[TILGen study-immunological targets in patients with breast cancer : Influence of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes]. / TILGen-Studie ­ Immunologische Angriffspunkte bei Patientinnen mit Brustkrebs : Einfluss der tumorinfiltrierenden Lymphozyten.

BACKGROUND: The interaction of our immune system with breast cancer (BC) cells prompted the investigation of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and targeted, tumor antigen-specific immunotherapy. OBJECTIVES: Correlation between TILs and pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NACT). Tumor-specific antigens (TSAs) in HER2+ and triple negative BC and establishment of TSA-specific therapies within the interdisciplinary TILGen study. METHODS: Illustration of the TILGen study design. Assessment of TILs and correlation with pCR within this BC study. RESULTS: pCR was achieved in 38.4% (56/146) and associated with estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor negative (ER-/PR-) and HER2+ tumors. Lymphocytic predominant BC (LPBC) was found in 16.4% (24/146), particularly in ER-/PR- (ER-: 27.3% vs. ER+: 9.9%, PR-: 22.3% vs. PR+: 8.2%), large, and poorly differentiated BC. TILs were significantly correlated with pCR in multivariate analysis. In LPBC, pCR was achieved in 66.7%, whereas it was 32.8% in non-LPBC. CONCLUSIONS: First results confirm the influence of the human immune system on the response to NACT in HER2+ and triple negative BC. TSA-specific immunotherapy might improve the outcome in BC patients but there is an urgent need for comprehensive studies to further investigate this issue.

[Documentation Time and Effort and Associated Resources for Patients with Primary Breast Cancer from Diagnosis to End of Follow-Up - Results of a Multicentre Validation]. / Dokumentationsaufwand und verbundene Ressourcen bei Patientinnen mit einem primären Mammakarzinom - von der Primärdiagnose bis zur Abschluss der Nachsorge - Ergebnisse der multizentrischen Erhebung.

INTRODUCTION: Tumour documentation is essential for quality assurance of oncological therapies and as a source of reliable information about the in- and outpatient care. The documentation effort and the associated resource consumption were analysed for the example of breast cancer. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The different steps in the care of patients with primary breast cancer in a standardised disease situation were defined from initial diagnosis to the end of the follow-up. After the pilot phase, a multicentre validation (n=7 centres) was performed with the support of the Federal Ministry of Health. The documentation time points were horizontally collected and analysed with regard to amount, duration and personnel expenses. RESULTS: 57% of the documentation costs are caused by the physicians. Regarding the different centres, documentation costs were calculated between € 352.82 and € 1 084.08 per patient from diagnosis to completion of aftercare. Non-certified centres had a reduced documentation effort and thus lower costs. CONCLUSIONS: The results demonstrate the need for a reduction of the documentation effort - particularly for physicians - the most expensive profession in the health system. A quality improvement is expected from the certification with its special requirements. In this context, there is a justified demand for an adequate remuneration of the documentation effort for certified centres. Furthermore, it is necessary to reduce the number of variables for quality assurance and to define them centrally. A comprehensive multi-disciplinary documentation should be achieved. Investments in a single data set and interface enhancements of existing documentation systems should be realised.

Budget impact of the Oncotype DX® test compared to other gene expression tests in patients with early breast cancer in Germany.

PURPOSE: Gene expression tests can inform decisions on whether to recommend chemotherapy for patients with HR+, HER2- early breast cancer. The goal of this analysis was to compare treatment costs by an expanded budget impact model of reimbursed gene expression tests in Germany. METHODS: A cost comparison was constructed as an expanded budget impact model to calculate average total costs per patient covered by public health insurance. Based on the strong clinical evidence from the prospective randomized controlled trial TAILORx including more than 10,000 patients with HR+ and node negative breast cancer, the assumption was made that the Oncotype DX® test accurately predicts chemotherapy benefit and clinical outcomes. For the further reimbursed tests (EndoPredict®, MammaPrint®, Prosigna®), results from comparative studies - aligned with prognosis studies - as analyzed in IQWiG Rapid Report D19-01 were applied. RESULTS: The use of the Oncotype DX test led to estimated average savings per patient of 2,500 € vs. EndoPredict, 1,936 € vs. MammaPrint, and 649 € vs. Prosigna. Savings were achieved by reduction of unnecessary chemotherapy use, a consequence of false-positive test results (EndoPredict 73%, MammaPrint 42%, Prosigna 20%). False-negative test results (EndoPredict 5%, MammaPrint 22%, Prosigna 49%) reduced necessary chemotherapies, which initially results in cost savings, but may lead to increased long-term costs associated with management of progressive disease. CONCLUSION: The results from this model suggest that the use of the Oncotype DX test reduces the cost of health care in Germany making it the most cost effective test compared to the further tests.

Complementary and alternative medicine and musculoskeletal pain in the first year of adjuvant aromatase inhibitor treatment in early breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Patients with breast cancer (BC) show strong interest in complementary and alternative medicine (CAM), particularly for adverse effects of adjuvant endocrine treatment - e.g., with letrozole. Letrozole often induces myalgia/limb pain and arthralgia, with potential noncompliance and treatment termination. This analysis investigated whether CAM before aromatase inhibitor (AI) therapy is associated with pain development and the intensity of AI-induced musculoskeletal syndrome (AIMSS) during the first year of treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The multicenter phase IV PreFace study evaluated letrozole therapy in postmenopausal, hormone receptor-positive patients with early BC. Patients were asked about CAM use before, 6 months after, and 12 months after treatment started. They recorded pain every month for 1 year in a diary including questions about pain and numeric pain rating scales. Data were analyzed for patients who provided pain information for all time points. RESULTS: Of 1396 patients included, 901 (64.5%) had used CAM before AI treatment. Throughout the observation period, patients with CAM before AI treatment had higher pain values, for both myalgia/limb pain and arthralgia, than non-users. Pain increased significantly in both groups over time, with the largest increase during the first 6 months. No significant difference of pain increase was noted regarding CAM use. CONCLUSIONS: CAM use does not prevent or improve the development of AIMSS. Pain intensity was generally greater in the CAM group. Therefore, because of the risk of non-compliance and treatment discontinuation due to the development of higher pain levels, special attention must be paid to patient education and aftercare in these patients.

Polymorphisms in the novel serotonin receptor subunit gene HTR3C show different risks for acute chemotherapy-induced vomiting after anthracycline chemotherapy.

The aim of this study was to correlate chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV) with commonly occurring single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) in the 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor 3 genes (HTR3). Women with breast cancer without previous chemotherapy were eligible for this prospective study. All patients received epirubicin, with or without cyclophosphamide, and preventive medication with ondansetron and dexamethasone. The patients documented every vomiting event on an hourly basis. Real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis was performed for the following nonsynonymous SNPs: p.Y129S (HTR3B), p.K163N (HTR3C) and p.A405G (HTR3C). The overall proportion of patients (total n = 110) who reported vomiting in the first 24 h after chemotherapy was 31.8%. The variant genotype of K163N (HTR3C) was associated with vomiting, which occurred in 50.0% (P = 0.009). Polymorphisms in the HTR3C gene could serve as a predictive factor for CINV in patients undergoing moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Budget impact analysis of gene expression tests to aid therapy decisions for breast cancer patients in Germany.

OBJECTIVES: Many women with early-stage, hormone receptor-positive breast cancer may not benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. Gene expression tests can reduce chemotherapy over- and undertreatment by providing prognostic information on the likelihood of recurrence and, with Oncotype DX, predictive information on chemotherapy benefit. These tests are currently not reimbursed by German healthcare payers. An analysis was conducted to evaluate the budget impact of gene expression tests in Germany. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Costs of gene expression tests and medical and non-medical costs associated with treatment were assessed from healthcare payer and societal perspectives. Costs were estimated from data collected at a university hospital and were combined with decision impact data for Oncotype DX, MammaPrint, Prosigna and EndoPredict (EPclin). Changes in chemotherapy use and budget impact were evaluated over 1 year for 20,000 women. RESULTS: Chemotherapy was associated with substantial annual costs of EUR 19,003 and EUR 84,412 per therapy from the healthcare payer and societal perspective, respectively. Compared with standard care, only Oncotype DX was associated with cost savings to healthcare payers and society (EUR 5.9 million and EUR 253 million, respectively). Scenario analysis showed that both women at high clinical but low genomic risk and low clinical but high genomic risk were important contributors to costs. CONCLUSIONS: Oncotype DX was the only gene expression test that was estimated to reduce costs versus standard care in Germany. The reimbursement of Oncotype DX testing in standard clinical practice in Germany should be considered.

Patients' attitudes to totally implantable venous access port systems for gynecological or breast malignancies.

AIMS: The aim of this study was to analyze patients' port-related quality of life. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 260 consecutive patients with gynecological or breast malignancies were asked to take part in a questionnaire-based survey including 26 questions, and 232 women agreed to participate in the study. The questionnaire inquired about port-related aspects of everyday life and the use of a central venous access port device for chemotherapy and supportive cancer care. Multivariate analysis was used to identify parameters associated with satisfaction and dissatisfaction in relation to the port. RESULTS: Most of the women were very satisfied with the use of a port to provide venous access for chemotherapy and supportive cancer care. Faster hospital procedures, good cosmetic results, and the ability to cope with the social environment had a significant influence on the degree of satisfaction. Fear of port punctures, inconvenient heparinization of the port, and fear of complications were found to be negative variables associated with the method. CONCLUSIONS: Port catheters are well accepted by patients for chemotherapy and supportive cancer care. Generally ports should be rapidly removed after the end of antineoplastic treatment in order to improve patients' satisfaction with the procedure.

Risk and risk assessment for breast cancer: molecular and clinical aspects.

Chemoprevention, prophylactic surgery and intensified screening programs are options which can be offered the patients with an increased lifetime risk (p(life)) for breast cancer (BC). Estimation of p(life) includes BRCA mutation analysis and risk estimation based on individual risk factors and family history. MENDEL and BRCAPRO are models which can estimate mutation carrier status probability (p(mut)), p(life) and p(mut) can be estimated using Cyrillic3 software which incorporates BRCAPRO and MENDEL. To integrate age, hormonal factors and benign breast biopsies in risk assessment the Tyrer-Cuzick model can be used. These models support the decision pro or contra genetic analysis and improve the number of positive gene testing results. Estimations of p(life) and p(mut), based on a mathematical model, should deal with algorithms and penetrance/frequency data adequate to the population counselled. Being the main modulatory factors, reproductive/hormonal data should be incorporated like the Tyrer-Cuzick model does.

Evaluation of a Marker Clip System in Sonographically Guided Core Needle Biopsy for Breast Cancer Localization Before and After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Introduction The placement of intramammary marker clips has proven to be helpful for tumor localization in patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast-conserving surgery. The purpose of our study was to investigate the feasibility of using a clip marker system for breast cancer localization and its influence on the imaging assessment of treatment responses after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Patients and Methods Between March and June 2015, a total of 25 patients (n = 25), with a suspicion of invasive breast cancer with diameters of at least 2 cm (cT2), underwent preoperative sonographically guided core needle biopsy using a single-use breast biopsy system (HistoCore™) and intramammary clip marking using a directly adapted clip system based on the established O-Twist Marker™, before their scheduled preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Localization of the intramammary marker clip was controlled by sonography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Results Sonography detected no dislocation of intrammammary marker clips in 20 of 25 patients (80 %), while digital breast tomosynthesis showed accurate placement without dislocation in 24 patients (96 %) (p < 0.05). There was no evidence of significant clip migration during preoperative follow-up imaging after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. No complication related to the clip marking was noted and there was no difficulty in evaluating the treatment response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Among the breast-conserving surgeries performed, no cases were identified in which intraoperative loss of the marker clip had occurred. Conclusion Our study underscores the importance of intramammary marking clip systems before neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Placement of marker clips is advised to facilitate accurate tumor bed localization. With regard to digital breast tomosynthesis, its development continues to improve the quality of diagnostics and the therapy of breast cancer particularly for small breast cancer tumors or in neoadjuvant chemotherapy setting.

Genetic Breast Cancer Susceptibility Variants and Prognosis in the Prospectively Randomized SUCCESS A Study.

Large-scale genotyping studies have identified over 70 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with breast cancer (BC) risk. However, knowledge regarding genetic risk factors associated with the prognosis is limited. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate the prognostic effect of nine known breast cancer risk SNPs. BC patients (n = 1687) randomly sampled in an adjuvant, randomized phase III trial (SUCCESS A study) were genotyped for nine BC risk SNPs: rs17468277 (CASP8) , rs2981582 (FGFR2) , rs13281615(8q24), rs3817198 (LSP1) , rs889312 (MAP3K1) , rs3803662 (TOX3) , rs13387042(2q35), rs4973768 (SLC4A7) , rs6504950 (COX11) . Cox proportional hazards models were used to test the SNPs' association with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Additional analyses were carried out for molecular subgroups. rs3817198 in LSP1 (lymphocyte-specific protein 1) was the only SNP that significantly influenced OS (p = 0.01) and PFS (p < 0.01) in the likelihood ratio test comparing the genetic survival model with the clinical survival model. In the molecular subgroups, triple-negative patients with two minor alleles in rs3817198 had a much better prognosis relative to OS (adjusted HR 0.03; 95% CI 0.002 - 0.279) and PFS (HR 0.09; 95% CI 0.02 - 0.36) than patients with the common alleles. The same effect on PFS was shown for patients with luminal A tumors (HR 0.19; 95% CI 0.05 - 0.84), whereas patients with luminal B tumors had a poorer PFS with two minor alleles (HR 2.13; 95% CI 1.02 - 4.40). The variant in rs3817198 has a prognostic effect particularly in the subgroup of patients with triple-negative BC, suggesting a possible link with immunomodulation and BC.

Touch Imprint Cytology and Stereotactically-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of Suspicious Breast Lesions: 15-Year Follow-up.

Introduction: Stereotactically-guided core needle biopsies (CNB) of breast tumours allow histological examination of the tumour without surgery. Touch imprint cytology (TIC) of CNB promises to be useful in providing same-day diagnosis for counselling purposes and for planning future surgery. Having addressed the issue of accuracy of immediate microscopic evaluation of TIC, we wanted to re-examine the usefulness of this procedure in light of the present health care climate of cost containment by incorporating the surgical 15-year follow-up data and outcome. Patients and Methods: From January until December 1996 we performed TIC in core needle biopsies of 173 breast tumours in 169 patients, consisting of 122 malignant and 51 benign tumours. Histology of core needle biopsies was proven by surgical histology in all malignant and in 5 benign tumours. Surgical breast biopsy was not performed in 46 patients with 46 benign lesions, as the histological result from the core needle biopsy and the result of the TIC were in agreement with the suspected diagnosis from the complementary breast diagnostics. A 15-year follow-up of these patients followed in 2013 and follow-up data was collected from 40 women. Results: In the 15-year follow-up of the 40 benign lesions primarily confirmed using CNB and TIC, a diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value and accuracy of 100 % was found. Conclusion: TIC and stereotactically guided CNB showed excellent long-term follow-up in patients with benign breast lesions. The use of TIC to complement CNB can therefore provide immediate cytological diagnosis of breast lesions.

Use of intensified early cancer detection in high-risk patients with familial breast and ovarian cancer.

A prospective follow-up study was carried out to evaluate the influence of risk and genetic counselling on use of early cancer detection. Five hundred and fifty-six subjects who fulfilled inclusion criteria for a genetic analysis of the BRCA1/2 genes (the high-risk group A) and 205 who did not fulfil the inclusion criteria (the lower risk group B) attended primary consultation in the interdisciplinary cancer genetic clinic. Information about participation in the early cancer detection programme was documented. Information about changes in use after consultation could be evaluated from 349 women (94 group B and 255 group A). Methods such as monthly self-palpation, breast palpation by gynaecologist, ultrasound of the breast, transvaginal ultrasound and pelvic examination had all been commonly used. Consultees at higher risk used mammography less often than women at lower risk. Magnetic resonance imaging of the breast was used rarely. Most methods were used more often at the recommended interval by women at higher risk during the follow-up period. In conclusion, at present intensified early cancer detection programmes for women at risk provide a less invasive option than chemoprevention or prophylactic surgery. Although the methods are used at high frequency it seems feasible to motivate women at risk to participate. This can be done by providing information and counselling in the cancer genetic clinic.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: which diagnostic procedures can be used?

BACKGROUND: To improve breast cancer treatment, the evaluation of predictive factors is in the focus of clinical research. Significant discrepancies between the clinical assessment of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and the pathological assessment of response from post-therapy surgical specimens have been demonstrated. We focused on comparing the value of various diagnostic methods used in medical routine. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A clinical evaluation of the primary tumour and regional lymph nodes before and after NACT was performed in 139 patients by physical examination, sonography and mammography. RESULTS: Mammography and physical examination correlated best with pathological findings in the measurement of the tumour, whereas sonography was the most accurate predictor of the status for axillary lymph nodes. CONCLUSION: Mammography and physical examination are the best non-invasive predictors of the real size of the primary breast cancer, whereas sonography correlates better with the proven status of axillary lymph nodes.

[Prophylactic surgery of mammary and ovarian carcinoma]. / Prophylaktische Chirurgie des Mamma- und Ovarialkarzinoms.

New insights into the genetic basis of carcinogenesis have been obtained by modern molecular biological techniques. Several susceptibility genes are known. The hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (germline mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2) and endometrial cancer in the context of the hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer syndrome (HNPCC), germline mutations in mismatch-repair genes, are the most frequent hereditary cancer syndromes in gynaecology. Mutations in TP53 (Li-Fraumeni syndrome) and PTEN (Cowden's disease), associated with increased risk of breast cancer, are responsible for a smaller portion of familial breast cancer. The risk of inheritance and disease can be identified and defined by investigating family history, risk calculation programs, and genetic testing. Afterwards, options of primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention can be formulated. Presently, prophylactic surgery is the only option proven by clinical trials that can reduce the mortality of hereditary breast and ovarian cancer.

Breast Cancer Update 2014 - Focus on the Patient and the Tumour.

The therapy for patients with breast cancer has developed markedly in the past ten years. Our understanding of the molecular biology of tumours and the characteristics of the patients has shaped the recent advances. In this review we present the latest knowledge about the therapy for breast cancer. There are new tests and options not only in the field of anti-HER2 therapy but also in the management of triple negative and hormone receptor-positive patients. Comprehension of prognosis and therapeutic response to chemotherapies is little by little helping to define patient groups who will not respond to chemotherapy or who do not need treatment because their prognosis is extremely good. In the field of anti-HER2 therapy, work is continuing on the development of drugs suitable for and able to overcome trastuzumab resistance. For hormone receptor-positive cancers, we now have a better understanding of which therapy groups will benefit from which anti-endocrine drugs, and which will be able to overcome a possible resistance (treatment of the PI3K pathways, inhibition of the cell cycle). Molecular tests are still being evaluated with regard to the clinical situations in which they may have the greatest relevance for therapeutic decision-making; however, evidence is also increasing as to the fields in which good predictions for the prognosis can be obtained. On the whole, more work is needed to promote our understanding of the new developments in diagnostics and therapy and to involve both physicians and patients equally in the procedures.

Biomarkers in Patients with Metastatic Breast Cancer and the PRAEGNANT Study Network.

Progress has been made in the treatment of metastatic breast cancer in recent decades, but very few therapies use patient or tumor-specific characteristics to tailor individualized treatment. More than ten years after the publication of the reference human genome sequence, analysis methods have improved enormously, fostering the hope that biomarkers can be used to individualize therapies and offer precise treatment based on tumor and patient characteristics. Biomarkers at every level of the system (genetics, epigenetics, gene expression, micro-RNA, proteomics and others) can be used for this. This has led to changes in clinical study designs, with drug developments often only focusing on small or very small subgroups of patients and tumors. The screening and registration of patients and their molecular tumor data has therefore become very important for the successful completion of clinical studies. This new form of medicine presents particular challenges for patients and physicians. Even in this new age of genome-wide analysis, the focus should still be on the patients' quality of life. This review summarizes recent developments and describes how the PRAEGNANT study network manages the aforementioned medical challenges and changes to create a professional infrastructure for patients and physicians.

Comparison of Sonography versus Digital Breast Tomosynthesis to Locate Intramammary Marker Clips.

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the accuracy of sonography versus digital breast tomosynthesis to locate intramammary marker clips placed under ultrasound guidance. Patients and Methods: Fifty patients with suspicion of breast cancer (lesion diameter less than 2 cm [cT1]) had ultrasound-guided core needle biopsy with placement of a marker clip in the center of the tumor. Intramammary marker clips were subsequently located with both sonography and digital breast tomosynthesis. Results: Sonography detected no dislocation of intrammammary marker clips in 42 of 50 patients (84 %); dislocation was reported in 8 patients (16 %) with a maximum dislocation of 7 mm along the x-, y- or z-axis. Digital breast tomosynthesis showed accurate placement without dislocation of the intramammary marker clip in 48 patients (96 %); 2 patients (4 %) had a maximum clip dislocation of 3 mm along the x-, y- or z-axis (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The use of digital breast tomosynthesis could improve the accuracy when locating intramammary marker clips compared to sonography and could, in future, be used to complement or even completely replace sonography.

Prevention and therapy for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women at high risk for breast and ovarian cancer.

The hereditary breast (BC) and ovarian (OC) cancer syndrome (HBOC) includes genetic alterations of various susceptibility genes such as TP53, ATM, PTEN or MSH2, MLH1, PMS1, PMS2, MSH3 and MSH6, BRCA1 and BRCA2. Germline mutations of the cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2 seem to be the major aetiology of the HBOC. Genetic counselling and identification of high-risk families may be essential (1) to provide the best method for genetic testing by explaining the sensitivity and specificity of the methods, (2) to offer the opportunity to participate in specific early cancer detection programmes (breast (self) palpation, ultrasound, mammography and magnetic resonance tomography for breast cancer; vaginal exploration and ultrasound for ovarian cancer), (3) to inform them about prophylactic medication (oral contraceptive pill (OCP), chemoprevention (tamoxifen, raloxifen, aromatase inhibitors)) or surgery (bilateral prophylactic mastectomy or oophorectomy) and (4) to provide individualized psychological support. To fulfil these broad demands, an inter-disciplinary counselling approach (gynaecological oncology, human genetics, molecular biology, psychotherapy) in the setting of a cancer genetic clinic seems the most appropriate. There, participation in predictive genetic testing or the use of preventive or therapeutic options may be discussed extensively with the subjects. In particular, preventive options are emotionally disturbing for the subjects, and in cases of previous cancer. BC chemoprevention for high-risk women does not seem to be as effective as expected. However, OCP reduces the risk for OC. For prophylactic surgery, various points have to be considered, including: (1) individual risk assessment and gain in life expectancy, (2) value of screening and early detection methods or medical prevention, (3) disease characteristics and prognosis, and (4) anxiety and quality of life. Decisions regarding these options have to be individualized and psychological support must be offered during the period of decision and follow-up.

Awareness of breast cancer incidence and risk factors among healthy women.

The efficacy of early breast cancer detection programmes seems to be mainly influenced by the awareness of breast cancer in general among healthy women. This study aimed to provide information about women's understanding of breast cancer incidence and risk of disease. Based on a newly developed questionnaire 2108 healthy women were asked about their knowledge and perceptions in relation to breast cancer incidence, risk factors, risk perception and level of concern. Of these women 78.8% were well aware of breast cancer in general terms. However, there were major aspects such as incidence or risk factors that were poorly understood. Only one-third correctly estimated the incidence of breast cancer; 95% understood breast cancer in the familial history as a risk factor, but only 57% understood the age risk; 37.1% of women perceived hormonal contraceptives and 35.9% hormonal replacement therapy as risk factors of breast cancer. The latter estimation was significantly higher in women above 40 years. Recommendations for the improvement of cancer prevention programmes include targeting understanding of lifetime risk of breast cancer, age as a risk factor, survival from breast cancer or hormonal factors. There is a need to separately address the perceptions of women depending on age, social status and educational levels.