Petroclostridium xylanilyticum gen. nov., sp. nov., a xylan-degrading bacterium isolated from an oilfield, and reclassification of clostridial cluster III members into four novel genera in a new Hungateiclostridiaceae fam. nov.

A rod-shaped, Gram-stain-positive, obligately anaerobic, xylan-degrading bacterium, SK-Y3T, was isolated from oily-sludge of Shengli oilfield, China. Optimum growth occurred at 50 °C, at pH 7.5 and without addition of NaCl. The predominant cellular fatty acids of strain SK-Y3T were iso-C15 : 0, anteiso-C15 : 0 and iso-C17 : 0, and the main polar lipids were glycolipids (GL), lipids (L), phosphatidylglycerol (PG) and diphosphatidylglycerol (DPG); no respiratory quinones were detected. The genomic DNA G+C content was 37.2 mol%. Phylogenetic analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequences showed that strain SK-Y3T belongs to clostridial cluster III, exhibiting 91-92% sequence similarity to the most closely related species, namely Clostridium clariflavum, Clostridium straminisolvens and Acetivibrio cellulolyticus. Based on distinct physiological and phylogenetic differences from the aforementioned described taxa, strain SK-Y3T (=DSM 103557T=ACCC 19952T) is proposed as the type strain of a novel species of a new genus, Petroclostridium xylanilyticum gen. nov., sp. nov. Furthermore, analysis through 16S rRNA gene, ribosomal protein and whole genome sequences indicated that clostridial cluster III members should be reclassified into four novel genera for which the names Hungateiclostridium gen. nov., Thermoclostridium gen. nov., Ruminiclostridium gen. nov. and Pseudoclostridium gen. nov. are proposed. In combination with the genera Anaerobacterium, Cellulosibacter, Ercella, Fastidiosipila, Mageeibacillus, Pseudobacteroides, Petroclostridium and Saccharofermentans, clostridial cluster III members formed a monophyletic clade within the order Clostridiales but that was clearly distinguished from other Ruminococcaceae members, which is proposed as a novel family, Hungateiclostridiaceae fam. nov.

Coexistence and competition of sulfate-reducing and methanogenic populations in an anaerobic hexadecane-degrading culture.

BACKGROUND: Over three-fifths of the world's known crude oil cannot be recovered using state-of-the-art techniques, but microbial conversion of petroleum hydrocarbons trapped in oil reservoirs to methane is one promising path to increase the recovery of fossil fuels. The process requires cooperation between syntrophic bacteria and methanogenic archaea, which can be affected by sulfate-reducing prokaryotes (SRPs). However, the effects of sulfate on hydrocarbon degradation and methane production remain elusive, and the microbial communities involved are not well understood. RESULTS: In this study, a methanogenic hexadecane-degrading enrichment culture was treated with six different concentrations of sulfate ranging from 0.5 to 25 mM. Methane production and maximum specific methane production rate gradually decreased to 44 and 56% with sulfate concentrations up to 25 mM, respectively. There was a significant positive linear correlation between the sulfate reduction/methane production ratio and initial sulfate concentration, which remained constant during the methane production phase. The apparent methanogenesis fractionation factor (αapp) gradually increased during the methane production phase in each treatment, the αapp for the treatments with lower sulfate (0.5-4 mM) eventually plateaued at ~1.047, but that for the treatment with 10-25 mM sulfate only reached ~1.029. The relative abundance levels of Smithella and Methanoculleus increased almost in parallel with the increasing sulfate concentrations. Furthermore, the predominant sulfate reducer communities shifted from Desulfobacteraceae in the low-sulfate cultures to Desulfomonile in the high-sulfate cultures. CONCLUSION: The distribution of hexadecane carbon between methane-producing and sulfate-reducing populations is dependent on the initial sulfate added, and not affected during the methane production period. There was a relative increase in hydrogenotrophic methanogenesis activity over time for all sulfate treatments, whereas the total activity was inhibited by sulfate addition. Both Smithella and Methanoculleus, the key alkane degraders and methane producers, can adapt to sulfate stress. Specifically, different SRP populations were stimulated at various sulfate concentrations. These results could help to evaluate interactions between sulfate-reducing and methanogenic populations during anaerobic hydrocarbon degradation in oil reservoirs.