RESUMO
Peptide-receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) is a targeted molecular therapy used to treat neuroendocrine tumours (NET). It has been shown to be effective and well-tolerated in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours in several centres in United States (US), Europe and Australia. Tolerability and efficacy data emerging from Asian centres remain few. Epidemiological evidence suggests that there are differences in neuroendocrine neoplasms between the population groups. We aim to describe the treatment and safety outcomes of PRRT in the Asian population. Methods One hundred and seven (107) patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumour who had undergone PRRT treatment from January 2012 to March 2019 were included in this retrospective study. The response rates using RECIST1.1 and qualitative analysis were examined. The overall and progression free survival curves were also evaluated. Results The median progression free survival was 49 months. Response assessment after completion of treatment showed that 33(37.9%) of 87 patients had partial or complete response. Subgroup analysis comparing high- and low-grade NET showed that there was a significant difference in the time to progression curves. Comparison of the number of cycles and progression free and overall survival also showed a significant difference. Ten patients (9%) had grade 3 or more haematological toxicities. Four patients (4%) had grade 3/4 hepatobiliary toxicities, although the presence of extensive liver metastases was a confounding factor. None of the patients had grade 3/4 acute kidney injury. Conclusion Our results show that PRRT is safe and effective in the treatment of metastatic neuroendocrine tumour in the Asian population. There was a significant difference in the progression free survival curves between low-grade and high-grade NET, and in the progression free and overall survival comparing the number of cycles received.
RESUMO
The authors present the case of a 59-year-old lady diagnosed with lymphoepithelial carcinoma (LEC) of the left parotid gland. The primary tumour was identified using contrast-enhanced CT, and diagnosis was confirmed via fine needle aspiration cytology and immunohistochemistry. Staging using fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET CT revealed regional nodal metastases, while no distant metastasis was evident. Following radical radiotherapy, a favourable locoregional response was observed on MRI, yet the patient's plasma Epstein-Barr virus load continued to rise. Given her primary tumour's somatostatin receptor type 2 (SSTR2) positivity, gallium-68 DOTA-[Tyr3] octreotate PET CT (68Ga-DOTATATE PET CT) was performed, revealing multiple distant metastases with DOTATATE avidity. Despite attempts at palliative chemotherapy and immunotherapy, disease progression led to the decision for the best supportive care. The unique presentation of metastatic LEC on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET CT suggests a potential role for SSTR2-targeted imaging in diagnosis and management.
RESUMO
Our objective was to demonstrate primarily the safety and secondarily the efficacy of 90Y glass microspheres in selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a local Southeast Asian hospital. Methods: Eleven consecutive patients with small, unresectable, nonmetastatic HCC and referred for locoregional therapy with SIRT with a curative intention were followed up for 6 mo after the procedure by way of interviews, blood tests, and anatomic scans. Results: Although 5 patients had deranged liver function tests after the procedure, in only 1 patient did this constitute a grade 1 toxicity (in alkaline phosphatase) by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Half the patients showed a reduction in serum α-fetoprotein measurements, and 6 of 11 patients demonstrated an objective response (complete or partial) on imaging. Conclusion: SIRT with 90Y glass microspheres is a safe and efficacious locoregional therapy for unresectable HCC. There are similar articles published in the West; however, the patient population there comprises far fewer Asians and the underlying cause for HCC is different from that in the Asian population. Despite these differences, SIRT is an equally effective and safe option for such patients.