Nasopharyngeal microbiota in children is associated with severe asthma exacerbations.

BACKGROUND: The respiratory microbiome has been associated with the etiology and disease course of asthma. OBJECTIVE: We sought to assess the nasopharyngeal microbiota in children with a severe asthma exacerbation and their associations with medication, air quality, and viral infection. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was performed among children aged 2 to 18 years admitted to the medium care unit (MCU; n = 84) or intensive care unit (ICU; n = 78) with an asthma exacerbation. For case-control analyses, we matched all cases aged 2 to 6 years (n = 87) to controls in a 1:2 ratio. Controls were participants of either a prospective case-control study or a longitudinal birth cohort (n = 182). The nasopharyngeal microbiota was characterized by 16S-rRNA-gene sequencing. RESULTS: Cases showed higher Shannon diversity index (ICU and MCU combined; P = .002) and a distinct microbial community composition when compared with controls (permutational multivariate ANOVA R2 = 1.9%; P < .001). We observed significantly higher abundance of Staphylococcus and "oral" taxa, including Neisseria, Veillonella, and Streptococcus spp. and a lower abundance of Dolosigranulum pigrum, Corynebacterium, and Moraxella spp. (MaAsLin2; q < 0.25) in cases versus controls. Furthermore, Neisseria abundance was associated with more severe disease (ICU vs MCU MaAslin2, P = .03; q = 0.30). Neisseria spp. abundance was also related with fine particulate matter exposure, whereas Haemophilus and Streptococcus abundances were related with recent inhaled corticosteroid use. We observed no correlations with viral infection. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that children admitted with asthma exacerbations harbor a microbiome characterized by overgrowth of Staphylococcus and "oral" microbes and an underrepresentation of beneficial niche-appropriate commensals. Several of these associations may be explained by (environmental or medical) exposures, although cause-consequence relationships remain unclear and require further investigations.

Oxygen saturation targets for children with respiratory distress: a systematic review.

Background: In children with respiratory distress, supplemental oxygen is indicated at peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2) thresholds of 90-94%. However, these thresholds are poorly studied. We conducted a systematic review to summarise the existing evidence for SpO2 thresholds in children with respiratory distress. Methods: Electronic databases and registries were searched for original articles published from 1 January 2010 to 7 January 2022 comparing two or more SpO2 thresholds in children with respiratory distress. Primary outcomes were safety, including mortality, neurocognitive outcomes and readmissions, and effectiveness, including admission rate and length of hospital stay. Methodological appraisal was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB-2) or Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies - of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tools. Results were narratively synthesised. Results: We retrieved 3384 results; seven studies were included. Lower thresholds ranged from 80% to 92% and were compared with higher thresholds ranging from 92% to 94%. Studies were highly heterogeneous in setting, design, population and outcomes. Risk of bias varied from low to high. Lower SpO2 thresholds had equivalent mortality, neurocognitive outcomes and readmissions or re-attendance to healthcare to higher thresholds. Lower SpO2 thresholds showed a significant decrease in admission rates by up to 40% and shortened hospitalisation duration by 10-18 h. Conclusions: The current SpO2 thresholds of 90-94% in children with respiratory distress may be too high, which could lead to unnecessary hospitalisations and prolonged hospitalisation duration. SpO2 thresholds as low as 88% are potentially safe in children with respiratory distress and may reduce hospitalisation rates and length of stay. However, high-quality evidence is needed to support this.

[Self-harm among children and adolescents]. / Zelfbeschadiging bij kinderen en adolescenten.

Self-harm among children and adolescents is a prevalent health issue. Definitions of self-harm differ, and the distinction between attempted suicide or self-harm is often unclear. A recent large population-based cohort study on self-harm among children and adolescents aged 10-29 years showed a sharp increase in the incidence of self-harm, especially in girls aged 13-16 years. It also showed an inequality in treatment offered, depending upon the socio-economic profile of the region in which the patient presented.We illustrate the problem of self-harm by presenting a clinical case, and provide advice on when to suspect self-harm and how to proceed when self-harm is suspected. Furthermore, we show that a similar increase in incidence of self-harm to that which has taken place in the UK has also been signaled in the Netherlands. Self-harm is associated with an increased risk of death by suicide and other causes of unnatural death. Evidence for therapeutic options for self-harm is limited.