Single pre-operative radiation therapy (SPORT-CK) trial for low-risk breast cancer: Early results of a phase 2 study.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Preoperative partial breast irradiation (PBI) is a novel technique that can be used in patients with early-stage breast cancer with the goal of limiting the irradiated breast volume, toxicity and number of fractions. The aim of this trial is to assess the toxicity, surgical, oncologic and cosmetic outcomes of preoperative PBI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this single-arm phase II trial, we enrolled women ≥ 60 years, with unifocal low-risk breast invasive ductal carcinoma (cT1N0, grade 1-2, ER+, Her2-). Patients were treated with a single fraction of 20 Gy of preoperative PBI using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Patients then underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS) +/- sentinel lymph node biopsy within 72 h of radiation. Primary outcomes were rate of surgical complications and early toxicity. Secondary outcomes were cosmesis at 12 months, chronic toxicity and ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were recruited with a median age of 67 years, and a median follow-up of 60 months. Sentinel biopsy was positive in 1 out of 24 patients (4 %). Two patients received adjuvant RT for close margins or positive lymph nodes. Within the first 90 days, none of the patients had surgical complications; almost all had grade 0 to 1 acute and late RTOG skin toxicity. The cosmetic outcome was rated between good and excellent in all cases by physicians and patients, except for one patient who self-rated her cosmesis as fair as of the third year. There were no recurrences. CONCLUSION: Preoperative single-fraction PBI is a safe and feasible treatment for elderly patients with low-risk early-stage breast cancer, with no surgical complications, very low rates of acute and late radiation toxicity, and excellent cosmetic outcomes. Randomized controlled trials are needed to compare preoperative to adjuvant PBI in this patient population.

A case of penile melanoma illustrating the low sensitivity of frozen sections in the assessment of sentinel lymph nodes.

A 75 year-old uncircumcised man presented with a 1.1mm thick malignant melanoma on the ventral aspect of the glans penis. He underwent isosulfan blue and technetium 99m guided sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy and distal penectomy with 2 cm margins. This is the third reported case of penile melanoma using both markers for SLN mapping. While frozen sections and H& E stains were negative, S-100 and HMB-45 immunohistochemistry revealed micrometastasis in one of the sentinel nodes. This case illustrates that any discussion with the patient about management and prognosis should await immunohistochemistry results.

Impact of melanoma diagnosis on sun-awareness and protection: efficacy of education campaigns in a high-risk population.

BACKGROUND: Malignant melanoma is a significant cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Sun-awareness campaigns increase public knowledge but may not translate into behavioral changes in practice, which is particularly alarming when reported for individuals in high-risk groups. In particular, patients diagnosed with melanoma are at increased risk of developing subsequent primary melanomas compared with the general population. OBJECTIVES: The study was undertaken (1) to assess whether patients with known risk factors for developing melanoma had been exposed to preventative campaign messages prior to their diagnosis, (2) to quantify whether the diagnosis of melanoma changed sun-related attitudes and behavior, and (3) to assess the adequacy of sun-related advice given to patients with melanoma, as well as their compliance with the advice. METHODS: Using an anonymous questionnaire, 217 patients previously diagnosed with melanoma were interviewed on the source and frequency of received sun-related advice, as well as on their knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward sun protection before and after the diagnosis. RESULTS: The number of patients who reported receiving sun-related advice after being diagnosed with melanoma increased by 36% (52% pre-vs. 88% postDiagnosis), with advice being given more frequently and more often by a physician (19% pre- vs. 49% postdiagnosis). Furthermore, sun-related attitudes and behavioral practices were positively altered. Yet, patients with known risk factors were not preferentially targeted for advice before their diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: The diagnosis of melanoma leads to increased sun-awareness and protection. While dermatologists should continue their efforts to promote and reinforce sun-awareness in patients with melanoma, additional emphasis on preventative targeting of high-risk individuals would be of marked benefit in decreasing the overall incidence of melanoma. Non-dermatologists, such as family physicians, can be key players in this preventative campaign, and can be educated to recognize and educate patients at risk, as well as direct them to be followed under dermatology care.