients (88% [95% CI 64-99]) in the toripalimab plus celecoxib group and 11 of 17 patients (65% [38-86]) in the toripalimab monotherapy group had a pathological complete response. All patients continued to receive adjuvant toripalimab with or without celecoxib for a total perioperative duration of 6 months and were alive and free of recurrence at data cutoff. During neoadjuvant treatment, ten (59%) patients in the toripalimab plus celecoxib group and ten (59%) in the toripalimab monotherapy group had grade 1-2 treatment-related adverse events. Only one (3%) of 34 patients, who was in the toripalimab plus celecoxib group, had a grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse event during the neoadjuvant phase, which was grade 3 increased aspartate aminotransferase levels. In the adjuvant phase, only one (3%) of 34 patients, who was in the toripalimab monotherapy group, had a grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events, which was grade 3 increased aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels. INTERPRETATION: Neoadjuvant toripalimab with or without celecoxib could be a potential therapeutic option for patients with mismatch repair deficient or microsatellite instability-high, locally advanced, colorectal cancer. This treatment was associated with a high pathological complete response rate and an acceptable safety profile, which did not compromise surgery. Longer term follow-up is needed to assess effects on survival-related endpoints. FUNDING: The National Key R&D Program of China, the National Natural Science Foundation of China, and the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology-Junshi Biosciences Oncology Immunity Research. TRANSLATION: For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Mucinous Adenocarcinoma Predicts Poor Response and Prognosis in Patients With Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer: A Pooled Analysis of Individual Participant Data From 3 Prospective Studies.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the predictive implications and prognosis of mucinous adenocarcinoma (MAC) in locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) with intensified neoadjuvant treatment. METHODS: Individual patient data of LARC patients from 3 prospective clinical trials was analyzed. Neoadjuvant treatment regimens comprised chemoradiotherapy (CRT) with fluorouracil (5-FU) or mFOLFOX6, neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone with mFOLFOX6 or mFOLFOXIRI. The postoperative pathological result, local recurrence and disease-free survival (DFS) were retrospectively analyzed in patients with MAC and adenocarcinoma (AC) with neoadjuvant treatment. RESULTS: Totally, 743 patients were recruited, with 620 patients eligible for analysis. Fifty-three (8.5%) patients were MAC. The pathological complete response (pCR) rate and tumor downstaging rate (ypStage 0-I) between MAC and AC patients was 7.5% vs. 22.0% (P = .01) and 20.8% vs. 48.7% (P < .001), respectively. Among patients receiving preoperative CRT with 5FU or mFOLFOX6, the pCR rate and tumor downstaging rate between MAC and AC patients was 11.1% vs. 27.3% (P = .03) and 23.7% vs. 52.6% (P = .001), respectively. Regarding neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone with mFOLFOX6 or mFOLFOXIRI, the pCR rate and tumor downstaging rate was 0 vs.13.2% (P = .11) and 11.8% vs. 42.5% (P = .03) between MAC and AC group, respectively. With the median follow-up time of 38.9 months, the 3-year DFS and 3-year locoregional recurrence rate was 58.4% vs. 77.6% (P = .02) and 26.0% vs. 5.7% (P = .001) in the MAC and AC group, respectively. MAC (hazard ratio [HR] 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-2.98), PNI (HR 3.23, 95% CI, 1.85-5.72) and LVI (HR 2.04, 95% CI, 1.02-4.08) were independent prognosis factors and were associated with worse DFS. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with MAC of the rectum are associated with a lower pCR rate and tumor downstaging rate, higher incidence of local recurrence, and poorer DFS with neoadjuvant treatment.

Clinical analysis of thymic regrowth following chemotherapy in children and adolescents with malignant lymphoma.

OBJECTIVES: Thymic regrowth following chemotherapy has typical clinical and imaging manifestations that can be used to diagnose it prior to pathological diagnosis. We investigated methods for diagnosing thymic regrowth following chemotherapy with non-invasive methods. METHODS: Our study included 26 children and adolescents with thymic regrowth following chemotherapy for malignant lymphoma. Computed tomography scans were routinely performed for follow-up observations. After the emergence of new mediastinal masses, patients either underwent Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography scans to identify the characteristics of the mass, or were closely followed up. RESULTS: Thymic regrowth occurred 1-12 months after the last chemotherapy (mean, 4 months). Computed tomography mostly revealed diffusely enlarged thymic parenchymatous tissues that maintained normal thymic morphology. Computed tomography values were 36.72 ± 9.48 Hu and increased by 5.56 ± 2.62 Hu in contrast enhancement. The mean volume of the mass was 19.2 cm(3). Twenty patients underwent positron emission tomography; among them, five (25%) showed no intake of Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose in the anterior mediastinal mass, and 15 (75%) showed radioactivity distribution in the mass with a mean standardized uptake value of 2.7; the shape was regular and radioactivity distribution was uniform. The mean follow-up duration was 40 months and all patients achieved disease-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: In the absence of pathological diagnosis, thymic regrowth following chemotherapy can be diagnosed by clinical features combined with characteristic manifestations in computed tomography and positron emission tomography scans.

Significance of myeloid antigen expression in precursor T lymphoblastic lymphoma.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Precursor T lymphoblastic lymphoma (T-LBL) is a highly aggressive lymphoma. Myeloid antigen expression was found in some of the patients, and its clinical significance is worth studying. This study was to compare the clinical features, short-term efficacy and survival of T-LBL patients with or without myeloid antigen expression so as to evaluate its prognostic significance. METHODS: Forty-five T-LBL patients, with a median age of 14 years, were treated at Sun Yet-sen University Cancer Center between January 2000 and July 2008. These patients were divided into myeloid antigen-positive group (My(+) group) and myeloid antigen-negative group (My(-) group) based on the flow cytometric (FCM) analysis in bone marrow or pleural fluid. Myeloid antigen expression and its correlation with the short-term efficacy and overall survival were assessed in the two groups. RESULTS: There were 18 patients (40.0%) in the My(+) group and 27 (60.0%) in the My(-) group. The myeloid antigen expression was negatively correlated with the initial level of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), but not with other clinical features. The remission rate was lower in the My(+) group than in the My(-) group (38.8% vs. 70.3%, P = 0.028). The 2-year overall survival rate was lower in the My(+) group than in the My(-) group (51.9% vs. 78.7%, P = 0.036). By age subgroup analysis, there were no differences in response and survival rate among children and adolescents with or without myeloid antigen expression. But the remission rate and the 2-year overall survival rate were significantly lower in adult patients with myeloid antigen expression than in patients without it. Univariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated that age and myeloid antigen expression were adverse prognostic factors. CONCLUSION: Myeloid antigen expression is a predictor of a poor response to chemotherapy, and adverse prognostic factor in adult T-LBL, but not in children with T-LBL.

Gene Expression Signature to Predict Prognosis and Adjuvant Chemosensitivity of Colorectal Cancer Patients.

PURPOSE: Molecular characteristics using gene-expression profiling can undoubtedly improve the prediction of treatment responses, and ultimately, the clinical outcome of cancer patients. We aimed at developing a genetic signature to improve the prediction of chemosensitivity and prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed microarray data of 32 CRC patients to explore the potential functions and pathways involved in the disease relapse in CRC. Gene expression profiles and clinical follow-up information of GSE39582, GSE17536, and GSE103479 were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus database (GEO) to identify prognostic genes. Eventually, a model of 15-mRNA signature was established, in which its efficacy for predicting chemosensitivity and prognosis was examined. RESULTS: Based on the proposed model of 15-mRNA signature, the test series patients could be classified into high-risk or low-risk subgroup with significantly different overall survival (OS) rate (hazard ratio [HR]=1.48, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.30-1.70, P≤0.001). The prognostic value of this 15-mRNA signature was confirmed in another validation series. Further analysis revealed that the prognostic value of this signature was independent of the TNM stage and can predict adjuvant chemosensitivity of patients with early-stage CRC. CONCLUSION: We identified a novel 15-mRNA signature in patients with CRC, which could be clinically helpful in the prognosis evaluation and the process of selection of patients with early-stage CRC for undergoing adjuvant chemotherapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Regorafenib in Combination with Chemotherapy as Second-Line Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Network Meta-Analysis and Systematic Literature Review.

INTRODUCTION: Although various therapies are available for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there is lack of head-to-head evidence. Recent studies have demonstrated the efficacy of chemotherapy in combination with different biological agents including regorafenib in second-line therapy in patients with mCRC. We conducted a network meta-analysis (NMA) to estimate the relative efficacy and safety of regorafenib in combination with chemotherapy compared to other biological agents with chemotherapy combinations. METHODS: A literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab, regorafenib, panitumumab, cetuximab, ramucirumab, conatumumab, ganitumab, and aflibercept in combination with chemotherapy against chemotherapy alone as second-line setting from inception to 7 February 2019 in patients with mCRC. The survival outcomes were analyzed by the frequentist statistical approach (R software, netmeta package) while the level of individual treatment arms was assessed using the Bayesian method (R software, gemtc package). RESULTS: We identified 12 articles involving eight RCTs studies analyzing 6805 patients. The studies compared bevacizumab (3), regorafenib (1), panitumumab (2), cetuximab (3), ramucirumab (1), conatumumab (1), ganitumab (1), and aflibercept (1) against chemotherapy alone as comparator. The progression-free survival (PFS) revealed that regorafenib performed better than aflibercept (HR 0.9631, 95% CI 0.6785-1.367), ganitumab (HR 0.7228, 95% CI 0.3985-1.3109), panitumumab (HR 0.9653, 95% CI 0.6781-1.3742), and ramucirumab (HR 0.9206, 95% CI 0.6504-1.303). Regorafenib performed better than bevacizumab (OR 0.797, 95% CI 0.328-1.88) in terms of tumor response. Safety analysis showed that regorafenib performed better in reducing grade ≥ 3 adverse events (AE) than cetuximab and conatumumab, neutropenia than conatumumab, and fatigue than cetuximab. CONCLUSIONS: Regorafenib combined with chemotherapy might be a potential alternative to conventional therapeutic options in second-line treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer and could be considered as the best option for treating patients with KRAS and BRAF mutated mCRC. However future RCTs are needed to confirm these results.