A controlled trial of two forms of self-management education for adults with asthma.

PURPOSE: Excess morbidity and mortality due to asthma, aggravated by demonstrably poor patient self-management practices, suggest the need for formal patient education programs. Individual and group asthma education programs were developed and evaluated to determine their cognitive, behavioral, and clinical effects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We compared changes in asthma symptoms, utilization of medical services, knowledge about asthma, metered-dose inhaler (MDI) technique, and self-management behaviors for 323 adult Kaiser Permanente patients with moderate to severe asthma who were randomly assigned to small-group education, individual teaching, or 1 of 2 control conditions--an information (workbook) control or usual control (no formal asthma education). Data were collected from patients by questionnaire, diary, and physical examination at enrollment and at 5 months and 1 year after intervention. Medical record data on these patients were abstracted for a total 3-year period, from 1 year before to 2 years after enrollment. RESULTS: Compared with the usual control, the self-management education programs were associated with significant improvements in control of asthma symptoms (reduced "bother" due to asthma and increased symptom-free days), MDI technique, and environmental control practices. Small-group education also was associated with significant improvements in physician evaluation of the patients' asthma status and in patients' level of physical activity. For both group and individual education recipients, improvement in MDI technique was positively correlated with improved control of symptoms; however, the degree of improvement in symptoms was greater than that which could be accounted for on the basis of improvement in MDI technique alone. The time course over which changes occurred in the various outcome measures suggests the mechanism by which education resulted in improvement in the patient's status. Significant improvements in MDI technique and environmental control practices were manifest immediately following education (5-month follow-up) and at the 1-year follow-up. Significant improvements in symptom measures were not apparent until the 1-year follow-up. The rate of utilization of medical care for acute exacerbations decreased between baseline and the 2-year follow-up period, but this decrease did not differ significantly among treatment conditions. However, there was a trend toward greater reduction in patients receiving small-group education. An ad hoc finding of a significant difference favoring small-group education between the baseline and the second follow-up year acute visit rates was observed. This result must be regarded as tentative, since it is not clear that unambiguous statistical significance is attained in the light of multiplicity issues. However, this trend is consistent with the antecedent benefits of the small-group education, and appears to warrant further investigation. CONCLUSIONS: Carefully designed asthma education programs for adults can improve patients' understanding of their condition and its treatment and increase their motivation and confidence that the condition can be controlled, thereby increasing their adherence to the treatment regimen and management of symptoms, and, in turn, improving control of symptoms. Both small-group education and individual education were associated with significant benefits, but the group program was simpler to administer, better received by patients and educators, and more cost-effective. The results show promise for improving clinical outcomes, through well-designed educational programs, for patients with asthma and other chronic health problems.

Emergency management of asthma in children.

We studies the records of 242 consecutive visits paid by 85 children for emergency treatment of asthma, using a standard format that included history, physical signs, peak expiratory flow rates, and responses to treatments. The decision for admission was made in 23% of the episodes. It was based on the degree of airway obstruction, as reflected in physical signs and depression of PEFR, remaining after treatment. The risk of hospital admission was directly related to duration of symptoms prior to the visit, to the extent of signs of airway obstruction on arrival, and to response to the first epinephrine injection. In 39 instances, children were sent home only to return within two days because symptoms recurred. Review of data from their initial visits did not allow us to predict most of these returns. These data may serve as an aid to composing criteria useful for managing episodes of asthma in children. They support the utility of pulmonary function data in discriminating between episodes that can and those that cannot be managed safely as outpatients.

Reducing hospitalizations of children with asthma.

This study sought to determine if the amount of in-hospital time could be reduced for a selected population of asthmatic children by using a behavioral intervention ("time-out" from positive reinforcement) in a general pediatric hospital. The measurements of hospital use selected were duration and frequency of hospitalization, and the time needed after admission to reverse airflow obstruction, as reflected by peak expiratory flow rates. Seven patients were selected because their use of the hospital appeared to be appreciably in excess of the severity of their asthma. All seven had been followed for at least one year prior to intervention, and were then followed for at least one year after the initial intervention. Intervention was a time-out procedure consisting of a program that removed many of the social rewards for being hospitalized. The results indicated that each of the measures of hospital use tested was reduced during and following the intervention.

Prospective study of hospitalization for asthma. A preliminary risk factor model.

We conducted an exploratory analysis of several prospectively obtained objective measures of disease activity to derive a predictive model of hospitalization for asthma among 310 adults, ages 18 to 50 yr, with moderate to severe asthma. Baseline characteristics associated with increased risk of hospitalization in the succeeding year include (1) prior year hospitalization, (2) moderate or severe respiratory impairment, (3) a medication regimen consistent with severe asthma, (4) a history of significant systemic steroid use, (5) maximum overnight PEF variability > 40%, and (6) mean evening PEF < 60% of predicted (relative risk = 6.5, 6.9, 8.1, 3.7, 3.0, and 3.2, respectively). Recursive partitioning analysis, depicted as a "classification tree," provided a more sensitive (94%) and specific (68%) multivariate description of the data set than either logistic regression (87 and 48%, respectively) or a simple additive risk model (46 and 93%, respectively). Patients with very high (> 50%), moderately elevated (10 to 15%), and very low (< 5%) risk of hospitalization were identified on the basis of particular combinations of prior hospitalization history, level of respiratory impairment, and medication regimen. Overnight variability and mean evening PEF measured at home over a 2-wk period proved less informative for risk stratification than respiratory impairment determined once at baseline by office spirometry. The findings warrant replication and extension in other populations with the goal of developing decision rules for risk stratification and effective interventions for risk reduction.