RESUMO
BACKGROUND: The picosecond Alexandrite laser has shown increased efficacy in tattoo removal in comparison to Q-switched lasers. However, bulla formation is a well-known and expected side effect of this novel treatment and causes patient discomfort. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the incidence of bulla formation after tattoo treatment using the combination of the picosecond Alexandrite laser and fractionated CO2 ablation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective chart review to determine the incidence of bulla formation after laser tattoo removal in 95 patients who were treated with either with the picosecond Alexandrite laser alone or in combination with fractional CO2 ablation. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (32%) treated with the picosecond laser alone experienced blistering, whereas none of the patients treated with the combination of the picosecond laser and fractionated CO2 ablation experienced blistering. The difference in incidence of bulla formation between the 2 groups was found to be statistically significant (p < .05). CONCLUSION: This study shows a significant decrease in bulla formation associated with tattoo treatment when fractionated CO2 ablation is added to the picosecond Alexandrite laser, which is consistent with observations from a previous case series. This is important because decreasing extensive blistering likely results in increased patient satisfaction and willingness to return for future treatments.
Assuntos
Vesícula/etiologia , Vesícula/prevenção & controle , Lasers de Gás/efeitos adversos , Lasers de Gás/uso terapêutico , Lasers de Estado Sólido/efeitos adversos , Lasers de Estado Sólido/uso terapêutico , Tatuagem , Terapia Combinada , Humanos , Estudos RetrospectivosRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Although typically mild, transient, and expected, most adverse events (AEs) postsclerotherapy are inflammatory in nature. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of a high-potency topical corticosteroid (TC) applied immediately postsclerotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Subjects undergoing bilateral lower extremity sclerotherapy with polidocanol had extremities randomized to a single application of betamethasone dipropionate and placebo saline solutions immediately post-treatment in a double-blind manner. Adverse events were assessed for each extremity by subjects at t = 0 (preapplication) and t = 15 (15 minutes postapplication) and by an investigator at t = 0 and t = 15, and at Days 14 and 60. Subjects and investigator evaluated efficacy with a quartile improvement scale. RESULTS: Sixteen female subjects completed the study. Subjects reported no statistically significant differences in AEs between TC and placebo at either t = 0 or t = 15. Investigator scores for erythema and swelling/urtication were not significantly different between groups at the same time points. Although most subjects demonstrated 26% to 75% improvement at Day 60, results were not significantly different between extremities on subject and investigator evaluation. CONCLUSION: High-potency TC application immediately postsclerotherapy produced no statistically significant differences in subject- and investigator-assessed AEs and clearance rates compared with placebo. Foam sclerotherapy with polidocanol is safe and effective for the treatment of lower extremity reticular veins.